Good morning. My name is Mike, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Q1 2018 National Fuel Gas Company Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I will now turn the call over to Brian Welsch, Director of Investor Relations. You may begin your conference.

Thank you, Mike, and good morning. We appreciate you joining us on today's conference call for a discussion of last evening's earnings release. With us on the call from National Fuel Gas Company are Ron Tanski, President and Chief Executive Officer; Dave Bauer, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer; and John McGinnis, President of Seneca Resources Corporation. At the end of the prepared remarks, we will open the discussion to questions. The first quarter fiscal 2018 earnings release and February Investor Presentation have been posted on our Investor Relations website. We may refer to these materials during today's call. We would like to remind you that today's teleconference will contain forward-looking statements. While National Fuel's expectations, beliefs and projections are made in good faith, and are believed to have a reasonable basis, actual results may differ materially. These statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and you may refer to last evening's earnings release for a listing of certain specific risk factors. National Fuel will be participating in the Scotia Howard Weil Energy Conference in March. If you plan on attending, please contact me or the conference planners to schedule a meeting with the management team. And with that, I'll turn that over to Ron Tanski.

Thanks Brian, and good morning everyone. We started off our 2018 fiscal year with a very good first quarter and Dave Bauer will review the numbers and all the changes brought about by the new tax law in a little bit. Our field operations are moving along all according to plan and there was no real excitement during the quarter which is a really good thing in the natural gas business where surprises are generally not a good thing. But one item that is not following along our original plan is our Northern Access pipeline. As you know, we're waiting for either a decision from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals overturning the denial of a water quality certification by the New York DEC or a decision on a request for rehearing on our FERC certificate where FERC could determine that the New York DEC took too long to act on our application for the water quality certification. So there are no set timelines for either of these proceedings, we estimate that we might hear from the Second Circuit in the summer. We could hear from the FERC at any time. While we wait to see the outcome of our Northern Access proceedings, we continue to look at ways to build or acquire more transmission capacity out of our Western development area. A project of any size usually has a long lead time and we're finding that to be true in this case also. As I said on previous calls, we’re looking at possible options both on a standalone basis and with partners but we are not far enough along to provide any details today. In the meantime, Seneca continues to manage its drilling program to focus on drilling and completing wells where we have adequate take away capacity or…

Thanks Ron, and good morning everyone. Seneca produced 40.1 Bcfe during the first quarter compared to 44.9 Bcfe in last year's first quarter. If you recall last year's first quarter gas production in Pennsylvania was much higher than anticipated due to flush production from wells that have been curtailed in some cases for over a year. In Pennsylvania production from our fiscal 2018 fourth quarter to first quarter 2018 was essentially flat just slightly lower by 0.2 Bcf. We had voluntary price curtailments in October and early November that totaled around 1.2 Bcf net and some unexpected operational curtailments that I'll touch on a bit later. There have been no additional marketing curtailments since early November with the arrival of cold weather and basin spot pricing is really improved averaging around $3 per MMBtu in January across our receipt points. With respect to our operations, we have recently brought on a new pad Lycoming County. This is the first pad developed with a second rig added in May of last year. First production from this pad occurred in early January and current production is over 80 million a day from six wells. We will continue to be active drilling in Lycoming County for at least another three to four months as we build docs ahead of the projected July 2018 in service date of Atlantic Sunrise. I’m moving to the WDA, we remain at eight Utica wells drilled and completed. The most recent three Utica wells are located on a pad for we are currently completing 12 Marcellus wells our final pad in the joint development agreement with IOG. During the completion operations on this pad, we have shut in these three Utica wells. As such we plan to provide a more detailed update on Utica well performance next quarter.…

Thank you, John. Good morning, everyone. For the first quarter National Fuel reported earnings per share of $2.30. U.S. federal tax reform led to some large adjustments in the quarter but beyond that the quarter was fairly straightforward. Stripping out the $1.29 per share adjustment to our deferred tax balances, earnings were $1.02 per share compared to a $1.04 last year. Our regulated operations performed in line with expectations and were generally consistent with the prior-year. In the E&P segment, the sustained increase we've seen in crude oil prices was more than offset by lower production, lower realized natural gas prices due to the exploration of some favorable hedges. Primary driver of our results for the quarter related to federal tax reform. As you know, the federal statutory rate decreased from 35% to 21% effective January 1 of this year. National Fuel's tax year like our fiscal year runs from October 1 to September 30. IRS rules are pretty specific on how we deal with this midyear rule change. For fiscal 2018 they require us to use a blended federal rate of 24.5% retroactive to October 1, 2017. Then in fiscal 2019, our rate will drop to 21%. The drop in the tax rate will have a meaningful impact on our future earnings. As you saw in our release, we move to a 24.5% federal rate increased earnings by $0.11 per share during the first quarter. Looking to the full fiscal year, we anticipate our effective tax rate will be approximately 27%. We expect to further drop in our effective rate in 2019 once we've transitioned the new 21% rate. We are still awaiting details on certain aspects of tax reform such as potential limitations on the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation but for now we are assuming…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from Holly Stewart from Scotia Howard Weil.

Maybe just the first one for John, John I think last quarter you talked about the potential to add another frac here maybe in the back half of the year just kind of given the movement and the development schedule that your references within the release. Can we get an update on really this thinking there?

What we will end up doing is using a spot crew when we’re completing wells in Lycoming. We already have done that on our first pad there, now we’re drilling two additional pads and we’ll use a second spot crew for that activity as well. So we’ll keep a single crew in the WDA but we’ll use it - will have a spot crew out these when we’re completing wells.

And those rates for those crew is pretty comparable to what you’re already paying?

A little more expensive but actually not as bad as we thought they were going to be.

And then maybe another one for you. Just looks like there has been some recent A&D activity in the Northeast and looks like there are others expecting to be marketing packages, any appetite for Seneca to get a larger position up there?

Yes, especially in our Eastern in the EDA we certainly have an appetite and so - and when opportunities arise we definitely review them and right now we haven't seen any formal sales processes happen but it is - there are opportunities that we’d be interested in.

And then maybe one for Dave. Dave I think you mentioned 350 million if I had that written down right of pipeline projects over the next five years it looks like Empire North is 140 of that. Any color you can provide at this point on anything larger?

Well the 350 that I referred to Holly is the amount we expect to spend on modernization projects. And so you think of our system is an older one with pipeline going back into the 40s and 50s and over time that has to be upgraded and replaced. And we've done quite a bit of that over the past few years and I've got a decent backlog of what’s going to be larger projects off into the future. And over time it will grow rate base.

[Operator Instructions] The next question is from Graham Price from Raymond James.

Just wondering how much of the service cost inflation that was mentioned in the release was kind of on the completion side. And then from what you’ve see what the market looks like as far as entering long-term service contracts and locking in some of that pricing going forward?

We've seen increases basically across all of our costs. Certainly the pumping pressure services is definitely the highest that we've seen, it’s the biggest piece of our drilling completion costs and so it has the most impact. Most of our contracts historically have been fairly long a year plus as activity has increase those contract terms have been a little bit shorter. And so we'll see as we go forward we'll see what kind of increases or whether we’re able to keep it flat.

And then from my follow-up of the wells that were delayed into 2019, I’m just wondering if we could get a little color on where those are located?

I'm sorry I missed the question, ask that again.

I think there were a few completions that were delayed from 2018 into 2019 I was just wondering where those were located?

Those will be a little bit of delay at 007 and then a little bit of Lycoming.

Your next question is from Chris Sighinolfi with Jefferies.

Dave just wanted to start if I look at obviously appreciate the color you offered last night and today with regards to the tax impacts and obviously I also appreciate that there are some elements to what the policies sort of formal implications might mean and are still unresolved. But if I pivoted the cash tax line and think about what you've historically been paying in terms of cash taxes I know you called out federal AMT as being part of that. But I just wondering if you could help us maybe narrow down what your expectations are if we think about historically what you are paying and sort of the rate implied what might happen to that on sort of the nearer intermediate term?

Well in the real near-term, I don’t see there being any impact because we still have a decent sized NOL that will offset any tax payments for this year because of a quark in the way the transition rules work will still be subject to AMT this year in 2018 but that will be a relatively small dollar amount. As we move past 2018 into 2019 and 2020 we’re still doing a lot of the modeling around this and as you pointed out things can change. But I do expect that directionally we’ll be better off from a cash flow standpoint. When you look at the ability of the non-regulated businesses to take a 100% depreciation in year one that generates quite a bit of deductions our utility and pipeline will go back to makers and will have a good amount of taxable income we think. Because we file a consolidated return we’re able to effectively capture the value of the accelerated depreciation on the non-reg side. So when you blow away all the smoke I don't that I gave you a specific number, but directionally we’d expect to be better off cash flow wise.

And then I guess and this is maybe an unfair question but I’ll ask it anyway because we have to think about sort of terminal states and worlds long into the future. But I guess given the nature of the change and the step down in the federal rate. I mean where would you think that we should mark sort of a long-term cash tax rate for you with federal and state and with the myriad of sort of different businesses that you guys have assuming the portfolio will remain static?

Yes, I would say in the mid 20s is what my tax guy is telling me but we like I said Chris we are still modeling this so we’ll keep you updated as we go through that process.

Listen I appreciate I think everybody on the line appreciates the fact that its early days and it came together late in the year and there is so many parts that move and maybe offset. So just the initial thoughts are a helpful there. I guess switching gears I was also thankful for the update on the southern I guess southbound service on Empire. Just wondering what are the options with that capacity if you could walk us - I mean obviously you don't expect the contractor to renew certainly not at the existing rate. But - guess what is the decision tree with what to do with that and what options are available?

I think it’s pretty simple and that we’d like to try and market the capacity in some way. We have the ability to discount rates, so certainly that would be a preferred option for unsuccessful in doing that and show a revenue requirement we can file our rate case.

And then talking about the rate case you had talked about the modernization effort so you’re talking about just moment ago with Holly. Is the recovery on that spend requiring a rate case action on the systems or are they built-in sort of tracking elements that you'll capture in some of that spend?

Yes, we have a requirement in supply company which is where all of the modernization dollars are, there is really none on Empire. We have to file our rate case and supply by the end of 2019. So we'd look to that event if you will is a way to recover some of that modernization spending.

The next question is from Tim Winter with Gabelli and Company.

I was wondering Ron if you could talk a little bit more about the logic and outlook for FERC to rehear the Northern Access application. And should they approve what other obstacles would be there and would New York have any recourse?

Well as you know we already submitted our request for rehearing on that and if you're going to try to get any read through from FERC’s action on the constitution request for rehearing which that order came out January 11 I believe. As we always point out facts are different in each one of these cases and as it is with ours we’re different in constitution. And given the fact that there's been this much time between what they did in constitution and haven’t acted on ours yet, you can indicate that we are hopefully getting a different answer. So you move on from that and taking your promise that FERC grants our rehearing and indicates that the DEC took too long. Obviously DEC could go try to appeal that request rehearing again, I’m not sure of the absolute procedural steps they would take but given what we've seen in the Valley lateral, the Millennium case I would expect that you just see more litigation attempted from the stateside.

There are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back over to the presenters.

Thank you, Mike. We like to thank everyone for taking the time to be with us today. A replay of this call will be available at approximately 3 PM Eastern Time on both our website and by telephone. And we'll run through the close of business on Friday, February 9. To access this replay online please visit our Investor Relations website at investor.nationalfuelgas.com. To access by telephone call 1-800-585-8367 and enter the conference ID number 8999277. This concludes our conference call for today. Thank you. Goodbye.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.