So, thank you, Dave for your question. This is Zach Venegas, the CEO. So, there's a couple of points I'll make right off the bat, and one is your totals are incorrect. That's one. And the second point is, simply over the five years since Scott and I have founded the Company, we retained more than 98% of our total shareholding. So, that has nothing to do with where the share price is right now. And so, there's been a 10b5 program in place for very small shares of insiders over time, but nothing in the magnitude that you've been talking about, that you just mentioned. You're miscounting the amount of shares that are getting done, because you're not reading the reporting -- the reports correctly. But, in any case, what I'll say is that miniscule amount of shares compared to the total overhang of millions of shares are coming from non-insiders over the last 7 months is the main driver in our view of the stock prices decline. So, that's the answer to that. It's saying a couple of hundred thousand or shares over five years is driving the stock price down is absurd. So, that's the answer to that question. And so, I'll -- with that I'll answer the next question in the queue, which is, what our long-term plans for data? And are the revenue streams outside of the business intelligence tool? So, the answer to that is absolutely, we're currently in fairly advanced discussions with a number of different third-party data aggregators and utilizers us to drive increased levels of usage and revenue for the product. What we want to see is obviously where the greatest bang for the buck, so to speak is, for the data product beyond the business intelligence. And as we mentioned, we also are begin to focus on revenue driving data tools for our underlying tools for our clients. And then, I have one other one that was written in here. And that's around liquidity and the convert. So, it essentially is -- the question is when -- why did we take converts that are now resulting in low stock price sales? And when will we focus on improving our liquidity position? And the answer to that is simply, sort of in the hindsight mode, it looks like the converts that we did are at a low price, but at the time, the market was even tighter than for capital than it is now. And we didn't want to make any substantial sales of equity at a very low or very tight price. And so, we did just the bare minimum to keep operations going, so we can continue to do the turnaround and produce the results that we just produced over the last two quarters. And we're already seeing substantially improved offerings of finance that we hope to report positively on in the Q2 call. And then, in terms of liquidity, again, since we're not burning much cash, we're not in a position that others are where they have to raise massive amounts of money to stay alive. That's not our position. We have a strong operating business with strong operating leverage and our business model isn't fundraising. So, we're comfortable where we are, and we'll continue to improve the liquidity position as we move towards profitability. Is there another phone question?