Earnings Labs

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS)

Q1 2017 Earnings Call· Thu, Apr 27, 2017

$361.46

Key Takeaways · AI generated
AI summary not yet generated for this transcript. Generation in progress for older transcripts; check back soon, or browse the full transcript below.

Same-Day

-2.12%

1 Week

-7.23%

1 Month

-9.66%

vs S&P

-10.88%

Transcript

Operator

Operator

Greeting and welcome to the Reliance Steel & Aluminum Company First Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. An interactive question-and-answer session will follow formal presentation. [Operator instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Ms. Brenda Miyamoto, Investor Relations for Reliance. Thank you. You may begin.

Brenda Miyamoto

Analyst

Thank you, operator. Good morning and thanks to all of you for joining our conference call to discuss our first quarter 2017 financial results. I'm joined by Gregg Mollins, our President and CEO; Karla Lewis, our Senior Executive Vice President and CFO; Jim Hoffman, our Executive Vice President and COO; and Bill Sales, our Executive Vice President of Operations. A recording of this call will be posted on the Investors section of our website at investor.rsac.com. The press release and the information on this call may contain certain forward-looking statements, which are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to change and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties or other factors which may not be under the company's control, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievement of the company to be materially different from the results, performance or other expectations implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to those factors disclosed in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 under the caption Risk Factors and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The press release and the information on this call speak only as of today's date and the company disclaims any duty to update the information provided therein and herein. I will now turn the call over to Gregg Mollins, President and CEO of Reliance.

Gregg Mollins

Analyst

Thank you, Brenda. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I’m excited to review our strong first quarter results with you. Improved demand, higher metal pricing and continued strong execution resulted in record quarterly gross profit dollars, driving our highest earnings per share and net income since the first quarter of 2012. The pricing environment remained positive throughout the first quarter of 2017. Price increases on virtually all of our products contributed to increase in our FIFO gross profit margin to 30.2%, up from 29.4% in the first quarter of 2016 and 29% in the fourth quarter of 2016. In addition to positive pricing trends that contributed to our enhanced gross profit margin during the quarter, as price increases were announced by the domestic metals, our higher sustainable gross profit margin remains intact as a result of the investments we are making in value added processing equipment. We have invested approximately $1 billion in capital expenditures over the last six years, with the majority of this amount spent on value added processing equipment. These investments far outpace our peers, and along with our decentralized operating model, provide us with a significant competitive advantage to supply our customers with the highest quality products and services on a just in time basis. Because of this competitive advantage, and assuming no significant changes in market conditions, we believe that we can sustain a reported LIFO gross profit margin within the range of 27% to 29%. Our managers in the field continue their strong execution, with solid performance on all fronts, including pricing discipline, inventory management and expense control, resulting in the majority of our operations significantly increasing the pretax income in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the first quarter of 2016. Our operations took advantage of the improved…

Jim HoffmanW

Analyst

Thanks, Gregg and good morning everyone. Before we begin, I'd like to take a moment to thank our folks in the field for a job well done this quarter. Our continued success and enhanced gross profit margin is directly correlated to their hard work and dedication. I'm very proud of their achievements. Now I’ll spend a few moments commenting on demand and pricing for our carbon steel and alloy product, as well as our outlook on certain key end markets we sell those products into. Bill will then address our aluminum and stainless steel products and related end markets. Demand for automotive, which we service mainly through our toll processing operations in the US and Mexico, remains very strong at current production rates. Growth continues to be driven by the increased usage of aluminum, with 2016 being a record year for us in terms of the volume of aluminum processed. Given fairly steady automotive demand, coupled with the significant capital investments in our toll processing operations, we anticipate 2017 volumes will be up or even above 2016 levels. In addition to investments in processing equipment, we've been expanding our facilities to support automotive demand for both carbon and aluminum processing. Our facility in Monterey, Mexico remains very active since we began shipping product in the third quarter of 2016 and is performing in line with our expectations. In addition, construction remains on schedule at our new US facility in Kentucky and we expect it will be fully operational during the second quarter of 2017. First quarter demand in heavy industry, which includes railcar, truck trailer, ship building, large manufacturing, tank manufacturers and wind and transmission towers, was in line with levels experienced in 2016. Demand in non-residential construction market continues to experience steady upward growth, though volume is still far…

Bill Sales

Analyst

Thanks, Jim. Good morning everyone. Let me also start by congratulating our folks in the field for their continued outstanding operational performance in the first quarter. We greatly appreciate your efforts. I will now review pricing and demand for our aluminum and stainless steel products, as well as the key industry trends in the market for these products. I’ll begin with aerospace, which continues to be a very strong end market for Reliance. To date, lead times have extended to about nine to 12 weeks for aluminum aerospace plate. The backlog for orders of commercial planes, remains healthy and we expect build range should continue to improve modestly in 2017, led by single-aisle planes. Overall, demand in the aerospace market remains solid, especially for aluminum plate where we continued to experience healthy volume growth during the first quarter of 2017. Based on these trends, we are maintaining our positive outlook for the aerospace market. We saw increased activity for many of our defense customers in the first quarter 2017, as spending in the industry ramped up. In addition to this, as noted on our last conference call, 2017 marked the beginning of our involvement with the five year $350 million Joint Strike Fighter program, strengthening our already strong position in the aerospace and defense markets. Our entry into the aerospace market in India through our all metal service center, our all metal services subsidiary in the UK remains on track to become operational by the end of the third quarter of 2017. The semiconductor market continues to be a bright spot for us in both the US and Pacific Rim regions. Demand is strong and the outlook remains positive for the balance of this year as well as into 2018. Turning to pricing. The majority of the products that we…

Karla Lewis

Analyst

Thanks, Bill and good morning everyone. Our net sales in the first quarter of 2017 were very strong at $2.42 billion, up 11.9% from the first quarter of 2016, with our tons sold up 2.5% and our average selling price per ton sold at 9.7%. Compared to the fourth quarter of 2016, our net sales were up 17.4%, with our tons sold up 12.8% and our average selling price per ton sold up 4.2%. We had expected tons sold to increase 8% to 10% in the first quarter as compared to the fourth quarter of 2016 due to normal seasonal factors, along with improved customer sentiment. However, overall demand was stronger than we had anticipated, including in the energy market. Our average selling price increase of 4.2% was at the high end of our expectation of 2% to 4%. Our gross profit margin in the first quarter of 2017 was 29.8%, up from 29.4% in the first quarter of 2016 and consistent with the fourth quarter of 2016. Mill price increases in both the first quarter of 2017 and the fourth quarter of 2016 contributed to our gross profit margin exceeding our recently increased estimated sustainable range of 27% to 29%. Our increased gross profit margin, along with improved sales levels, resulted in our highest ever quarterly gross profit dollars of $721.6 million. Given higher mill prices, we recorded a net LIFO inventory evaluation charge or expense of $10 million for the first quarter of 2017, or $0.09 earnings per diluted share. We currently estimate net LIFO inventory evaluation expense of $40 million for the full year of 2017. We did not record a LIFO inventory evaluation adjustment in the first quarter of 2016 and recorded $16.2 million of income or positive $0.14 per share in the fourth quarter of…

Operator

Operator

Thank you. [Operator instructions]. And our first question comes from Phil Gibbs from KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Philip Gibbs

Analyst

Thanks very much. We appreciate you being very consistent and boring after these last couple of days. Thank you. The alloy for the second quarter on the demand side, you're talking about up a little bit here versus Q1, Gregg and Karla. What have you seen so far in April and maybe some indications from your customers that give you that confidence or visibility?

Gregg Mollins

Analyst

I think what we're seeing in April is fairly consistent with what we saw during the first quarter. So it’s no swing up or down. It’s pretty consistent. The feelings of our customers that we're getting from our managers in the field is also still positive. They feel good about it. Inventory levels at our customer level are still lean. No one's really built up in spite of the fact that prices were going up. Sometimes there's a little bit of a build tendency. There’s probably been a little bit of that, but nothing significant at all, same with service centers I don't see service centers and certainly our inventory turn at 4.7 times kind of holds that up. So generally speaking, I think our guidance of 0% to 2% on pricing as well as on demand, is pretty reflective of our feelings. You know us. What you see is what you get and I think our guidance is really exactly the way we feel about it.

Philip Gibbs

Analyst

Okay. I appreciate that color, and I know there's been some debate among the industry on the MSCI data just in March. Do you think that, particularly for carbon, that’s sub two months on hand or in and around two months on hand. Do you think that's really indicative of where the industry is at right now?

Gregg Mollins

Analyst

Karla?

Karla Lewis

Analyst

I think Phil, certainly that’s a pretty low number based on historical standards, but a very large percentage of the MSCI data, as you know, is heavily weighted toward spot roll and that is a product where internally at Reliance, we certainly expect flat rolled inventories to turn at a much higher rate than some of our other products. So it's pretty low. People may be adjusting their buying patterns based on their expectations on pricing. So it could have gone down a little lower industry wide than we’ve seen historically. But we think it's a good number. We don't have a better number.

Philip Gibbs

Analyst

Got it. And my west question here is for Bill. On the aluminum side, Bill, can you provide us any in terms of whether or not you’ve started to see some of that JSF contractor and your other defense contracts kick in in Q1. And then also, if there were aluminum sanctions you put on material, I don't know what it would include, but I'm sure you've thought about it a little bit in the recent days. How would that potentially impact the way that you're thinking about things? Thanks.

Bill Sales

Analyst

Yes, Phil. The JSF we did, we are seeing volume in Q1 there. It is ramping up and it's ramping up at about the pace we thought it would. And as you recall, that's not spread equally over five years. So we’ll ramp up and you'll see those volumes continue to improve. But when we look at Q1 volumes, it's about where we thought it would be. And on the trade case, I think from what I've read, it seems like that is going to have an impact more on the Midwest spot kind of price level, which in turn will impact a lot of our products. So we'll watch that pretty closely, but we've seen the Midwest spot run up. We’re up about $0.09 since the beginning of the year. So a lot of people think that we may see that continue to go up even higher. So we're watching it closely.

Philip Gibbs

Analyst

Thank you.

Operator

Operator

Our next question is from Seth Rosenfeld from Jefferies. Please we go ahead.

Seth Rosenfeld

Analyst

Good morning. I have two questions, first one on energy and then moving on to stainless. On the energy front, I find that interesting your comments, you're seeing that recovery developing faster than previously expected. Can you give a bit of color about which parts of the energy complex you're seeing developing better or worse than your earlier expectations, and just walk us through your own leverage to the energy cycle. And then secondly, on stainless, two of your main suppliers Acerinox and Outokumpu, they reported earnings earlier today. They had notably disparate views towards pricing, one calling for more hikes seemingly and one looking at maybe a cap to the imports. You sounded quite positive on stainless steel. Can you talk a bit more about your own views toward buyer appetite and pricing? Thank you.

Jim Hoffman

Analyst

Hey Seth, this is Jim. I'm going to answer your energy question the way I understood it first. First of all, our expectations have been pretty low. I mean the rig count is up. I mean it's up dramatically from a year ago, but it’s still way off from where the peak is. What we're seeing out there, we didn't anticipate the drilling activity to go up as quickly as it did. The completion end of it is a really big part of our market and we haven't seen that yet. What's going on there, if you read between lines, the drilling activity has a lot to do with the land leases. They have to show some activity on that land or they lose the leases. So they do their drilling. However, they've yet to ramp up the completion. And completion, in the way I see completion, that's everything other than drilling. When the completion end starts, which it will, you're not going to waste money drilling wells and not complete them. So at some point they are going to complete those wells. So we were cautiously optimistic that the increase in drilling activity will continue. But like I said earlier, the expectations have been low and they are still a long way from - to getting back to any kind of peak levels.

Karla Lewis

Analyst

And from the earnings impact on that, Seth, as we commented, our energy companies as a group were profitable in the first quarter, but not at what we consider to be normal profitability levels. We were just happy to see some level of profitability there. So it can be meaningful to our earnings. In normal times in the energy markets, we expect the pretax returns from those companies to be anywhere from 1.5 to 2 times the company average. So we're still well below that. We don't expect to be there next quarter, but it can be additive to our earnings as we see that market continue to recover. And remember, we're also down probably to half the level as a percent of sales, our energy sales currently as they were in kind of 2014 period. So there's definitely room for that to continue to prove and add to our earnings.

Gregg Mollins

Analyst

Yes. Seth, on the demand side for stainless, demand continues to be good. And I think our guys in the field, feel like there's good activity from a demand standpoint. The two price increases, one that was announced in January and one that was for April, I think there may be a little traction where some of that price increase may not be sticking. We're keeping our ears very close to the market and what's going on there, but pricing has improved with those increases it's just a matter, if all or any or maybe that last increase is going to actually hold. So we're watching that pretty closely.

Seth Rosenfeld

Analyst

Thank you. Just want to follow up on stainless. Are you seeing any signs of actual downside risk to those base prices today, or just more of a stable status quo environment?

Gregg Mollins

Analyst

Well, the downside risk from a pricing standpoint, may be some of that last increase, but other than this - not on the base price, no.

Seth Rosenfeld

Analyst

Okay, thank you very much.

Operator

Operator

[Operator instructions]. And our next question is from Novid Rassouli from Cowen and Company. Please go ahead.

Novid Rassouli

Analyst

Hey guys, thanks for taking my questions. The increase in tons sold in this first quarter outpaced your guidance and it looks like energy was definitely part of the factor there. I just want to see if you can maybe talk a little bit more about the delta there and what was driving that.

Gregg Mollins

Analyst

I think we saw really across the board increases in non-residential construction. Heavy equipment is pretty steady. Aerospace we had that kicker with the JSF. And automotive, we continue to do the toll processing work there and that's doing well. It’s a little bit - once we get that, especially our operation opened in Kentucky, we hope to see what we know we’ll see, a pop there by way of demand. But overall, probably the biggest kicker that we had in the first quarter was energy. Again that popped up. As we've been talking about today, a little bit faster than we anticipated, which is obviously a positive thing. Our people actually down in the oil belt, are now talking less about suicide than they were over the last two years. Okay. So that's a real positive, but overall it was pretty much across the board. The improvements were kind of what we expected in our guidance and we’re now a little bit better. I think we guided to 8% to 19% above fourth quarter and it ended up being more like 12%. So that was good. But probably a relatively healthie quarter that part of that 12% versus the 8% to 10% guidance was in the energy sector.

Novid Rassouli

Analyst

Got it. And then just one more follow up then on energy, Gregg. So the increase in rig counts, I mean you basically have said quoting activity has improved and the rise that we've seen has been pretty sharp. And you said earlier, I think to Seth’s question that you expect drilling activity to continue. I'm just curious. We’ve seen kind of a choppy environment on the WTI side, above 50, below 50 and some people are thinking that rig counts may plateau. I was just wondering if the buying activity that you're seeing right now is indicating that the current trend will continue. It sounded like that was the case, but I was just wondering if you can help us understand the psyche of the buyer right now and if there's any hesitancy in their part given the choppiness of WTI prices.

Jim Hoffman

Analyst

Novid, this is Jim. We anticipate it to continue to go up. I mean there's cautious optimism out there. Like I mentioned earlier, the rig count has gone up. There’s still some - there's still a lot of capacity out there with the product itself. I mentioned the fact that the drilling activity, some of it's based on land leases that you need to show activity on that land or you're going to lose the lease. So we see that to continue to increase at an okay pace. I mean it’s still far below, but like as I mentioned before, the completion of a well is where the steel consumption - our steel consumption really continues up. There’s a lot of pipeline activity out there that has been approved and building. That obviously goes - that's not in our wheelhouse, but the mills themselves, if you've been listening in on the producing mills, their activity in energy has gone up a lot based on those pipelines that are out there. So everything is positive. I mean our order count is up. Our margin count is up. Just general positive feeling out in the market is up, and we just - at the price of oil and all the things I just mentioned, we anticipate it to continue.

Novid Rassouli

Analyst

Great. Thanks guys.

Operator

Operator

Thank you. This does conclude the question-and-answer session. I’d like to turn the floor back over to Mr. Mollins for any closing comments.

Gregg Mollins

Analyst

Thanks again for your support and for participating in today’s call. We'd like to remind everyone that in early June, we will be in Chicago presenting at Deutsche Bank's Global Industrials and Basic Materials summit. And in late June, we will be in New York City, participating in Jeffries Annual Steel Summit, KeyBanc’s Steel Roundtable and Macquarie’s Global Metals, Mining and Materials Conference. We hope to see many of you at one of these events, and we hope you have a great day. Thanks for joining us today.

Operator

Operator

Thank you. This does concludes today's teleconference. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time.