Douglas Neis
Analyst · B. Riley
Thank you and welcome, everybody to our fiscal 2016 third quarter conference call. As usual, I’ll need to begin by stating that we plan on making a number of forward-looking statements on our call today. Our forward-looking statements could include, but not be limited to statements about our future revenue and earnings expectations; our future RevPAR, occupancy rates, and room rate expectations for our hotels and resorts division; our expectations about the quality, quantity, and audience appeal of film product expected to be made available to us in the future; our expectations about the future trends in the business group and leisure travel industry and in our markets; our expectations and plans regarding growth in the number and type of our properties and facilities; our expectations regarding various non-operating line items on our earnings statement; and our expectations regarding future capital expenditures. Of course, our actual results could differ materially from those projected or suggested by our forward-looking statements. Factors, risks, and uncertainties which could impact our ability to achieve our expectations are included in the risk factors section of our 10-K and 10-Q filings, which can be obtained from the SEC or the Company. We’ll also post all Regulation G disclosures when applicable on our website at www.marcuscorp.com. So, with that behind us, let’s talk about our fiscal 2016 third quarter and first three quarters. And as you can see it was another great quarter for us. Thanks to record performance from our theatre division. As been the case now for three years we once again outperform the industry and pretty significantly of that. Results from our hotels and resorts division were down slightly this quarter, but year-to-date we remain significantly ahead of last year and we're also performing in this division. Following our usual format for these calls, I am going to take you through some of the detail behind the numbers, both on a consolidated basis and for each division, and then turn the call over to Greg for his comments. So we'll start with interest expense, you'll notice it was down slightly compared to last year due to a lower average interest rate and a small decrease in total borrowings. But other than that there were no significant changes in the line items below operating income or effect of income tax rate. So we can skip that portion of my usual comments this quarter. Before I begin these division. I will briefly shift gears away from the earning statement for a moment tell you that our total capital expenditures during the first three quarters of fiscal 2016 totaled approximately $58 million compared to approximately $59 million last year. Now approximately $49 million of our total spend during fiscal 2016 first three quarters was incurred in our theatre division, the majority of which related to the completion of multiple DreamLounger seating projects, UltraScreen DLX screens, and new food and beverage outlets, as well as cost related to two new theatres and now under construction and the purchase and renovation of a closed theatre that now is open on the south side of Chicago. At this point our fiscal year we believe we're on pace for a total capital expenditures for fiscal 2016. The likely be in the $75 million to $80 million range. Borrowing any growth opportunities that could arise in the remaining months and recognizing that the timing of payments for several of our various projects could vary and carryover to fiscal 2017. The actual timing of various projects currently underway or proposed will certainly impact our final capital expenditure number, as well any currently unidentified projects or acquisitions that could develop during our fiscal year. So, now, I’d like to provide some financial comments on the operations for the third quarter and first three quarters, beginning with theatres. Our box office and concession revenues increased 19.8% and 16.3% respectively during the third quarter and our total revenues have now increased approximately 8% during the first three quarters of fiscal 2016. I want to remind you that while the periods we’re comparing in today’s release are both 13 and 39 weeks. Keep in mind that because 2015 was essentially a 53-week year for us, the weeks that we are comparing to do not match up on the calendar. More specifically, this year’s numbers include a 13-week period from July 1st through September 29, 2016 for the third quarter. And the 39-week period from January 1 through September 29 for the first three quarters. Using our last Thursday, December fiscal year-end, the numbers that we're comparing to cover the period from June 26, 2015 through September 24, 2015 for the third quarter and December 26, 2014 through September 29, 2015 for the first three quarters last year. And that means during the third quarter, we essentially traded a week in June last year for a week in September this year, which is not typically a favorable trade. And the calendar disconnect becomes even more significant when looking at the first three quarters numbers because as you know the week between Christmas and New Year’s is historically one of the busiest, if not the busiest weeks of the year for moviegoing. So the up nearly 8% year-to-date in revenues, when comparing to a period that includes the Christmas week last year was pretty impressive from where I said. Now as a result, there are really two ways to compare our third quarter and first three quarters results to the industry and I'll try to explain this as succinctly as I can because it can be confusing. We've established our weeks in both the third quarter and the first three quarters this year that we've already established there misaligned with comparing to last year. So when we compare our results to the industry. Our first option is to compare our changes in box office revenues for our misaligned weeks to the change in the national box office for those same misaligned weeks. When we do that based upon U.S. box office numbers compiled by us using data from rent track and national box office reporting service of the theatre industry, we find that the national box office increased by 9.3% during our third quarter and 1.9% during our first three quarters, meaning that we outperformed the industry by 10.5 percentage points during the third quarter and 6.2 percentage points during the first three quarters. We will probably interests you – most as how do we compare to the more comparable 13 and 39 weeks last year as that more closely matches, what you'll see reported from others in our industry. And they're the story only gets better. Again using ran track, we calculate that the U.S. box office increased 14.7% during the third quarter of calendar 2016. Meanwhile, adjusting our reported last year's numbers are removing that last week in June and adding the last week in September that I talked about, thus kind of fixing that misalignment if you will. We find that our third quarter box office revenues increased a significant 25.2% compared to the same weeks last year, which is once again 10.5 percentage points better than the U.S. average for the quarter. I've going through the same exercise the first three quarters of the year. We're now running 6.9 percentage points better than the U.S. average year-to-date. This means we have now outperformed the industry during the 11 of our last 12 reported interim periods or three years something we're very proud of. Going back to our reported comparisons, the third quarter increase in our box-office revenues is attributable to an increase in attendance at our comparable theatres of 14.7% an increase in our average admission price 4.2% for the third quarter. For the first three quarters of the year, our 8.1% increasing in box office, receives is attributable to a 3% increase in attendance and a 4.6% increase in our average ticket price. The fact that we’ve increased our number of premium large-format screens with a corresponding price premium, certainly contributed to our increased average ticket price during the fiscal 2016 period, as did a modest price increase taken back in January. Conversely, I’ll tell you that our growth in our average ticket price was tempered during the first three quarters of this year so far. By the fact that two of our three highest grossing films year-to-date were animated or family-orient films, compared to none of our top three last year year-to-date, meaning that we had a much higher percentage of our box office mix came from the lower price kids and matinee pricing. We’re also very pleased to report an increase in our average concessions, food and beverage revenues per person of 1.4% for the third quarter and 3.8% during the first three quarters, compared to the same period last year. Our investments in non-traditional food and beverage outlets continued to contribute to this outstanding performance, but once again I’ve been tempered this year, but a change in film product mix, as animated and family pictures tend to not draw as many people to our non-traditional food and beverage outlets, compared to more adult oriented films. Finally, I'll also note that other revenues for our theatre division increased 28% during our third quarter and then increased nearly 13% year-to-date with increases from Internet surcharge ticketing fees and pre-show advertising income contributing to a strong performance. I also want to point out that our agreement with our current advertising provider Screenvision includes a provision for a one-time incentive payment if a defined cumulative attendance milestone is reached within the fine time period. Now based upon our current projections, we believe we'll reach this milestone during our fiscal 2016 fourth quarter. As a result, I'm very pleased to tell you that our operating results during the fourth quarter fiscal 2016 are expected to benefit from the significant one-time payment which is currently forecast to be approximately $3 million or could even be slightly higher. Shifting to our hotels and resorts division. If you do the math, you'll see that our overall hotel revenues were down 3.4% for the third quarter and down 1.6% for the first three quarters, but if you eliminate the hotel we sold in October 2015, the Hotel Phillips from last year’s results and the SafeHouse restaurant that we purchased last June from both years. You will find that same property revenues were actually up 0.3% and 2.1% respectively compared to last year’s third quarter and first three quarters. Now, as noted in our press release, our total RevPAR for eight comparable properties increased 2.7% during the fiscal 2016 third quarter, compared to the comparable period last year, and 4.6% for the first three quarters of fiscal 2016 compared to last year. As we’ve noted in the past, our RevPAR performance did vary by market and type of property. According to data received from Smith Travel Research and compiled by us in order to compare our fiscal quarter results, comparable upper-upscale hotels throughout the United States experienced an increase in RevPAR of 2.3% during our fiscal 2016 third quarter and competitive hotels in our collective markets experienced an increase in RevPAR of only 1.7% during our fiscal 2016 third quarter. Year-to-date, Smith Travel Research date indicates that upper-upscale hotels have experienced an increase in RevPAR of 2.4% and competitive hotels in our collective markets have experienced an increase in RevPAR of 2.5%. Thus, you can see that we outperformed in this division as well during both the quarter and first three quarters. Breaking our numbers out a little more specifically, our fiscal 2016 third quarter overall RevPAR increase was due entirely to a 2.6% increase in our average daily rate. Our overall occupancy rate was virtually unchanged. Year-to-date, our occupancy rate has increased 1.4 percentage points and our average daily rate has increased 2.7%. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Greg.