Doug Neis
Analyst · Barrington Research. You may proceed with your question
Thanks, Josh, and welcome everybody to our fiscal 2019 third quarter conference call. As usual, you know, I need to begin by stating the plan and making a number of forward-looking statements on our call today. Forward-looking statements could include, but not be limited to statements about our future revenue and earnings expectations; our future RevPAR, occupancy rates and room rate expectations for hotels and resorts division; our expectations about the quality, quantity and audience appeal of film products expected to be made available to us in the future; expectations about the future trends in the business group and leisure travel industry and in our markets; our expectations and plans regarding growth and the number and type of our properties and facilities; our expectations regarding various non-operating line items on our earnings statement; and our expectations regarding future capital expenditures. Of course, our actual results could differ materially from those projected or suggested by our forward-looking statements. Factors, risks and uncertainties, which could impact our ability to achieve our expectations, are included in the Risk Factors section of our 10-K and 10-Q filings, which can be obtained from the SEC or the company. We'll also post our Regulation G disclosures when applicable on our website at www.marcuscorp.com. So with that behind us, let's talk about our fiscal 2019 third quarter and first three quarters. Overall, a very good quarter that's massed a little bit by an income benefit last year and by the comparisons related to our new hotel opening. Marcus Theaters reported record revenues and a healthy increase in operating income and on the hotel side without the non-recurring preopening expenses and anticipated initial startup losses related to the Saint Kate. We would have reported a nice increase in our operating results in that division as well. As is our usual practice, before we get to Greg's comments on the quarter, I'm going to take you through some of the detail behind the numbers both on a consolidated basis and for each division. Now there's not much to say about the line items below operating income. Investment income was down compared to last year, but was offset by another decrease in interest expense due to reduced borrowing levels. The changes in the other line items were minimal. So as a result with operating income flat due to Saint Kate and other income and expense slightly better than last year, we reported a small increase in pretax income this quarter. No income taxes on the other hand had a big swing that definitely impacted our comparisons and net earnings. Now to begin with, last year during the third quarter, we benefited from a nearly $0.75 million to $1 million onetime reduction in deferred tax liabilities related to a change in tax accounting method that was made last year. We also had a significant increase during last year's third quarter in tax benefits from excess share-based compensation. So when you put the two together, we had an extraordinarily low third quarter effective income tax rate last year. Year-to-date our first three quarters effective income tax rate, adjusted for losses from non-controlling interests is currently at 23.4% compared to 21.5% last year. We continue to anticipate that our effective income tax rate for the remaining quarter fiscal of 2019 will be in that 24% to 26% range, just like the third quarter was depending upon the amount of excess tax benefits, our share-based compensation and any other adjustments that we may recognize in the quarter. Now shifting gears away from the earning statement just for a second, our total cash capital expenditures during the first three quarters of fiscal 2019 totaled approximately $50 million compared to approximately $45 million last year. Now that 2019 number does not include the approximately $30 million cash component of our Movie Tavern acquisition. Approximately $22 million of our total spend during the first 2019 -- during the fiscal 2019 first three quarters was incurred in our theater division and related primarily to our continuing DreamLounger seating projects and premium large format conversions that we have referenced in our press release. The approximately $28 million of capital expenditures on our hotels and resorts division during the first three quarters were primarily related to the two major renovation projects at the Saint Kate and the Hilton Madison, plus various normal maintenance projects. So at the three quarters point of our fiscal year, it appears that we're likely to end the year with total capital expenditures for fiscal 2019 in the $60 million to $70 million range, again excluding the Movie Tavern cash consideration and recognizing that the timing of several of our planned expenditures are still just estimates at this time. The actual timing of the various projects currently underway or proposed will certainly impact our final capital expenditure number as well any currently unidentified projects or acquisitions that could develop during our fiscal year. So now I'd like to provide some financial comments on our operations for the third quarter and first three quarters and I'll start with the theater divisions. As you know, we completed our acquisition of the Movie Tavern theaters on February 1st of this year and thus throughout the year, we've in order to make our comparison to last year more meaningful, we've always been trying to distinguish how our comparable legacy theaters have performed versus the prior year in conjunction with these overall results. So, with that in mind, while our reported admission revenues increased 33.1% and our concession revenues increased 60.8% during the third quarter compared to last year, when you exclude Movie Tavern from the numbers, you'll find that our comparable admission and concession revenues increased 6.3% and 9.4% respectively. Now year-to-date, once again excluding the Movie Tavern theaters, our comparable admission and concession revenues have decreased 5.7% and 1.7% respectively, due of course to the industry's challenging first quarter. Now according to data received from Rentrak and compiled by us to evaluate our fiscal 2019 third quarter and first three quarters, United States box office received, excluding a handful of new builds for the top 10 circuits, increased 3% during the fiscal 2019 third quarter and decreased 6.2% for the first three quarters of our fiscal year. So as a result, we believe that our admission revenues for comparable theaters during the third quarter fiscal 2019 outperformed the industry averaged by 3.3 percentage points with our year-to-date now – results also now running ahead of last year by about 0.5 percentage points. Greg will address this outperformance, as well as the outperformance of our Movie Tavern theaters during his prepared remarks. Now, attendance at our comparable theaters was up slightly this quarter 0.2% compared to last year, but the vast majority of our increases in same-store admission and concession revenues were the result of increased per capita revenues. Our average admission price at our comparable theaters increased 6.2% during the third quarter and 2.8% now for the first three quarters of the year compared to the same period last year. Average admission price was favorably impacted by modest price increases taken at the beginning of the second quarter as well as a conversion to a sales tax additive or tax on top pricing model that was – is consistent with the majority of what our competitors do as well. We also continued to benefit from our increased number of PLF screens that include premium pricing. Conversely, our average admission price likely was negatively impacted from the fact that two of our top three films during the third quarter, The Lion King and Toy Story 4 were films that generally appealed to a younger audience, resulting in a higher percentage of lower-priced children's tickets sold. Last year, during the third quarter only one of our top 5 films Incredibles 2 was aimed at a younger audience. We're also pleased to report increase in our average concession food and beverage revenues per person at our comparable theaters of 9.3% for the third quarter, and 7.3% for the first three quarters of fiscal 2019. Our investments in non-traditional food and beverage outlets continue to contribute to higher per capita spending, and if you add Movie Tavern to the numbers, our average concession food and beverage revenues per person increased by nearly 32% this quarter. Our theater division operating margin declined during the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2019, compared to the same period as last year, due in large part to the inclusion of the Movie Tavern operating results. Our Movie Tavern theaters will have a lower operating margin than our legacy theaters due to the fact that all 22 acquired theaters are leased rather than owned and rent expense is generally significantly higher than depreciation expense. In addition, the fact that a larger portion of Movie Tavern revenues are derived from the sale of in-theater food and beverage, will also contribute to lower operating margins, as food and labor costs are generally higher for those items compared to traditional concession items. Of course, as you've heard us say before, we take dollars to the bank, not percentages. Lastly, our press release and attached table reconciling net earnings to adjusted net earning's highlight for you the significant impact and non-recurring acquisition and preopening expenses related to Movie Tavern had on our reported year-to-date results, approximately $2 million or $0.05 per share effect. There was minimal impact during the third quarter. Shifting to our hotels and resorts division, our reported results for both the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2019 were obviously impacted by the fact that we closed the Intercontinental Milwaukee hotel after the first week in January in order to begin a major renovation that transformed this hotel into Saint Kate – The Arts Hotel. We reopened the new hotel in early June, but even then a portion of the rooms and food and beverage outlets didn't really fully open until later in the month. And our pre-opening expenses, including a grand opening party and other non-recurring expenses, continued into our third quarter. As expected, we also incurred initial startup losses at this hotel during the third quarter as we compared a newly opened independent hotel to the results of a stabilized brands hotel the year before. As previously reported, we also were undergoing a major renovation of our Hilton Madison hotel during the first half of the year, which negatively impacted our reported results for the first three quarters from this division. Now on its face, we're reporting slightly decreased hotel revenues and decreased operating income in the third quarter and first 3 quarters of fiscal 2019 compared to last year's same period. But when you exclude the closed former Intercontinental now Saint Kate hotel and cost reimbursements, which have nothing to do with our owned hotels, if you exclude those from our results, you'll find that our comparable hotel revenues actually increased 1.7%, during the third quarter and 2.7% for the first three quarters of fiscal 2019. And our operating income – our operating income, increased by approximately $700,000 or 6.2% during the third quarter, and $1.75 million or 11.4% during the first three quarters of fiscal 2019, all compared to the prior year periods. These numbers are despite some negative impact that are Hilton Madison as well, which was due to the aforementioned renovation. As the table in our press release highlights non-recurring preopening expenses and initial startup losses at the Saint Kate negatively impacted our reported results by approximately $1.6 million or $0.04 per share during our fiscal 2019 third quarter and $5.5 million, or $0.13 per share during the first three quarters in the fiscal 2019 year. Now, when I refer to preopening expenses, I'm primarily talking about direct expenditures incurred in conjunction with the six-month closing and subsequent reopening of the hotel. When I refer to initial startup losses, I'm addressing the delta that has occurred as expected between the operating performance of this brand new independent hotel compared to a stabilized branded hotel last year. And Greg will expand on this a little bit more in his comments. The biggest contributor to our same-store increase in revenues were increased food and beverage revenues during our fiscal 2019 third quarter. Our total revenue per available room or RevPAR for our seven comparable own hotels, which excludes the Saint Kate, for the third quarter and the first three quarters increased 0.6% during the third quarter, and 0.9% during the first three quarters of the fiscal 2019, again compared to last year's same periods. But even those numbers are a little deceptive because as I mentioned, we also had one hotel, the Hilton Madison significantly impacted during the first half of the fiscal year due to a major renovation. When you strip that hotel out, our true comparable hotels actually reported an increase in RevPAR year-to-date of 2.8%. As we've noted in the past, our RevPAR performance did vary by market and type of property. According to data received from Smith Travel Research and compiled by us in order to compare our fiscal quarter results, comparable upscale hotels throughout the United States experienced an increase in RevPAR of 1.4% during the third quarter and 1% year-to-date. Meanwhile, competitive hotels in our collective markets experienced an increase in RevPAR of 3.2% in the third quarter and 3.6% in the first three quarters. So, thus year-to-date, our numbers essentially match the national numbers and the numbers -- and our numbers without the Hilton Madison are just slightly less than our competition. Given the amount of new supply in some of our markets, that's not necessarily surprising in the short run that we might lose a little bit of our generally over-indexed market share. In total, we still significantly over-indexed in our markets. Breaking out the numbers of all seven of our open hotels more specifically. Our fiscal 2019 third quarter overall RevPAR increase was due to a 1.2% increase in our average daily rate or ADR, partially offset by an overall occupancy rate decrease of 0.5 percentage points. Year-to-date, our fiscal 2019 first 3 quarters RevPAR increase was due entirely to a 1.6% increase in our ADR, partially offset by an overall occupancy rate decrease of 0.5 percentage points. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Greg.