Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to Murphy USA Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Christian Pikul, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Ashley, and good morning, everyone. Thanks again for joining us today. With me, as usual, are Andrew Clyde, President and Chief Executive Officer; Mindy West, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and Donnie Smith, Vice President and Controller. After some opening comments from Andrew, Mindy will give us an overview of the financial results, and then we'll open up the call to Q&A. Please keep in mind that some of the comments made during this call, including the Q&A portion, will be considered forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and as such, no assurances can be given that these events will occur or that the projections will be attained. A variety of factors exist that may cause actual results to differ. For further discussion of Risk Factors, please see the latest Murphy USA Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K and other recent SEC filings. Murphy USA takes no duty to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. During today's call, we may also provide certain performance measures that do not conform to generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP. We have provided schedules to reconcile these non-GAAP measures with the reported results on a GAAP basis as part of our earnings press release, which can be found on the Investors section of our website. With that, I'll turn the call over to Andrew.

Thank you, Christian. Good morning, and welcome to everyone joining us today. We're looking forward to discussing with you not only our strong third quarter results, but also the next steps we announced in the ongoing evolution of our capital allocation strategy. The business is demonstrating excellent momentum as we head into 2021, and we are excited about the opportunity set in front of us. So let's get started with the third quarter results, which are comping equally impressive results from the third quarter of last year. Beginning with the fuels business, total fuel contribution dollars were only $6 million lower than last year, yet these results were delivered in a much different commodity price environment. Although COVID has changed the way we talked about business performance the past few quarters, we feel like we are back to talking about the normal drivers of volatility, including both the magnitude of change and overall direction of fuel prices. In the third quarter last year, prices generally trended lower through July and August, and were flat in September which was a highly favorable setting and generated an exceptional all in fuel contribution of $0.11 per gallon. This year, prices were choppy but generally flat in July. Trended steadily higher in August and briefly dipped in September prior to rallying higher the last half of the month. Generally, that is an unfavorable environment. But remarkably, the third quarter 2020 environment generated an even higher all-in fuel margin of $0.223 per gallon, about $0.02 per gallon or 10% above the prior year. Despite total volumes down around 12% year over year, total fuel contribution dollars of $220 million were only about 2.5% lower, down from $226 million a year ago. Importantly, these results continue to validate our belief that fuel retailers are establishing higher…

Thanks, Andrew. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for listening today. I will start off with some standard items. Average retail gasoline prices per gallon during the quarter were $1.90, sharply lower than year ago prices of $2.38. Capital expenditures approximated $61 million in the third quarter, a $54 million of which was allocated to retail growth, $5 million to maintenance capital and the remaining $2 million allocated to various corporate and strategic initiatives. We continue to expect full year capital spending in 2020 to fall between $250 million and $275 million. We ended the third quarter with cash on the balance sheet of $318 million, $197 million of availability under our $325 million ABL facility, which remains undrawn. Total debt outstanding at quarter end was down to $1.0125 billion, reflecting ongoing quarterly term loan principal payments of $12.5 million. Ended down to $1 billion currently post the quarter four principal payment we made in early October. Based on quarter end debt outstanding, the leverage ratio we report to our lenders was approximately 1.4 times as of September 30 versus 1.4 times in the second quarter and 2.1 times reported in the third quarter of 2019. Although we don't expect a repeat of 2020 financial performance in 2021, the balance sheet does remain under levered if current market conditions persist and could be utilized to support some of the capital allocation strategies Andrew mentioned. Due to the execution of approximately $90 million of share repurchase during the third quarter, as of September 30, 28.6 million common shares were outstanding or about 29 million shares on a fully diluted basis. As stated in the press release, $7 million remains in the up to $400 million program authorized by the Board in July of 2019, which means since quarter end, we have repurchased another 300,000 shares or about $37 million worth. Any amounts left over from that program will be executed as market conditions allow prior to kicking off any activity in the up to $500 million program recently authorized by the board. Looking at the financial results, I want to make just a couple of comments. There are no changes to the revised 2020 guidance published in our second quarter earnings release with the exception of some onetime G&A expense, we incurred during the third quarter, which will push total expense for the year above that guided range. Total G&A expense for the third quarter was $53.7 million, an increase of nearly $18 million above the prior-year quarter. As Andrew said, we were very pleased to announce the $10 million donation to the Murphy USA Charitable Foundation, which is important to all of us here in El Dorado and South Arkansas. In addition to this donation, we also trued up some accruals for about $2 million, and the remaining variance was due to investments in new capabilities and the timing of certain project expenses. That wraps up my comments, so I will turn it back over to Andrew.

Thanks, Mindy. I want to close with the final message to our existing shareholders and potential investors listening in. Our commitment to value creation through organic growth remains our highest priority and assure you capital will continue to flow to our highest returning opportunities. When we have the right opportunities in the right markets to further accelerate our high-return organic growth program, we will allocate incremental capital commensurate with that opportunity. Secondarily, we'll continue to use cash balances, free cash flow and an appropriately leveraged balance sheet to support other value creation initiatives, including share repurchase and dividends. With dividend preservation and growth receiving priority consideration now that we've initiated one. Lastly, we will continue to explore and seek out M&A opportunities with distinctive capability building synergy and reverse synergy potential to optimize the returns from both our new stores and any acquired assets. With that, operator, we can open up the lines for our Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from Ben Bienvenu with Stephens, Inc.

Good morning. I think the most notable kind of focus here on the quarters, and you provided a lot of good context and commentary is on the updated capital allocation thought process. And I think what I heard you say is while there might be a perception that a dividends signal potentially slowdown in growth or a change or shift in your capital allocation strategy that's been so effective. I think what I heard you say is it's really supplemental. And I think you kind of demonstrated your commitment to the buyback, I guess, in buying the 700,000 shares late in 3Q, and then more in 4Q kind of price higher than here. So I guess maybe help put into context for us, how you continue to think about how this evolves, maybe not in the near term, but over the long term, and you talked about accelerating growth for new stores in 2021. How long is that runway for store growth? I think that would be helpful for us to hear too.

Yes. Thanks, Ben. It's a really good question, and I'm sure there's a whole lot of conspiracy theories or views about, oh, why this change? As you and I have talked about, and we've talked about with other investors, I mean we simply just have a high-class set of opportunities in front of us. And if you think about having achieved strategic goals earlier, achieving the financial goals associated with those strategies earlier, generating superior free cash flow, including the outsized leverage in the current environment, I mean there's hardly a quarter that goes by that we don't have $300 million of cash in the bank, and yet we're continuing to buy back shares at an accelerated rate and growing at an accelerated rate. So I mean, the free cash flow machine in this business is, it's just capable of doing more. As we thought first about accelerating organic growth, the reality is, we've already accelerated our organic growth and building up a pipeline to be able to do 50 stores a year on a sustainable basis. And from the target markets we've identified, we have a super long future of continuing to do that. So there is no constraint in the growth even in those markets. It's more about if we wanted to increase the pipeline from 50 stores a year to 75 stores a year that would take another couple of years to build up that pipeline to do it. So we couldn't announce that we're going to do 75 new stores in 2021 because 50 was already a stretch. And if you went back a couple of years ago, we're only targeting $40 million in 2021. So we've accelerated the organic growth to start with. As we think about share repurchase and dividends, you can go from…

Yes, that's perfect. Tacking on to that on the M&A, that's something we've heard about in the past. But I think you guys don't have executed really well in your business. I'm curious, when you think about buying someone else's business and layering on your execution skills is it just that, but you need to justify the purchase price of the business? I think about how in RV, your multiple is maybe lower than where it should be. And you might be in kind of an inverted area where you have to buy businesses at multiples in excess of yours and capture synergies or efficiencies to get that deal to be accretive. Is that the right perception? Am I misperceiving that how do you guys think about making the math work on M&A if you truly want to buy a good business with good capabilities?

Yes. So it's a great question. Let's be real clear, we're not doing M&A for M&A's sake. We are not going to target, as we think about our larger format stores, I mean we are in the food and dispensed beverage business, it's not the made-to-order or with the kitchen, with the commissary [ph] type model that many people think about. But we have dispensed solo, we have dispensed frozen beverage, we have dispensed coffee, we have open air dairy coolers, we have heated items and heatable items, etcetera. And to be honest with you, it's our least developed category; and during COVID it was effectively shutdown. And we have made a number of strategic hires over the past few months; we've also been working very thoughtfully with our partner Cormark about what a very distinctive best for Murphy USA & Murphy USA's format in customer offer would look enrolling the customer renewing our contract with them which is going to provide additional benefits to us in this category. So we are all about enhancing a capability that's probably our least developed capability to get the most return out of our larger format stores, right; so that's our priority. But my prior background made it very obvious to me that the capability building is hard, and even though I think we have done an exceptional job at Murphy USA building and enhancing our capability, it would be foolish for us to think that we shouldn't look to the outside to say, "is there an appropriate capability we could acquire." It's not going to be a massive firm, but on the other hand, it's got to be big enough to have capabilities at scale; it's people, it's technology, it's process, experience, it could be brand, it could be platforms that are…

Okay. Thank you for that. My last question. You touched on the October trends as it relates to the gallons. You mentioned that the in-store was running still at elevated levels. Just curious can you provide more granularity on how the in-store is performing through October? And then on the gallons, how much of that improvement from what we saw in 3Q, and I think even in September, the last update you had given, is a function of a compare? I think you had an easier compare in the fourth quarter. And how much of it is kind of what you're seeing relative to either the external environment or something that you guys are doing?

Sure. So I think from an external environment, October was good last year. And frankly, this year, we've seen, again, kind of a choppy market. So that kind of the teens, the low $0.2 kind of reflects that we've seen some volatility in rising prices. We certainly saw that at the end of September. So that wouldn't bode well for starting off the month of October. So from a market environment standpoint, we're actually comping a better period last year than what we're seeing this year. In terms of what we're doing, we're clearly doing a better job on retail pricing excellence, and we're further down the road in terms of optimizing that capability. And so there'll be a positive benefit from that, which we've continued to see every quarter on quarter. On the merchandise numbers, I don't have those right in front of me, but it's more of the same, holding our gains on the tobacco side, continuing to see destination purchases on some of the other key categories and with the recovering traffic seeing the attached categories rebound appropriately there as well. So generally, all very, very strong and good news.

Okay, great. I'll leave it there. Thanks.

Your next question comes from Bobby Griffin with Raymond James.

Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions, and we appreciate all the detail and updated capital allocation strategy. Very helpful. I guess, Andrew, first thing I wanted to talk about back when you kind of in your prepared remarks, you guys have been executing at an extremely high level, high-class problem of having cash and different avenues to spend it. Can you maybe talk a little bit about some of the back end investments that are needed to support the bandwidth of being able to look into S&B as well as maintain organic growth as well as maintain some of the other initiatives that the company has been doing so successfully?

And when you say back end investments, are you talking about the CapEx outlook? Or are you talking about more other things?

Well, I mean, people, systems, you guys have been executing very well. We're moving into another area of potential upside through this updated capital allocation strategies. How to maintain the bandwidth of the other organic growth stuff that's been going so well, too, is people that need to be hired, systems or anything of that sense going forward?

Sure. So what I would say is that if you just think about the organic growth, I think we have an exceptional asset development team that has focused on our core markets and good partners that work with them, especially around the construction side of that, where I think our business got a priority during COVID because we never put the brakes on the business. So there's absolutely nothing that changing or slowing down on that front. We've challenged cross-functional team to say, how do we get the most out of our 2,800s and we think about food and beverage further store labor optimization layout, etcetera. We have initiatives just to continuously improve and think about further optimization there. So as they get into a normal cadence of maintaining a pipeline. We had a building committee yesterday that looked at some incredible new NTI locations and raise and build, rebuild locations. I would just say we're just on a smooth running cadence for all of those activities and our store build plan continues to track along the way. So there's nothing really different that we're doing along this front. In terms of one of our capabilities, Murphy drive rewards, we built it and we knew we had to build it to be successful around our two biggest categories, fuel and tobacco, and it has. And so now we're effectively just going to point it to support other categories, and it's an incredible capability because it's also a great communication tool to let customers know that we have new products or come try this product and get their trial and conversion and acceptance. So we can create panels from our customer base to give us input on their taste and so forth. And so as I mentioned in the prepared comments,…

Very, very, very helpful. I appreciate that. And I guess second for me. I mean when you think about the expanding capabilities, clearly on the larger next-generation stores. I mean, that can be very beneficial when you look at kind of your powerful CEOs that you do raise and rebuild of stuff, do you see further opportunities to kind of integrate any potential acquisition or any potential additional capabilities into those smaller formats that could drive even better upside out of those high-performing assets?

Absolutely. I mean our 1,400 square foot stores have a coffee program. We've got some stores, we pour out more coffee than we sell, right? We've got to improve that. And it's a whole set of capabilities that will allow us to do that better. Same with dispensed beverage, ICE tea, Open air coolers, reheatable items, grab and go, etcetera. And as I said, we're working on what we think are a couple of really unique clever ideas that will allow us to come up with something that's fit for our formats, fit for our purpose and fit for our customers. And if there's one thing you know about Murphy U.S.A., we are not going to be a me-too late, take that approach similar to Murphy drive rewards. We recognize our model is different. And so the ideas and the creativity and the innovation, we're going to apply to our unique opportunity set. It's going to probably look a little bit different than the average run of the mill offer out there as well.

Okay. I guess, Andrew, lastly, I mean I understand this is a little bit tougher of a question far out, but you look at the $500 million target next year, I mean if you had to pick one or two things that would cause you not to be able to get there from an industry standpoint, what would those be? Besides, obviously, an economic recession or something, but is it just the volatility around fuel margins? Or is it lapping the big merchandising growth and gross profit, anything just to help us think about that number in context to some of the variables that you have to go up against?

Yes. So I would say there's no lack of conviction of finishing a $500 million program in the next three years. It's more about the timing of it, right? And if you think about anything that would cause you to say, "Hey, you know what, we're going to go slow to go fast versus how we could go faster on the front end, like we did with a $400 million program. I mean, those are the things we're going to be looking for. And look, there's a lot of uncertainty as we think about the current environment, the capital markets, the election, taxes, other regulations, etcetera. And so those things could have an impact on near-term EBITDA, etcetera. And those would be the things that we would be keeping a very close eye on it. As you said, they're external, they're industry, they would affect all parties, etcetera. So it's less about where we expect to be at the end of that three-year authorization. It's more of a timing in which we execute that. And that's why we thought a dividend was also very appropriate as well because if there's a timing period where we're out of the market, we are continuing to provide a consistent return of capital to our shareholders.

Thanks, Andrew. I don't think probably was not super clear in my question, but that's helpful in another asset. I was more looking at the $500 million EBITDA target for '21. And what you answer is very helpful indirectly, too, for modeling purpose and how we think about that. But in regards to that EBITDA target, if there was a couple of things that would cause you not to hit it, what would that be barring an economic recession, of course, just some of the variables that you guys actually comp against to help us keep that in context as we're building out our models?

Sure. Well, look, I think the first fundamental is this new fuel volume margin equilibrium that we've talked about. And we continue to see evidence, as we've shared in this quarter and what we're seeing currently that the market is behaving very rationale. There's nothing that says the market could wake up one day and become highly irrational for whatever reason. That's the single biggest driver of our expected variability in our numbers. But just as it could put that number at risk, you could see it having outsized benefits in 2021 also. So that's one as we saw this year swings both ways. Certainly, there could be regulations around tobacco, our second largest category. I think Altria just announced a price increase, and we see benefits that come from that, but we could see tax increases or other regulations that could impact that. Fortunately, our market mix is such that we are in more favorable geographies than we're the most tightened regulations and taxes tend to be. I would say those are probably the two biggest items in terms of 2021 EBITDA, any changes to regulations, minimum wages, etcetera. We certainly wouldn't expect that to transpire in such a short-term period, even with a new administration in the White House.

Thank you. I appreciate the details. Congrats on a good quarter and good execution, and best of luck in the fourth quarter.

Thanks, Bobby.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from John Royall with JP Morgan.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. On the dividends, are the plans to keep a yield in line with peers? Or do you have a particular per share growth target over time? Or any other kind of ratio of income or cash flows you're targeting? And I guess what I'm getting at is would the idea be to eventually differentiate with the dividend? Or is it more just to kind of keep in line with peers?

Yes. I think it's a good question, John. I think certainly, there's at least three metrics, most firms look at when they initiate a dividend, and we're clearly in terms of dividend-paying firms on the lower end of that, it's not only in line with the retail peers in our industry, but the broader retail peer group that we look at. And so we'll keep an eye on all the various metrics, knowing that there are some things like your share price or market cap, your shares outstanding, other things that certainly impact those metrics. I think to the second question about, would it ever become a differentiator. I think that's the difference between what I call the share repurchase plus model in a dividend plus model. And I think we're still years away from a growth opportunity standpoint, from moving to a dividend plus model where you differentiate on the dividend and you share repurchases to just supplement that. I think our view is that there's still so much upside in our business, value that's not captured in the current share price, earnings potential from the growth and the ramp of these new stores that hasn't built in we're going to be more bullish on share repurchases, complementing it with the dividend. And I'm sure there's some point in every company's lifecycle where it makes a transition to becoming more differentiated on a dividend, but we're nowhere near that stage, given all the growth opportunities we have in front of us and the fact that growth isn't fully baked into our share price.

That's really helpful. And then on leverage levels, you talked about the 2.5 times max. Would you be willing to step outside of that for an attractive acquisition? And can you remind us if you have any covenants that restrict you beyond certain levels. I think in the past, you've talked about maybe three or 3.5 times, but that might be a little stale.

Yes. I'll let Mindy tackle the covenant. But I think in terms of acquisitions, it would take something pretty significant, given our current cash balance, our current leverage ratio to move above 2.5 times, and we could certainly do that. I think with our bonds trading at over 107%, we could effectively borrow money today at less than 4%. So we certainly wouldn't be concerned about doing that. But anything that we would do would get us quickly back below 2.5 times very quickly. And frankly, that's our stated goal. It's a great place for a business like ours to operate. It gives us a lot of free cash flow flexibility, and it gives us the opportunity to be flexible with a lot of opportunities. Mindy, you want to add on to that, talk about the covenant?

Sure. With regard to the covenants, both of our bonds that we have outstanding carry a three times MAX leverage, which allows us to have unrestricted, restricted payments if we are below that, which affects, obviously, share repurchases and dividends. So as long as we stay within the three times range, and we have a lot of freeboard between where we are now and there to even touch that. We can do unrestricted share repurchases and dividends.

Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from Carla Casella of JP Morgan.

One question on the M&A front and related on the criteria. So I'm wondering if you had been seeing in turning down a lot of M&A opportunities in the past or if this will be a new exploration for you? And then also, any criteria you can give us to put our arms around the M&A process? Would you look at a either dollar outlay or leverage or multiple? Any kind of criteria you put around that?

Yes. So one thing we'll have to get use of saying is we don't comment on any specific transactions or ones in the past. But I've said publicly, we've looked at a lot of transactions. I'd say we're probably not in the deal flow on all of them because most of them would not have been attractive to us in the first place. But we have looked at a lot. We have the capabilities to analyze, do the due diligence if you think about how we dissect and look at our business, we absolutely have the horsepower to get inside and look at other businesses and be honest about where we see the opportunities and we have a great set of advisors that support us on a variety of initiatives to help on that front. So with respect to anything in the future, I think we've been pretty clear, right? I mean, our initial focus is can we complement the organic capability building efforts we are undertaking to get the highest possible returns out of our larger formats by acquiring that capability on the outside. Right? So that means they have the capability. It's distinctive; and the key thing you would see there is it should have the ability to port the capabilities in some of those platforms to our stores. And so in that case, it would be as much reverse synergies, but I couldn't help, but think that there would be other synergies associated with that from the benefits of our business is advantaged. And so that's the primary focal point as we sit here today. We do have target markets that we are focused on, that we are growing our NTI efforts in, etcetera. And those strategic markets could present opportunities as well. And as we look at just the normal type of synergies that we got, we could get from those, whether it's in the fuel supply chain and leveraging the proprietary capabilities we have there, whether it's our ability to optimize stores, which I think really is a distinctive capability and which is why lot of the stores out there that we have seen having EBITDA per store much lower than ours is that they're not fully optimized. And then, I think we have a superior supply contract from our scale. And so it's not that we couldn't get synergies out of some of the transactions that have taken place today. We'd want to make sure that we're getting a capability with them or it's a very strategic access to markets where we're already planning on growing anyway. So that gives you a sense of how we would look at it. We're not going to do M&A for M&A's sake and go out and acquire less than average assets at a premium.

Okay, great. And then just one clarification or a follow-up, I guess, on the food and beverage increased focus. It doesn't sound like to me like you're considering switching to a bigger format, but just wanted to hear that from you.

That is correct. We believe the 2,800 square format that we have can deliver very efficiently and effectively all the things our customers are looking for. I think there's a chasm you jump between that and a made order model, which requires 5,000, 6,000, 7,000 square feet, $5 million, $6 million, $7 million to build, two acres, etcetera. One of the best looking stores in our Building committee yesterday was on 610 of an acre. Quick trip, cheap wall all firms, we always admire couldn't build their format on less than two acres. We can still build our modular 2,800 square foot store there. The key for us is to come up with a distinctive offer for food, dispensed beverage, hot and cold, etcetera, that we're already putting the platforms in our stores and getting the most out of there. So yes, definitively, no, we're not looking to start building bigger stores. It's getting the most out of the high-return stores we've already got. And our view is that with those even higher returns that gives us the confidence to even further accelerate our organic growth in the future.

Okay, great. Thanks a lot.

There are no further questions at this time. I will now hand the call back to Andrew Clyde for closing remarks.

Great. Well, thanks, everyone, for joining today. I know we hit everyone with a lot, especially with our second announcement, but I think we've got some great questions today, and I hope the clarity and conviction behind our answers to the really good questions, gives you a clear sense of where we're going with our business. We're really excited as we're beginning 2020 in the rearview mirror; we have a lot of exciting things in front of us in 2021. Thank you all.

That concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.