Thank you for standing by. This is the Chorus Call Conference operator. Welcome to the IAMGOLD First Quarter 2020 Operating and Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions]. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Indi Gopinathan, Vice President Investor Relations and Corporate Communications for IAMGOLD. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much, Ariel. And welcome everyone to the IAMGOLD first quarter 2020 conference call. Joining me today on the call are Gord Stothart, President and Chief Executive Officer; Carol Banducci, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Bruno Lemelin, Senior Vice President, Operations and Projects; Craig MacDougall, Senior Vice President, Exploration; and Jeff Snow, Senior Vice President, Business Development and General Counsel. Our remarks on this call will include forward looking statements. Please refer to the cautionary language regarding forward looking information in our disclosure document and be advised that the same cautionary language applies to our remarks during the call. The slides referenced on this call can be viewed on our website. I will now turn the call over to our President and CEO, Gord Stothart.

Well, thank you, Indi. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I hope everyone is safe and healthy and managing through their own little private Groundhog Day experience. Anyways, so last night we issued our first quarter 2020 results, which demonstrate our leverage, the gold price, and strong operating cash flows. Before we get into the discussion of the quarter, I wanted to touch on the current environment and how our company is situated. In this uncertain environment caused by the global COVID-19 crisis, IAMGOLD is fortunate to be operating from a position of strength. We have a strong balance sheet to withstand operational and/or market disruptions. We have operations in diverse jurisdictions, which in turn diversifies our risk of exposure to the current crisis. Our team has enacted an effective multi-level crisis management process very early on in the outbreak, which has enabled timely implementation of strict protocols and a quick and agile response to a fluid situation. IAMGOLD has a deep bench strength across the organization at both the operations and corporate level to support the business and we have been successful in taking a collaborative approach to government and community relations. Despite the challenges of the current situation, we have continued to move the business forward as evidenced by the completion of the Saramacca UJV agreement with the Surinamese state-owned petroleum company Staatsolie that we announced a couple of weeks ago. Bruno will provide some additional details a little later, but I'd like to say that Staatsolie represents a solid partner for Rosebel given their experience as a partner with Newmont over the past several years on the Merian mine in Suriname. So our strengths have enabled us to respond in a timely and effective manner to the global COVID-19 crisis, once again reflecting our…

Thank you, Gord. The company saw strong gold margins in the quarter resulting in strong operating cash flows, although Rosebel and Essakane were impacted by lower sales volumes in the quarter compared to the same prior year period. Earnings were impacted by embedded derivatives related to the Rosebel power purchase agreement and our senior notes. We have continued to prudently manage our balance sheet with cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and restricted cash totaling $829.8 million at March 31. We also amended our credit facility extending the maturity of $447 million of credit to January 31, 2024. As we all know, COVID-19 has impacted mine operations globally and we are no exception. However, in this time of uncertainty we also see opportunity and were able to execute a number of currency and fuel hedges at levels that compare very favorably to our internal planning rates. Earlier Gord laid out our revised production and cost guidance for 2020. I'll note here that we expect depreciation expense in 2020 to be in the range of $250 million to $260 million, down $10 million from the previous guidance. Guidance for cash taxes remains the same at $30 million to $45 million. Revenues in Q1 were $274.5 million on strong gold prices while cost of sales were lower compared to the same prior year period and the prior quarter. The adjusted net loss for the quarter was $4.9 million or $0.01 per share. Net cash from operating activities before changes in working capital totaled $72.8 million. As I noted earlier, we are prudently managing our balance sheet in these uncertain times. We have a total liquidity position excluding restricted cash and including our current $5 million credit facility of $1.3 billion. Our $400 million in senior notes are not due until 2025. This next slide highlights the strength of our financial position relative to our peer group. And as you can see, we are in a net cash position with peer-leading liquidity. I will now pass along the call over to Bruno to discuss operations.

Thank you, Carol. We are committed to the health and safety of our employees. The first quarter of 2020, we were slightly above our target. As noted with a DART rate, which stands for days away, restricted or transfer duty of 0.65. We work every day to meet or exceed our safety goals, implementing and refreshing a number of initiatives to ensure a safer work environment including a comprehensive behavior-based safety program. Slide 20. This slide summarizes our results for the quarter with total consolidated attributable production of 170,000 ounces. Cost of sales of $1,064 per ounce sold, total cash cost of $993 an ounce produced. All-in sustained costs were $1,230 per ounce sold for the first quarter. I will now review each operation in turn. At Essakane, attributable gold production for the first quarter 2020 was 84,000 ounces. The key factor negatively impacting production was lower tonnes mined than planned due to lower utilization rate and sequencing. Sales volumes were lower for the quarter as noted earlier. All-in sustaining costs were $1,054 for the quarter, largely impacted by the lower than trend volumes. In response to COVID-19 Essakane was moved to island mode with quarantine processes in place for personnel moving in and out of the site. In 2020, our focus is on mill optimization at Essakane, which targets improvements in throughput about 10% as well as recovery improvements. Completion of this work is slightly delayed and we expect this to be completed late this year. It is a high waste stripping year for Essakane with about $65 million in non-sustaining capital plan for push backs. In addition, on the exploration front drilling at Tassiri is complete and we are comparing these results to assess resource potential. As Gord mentioned, we have a number of measures in place to…

Thank you, Bruno. And good morning everyone. Before I begin, please note that the results I talked about today have been previously disclosed in accordance with securities regulations and signed off by the qualified persons within the company reporting them. In 2020, our planned exploration spend is $52 million excluding project development activities and studies, which represents an increase of $5 million from our prior guidance in order to support additional resource development drilling at Rosebel. Our 2020 resource development and exploration program includes approximately 190,000 to 210,000 meters of diamond and reverse circulation drilling. Let's begin with this chart, which shows the compilation of the industry reserve base among some of our peers. As you can see, industry reserves have been on a steady decline since 2012 while IAMGOLD has been working hard to differentiate ourselves from this industry trend generating 48% percent increase in reserves over that time. In 2016, we have added some 8.9 million ounces, more than doubling the ounces in our reserve base. This is the result of a sustained commitment to exploration and the hard work of our exploration and mine geology teams. We believe this is a significant competitive advantage for IAMGOLD in our future. Now onto a few highlights for the quarter. During the quarter at Nelligan, we completed approximately 5,000 meters of diamond drilling designed to infill and further test continuity of mineralization associated with the Renard zone. As you will remember, we announced the maiden mineral resource estimate for the Nelligan gold project in the fourth quarter of 2019 with resources on 100% basis totaling 3.2 million ounces in an inferred category at a grade of 1.02 grams per tonne gold. At the nearby Monster Lake project located 15 kilometers south of the Nelligan gold project, we have completed approximately…

Well, thanks, Craig. I want to take a moment to truly thank our team around the organization who have exhibited an outstanding professionalism while dealing with this unprecedented situation brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe that IAMGOLD has an exciting future with a great foundation of existing operations, superior balance sheet, and one of the best growth portfolios of development assets and exploration projects in the industry. All of this is underpinned by a savvy experienced team of technical, operational, and financial professionals. We remain focused on improving our cash flow outlook while safely executing on or better than plan. Our goal over the next few months is to provide clarity regarding our company growth strategy and we look forward to speaking with you again at that time. Thank you for joining us.

We will now begin the question and answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Fahad Tariq of Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Can you give a bit more color on the 2020 cost guidance? I'm just trying to reconcile production guidance was revised down just a little bit 2%, but costs went up quite a bit more 8% or 9%. And two out of the three mines weren't really shut down for COVID-19. I can appreciate there is some additional protocols in place, but I'm just trying to figure out how much of this is kind of COVID-related to cost escalation, how much of it is maybe something else whether it's mine sequencing or something else. Just any color on that would be would be helpful. Thanks.

Yeah. I'd go ahead, Tariq. So there's a couple things at work. As you correctly point out the guidance has changed in terms of production so we are producing fewer ounces than we had originally booked into our analysis. On the cost guidance we are seeing some direct COVID-related costs and some indirect COVID-related costs. As you point out, both the changes in the productivity is due to do the protocols some outright additional costs as we've had to change some of our housing facilities and our housing of employees like. We're not bringing in employees on a daily basis from a few of the sites. We have seen some additional costs due to hedge reconciliation with the lower oil price so that that is added to the costs and as well our initial budget numbers were done at 1,350 gold price. So we're seeing significant increases up to -- I think it's around $15 an ounce going forward looking at royalty costs, which are also embedded in the cash cost. There is some re-sequencing and we have -- while Essakane and Rosebel continue to produce through the full period we have seen some adjustments and we are -- we have at both sites been putting more stockpile material in when we have some productivity or manpower adjustments to the mining rate. As we look forward, that impact is really going to mostly fall in Q2 and we feel we'll be recovering a lot of that in the second half of the year. Carol, would you add anything else?

No, I think that's a good summary again having to draw on stockpiles certainly impacted the costs. And as you pointed out, just the productivity levels were impacted at the two sites more specifically Essakane and Rosebel due to different protocols and measures that we took with social distancing and of course we went into care and maintenance with Westwood. So I think you summed it up pretty well for us.

Our next question comes from Josh Wilson of RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

You might be on mute, Josh.

Oh, sorry about that. The first question relates to the Sadiola. When should we expect closing for that transaction and what ultimately is pending here for approval?

Actually, I'm going to turn that call over to Jeff Snow who's on the call.

Sorry, Josh. You kind of -- can you repeat the question?

Yes, sorry. For Sadiola what remains pending for the approval here of the sale and when should we expect closing?

We're scheduling closing for end of May. And the only things remaining really are the government to sign off on the documentation. All has been agreed, but it takes a while to work its way up to the various levels in the government in terms of obtaining signatures. But we're scheduling in the end of May for the finalization of the deal.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

You're welcome.

And then with regards to 2021 guidance, Gord, the existing numbers were maintained but they are noted as being under review. What do you consider to be the big factors here that could change the forecasts for next year?

Really the only -- well, I guess, the two biggest factors that we're reviewing right now is as we're working with our forecast not only through the end of this year, but through the end of 2021. It's just understanding if any sequencing changes arising from changes to this year's plan impact next year's plan and also, of course just reviewing the costs and trying to understand productivity levels and being prudent around how long the current protocols will have to be kept in place going forward and what if any impacts that will have. As of right now, we don't see any specific impacts on 2021, we just felt it was prudent to complete our reviews and be transparent with the market that, in fact, we are having a good hard look at that to understand where 2021 might go.

Got it. And then last question on Côté with, I guess, 60% of the detailed engineering now complete, are there any sort of indications of directionally how the project is looking versus what expectations were beforehand?

I mean certainly there are some changes to the timing of what the schedule looks like versus where we've looked at that earlier. The current situation has forced us to go back and revisit timing. On a cost basis, we have seen on a total basis slightly a little bit of cost up just more from holding costs over the last while, however, going forward we do see some real opportunities to maybe recoup some of those. And the go-forward cost is really not materially different from anything we've said previously. We can execute on this project pretty well within the budget. One nice thing about advancing the engineering is it's really narrowed the goalposts on what the size of the capital knot will be. We have a lot of -- or not a lot, but we have a number of bids in in-hand already that help us understand rather than an engineering estimate what a real life estimate of those costs will be, so we're adjusting our plans accordingly. And the other piece that we're looking at in our favor over the next little while is our opportunity to, perhaps, do some hedge work on the Canadian dollar exchange rate and on the fuel price through the construction period as our estimates to date have all been done at a CAD1.30 Canadian exchange rate and I think $65 or $70 oil price. So we can maybe lock in some nice benefits on that side if and when we choose to move forward with the Côté and those will be pretty substantial. I mean the Canadian dollar exposure to the capital cost is around 80% to 85% of the capital cost. So CAD1.41 Canadian dollar is hugely beneficial to us in U.S. dollar terms.

Okay, great. And when should we expect an update either on the projects or the strategic review?

We're just going through that analysis now, we had our board meeting yesterday and we're discussing the timing. I am hoping certainly by the middle of the year we'll be able to come out with a really clear message as to how we're going to proceed.

Our next question comes from Tanya Jakusconek of Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everybody. Just wanted to come back, Gord, to just some these costs that have gone up higher than we had expected for 2020 and I'm trying to just understand. And thank you for some of the clarity on the COVID cost. But of the 8%, 9% increase that you put out in overall estimate, I mean are those half related to COVID? I'm just trying to get an understanding.

%:

And just for us to understand going forward because -- and maybe just share with us the productivity. I mean how much have you seen in productivity loss?

%: When we're looking at our forecast going out we see that ongoing for Q2, and we also see that as we get into the second half of the year through some improvements so through some adjustments, we expect to clog most of that back and we'll be operating pretty close to full productivities in the second half of the year. %: When we're looking at our forecast going out we see that ongoing for Q2, and we also see that as we get into the second half of the year through some improvements so through some adjustments, we expect to clog most of that back and we'll be operating pretty close to full productivities in the second half of the year.

Okay. So then looking forward, there's going to be some -- going back to full productivity let's say the second half, but there's going to be some incurred costs from this COVID-19 that you're still trying to quantify that you think going to be embedded in the cost structure going forward?

Yes. For a while, for a while.

Okay.

0:00:01 cost:

0:00:22:

No, no. It's much more of the COVID impact. The throughput expansion was only scheduled to come into effect for us for Q4. So really the impact is more on the sequencing as Bruno alluded to and the use of stockpiles in the first half of the year. And -- yes. I'll leave it at that.

So it's just the Q2 impact and then we're back to normal capacity in Q3, Q4?

Well, we're back to current capacity, but we won't see the completion of the de-bottlenecking for Q4 that we have to that.

Okay. That's helpful. Yeah. Okay. And then just my last question, I'll pass it on to someone else. Maybe someone can just give us some insights on this new Government FX Regulation at Suriname?

Yes. I could speak to it. So this new currency law was brought forward in Suriname about five weeks ago now and I'm not sure of the exact timing. We obviously studied the issue very, very closely. What I can say is that civil society both from the general populace standpoint as well as the business community has pushed back very, very aggressively with the government. So even though the law was passed, they haven't enacted, they haven't started enacting any of the main provisions that were in that law. Our position -- and we validated that with external counsel and internal counsel and with the government, is that our mineral agreement stands, carries precedence over this revised law because of embedded stability agreements. And the mineral agreement was actually very thorough and quite explicit as to what our own currency options are and what we are allowed to do. And we could -- they're the same things we've always done and we have clarified with the government that we expect the same going forward and haven't received any pushback.

Our next question comes from Anita Soni of CIBC. Please go ahead.

Hi. Most of my questions have been asked. But could you just let me know this surface deposit that you're -- I assume is the service deposit, the low grade deposits that you -- I think the 109k tonnes that went into the mill of Westwood? Is that something that we should be modeling going forward for the remainder of the year? Is that more just a localized issue due to COVID?

Bruno, do you want to speak a little bit to Grand Duke and what the plan is for that and what they'll see in the 43-101?

Yes, Gord, [indiscernible] so the [indiscernible] pit is going to be a very small deposit to complement the ore production for Westwood for this year only. So in terms of modeling it's very limited. And the goal or the task that we have, our plan is to ensure that Westwood stand on its own merit and for the underground operations. So as per the press release in December, aiming at having a nice ramp up over the next three, four years of about 120,000 ounce for Westwood. So I think it's just a nice approximate feedback we are now capturing considering the gold price environment.

And it was --

And that --

I just saw -- Anita, I would also add that if the Grand Duke was in our original guidance for 2020 and 2021, we're actually -- as we're getting in and mining and seeing maybe a little bit more opportunity, but we're just evaluating that right now. I mean you will see Grand Duke numbers in the 43-101 that's released at mid-year. It's a small opportunity, but we had the spare capacity in the mill, so we're exploiting it.

Okay. And then just in terms of the cost associated with that, obviously it's not as -- it's not cost link for those ounces as the underground. Can you just give us an idea of how we see modeling on that until the mining cost per tonne?

Bruno, do you have the mining cost per tonne?

eliminate:

This concludes time allocated for questions on today's call. I will now hand the call back over to Indi Gopinathan for any closing remarks.

Thank you very much, Ariel. And thanks to everyone for joining us this morning and for your continued interest in IAMGOLD. We look forward to having you join us again for our second quarter 2020 conference call in August. Stay safe everyone. And goodbye.

This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thanks for participating. And have a pleasant day.