Good morning. My name is Lisa and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Weatherford third quarter 2017 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers remarks there will be a question-and-answer session. We ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up then re-enter the queue for additional questions that you may have. As a reminder, ladies and gentlemen, today's call is being recorded. Thank you. I would now it to turn the call over to Ms. Karen David-Green, Vice President of Investor Relations. Ma'am, may begin your conference.

Thank you, Lisa. Good morning and welcome to the Weatherford International third quarter conference call. With me on today's call we have Mark McCollum, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Christoph Bausch, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Today's call is being recorded and a replay will be available on Weatherford's website for 10 days. Before we begin with our prepared statements, I'd like to remind our audience that some of today's comments may include forward-looking statements. These matters may involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements. Please refer to our latest Form 10-K and other SEC filings for risk factors and cautions regarding forward-looking statements. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures is included in our third quarter press release which can be found on our website. Christoph will now provide a financial update on the third quarter followed by Mark's comments on our organizational structure and our roadmap going forward. Following these prepared statements, we welcome your questions. And now, I'd like to turn the call over to Christoph.

Think you, Karen. Third quarter revenue increased 7% sequentially. Segment operating income before R&D, corporate expenses, and charges and credits, improved by $73 million, with sequential operating income margins increasing 512 basis points to 2.3%, our first positive margin since the fourth quarter of 2015. Excluding charges and credits, loss per share for the quarter was $0.22, a sequential improvement of 22%. We recorded $35 million of overall charges net of tax during the third quarter. This included a non-cash charge of $7 million related to the fair value adjustment of our outstanding borrowings, $34 million in severance and restructuring charges, and $6 million in credits from litigation accrual releases and other charges and credits. In comparison in the second quarter, we recorded a non-cash credit of $127 million related to the fair value adjustment of our outstanding warrants, $29 million of severance and restructuring charges, and $12 million in net credits. North America revenue was up 13% sequentially, primarily due to the recovery of the Canadian spring breakup and an increase in Canadian and U.S. average rig count. Operating margins improved by 547 basis points sequentially, driven by a strong increase in our completions and well construction business in Canada and the U.S., combined with an overall lower cost structure in the U.S. Moreover, the seasonal recovery from the spring breakup in Canada led to higher revenue in artificial lift and other product lines. In the fourth quarter, we expect modest low single-digit increases in revenue in North America, as the rig count in Canada and the U.S. recently started to level off, and operators traditionally reduce activity levels during the holiday season. Operating income margins are expected to remain in line with the third quarter. International revenues were up 4% sequentially, and International segment operating income margins improved…

Thanks, Christoph, and good morning, everyone. We've made a lot of progress this quarter in terms of evaluating our business and mapping out our path forward. We've taken the first steps towards building a strong and solid company, and I'm confident that the results of our efforts will be seen in the coming quarters. I told you last quarter that I would be sharing more about our plans on this call and I'm staying true to my word. Our roadmap forward involves more than just cutting costs. We are realigning the segments of our business and emphasizing process, discipline, integration and collaboration across our organization. We also have a huge potential to strengthen our sales efforts and capture additional market share. A dual focus on solution selling and operational excellence creates the opportunity to significantly reduce cost and profitably grow revenue. Let me walk through some more specifics. Step one on the path forward is a revised organizational structure which Christoph touched on in his remarks. These changes will unlock our ability to achieve standardization and drive process improvements. The new structure integrates and aligns our product and service offerings into four focused business units, down from the previous eight product lines. Drilling and evaluation which includes drilling services, managed pressure drilling, service logging, wireline and our laboratories. Completions which includes our traditional completions portfolio as well as liner hangers and cementation products. Third is well construction which includes tubular running services, fishing and reentry and drilling tools. And finally production which includes artificial lift, drilling fluids and pressure pumping. This grouping enables us to leverage cross product line synergies and resembles to a large extent the organization and the decision-making processes of our customers. Each business unit is responsible for asset allocation, inventory management, technology development, talent and training,…

Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Sean Meakim from JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Thanks. Good morning.

Morning, Sean.

Mark, maybe we could start with the free cash. Just trying to get little more sense of some of the moving parts for the fourth quarter as you laid out from the numbers, but also into next year. I think back of the envelope implies that collections improvement's going to drive a good amount of the delta into 4Q, I guess that's to be expected seasonally. Also looks like maybe CapEx spend pushed out a little bit from 3Q to 4Q, overall coming down a little bit. Maybe could you guys give us a sense of not even just for the fourth quarter but into next year what you think in a flattish activity environment, how the business will get towards positive free cash over the next several quarters?

Hey, Sean, it's Christoph. So for the fourth quarter, I think one thing to understand is a little bit the third quarter, put it in perspective. So on the third quarter we had a working capital build which you probably have seen, it's about $140 million. Part of that capital build was for projects we were executing in the fourth quarter, and that is about $80 million broadly. We had a little bit of delay on customer collections because of Harvey because our customers, people were flooded out and then payments were not made in time, so we're going to recover that and then go back to normal in the fourth quarter. And we also had, as I mentioned, an inventory build in the third quarter for some contracts which are going to be delivered in the fourth quarter. So you'll see an improvement in working capital. You'll also see a reduction in the interest payment. As I said Q1, Q3 is usually high on interest cash payments and fourth quarter will come down. And from our perspective, we have no SEC payment, that was the last one we paid this quarter. So that's the big moving parts overall. If you look into next year overall, we haven't finished our plan yet completely so we're working on that as we speak. But we're targeting to go on a breakeven cash flow level for 2018. And you look at the various pieces up and down, so we still have working capital to work out, and our inventory levels are still pretty high and we have some cash to get out of that. You have some cost improvements which we'll see going in and we look at capital efficiency overall to make sure that our CapEx remains very diligent. So I think that's all I can say about that.

Okay. Fair enough. Thank you, Christoph, for all that detail. I guess just looking at some of the market share wins that you're highlighting, TRS specifically, I think you highlighted Indonesia as well as the North Sea. Has there been any bundling benefit? Or should we just think about (32:44) package MPD along with directional drilling into those wins? And maybe just give us a sense of how pricing is resetting on some of these contracts as you're able to pick them up. Trying to get a better sense of what's driving some of these share gains?

I think obviously on the share gains we have good technologies and I think we're a recognized leader in the TRS business. And clearly a market share leader in MPD. We had been running those businesses together for a while and I think while it hadn't been for very long they were beginning as a organization to get some traction, to do some cross-selling opportunities in those particular areas. And so again, our reorganization actually do further combination of our product lines was sort of in recognition of the significant opportunity in front of us. So some of cross-selling more of our product lines beyond just TRS and MPD. From a pricing perspective, the pricing environment out there continues to remain very competitive. There's spare capacity across the board. I would say that most of the pricing that we've seen on those are sideways in line. We're certainly not getting better pricing but not necessarily seeing lower pricing either. But I think that the larger comment, what we're trying to get to, is that the synergistic opportunity is cross-selling product lines is a huge opportunity in front of Weatherford. And we did our strategic analysis, what we found is that the structure itself had probably been getting in the way of the organization selling across the product lines and realizing or seeing the opportunities that probably were out there to do so. And so this realignment, both on the sales side as well as in the product line side, was to facilitate not only the better identification of those opportunities but the ability to deliver on those opportunities as well.

And so you say these wins are highlighting some of those changes already underway?

Yes. But this is just the very, very start of it. I mean the opportunity in front of it is very big.

Understood. Okay great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of James West from Evercore ISI. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, Mark.

Hey, James.

Mark, I recognize that you don't want to talk about additional divestitures outside of a potential number, which is obviously a prudent move. What if we switch to the other side? Since it's not a sellers' market but a buyers' market as you suggested in your prepared remarks, are there certain products or businesses out there that are of interest to you that would bring you some near-term EBITDA that you'd be willing to transact on?

I think the answer is that there are some areas that, obviously over the long term we look strategically, could be helpful. We're not interested in going and buying things just for the sake of buying something but I think everybody well recognizes that there are some holes in the portfolio that could be filled through the right acquisitions. But what's most important for me is that really and, just being honest right, that the only currency we have right now is our stock. Stock's low, and also if we do a transaction like that and adding EBITDA, I have to be able to walk forward and say synergistically it's accretive to both current and new shareholders, right? I've got to be able to demonstrate an overall value add from delevering as well as the synergies that that business brings. And I would just say that right now, we haven't been able to identify any of those opportunities in the market.

Okay.

So it's still out there and we see that as a potential option as well and so we will continue to look for those kinds of things but it's not an obvious answer today.

Okay. Got it. Thanks, Mark. And then if we think about the outlook, you talked about a sideways market for 2018 and I think it's prudent to manage your business to that but we, obviously, have a breakout underway in commodity prices currently and certainly customers, I think at least the ones that I talk to, you would have a better feel for this, but are a bit more optimistic about activity levels for 2018. So could you maybe balance where Brent certainly stands today versus your view of a sideways market going forward? I get the (37:53) North American comment but internationally, I mean, do you think perhaps it's a little bit conservative? Or is that how your customer conversations are today?

I think that while it probably is a little bit conservative, I think it also depends on what – if you get very specific on certain markets, they're going to behave differently. As an example, my belief is that at current commodity prices and the geopolitical situation, Latin America, for example, is going to continue to be under significant stress. And so I don't think, as we look forward, you can't necessarily ignore what's happening there. The Middle East. We continue to be very, very optimistic about what's happening in the Middle East. We're preparing for new contracts. There's some new tender opportunities that are in front of us in this next quarter that we'll be participating in and so we still have a good feeling about what's going to happen there, constructive there. North Sea, continued repair in the North Sea. Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa looks to continue to be under some level of stress throughout 2018. So again, commodity prices while they're improving, we're not at this point in time forecasting a dramatic improvement that all of a sudden restarts a number of different markets that have heretofore been languishing a bit. But I think at the margin, we continue to be very constructive about where we are and that there is – we're seeing consistent improvement albeit maybe at a slower pace than we had all hoped for back 9 to 12 months ago. And for us, what I'm trying to do is to make sure that we hold the reins tightly on the organization from a capital perspective and other things to make sure that we're driving the highest level of efficiency as we can. What you saw in our cash flow as an example this quarter is the tyranny of when the business is improving it requires an investment in working capital, and we're having to do that, and it puts stress on cash flows. We're going to try to manage that as tightly as we can. Of course for me the big opportunity for Weatherford is continue to attack (40:33) our structural cost and we just see some pretty big, through our analysis, some pretty big opportunities in supply chain and other areas that we could get regardless of what happens in the market. And so we make sure that – that's first priority is get the business leaned out as fast and as much as possible to position us for a more robust recovery as we go into 2019.

Got it. Makes sense. Thanks, Mark.

Our next question comes from the line of Jim Wicklund from Credit Suisse. Your line is open. James Wicklund - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Good morning, guys. Good operational quarter.

Hey, Jim. James Wicklund - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Chesapeake has done a debt deal, Transocean has done a debt deal. The debt people I talked to said the window is still open. Is there any consideration of maybe pushing maturities out another couple of years, if you don't raise your interest cost much and give you a little more breathing room to get to your $1 billion in savings, Mark?

Jim, it's Christoph. We're looking at that, but it has to make economic sense, so you have to look at where the bonds trade, what the rates are you can get. So we're looking at that, and when it makes economic sense, we'll do that. But right now, based on our analysis, it's not the right timing. Maybe going forward, but we'll look at that. James Wicklund - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Okay, that's fine. I appreciate that, at least we got that out. And on the land rig sale, I know you're talking to a couple of focused parties. Clearly the international rig count, especially where you guys have your rigs, is not the most robust business out there. It hasn't been the coiled spring that some people had hoped. Mark, is there some minimum? You had said a while back that you wouldn't fire-sale anything. Is it possible that nobody gives you a bid that you're willing to take and you wait for a better time? And I realize announcing that on a conference call probably isn't a great idea. But is there some minimum you have in your mind that you'll take? And anything below that, you'll hold on and wait for a better point?

I think you were right, that it's probably not the right venue to talk about that kind of details. But I think the answer is yes. I mean internally for us, as Christoph said in his remarks, right, we're proud of this business, right? It's a good business, we have good rigs and good contracts for those that are working, and a lot of upside. And so there's a walkaway number but right now, I think in where we are in the discussions, we have some interested parties who are at the table with us, who I think have identified the value there. And so what we've got to try to do is just see if we can't get some of these across the threshold. James Wicklund - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Okay. Thanks very much, guys. Appreciate it.

Our next question comes from line of Bill Herbert from Simmons and Company. Your line is open. Bill Herbert - Simmons & Company: Good morning, Mark. How are you?

Hey, Bill. Bill Herbert - Simmons & Company: Back to the land rig sale and the asset sales, just in general. I'm a little bit confused. So the divestitures that you're putting on ice, just based upon the fact that the feedback loop isn't great from a seller standpoint, and the $500 million in potential aspirational proceeds down the road. Does that include or exclude the MENA land rigs?

That excludes. Those are separate. Bill Herbert - Simmons & Company: Got it. Thank you. And so we're still tracking towards a MENA land rig sale by year-end, assuming that the stars align. And that's partly a question. And then another question is that, given your optimism and everybody else's optimism about the Middle East and the tendering that's going on there, and the quality of your Middle Eastern land rig fleet, one would think that the feedback loop would be improving, based upon the visibility of business that is coming down the road, Brent at $60, and the benefits from scaling up one's regional presence. Can you comment on that?

So to answer the first question, yes, it's still our aspiration to try to get the land rig deal done by the end of the year. I mean, obviously, we got a lot of work to do, but it's possible. It's doable. And that's the pace that we're trying to keep the project on. I think that the point is right. I mean think that there is interest, particularly where our rigs are working, concentrate in the Middle East. We have good solid contracts there, and so I think those parties who have been interested in the rigs have been most keenly interested in the market presence that we have in that region, and that's helping. What makes the process challenging is, you have to think of the entire universe, right? Those parties that are involved also have to go to the market to get financing. If they don't have all the resources at hand, and the same malaise that affects the equity markets, affect the financing in other markets as well. So again, trying to work with parties to move through this process has been interesting, and it would be great if everybody had an equivalent view of the market. But I don't think everybody does. Does that make sense? Bill Herbert - Simmons & Company: Yeah, it does. I think it's just a question of time, in terms of people believing in the sustainability of the tape (46:37) that we're seeing today, and we'll see.

Exactly. Bill Herbert - Simmons & Company: Yeah, and then secondly, or thirdly or fourthly, on the incremental $700 million in what I would bucket as cost reductions, I mean you talked about the billing in stage one, $300 million. Can you talk a little bit about the incremental $700 million? And, you said next 18 to 24 months. Is most of that, in terms of the cycle time for that realization, is that closer to the 18 months or the 24 months?

You know, I think pragmatically, I would say closer to the 24 months, but that doesn't mean that we're not going to be driving it much harder than that. Where the incremental plans are going to necessarily come from are going to be areas that require process change to achieve some of the savings. I mean, the $300 million are projects that – we have the $115 million, that was the organization realignment. The incremental from there are projects that were already underway that we have essentially sanctioned to continue, that will be hopefully on their way, with a timeline to achieve those within, I think, the middle of next year. Beyond that, what we're going to try to do is set specific plans around process changes that need to happen and push those as fast as possible with the process change then facilitating more work. Just to give you one example, in supply chain and in procurement and supplier management, we have some level of category management, but we don't category manage as much as we possibly could because our systems and processes don't necessarily – and the way that we've been organized, haven't facilitated the gathering of data to be able to go in and negotiate well. The second thing is that we haven't had any ability to track and enforce on-contract buying. We might have the right contract in place but our on-contract buy is a very low percentage, whereas benchmarking would tell you it should be a very, very high percentage. And when we just take the difference there, the numbers start accumulating to be a fairly large number. My anecdote to the organization is this $1 billion is a thousand $1 million decisions and there's a lot of that that's happening across the organization that…

Our next question comes from the line of David Anderson from Barclays. Your line is open.

Good morning. Thanks. Mark, considering your background on North America and the improvement we saw there, looks like the first real tangible signs of improvement. You've just talked to this kind of big reorganizational change here. Has that been impacted at all in North America? In other words, have you kind of started in North America? Is that kind of the beginnings there? And are we starting to see that already? Or maybe can you just talk about the improvement in North America and what went into it this quarter?

The changes we've made, we call it rip the Band-Aid off, right? Everything was done comprehensively across the world, and so the whole team has been working. So we're going to see changes across the world. In North America particularly, I would just sort of hats off to the team. I think that the leadership I think has gotten more focused around what they needed to do. I mean obviously my coming in, we had challenged the organization to really get very focused on where the opportunity lies and to push certain product lines that we felt like were languishing a bit, and not getting their fair share of the market opportunity that was showing itself. And so it's just been heavy lifting. I think trying to make better decisions along the way and pushing. And that's been the result that we've seen. And so the real opportunity from the reorganization itself and from other activity still all is in front of us.

That's great. Maybe you could just hone in a little bit on artificial lift, arguably your most important business in North America. As you have been sitting back and evaluating this business, can you just kind of give us your perspective of where that business is? Is this a business that needs to get fixed, I guess is my bigger question. Is it scaled properly? Is the cost structure where you want it to be? Can you just talk about that because that's obviously going to be a big part of your North American business going forward?

It would be wrong to single out artificial lift as being problematic. All of our businesses need to be leaned out and changed. But I would say specifically for artificial lift, I think it is fair to say that the margins that we are achieving in that business currently are not acceptable, right? We need to do better. As we look at it, we believe that there's opportunity around consolidation of manufacturing locations. We think that there are opportunities to improve on the logistics side of that business that we really haven't exploited. We think that the changes in the sales organization are going to impact that organization, probably as much as any other product line. And then I think on the supply chain side just managing that better will also help. We also believe that, and I mentioned this in my comments, that the digital transformation area – we've got these great technologies, the ability to be unique in the market from rolling out ForeSite and what it could do. And I guess our conclusion was that we weren't probably working well together between our software group and our business unit to get that out. And that's one of the things you saw this quarter is now we're beginning to get some traction there. We think that the opportunity there is significant and can create a lot of value as well. So each business unit will have its own specific business plans around not just addressing the market but what their technology roadmap will be, what they need to do from a location and manufacturing location. But clearly, I think that as we have evaluated the business, there is significantly more value to create for the Weatherford shareholder by fixing the lift business than it is to just give up, throw in the towel, sell the business and pay off debt. And so our view is let's get it fixed and we'll continue to evaluate. I also think long term quite frankly from the lift side, if Wall Street gets traction in terms of holding customers more accountable to returns and cash flow, it is my fundamental belief that improving production is the highest return thing that a customer could spend their capital dollars on. And I think Weatherford is uniquely positioned to take advantage of helping customers improve their production. So we're going to work hard to make sure that our product line portfolio is positioned well to help them do that.

Great point, Mark. Thanks.

Our next question comes from line of Kurt Hallead from RBC. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning.

Hey, Kurt.

Hey so, Mark, great outline, appreciate all that color. Just to follow up on the comment about game plan or goal to reduce your debt to EBITDA, cut that in half. As you guys think that through, how would you apportion the debt reduction versus the EBITDA improvement in cutting that debt to EBITDA in half as you go forward?

I took this question on the last conference call and I paid dearly for it, Kurt. So I'm not necessarily going to go that route again and give specific percentages. But I think that – let me just say that, right, we – as I said in our comments, right. We are anticipating, at least for the next 12 months, to have a relatively sideways market environment with which to deal with. And so in that context, it's going to be incumbent on us to really create our own success by working on our cost structure, by making sure that the portfolio we have is well-positioned and not continuing to invest in certain businesses that I think don't have a strong place in our portfolio for the long term. The honest answer is that in the next two years, the cuts that we will do, the savings, the improved working capital, all that is not going to be sufficient to get us all the way to the goal that we're outlining. And so there will be, at some point in time, the need for us to address something in the portfolio that may be more significant. What could that be? I don't want to speculate on that point in time and I also don't want to speculate on timing because I think what we're trying to do is work this project so that we have the luxury, and I use that word maybe a little loosely, right? But the luxury to – we've got time. We have time to fix the businesses and to then go into the market when it will maximize value for our shareholders. The optionality is a word that we use a lot around here in terms of making sure that – and our goal is not just about myopically reducing the debt, although that is the long-term goal, but reducing the debt ultimately with the goal of maximizing shareholder value. And so we're going to pick our times, we're going to pick our – and we'll come back to you when we have a better or more specific plan around the divestitures.

Okay. That's all fair. And then on, just quick follow-up, you guys referenced free cash flow breakeven in fourth quarter and then I think I also heard free cash flow breakeven on 2018 and just want to make sure I understand semantics correctly. That free cash flow breakeven would be after your capital expenditures. Is that correct?

That is correct, Kurt.

And then do you think – I know it might be a little bit early but your CapEx plan for next year, could we see that moving up year-on-year versus what it was in 2017?

It's a bit too early. We have actually planning meetings coming up where we're discussing that in the coming weeks. So we don't have a number yet.

Okay. That's all fair. Thank you so much.

Thanks, Kurt.

Great. And we are actually at the half hour. So we'd like to thank everyone for dialing in and joining us for our third quarter conference call. I'd like to turn the call back over to the operator for closing remarks.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.