Welcome to the Career Education Corporation First Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Don, and I will be the operator for today's call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Doug Craney. Mr. Craney, you may begin.

Thank you, Don. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on our first quarter 2014 earnings call. With me on the call this morning are Scott Steffey, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and Colleen O'Sullivan, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Following remarks made by management, the call will be opened for analyst questions. This conference call is being webcast live within the Investor Relations section of our website at careered.com. A replay of this call will be available on our site. You can also contact our Investor Relations department at (847) 585-3899. Before I turn the call over to Scott, let me remind you that this morning's press release and remarks made today by our executives include forward-looking statements as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. These statements are based on information currently available to us and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results, performance and business prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by these statements. These risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to those factors identified in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as expressly required by the securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update those risk factors or to publicly announce the results of any of these forward-looking statements to reflect future events, developments or changed circumstances or for any other reason. In addition, the remarks made today may refer to non-GAAP financial measures, which are intended to supplement but not substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP measures. Our press release and slide presentation, which accompany today's call and contain financial and other quantitative information to be discussed today, are available within the Investor Relations section of our website at careered.com. Now let me turn the call over to Scott.

Thanks, Doug. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for your interest in Career Education. Let me just state at the outset, I've got a little bit of a cold I've been battling and, if I stop talking, I didn't go away, I'm just trying to clear my throat and not burden everybody. So if you'll bear with me, we'll muscle through this. A few weeks ago marked my 1-year anniversary at Career Education. As I reflect back on my time, I'm proud of the progress and accomplishments we've made. At the same time, I'm even more excited about what's in store for the future. We are doing what we set out to do when I began this journey to make Career Education a highly respected, financially sound educational provider. Simply put, we are here to enroll, educate and place our students into a better position to succeed professionally. Closing the gap between students and employers is the goal of all of our efforts and we must do so in a professional manner that always puts student interests at the forefront of every decision. We know that student success will drive Career Education's success. On this morning's call, I will provide highlights from the first quarter results and share the progress we have made in meeting the 4 main objectives that we are focusing on to help return Career Education to profitability. We are once again utilizing slides, as I did last quarter, and I will share certain forward-looking information that I believe is important to further demonstrate the headway we are making in our turnaround strategy. I will not always provide forward-looking information but at this point in the turnaround, I believe it is relevant and appropriate. Following my remarks, I will turn the call over to Colleen for greater…

Thanks, Scott. Good morning, everyone. This morning, I'll take you through our financial operating results and provide some additional details for the quarter. Before I get started, as a reminder, we have changed our segment reporting, effective January 2014, to align with the manner in which we are managing the business. Our reportable segments are: AIU; CTU; Career Colleges, which is the combination of our previously reported Design & Technology and Health Education segments; Culinary Arts; and Transitional Schools. In February, we provided recapped quarterly and full year results for 2013 and 2012 under this new reporting structure. Revenue, excluding Transitional Schools, decreased 10.4% in the first quarter when compared to the prior year, as total student enrollments, excluding Transitional Schools, were lower by 8%. Including Transitional Schools, consolidated revenues decreased 14.5%. Operating expenses decreased by $19 million in the first quarter due to lower Transitional School expenses, lower metric-driven costs and benefits of our rightsizing and reengineering efforts. Our first quarter results also include approximately $6.8 million of legal charges related to preliminary settlements reached on outstanding legal items that Scott will summarize shortly. Absent these legal charges, our cost savings would have been greater. First quarter operating losses, excluding Transitional Schools, were $36 million compared to a loss of $14 million in the prior year quarter. Turning to financial results by operating segment. First, our University group. In the first quarter of 2014, CTU revenue of $87 million was 3.5% lower than the first quarter of 2013, as total student enrollments at CTU decreased 4% compared to last year. Operating income was $14 million in the current quarter compared to $16 million in the prior year quarter. Revenue at AIU of $53 million was 20.7% lower versus the first quarter of 2013, mainly due to a 14% reduction…

Thanks, Colleen. So now I'd like to take a few minutes to talk about a few other items that are important to understand. As I mentioned earlier, we have been making steady progress on improving the business on a number of fronts. This will continue to play out over the course of 2014, as we move further along the timeline of our turnaround strategy. In the first quarter, we continued to test various price disruption strategies at AIU. I talked about our AIU milestone grant last quarter as being a trial basis test. Upon reviewing the initial results of the trial program, we did not see a significant benefit of students progressing to the next section. As a result, we intend to test other options. We plan to introduce an intellipath adaptive learning MBA program at AIU and are considering self-paced learning options, as well. As I've said before, we will be experimenting with a number of strategies aimed at improving student outcomes and the affordability of a college education. Today, we offer scholarship opportunities to students across our portfolio of schools. All of these students-focused programs are designed to help students offset a portion of the cost of their education. We continue to make progress on resolving outstanding litigation, addressing several cases and putting them behind us. We resolved matters with the New York Attorney General case in 2013. The securities class actions and related derivatives cases were finalized in early 2014, and the final approval of the court has been granted. With respect to some of our legacy litigation, we have reached settlement with the Vasquez, Amador [ph] and related cases in California, putting behind us litigation, which has been active for years. In addition, we continue to make considerable progress in resolving our remaining legacy litigation. The…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Jerry Herman from Stifel. Jerry R. Herman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Colleen, I was just wondering if you can help us a little bit more with the cash flows associated with the Transitions Schools. You were helpful in saying that about, I guess, by implication, 80% of the $70 million is related to cash burn this year and I was hopeful that you would give us some reasonable ballpark figures on next year?

I think, as we've said previously, we're not giving too much in the way of guidance. But suffice to say, as we talked about, we have 30 campuses in total that are in the process of being taught out, 20 of which are expected to be closed here by the end of 2014, 10 of which then flow through '15, '16, those that have more of a 4-year degree, where we're allowing students to complete their courses of study. So from that perspective, I think, thinking about the losses as they decline, as the schools close their doors from an operation perspective may be a way to think about cash flow burn in future years. Jerry R. Herman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: And then, therefore, reaching 0 at some point in 2016?

Yes, there is some -- there's one, I believe, that goes to 2017. We provided a listing of the dates of closures in our February call. But also, keep in mind that we do have some remaining lease obligations that we're working actively on to look for alternatives to exit space. But that will be something that we also have to focus on as it relates to a number of the campuses that close. But from an operational perspective, yes, those losses will cease to 0 in '17 but they're declining faster from '15 forward. Jerry R. Herman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Okay, great. And, Scott, question on the -- sort of the regulatory side. As you reposition programs in the environment of gainful employment 2.0, how are you guys thinking about that regulation in terms of probability analysis on whether it goes through as currently described or what changes might occur?

We're, like everyone else, preparing our comments, which we're about to submit. We've done a lot of scenario planning around gainful employment and I feel comfortable that based on where -- I'm not trying to predict where this thing pans out. What I tell everybody, that if -- as I look at the world, I think if you had single definition with regards to Title IV, do whatever you want on gainful employment and the world would work out just fine from the standpoint of having the outcomes that you want on the use of Title IV money across the education industry. But having said that, I'm not trying to predict where this thing comes out. I'm just trying to make sure that we've got appropriate action plans in place for whatever the eventuality is. We've done a lot of scenario planning associated with it. And as soon as we get a good handle, a definitive handle on what it is going to be, we're going to be able to execute on best positioning the organization on a going forward basis and I think we'll be -- there are some scenarios that have some impact on us and there are some scenarios that have very de minimis impact on us.

Our next question comes from Jeff Silber from BMO Capital.

In your prepared remarks, you mentioned you expect total enrollment to be up at CTU and AIU by the second half of that -- of this year. I'm just wondering if you can give us some color on what gives you the confidence that, that will happen?

Well, the businesses -- CTU is really performing in a very predictable fashion. AIU is also. And as we look at improvements that we've made to retention activities and a variety of other metrics, student outcome entities, the way that we model out the businesses and the way that they're tracking on their business cases has CTU as a total enrollment positive. In the second half of the year and towards the end of the year, AIU becomes total enrollment positive. So it's a result of improvements on the front-end, as well as improvements in how we're educating our students and retention efforts and graduation efforts.

So if that would be the case, and I guess specifically on AIU with a pretty sizable operating loss in the quarter, would AIU be generating positive operating profit once we see total enrollment up?

On a going forward basis, it will. It may not at that instant. But, yes, it becomes a total enrollment positive organization, it becomes a positive contributor.

Okay. You mentioned a couple of other things. I just want to make sure I have the dates. You talked about a change in the intake model last year. Roughly when was that? I just want to see when we're going to be anniversary-ing that.

It started in June.

June. And that was at both schools?

It started in June and mostly -- it started in June and mostly with AIU. And then, eventually, we made changes more in the July, August time frame with CTU. But it first started with AIU in June.

All right. Great. And then in terms of the reintroduction of the associate degree, the Culinary Arts program, when was that?

It started this time last year, but it wasn't consistent throughout all of the schools. There are several schools where we are just now getting to the point of reintroducing that program. A couple of places, we had do some modifications facility-wise to be able to accommodate the program. And so when we went to a certificate program, not every place had associate degrees at that time. And so as we went back to the associate degree program, reintroduced it, there were a few places that were facility-constrained in being able to accommodate the reintroduction of the associate's program. And we're still solving that at a couple of places. So the crux of it happens -- the majority of it is starting to happen. But it does have a phase-in effect across several campuses throughout the year.

Okay. And, Colleen, one for you. What should we be budgeting for capital expenditures for this year?

We're looking anywhere from, consistent with what we said before, 2% to 3% of revenue.

Our next question comes from Trace Urdan from Wells Fargo.

I wondered if, Colleen, you could maybe update us on the lease termination expense. Is there any change from your perspective on what you're anticipating those are going to cost as you get kind of closer to the end here?

At this point, I don't have anything new to provide. What I will say is we have started a couple of things. One, we are seeing, and I think we spoke about it in February as well, the market in general picking up from a real estate perspective. But we also have begun the efforts to be more aggressive with exiting out from under those. So to the extent that we have information to share, we'll provide that on the next call. But at this point, nothing significant. We have seen -- we are exercising, where we can, early termination options and the like. But really, I would think the back half of this year we'll see, in earnest, some of those efforts coming to fruition.

Okay, great. And then, Scott, I wanted to ask you a question about Culinary. Prior management had made the change away from associate degree programs, primarily, I think, in response to gainful employment, with the sense that the shorter programs would clear the hurdles a little bit more easily. You guys are now reversing direction and going back towards the associate programs. Can you just comment on that factor as it relates to that decision?

Yes. I understand what you're -- the crux of your question. And what I can tell you is we've done a lot of work around that. I think there are a variety of different options that we have as we know what it is. And this is the best decision from the standpoint of students and employers, as well as from the profitability of the company, for how we're seeing the world right now. Based on what happens in that area, I think we'll have -- we'll be able to manage to whatever the outcome is of that. And so it's a manageable problem for us to deal with, depending if everything falls within the scenarios that have been outlined to date. And so I understand the issues that the associate program has with regards to discretionary income measurements but I also feel that we have the quivers in place to manage to a successful place if the rule comes out that way.

Our last question comes from Corey Greendale from First Analysis.

This is David Warner for Corey. I just wanted to dig in a little bit more on the target for Q4 EBITDA breakeven. What are you assuming there in terms of starts either in the Culinary or in the University segment? Can we -- do we assume double-digit starts growth in either one of those segments? And then are graduations going to be up in 2014 versus 2013? Anything you could give us on retention, as well.

Yes, I'm not giving that kind of forward guidance right now. The forward guidance that I feel comfortable with is to say that the core business is trending towards being EBITDA positive in the fourth quarter. I'm managing the business for total student enrollment population growth. And we saw some very good lead indicators from AIU and CTU in the beginning of the second quarter, with over 10% new student enrollment growth. But as I said, we've come up against some tougher year-over-year comps as we change the new student intake process. That's impacted those entities in the beginning part of the second half of the year. And so I expect that stuff to level out a bit. And our advertising spending and the like is really geared towards accomplishing new -- total student enrollment growth for the enterprise.

Okay. And then just a question on the advertising spending. Was there any timing impact there, either pulling it earlier -- forward earlier into the year or was it related to consolidation of Sanford-Brown? What was the, I guess, impetus for the advertising expense growing so much?

There was an advertising expense that we did pull into the front part of the year that was different from previous years from the standpoint of how we were targeting that new student population.

Okay, great. And just lastly, on the student readiness program, just a little bit more color. How would you characterize it in terms of length of the program, its rigorousness, whether you expect any impact on early student retention from a new program or anything you can give us?

Yes to all of the above. What we've done with that program and what we have found with students, and frankly, it's, from my experience, historically been true with students, is that the sooner that you engage them once they've made the decision to enter school, the sooner that you engage them and get them involved in activities and get them emotionally invested outside of whatever their financial commitment, you get them emotionally invested, where they're doing an assignment, where they're learning how to learn in your system, the more that their length of stay, their opportunity to graduate, their potential to graduate, all increases. And so what we're doing is, as soon as students say that this is something that they want to commit to, we want to get as much from them from the standpoint of educating them as to what it means to be successful at the institution of choice that they've come to us on. And so we're making those assignments as meaningful as we can. We're making them as much of a requirement, frankly, as we can with the students without doing anything negative to them but really pushing them very hard to make a commitment and to stay with the commitment. And that is showing very good signs over at AIU and CTU. It's part of learning what it means to learn on intellipath and how to be successful with that adaptive learning technology. And that has had positive retention results for us in our trials and as we worked it out. I told you, we expanded -- last quarter, we expanded a little too quickly at AIU. We've done a lot of rebalancing of that and fixing that, and we're seeing now carryover of what our trial stats were of people learning on…

We have a follow-up question from Jerry Herman from Stifel. Jerry R. Herman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Colleen, I'll start with the numbers question again. Is the D&A and stock comp run rate in the first quarter a good proxy for the full year?

Yes. It should be a relatively good proxy for how you think about the remainder of '14. Jerry R. Herman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Okay, great. And, Scott, you mentioned some of the strategic things you're contemplating, including acquisition and divestiture. How would you categorize that environment right now? And have you solicited interest in any of your assets or started a process in any way?

I would characterize the environment as interesting from the standpoint -- I've said that every quarter that I've been CEO. And I believe -- I said when I first came on that I believe it's part of the job of a CEO. Nothing's changed. It's still part of the job of the CEO to understand how you've deployed your assets and whether you've deployed them as to the best benefit of your shareholders or not. And so nothing in that regard has changed.

Thank you. I will now turn the call back over to Scott for closing remarks.

Okay. To wrap up, the first quarter represented another step forward in our strategy to return Career Education to profitability through an understanding of our long-term success is rooted in the collective success of our students. We generated enrollment improvements in our largest segment, University. We further lowered our cost structure and have identified specific strategies that we are executing within Career Schools to continue to stabilize that business. And we've made substantial progress on our Transitional School closures. Thank you once again for your time today and feel free to give us a call with any follow-up questions.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.