Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Equinox Gold Fourth Quarter 2023 Results and Corporate Update. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the conference over to Rhylin Bailie, Vice President, Investor Relations for Equinox Gold. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Ashia, and thank you, everybody, for joining us this morning. We will, of course, be making a number of forward-looking statements today. So please do visit our continuous disclosure documents on our website on SEDARPLUS and EDGAR. I will now turn the call over our CEO and President, Greg Smith.

Thanks, Rhylin, and good morning, and thanks for joining the call today. On the line with me is our COO, Doug Reddy, our CFO, Peter Hardie; our EVP of Exploration, Scott Heffernan and of course, our VP of Investor Relations, Rhylin Bailie. Again, today, we are discussing Equinox Gold's 2023 fourth quarter and full year financial and operating results. For those of you that are new to the company, Equinox Gold is a fast-growing America's focused gold producer. We've got seven producing mines across Brazil, Mexico and the United States. We also have several growth projects including our large-scale Greenstone gold mine in Ontario that we're bringing into production this year with our 40% joint venture partner Orion Mine Finance. Our production is supported by a large gold endowment including 17 million ounces in reserves and an additional 16 million ounces in measured and indicated resources. I'll just start with a broad overview and then I'll turn the call over to Pete and Doug for more details. We had a strong finish to the year with fourth quarter production of approximately 155,000 ounces, that's the second highest quarterly production in the company's history. Cash cost per ounce sold in the furth quarter was $1330, our lowest quarterly cash costs this year with all in sustaining cost per ounce sold at $1657. For the full year, we achieved our production guidance with just over 564,000 ounces produced. We sold 559,000 ounces in the year, beating our guidance with cash cost of $1350 per ounce and achieving the low end of our all-in sustaining cost guidance at $1612 per ounce. Our safety performance this year was good. Four of our sites had no lost time incidents in 2023 and Greenstone completed over 5.9 million hours worked during construction with only one lost…

Thanks, Greg. We're now on slide 8 in the presentation. We had a good Q4 that saw improvements in most key financial metrics compared to Q3 this year and Q4 last year, including gold ounces sold, realized price per ounce, income from mine operations, EBITDA and operating cash flow before changes in non-cash working capital. As Greg mentioned, Equinox had its strongest quarter on record for gold production and sales. We sold 150,000 ounces of gold at a realized price of $1983 per ounce for revenues of $298 million. Income from mine operations was $39 million and that's an increase of $13 million from Q3's income from mine operations of $25 million and $16 million more than we did in Q4 2022. The increases in income from mine operations from prior quarters is primarily driven by the strong and higher gold prices we realized in Q4. We had $198 million in operating expenses in Q4, which is a decrease compared to the $201 million of operating expenses from Q3 of this year and an increase from Q4 2022's $168 million. The quarter-on-quarter decrease from Q3 is primarily driven by lower reagent consumption at Los Filos. Included in our Q4 results are NRV write downs of $3.7 million or just under $4 million at Castle Mountain and just under $2 million at Santa Luz. On a per unit basis, our Q4 cash cost per ounce of $1330 is the lowest quarter for the year and lower than our annual 2023 cash cost per ounce of $1350. Compared to Q4 2022, cash cost per ounce increased over $100 per ounce. The increase from Q4 last year is attributable to a few factors including increases in mining costs related to contract mining rate increases, that's mostly at Aurizona and Santa Luz of about…

Thanks, Keith. We are now on Slide 10 of the presentation. At the Mesquite mine, gold production was within guidance at 88,000 ounces and below all in sustaining guidance at $1251 per ounce for the year. The mine stacked a large tonnage of ore in both Q3 and Q4 and it took a while to bring all of that ore under leach. This gold inventory was being drawn down in Q4 and it will continue into 2024 with most of the gold production in the first half of the year coming from the ore that's already stacked. Tripping of the Ginger pit is now the main focus for mining. The majority of the ore from that pit will be coming online in 2025. Ginger was a new discovery in 2023 and it's quickly been incorporated into the overall mine plan. At Mesquite the company continues working on developing additional resources and permitting to extend the life of the mine. At Castle Mountain, gold production was below guidance at 21,000 ounces and was within all-in sustaining cost guidance at $1899 per ounce for the year. Phase 1 is a small operation and that involves mining and processing of low-grade mineralized dump material. This material needs to be removed from the old open pits in anticipation of mining higher grade in situ ore during the Phase 2 expansion. Crushing agglomeration modifications were completed in 2023 and the contractor also increased their throughput by about 46%. But we still didn't get to the level of crushed material being fed through the crush and agglomeration system that we wanted. So we'll continue to work on this and also on cost reductions in 2024. At Los Filos, gold production was below guidance at 159,000 ounces and over the all-in sustaining cost guidance at $1890 per…

Yes, thanks Doug. And yes, I'll just reiterate with Greenstone coming online in in 2024, this is going to be a very transformative year for Equinox Gold. As we progress through this year, we're going to be increasing our production in what we believe will be a macro environment of decreasing interest rates and increasing gold prices. Our production from Greenstone will significantly reduce our operating cost and meaningfully increase our cash flow as we ramp up production through the year. And with our capital cost at Greenstone also substantially decreasing here, Equinox Global transition to generating significant cash flow later this year. I'd just like to thank the entire Equinox team, the team at Greenstone as well for their efforts during 2023, and of course a sincere thanks to all of our stakeholders. And I think I'll conclude there and pass it back to Rhylin for Q&A.

Perfect. Ashia, can you please remind people how to ask a question?

[Operator Instructions].

Perfect. Thank you. While we wait for people to queue up, we'll take a couple of questions from online. Doug touched briefly on what's happening at Greenstone. What are the next milestones that you will need to achieve to achieve first gold pour?

Doug, you want me to start and you can jump in? Sure. So, I mean, we're getting in the real final stages here. As Doug mentioned, the crushing circuit has been hot commissioned. We've been running it intermittently, accumulating a crushed ore stockpile in the storage dome. HPGR, which is the high-pressure grinding roll, is ready to receive material. The mills are almost there. Ball mill 1 has been turned and load tested and ball mill 2 is shortly behind it. And the real push and the primary push at this stage to get into full hot commissioning is just programming and instrumentation in the circuit. And so, we've got a full team focused on that right now. And as we move through that, we can bring on each incremental part of the circuit online. And as soon as we can push material through the whole thing, we'll start that hot commissioning. So, getting close. And in terms of what we'll publicly announce between now and first gold pour, I'm not sure because it really is coming down to just getting the programming done and starting to push material through the circuit. Is that about it, Doug, or anything else to add?

That's really what it boils down to now. Most of the other things are minor. And once you're in the hot commission, you can work through any residual issues and tidy everything up.

Okay. We've got a few questions online from Kerry Smith, our analyst from Haywood Securities. First one is for Doug. What's the stockpile grade at Greenstone? And is it in line with your block model?

Well, first of all, deal with the second part, is it in line with the block model? We did a grade control drilling program was done and everything is pretty much matching against the grade of the block model. And then on the current stockpile average grade, I think we're about one gram overall, but that's not reflective of the bins. I mean we've been getting I'll say a positive reconciliation on tonnes and low-grade material that's outside of the block model. But it is the first few benches. So we are carefully monitoring it as we go along. There is some variation on topography as you have the interface between soil and initial rock. But so far it looks like it's bang on.

Perfect. Thanks. Kerry is also wondering what our preferred strategy and options are for retiring the April 2020 convertible notes?

Well, the preferred strategy is that it settles in the money and they convert and move from being note holders to shareholders. If that does not happen, either they don't convert or does not settle in the money, we have a fund set aside from the convert that we raised in September, which is currently parked against the revolving credit facility, and it's there to repay, move bottle should we need to.

Thank you. One more from Kerry. How are the discussions going with the three communities at Los Filos for the long-term life of mine agreement?

I'll be general, because this is really a discussion between us and the communities at the moment. We've had -- I met with them in November. We've had several meetings through December, January. We have a team that's engaged and addressing concerns both on the current CSR side, but a separate team that also is able to meet with them on an ongoing basis. Full on dialogue, we've kind of laid it all on the table as to the opportunities at the mine and we see it as an opportunity to establish the next stage of life for Los Filos and it's clear that change is necessary, so but it's a dialogue and so it's going to take a while.

Okay. Thank you. Ashia, can we please take some questions from the phone?

The next question comes from Wayne Lam with RBC. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning, guys. Just curious on the non-sustaining spend at Mesquite this year, it's quite high on that stripping for the Ginger pit. Just wondering what kind of additional mine life or ounces we should expect from that stripping program?

I'll just start, Wayne, and Doug, feel free to jump in. So, Ginger is a new discovery, brand new pit at Mesquite. And so what you're seeing in our non-sustaining CapEx this year is basically the stripping program we're undertaking to advance that pit toward commercial production. And Ginger will provide a substantial amount of the ounces in 2025. And what this does, this capital investment this year, it really sets up for a fairly meaningful increase in production in 2025 at Mesquite. And then beyond that, we're continuing to develop additional sources of ore and kind of what we say on every call here is we want to keep Mesquite going as long as we can. And happily, we've been able to continue to do that through the discovery of new resources at site. So, certainly, 2025 is looking good at Mesquite. That's the whole point of the investment we're making this year.

Okay. Is that in reserve though or are there any parameters that on how we might be able to think about it?

I mean it came in quickly. So essentially it was identified by exploration and put into a resource model and as we came through 2023, but it is at a reserve level and was able to be put into the mine plan at the tail end of the year. And then we -- yes it's definitely we'll continue to look at additional opportunities to try to expand beyond but it provides good production in 2025.

Okay, great. Thanks. And then maybe just at Greenstone, it seems like the total CapEx budget was effectively spent by year end. Just wondering on the $95 million in non-sustaining, is the majority -- just on timing of that, is the majority of that spend going to be complete in the first half before the first gold pour? And then just looking at the mine plan, there was about $77 million in sustaining CapEx budget in year one and just wondering what the delta is versus the $25 million guidance?

I'll handle the first part of your question, Wayne. The $95 million is spread fairly evenly throughout the year. We split that really, call it, $55 million construction related, $40 million other, call it, ancillary infrastructure that we need to do, but timing of which we're still reviewing, and not at all fundamental to the actual construction budget. Of the $55 million about half of that is contingency, so that would -- related to construction, that would be the first half of the year with the remainder effectively spread throughout the year.

And I guess the second part of your question there Wayne, I mean, I don't have the feasibility study in front of me. Obviously, it's several years out of date in terms of where we're at in the project now. But within our sustaining CapEx, it's primarily for work around additional drainage on the site. We also are going to be maintaining our camp. Originally, it was a construction camp. Now we're going to make it, we'll call it, semi-permanent camp. And so we're going to do some upgrades on that camp. We don't really need to do those yet. We could push that out to later in the year. And then there's some capital stripping in there as well.

Yes. There may be a calendar year versus year one difference, a model difference versus a calendar year difference. But Wayne, we can get back to you on run that to ground and get back to you on it.

Okay, no problem. Thanks for the detail. And then maybe just curious on the ATM, you guys have done the convert in September, which was kind of advanced to try to derisk the upcoming repayment. And just curious, it seems like the execution over the past few months has been pretty aggressive on that facility. And so just wondering if that if you guys expect to continue that program over the coming months or how we should think about the execution on that ATM?

Yes. I guess, just looking at the big picture here, we've been in two years -- more than two years in a Canadian dollar terms, a $1 billion build for the company, pretty meaningful build. And we financed that largely through debts, some prepays, cash flow from operations, and to a very minor extent, some equity through our ATM at the sub-10% at this stage. And so, the ATM has been a good tool for us and our shareholders, I think, just to manage our cash balances and our financial strength across what has been a pretty significant build. As we go into the later part of this year, Greenstone hits commercial production, we start to generate substantially more cash flow from operations and it becomes less probably less of a focus for the company. In the near term, we've got access to it as we go through the commissioning at Greenstone. I think it's a good tool to have available to the company. But whether or not we'll use it will depend on how we are seeing things shake out with our overall liquidity position as bring Greenstone into production.

The next question comes from Don DeMarco with National Bank Financial. Please go ahead. Thank you, operator and good morning team.

First question, can you speak to the trajectory of the ramp up over the year? Mean, you got 240,000 ounces obviously back end loaded, but maybe any additional color on how we should model this quarter over quarter would be appreciated.

Yes. So, it's staged ramp up, probably the best way to put it. We think that we will start pouring gold in Q2. The first phase of the ramp up will be to get to sort of 60% of capacity. Commercial production, and let's call that sometime in Q3, starts to look like 80% of capacity. And then by the end of the year, we should be at that 90%, 95% capacity as we move into sort of November December.

Okay. And in response to an earlier caller's question, you mentioned the stock upgrades maybe one gram per tonne. Should we expect that the grades in the first half during the ramp up to be lower than in the back half?

Yes. So the original plan was to have around 800,000 tonnes, 900,000 tonnes at around a 0. 9 gram per tonne. That was in our original model. We're sitting here now at a million north of a gram. We've got as Doug mentioned, we've got several bins and we've got certain bins that are very, very high grade and then we've got some positive variance in terms of tonnes where we've got some lower grade material as well. So of course, as we start the ramp up, we're going to be running much lower grade material initially through the crusher and mills. And as we dial in the processing circuit, increase our recoveries, we'll start to introduce that higher grade. And in the first five years of this mine, the grade is higher than the life of mine average. So, we'll be able to ramp up the grade profile pretty quickly this year.

Okay, great. Well, I'll certainly look forward to that. Costs are attractive for the guidance. But sticking with Greenstone, on the Greenstone CapEx, you mentioned you expect to finish the year on budget versus the $1.23 billion total CapEx. Now CapEx guidance included the $68 million in post construction costs. Can you provide some more color on these items, like for example, it had the new hydro substation and so on. And are these items considered separate from that initial development CapEx budget?

Sure, so as we get to the very end here, we've got some things that fall into sort of sustaining capital or post construction capital. There's a few items that we did not need to do during the build that we pushed out. The hydro station is one of those items. It's more of a timing of the open pit as to when we need to move it. So it was not something that had to be done during the construction period. As we said, by the end of 2023, construction of the mine, of the tailing facility, of the crushing circuit, milling, all the stuff needed to run the operation and all the material infrastructure was complete and we moved into commissioning. And over the course of 2024 and into 2025, we do have to do the hydro substation. There are some historic soils on the property that were contaminated from early mining and earlier industrial activity. We need to move those into the tailings facility. We're buying an additional generator, which is really for redundancy for the power plant. We've got fleet payments, which are related to leasing for the fleet, which are kind of even through the year. And I think I said earlier, some drainage and then the camp and then some capital stripping that comes in later this year as well. So nothing sort of significant in and of itself, just things that will clean up the overall site and things that we need to do, although the timing of when we need to do some of these things is such that we can push them off or wait until commercial production or even 2025.

Okay, understood. Thanks for that. Well, that's all for me. Good luck with the rest of the ramp up.

The next question comes from Anita Soni with CIBC.

Apologies if this has been asked, I just topped off the nuance call. But I was just wondering, when it comes to the guidance for the Hard Rock -- sorry the Greenstone asset, could you give us a little bit of color on the grades and sort of cadence of throughput increases that you expect over the course of the year?

Yes, we just answered that question, Anita, and I'll give you the two scoops again. So, basically, from first go forward, the first ramp up is to 60%, and we see that happening relatively quickly. The push to commercial production would take us to 80%, and we see that happening sometime in Q3. And then as we move into the end of the year, we would hit that sort of 90%, 95% plus capacity and largely be at capacity by the end of 2024. The initial grades that we'll put through sort of for the material that will lead to first gold and into that 60% ramp up will be lower just as we go through the commissioning, make sure we're getting the recoveries and everything is working the way it should. And then we can start to introduce the higher grade material into the plant and through the back end of this year as we're in commercial production. The average grade for the first five years, this is a general comment in the model, is 1.47, but there's higher grade material available sort of within that broader average. Right now, we're sitting on a 1.5 million tonnes of stockpile. That's just over one gram. But within that 1.5 million tonnes, there's a fairly wide range of grades where we've got some low grade and we've also got a fair bit of much, much higher grade than that. So like any mine start up, start with the low grade, ramp up the production, increase the grades as we ensure we've got the recoveries and then get to commercial production.

Yes, I guess when I was last on the tour in September, you guys were talking about potentially smoothing that first five year profile. I think originally the technical part had very high grades at 1.7 gram per ton material and then dropped to 1.3. So I was looking for sort of a little bit of color on that, but then also the other aspect of it is the stockpiled material like your, as you mentioned the grade that you have in the stockpile is one gram per ton material and you're going to be feeding something materially higher than that. So it's relying on you pulling higher grade material out of that stockpile. So I was just wondering like what the actual feed material is going to be in the next couple of years?

Yes, I think, I mean, we're looking forward to looking at the mine plan and working on some of that smoothing in the future. Right now, Anita, we're totally focused on getting this plant up and running. Doug, earlier on the call, which also you were not at that point, Doug did talk about the reconciliation. Everything is reconciling incredibly well to the block model. We are finding that we have some more tonnes, tonnes that would have been waste, but actually do meet the criteria of ore. So, we will end up with some lower grade stockpiles rather than going to the waste dumps. But in terms of the mine plan and the reconciliation to what we had intended on mining, it's actually looking really good. So we're early on, we're early benches, but in terms of grade reconciliation, looking good, probably more tonnes than had been anticipated. And then going forward and optimizing the mine will come after we get it into production.

The next question comes from Arun Lamba with TD Securities. Please go ahead.

I think you might have just answered this, but in terms of an updated life of mine plan, the feasibility study somewhat dated, could we maybe expect one in 2025 or it's kind of focused on the ramp up and then we'll do 2025 guidance and maybe update life of mine plans maybe in 2026 or something, just timing on that?

I think that's our overall timing, 2020. Yes, I think -- sorry go ahead Greg.

I was just going to say Aaron, like again, totally focused on getting the mine into production right now. And then we've got some luxury to do some of those technical report updates. I'm thinking kind of later end of 2025 before we see a fulsome update like that. So the next sort of guidance coming out for 2025 would be a year from now, focus on that year and then in 2025, we could look to have a longer term mine plan updated to the next quarter.

Perfect. And then just on Castle, you mentioned permitting for the phase 2 going into 2026 and then in the MD&A you mentioned you're going to reevaluate whether there may be slowdown phase 1 or whatnot. Should we get an update on that in the first half of this year or is that probably in the second half of the year kind of similar to our lost fee loss in terms of timing on a decision for the phase 1 plants?

Yes, second half Doug, yes, it's in process right now, Aaron. So the permitting, it looks like we're making some good progress now on the permitting side. The BLM has been very engaged with us recently. We do expect that notice of completion and then this notice of intent coming in the relatively near term. And our estimate is that the process beyond the notice of intent will take around two years. So, that puts us into that mid-2026 timing for the permit for the expansion. And phase 1, as Doug kind of mentioned, it's a bit of a development project masquerading as an operating mine to some extent. The point of it is to maintain the permits and to excavate the existing open pits, and that's what we've been doing, and also doing testing on what this mine could look like at the increased production level. And it's fairly low-grade material that we're processing. We're using a contractor for mining, a contractor for crushing. The cost profile is higher than we would prefer. So, what we're looking at is what makes the most sense given we probably got two more years of permitting once we build phase 2. Obviously, we're going to have a much larger fleet. It will be a lot cheaper to move this material. But if it makes sense to continue doing it now, we can get it into a situation where we're doing it at a reasonable cost that would be sort of first prize for us and we continue on with what we're doing. But at this point, there's no point in consuming capital over the next two years for that to any extent that it's a better deal to do it in two years from now. So that's what we're looking at. And it might just be a situation where we reduce the throughput at Castle Mountain over the next couple of years as we prepare for the expansion.

The next question comes from Jeremy Hoy with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Hi, Greg and team. Thanks for taking my question. Most of mine have been answered. So the dialogue at Los Filos is fluid. But is there any sort of timeline that we can keep in mind or any dates that we can look to for progress updates on the negotiations?

I don't think we want to give yes, go ahead Doug.

I think we'll keep do our best to keep you informed, but given the dialogue, it's a back and forth. I can tell you that long term, the heap leaks is not the way to go. So, I mean, beyond the I don't know, this year, next year, it just makes less sense. The CIL is actually a cheaper option for us, because of the cyanide consumption and the pumping that happens on a heap leach. So, it is the time to discuss and to work it through. We'd like to obviously have everything wrapped up ASAP, but we continue to engage and try to be as open as we can to be able to lay out all our cards on the table and to come to an understanding of what makes for the next stage of life for the mine.

Yeah, I appreciate the color and that it's a fluid situation. Thank you.

We've got a follow-up question from Wayne Lam at RBC. Please go ahead.

Yes, I just had one follow-up. Just wondering on the impairment testing, the carrying value of Filos looks nearly equal to Greenstone now. And just wondering if that year end testing included updated capital and operating costs versus the 2022 feasibility study? And then just curious with the ongoing community negotiations, does it become kind of binary and that there may be a significant write down to be undertaken if you can't get a deal done?

Wayne, it's Pete. So the impairment test contemplates a CIL being put in. So of course, until the CIL is put in, it reflects current costs, but as Doug just mentioned, a CIL dramatically reduces operating costs there. And so that I think that probably answers your question on impairment. And then with respect to would we incur a write down at Los Filos if the sale did not proceed, we likely would, but we would obviously have to review that given the circumstances when we would have to redo that impairment test.

Okay. I guess I should clarify for accounting purposes, I shouldn't imply we did an impairment test. For accounting purposes, you look first to indicators and if you have an indicator, you do an impairment test. We concluded we did not have any indicators. So, there was no impairment test. Had we run an impairment test, it would incorporate the CIL and it is a better way to answer your question.

Okay, great. Yes, hopefully, you guys can get a deal done imminently.

We have got another follow-up question from Anita Soni at CIBC. Please go ahead.

Hi. Just another one on Greenstone and this time on the call. The AISC guide is 850 to 950 AISC. I assume from the point is it correct that it's from the point that it's going to be declared commercial or is it from the first gold pour that's the 850 to 950?

Yes, that's right, Anita. It's from the point of commercial production.

Okay. So, it's that and again, that was sometime probably in Q3, right? You got to get to the 80%?

That's right.

And then just in terms of that number, I was wondering is there any additional costs that may be being capitalized or put into another bucket or would the 850 to 950 incorporate all of the costs at that asset in the quarter and in Q4 if we were to use that as a run rate?

So the 850 to 950 the only cost it would exclude and Greg already alluded I'm sorry, you may not have been on, but Greg alluded to it earlier, is the leasing costs related to the initial fleet that we acquired during construction remains non sustaining. But apart from that, it grabs all the costs.

Okay. It grabs everything. So there's nothing else that's okay. All right. Thank you very much. Thank you.

We do have a few questions online, but I think they were pretty much all addressed with the questions that were asked from the analysts. But I will get back to you all individually to make sure you've not got any follow-up questions. So I think we're going to wrap it up here. Greg, do you have any closing statements?

No. Just thanks again everyone for attending the call and where to find us. If you've got any additional questions, the contact information is on our website. Rhylin, myself or any of us are always happy to engage with shareholders.

This concludes today's call. [Operator Closing Remarks].