Yes, thank you. So we do have a few questions that were previously submitted as was mentioned. Number one, I'd like to address is, why is the share price so low in maintenance terms despite nothing but positive news. So the answer to that is simply to say that we can't intelligently speak about why the collective investment community has not recognized the value that we see in the company, but there are certainly non-company specific items that impact our share price, now least of which is the massive sell off and decline in all cannabis stocks over the last nine months. That accounts I think for quite a bit of the decline in our stock price. There may be other factors in terms of investibilty of the exchange [indiscernible] and other things, but we'll work on improving and increasing the share price over the next 12 months. Number two, why do insiders keep selling even when the price is [indiscernible] share. And it is simply this, we have a 10b5 program which is a stock sale program that we do not control, so we are making sure that we are staying away from any issue with the SEC in the firm quite a long time ago. And in reality we certainly buy some of these plans are much less on average than 3% right around about say 2%. In addition, the CFO and myself Scott Ogur and myself had well over 97% of the shares that we started with over five years ago. so there is no question that we do not believe in the firm or trying to profit or trying to hurt the firm and selling indiscriminately. So again the 10b5 program is not controlled by us individually and we do that to make sure that we don’t run foul of any rules, so that's that in a nutshell. The next question is, do you foresee the epidemic affecting your growth trajectory? So in the long term we don’t, but again we don’t want to be in the business of prognostication especially about something like COVID-19. So we do think there will be some short-term impact. What they'll be, it will lead a way. In fact, we've seen retail cannabis sales go up, so that would mean that a lot of our retail clients in any case meaning retailers as opposed to growers should be doing better. But we don’t know what this will mean over the long-term should federal shutdowns change and what is determined in essential and nonessential business. Should that change, that might also impact us. So over the long term we think we are still in a strong growth trajectory over the short term we'd rather not try and forecast. I have already mentioned the next question which has coronavirus affected your client base? It is essentially drive sales up, both in terms of the number of people going to retailers as well as the average purchase amounts. So that seems to be a short term ruse, but we'll see. The next question is, how have personnel changes affected growth? And my answer to that is largely in the positive. We've had a very good sort of upgrade in personnel in key roles and it is really driving performance at the firm and I think later in the year there will be some metrics coming out showing what our revenue per employee is and that's on a very, very good trend line. Do we have any callers on the line? All right, so if we don’t have any callers on the line, I'll address a couple other issues that – a couple of other questions that came in from before. So one is the addition of Vicente Fox to the Board. So Mr. Fox has agreed to be on our Board, but we haven’t empanelled him as yet because Mexico's cannabis program has slowed down significantly and we don't want to essentially get ahead of the curve by focusing a lot time and resources in Mexico when it's not quite ready for market development. So when that changes, we will make the appropriate entitlements. So there is that. And then the next question is, you said in the last earnings call that the market really hasn’t caught up with the full value proposition in our view, in spite of that, in the stock market and your direct competitor KERN, Akerna is at a $64 million market capital, Helix is at a $12 million market cap. Does company management believe that it is a peer of KERN and it should be valued in the same range? The short answer is yes and it is a very simple comparison. If you look at our revenues as of this report, we have 25% higher revenues and we burn approximately $200,000 a month as of this reporting. Akerna's apples-to-apples comparison would be again 25% less revenue and burning more than $1 million a month. In addition, if you look at our cash flow from operations trend line, I think it shows a very strong story and I expect it to continue. So that alone is a very straightforward comparison that we are in fact peer competitors in the industry. So there is that question. Anything else, is there anything on the line now?