Thank you, Andre. Good afternoon everyone. Now I will talk about the performance of each one of the business operations in the first quarter of 2016 and afterwards giving some details about the consolidated results. Starting with Brazil, the uncertainties in the environment have been causing a lower level of demand affecting the performance of our businesses when compared to the first quarter of 2015. In relation to the first quarter 2015, shipments in the domestic market had an increase due to the seasonality of the periods of comparison. Exports went down in the first quarter of 2016 in relation to the fourth quarter of 2015 due to the channeling of shipments to the domestic market. Looking at the EBITDA for the first quarter of 2016, the absolute value increased by 33% in relation to the fourth quarter of 2015, due to the better market mix and the lower cost with production stoppages. With that EBITDA margin went from 6.9% in fourth quarter of 2015 to 9.2% in the first quarter of 2016. In North America, the economic environment continues to be positive, due to the gradual improvement in the non-residential construction sector, driving an increase in sales of 2.4% when compared to the first quarter of 2016 to 2015 and there are signs of recovery also in other sectors. EBITDA of the first quarter of 2016 reached R$355 million as compared to R$254 million in the first quarter of 2015, a 40% increase. This improvement was due mainly to the effect of the exchange rate variation in the period together with a better EBITDA margin 6.6% in the first quarter of 2015 going to 8.3% in the first quarter of 2016 due to the lower cost per ton showed and the lower operating expenses in U.S. dollars. With relation to the fourth quarter of 2015, a slight drop in the EBITDA margin was due to the one-off effect of the lower metals spread in the first quarter of 2016, as the transfer of the increase in the scrap costs to the steel cost will be felt as of the second quarter of 2016. South America, shipment in the first quarter had a drop of 6.5% on an year-on-year basis with different behaviors in countries where we operate. At the same time, optimization of operating cost, mainly in the Argentina, Colombia, and Peru units besides the lower scrap costs drove an increase in EBITDA margin that went from 9.6% in the first quarter 2015 to 14.8% in the first quarter of 2016, the better margin EBITDA operation since 2010, the benchmark. In special steel shipment in 2016 first quarter dropped by 9% vis-a-vis the first quarter of 2015 due to the slump in the demand from the automotive sector in Brazil. In relation to the fourth quarter of 2015 the increase in shipments occurred due to the good demand from the automotive sector in North America. The EBITDA reduction in special steel operations in the first quarter on a year-on-year basis occurred due to the lower dilution of fixed costs and lower profitability in the Brazil and U.S. units. Although this country continues to have good demand from the automotive sector, the challenges faced in the oil and gas sector affected the profitability of these units. On the other hand the other unit had an improvement in the profitability when compared on a year-on-year basis. As a consequence of this drop EBITDA margin went down from 11.6% in the first quarter 2015 to 8% in the first quarter of 2016. On a quarter-on-quarter comparison exception made to Brazil margins improved in all other geographies. And the EBITDA margin went to 8% in the specialty steel area. Slide number 7, talking about the consolidated results adjusted EBITDA reached R$930 million in the first quarter of 2016 with a drop of 16% on a year-on-year basis. Also look at the bridge chart on the upper part of the slide, we see that the reduction of the adjusted EBITDA occurred due to the drop in the volume shipped, partially offset by a higher net sales per ton and the overall cost of shipment. On the middle part of the slide, you can see that we went from a net income of R$267 million in the first quarter 2015 to R$14 million in the first quarter of 2016 due to the lower EBITDA and a higher depreciation when compared to the – when we compare the variations of these periods. It's important to stretch the positive evolution of the EBITDA in relation in the first quarter in relation to the fourth quarter of 2015 in absolute terms R$930 million vis-a-vis R$911 million and then margin 9.2% vis-a-vis 8.7% in the fourth quarter of 2015. Now slide number 8, indebtedness. The gross debt on March 31, 2016 was R$23.7 billion, 11% lower in relation to December 2015, due to the exchange rate variation in the period and the amortizations made over the first quarter of 2016. The average weighted cost of debt was 7.1% a year with the average amortization term of 6.3 years. On March 31, 2016, only 10% of the gross debt was short term represented most of them by working capital lines. I would like to mention that in relation to the maturity of R$4 billion for 2017, the cash availability and credit lines of the Company are more than enough to honor these commitments and most of them mature only in October of 2017. Besides, the Company has the alternative of refinancing part of this debt. We would like to mention that as most of the EBITDA in the last 12 months was generated by business operations abroad, mainly in U.S. dollars, and that more than 80% of the consolidated net debt of 31 March, 2016 is also denominated in U.S. dollars, the net debt/EBITDA indicators calculated in this currency presented a result of four times. Short term in the last two years that focus on free cash generation of the Company points to a reduction in this indicator over the year. Slide number 9, working capital and the positive evolution of this indicator over the last few quarters. In March, 2016, the cash conversion cycle continued to drop in relation to December 2015 due to the 4.5% drop in the working capital compared to a drop of 3.5% in net sales. I would like to mention the 18-day reduction in the cash conversion cycle from March 2015 to 2016 resulted from the strong inventory management of the Company and this is the shortest conversion cycle that was delivered since the fourth quarter of 2013. Slide number 10, free cash generation, as we can see on the upper part of the slide, the EBITDA was enough to honor our CapEx commitment in context that interest and increase in working capital resulting into a free cash – positive free cash flow generation and the CapEx reduction over the year especially in the second half and the additional efforts in the optimization of working capital will be important part in the generation of free cash flow in 2016. Now I would like to give the floor back to Andre.