Greetings, and welcome to the Columbia Sportswear First Quarter 2012 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Ron Parham, Senior Director of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications for Columbia Sportswear. Thank you, Mr. Parham. You may begin.

All right. Thanks, Bob. Good afternoon, and thank you, everyone, for joining us. Earlier this afternoon, we issued a press release announcing the first quarter financial results and updating our outlook for 2012. In addition to the press release, we posted a detailed CFO commentary to our Investor Relations website about 45 minutes ago, which we trust you've had a chance to review. With me today on the call are our President and CEO, Tim Boyle; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Tom Cusick; Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Bryan Timm; and Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Peter Bragdon. I'm going to ask our Chairman, Gert Boyle, to cover the Safe Harbor language.

Good afternoon. This conference call will contain forward-looking statements regarding Columbia's business opportunities and anticipated results of operations. Please bear in mind that forward-looking information is subject to many risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from what is projected. Many of these risks and uncertainties are described in Columbia's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011, and subsequent filing with the SEC. Forward-looking statements in this conference call are based on our current expectations and beliefs, and we do not undertake any duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this conference call to conform the forward-looking statement to actual results or change in our expectations.

Thanks, Gert. We're going to move right into our prepared to remarks. So I'll turn the call over to Tim.

Thanks, Ron. Welcome everyone, and thanks for joining us this afternoon. The results and updated outlook we announced earlier today reflect the continuation of the market dynamics that we discussed in detail in early February. Our wholesale markets in North America and Europe continued to work their way back towards equilibrium in the aftermath of the warmest winter in decades, with Europe's recovery further hampered by an ongoing debt crisis and macroeconomic weakness. Meanwhile, our direct-to-consumer businesses continued to generate growth, suggesting that consumer demand for our brands are really strong. Outdoor consumers are reacting positively, there we have the greatest control over the presentation and availability of our innovations and marketing messages. Markets served by our EMEA and LAAP distributors, who essentially operate direct-to-consumer businesses in their respected markets, also continued to generate growth in the first quarter, after allowing for the shift and timing of shipments of spring '12 advanced orders. We expect continued growth in these markets based on the advanced orders placed for fall '12. As we advised in February, we are no longer providing specific backlog figures at March 31 or September 30. Our seasonal advance orders continued to represent a single component, which together with a number of other important factors, comprise our quarterly and annual financial outlook. I do, however, want to provide color on a few underlying market dynamics reflected in our 2012 outlook. We are projecting global fall wholesale shipments below last year by a low single-digit percentage, with Apparel up slightly and Footwear down high single digits, primarily due to the impact of warm weather on the Sorel business. U.S. wholesale shipments are projected to be comparable to fall 2011. Despite the warm winter and indications from many of our U.S. wholesale customers that their fall 2012, hoping to buy…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from in the line of Bob Drbul with Barclays Capital.

Tim, I guess when you look at the, I guess, the outlook for the year and sort of the lingering effects from the weather, when you look at the closeout sales and on your inventory side, can you just talk a little bit like how you're managing the closeout sales and sort of to protect the brand and sort of how methodical you're being around making sure that the placement of that product doesn't hurt all the development that you've over the last few years with the Columbia brand, specifically?

Yes, certainly. Well, as you know, we've invested heavily in the direct-to-consumer outlet business, and we have a significant component of this residual going directly to our outlet store, where we can control it. But there is some inventory that we're selling through the value channel, but of a larger component, actually, between the combined Columbia outlet business and our regular wholesaler, customers have been absorbing this stuff. So we're pleased that the business -- that we can control it this way and we get higher margins, and frankly, we'll be able to realize a greater amount of profitability through that direction. We're not going to be directing this merchandise in areas where we think it'll hurt the brand.

And Bob, this is Tom, just maybe a little more detail on that. About 2/3 to 3/4 of that excess will actually go through our own direct-to-consumer channel.

And so of the -- is it 21% increase year-over-year, how much of that is actually closed out roughly? Did you give that number?

We didn't. And I don't have that number at my fingertips. But we will certainly sell a higher percentage of excess as opposed to the special makeups through our retail channel this year as compared to last.

Okay. And then, Tim, from the perspective of, I guess, the developments over the last few months, it's still time -- have you had cancellations of some of the fall orders and have you been able to effect some of the sort of the '12 order book, in terms of with your factory partners?

No. No. The cancellations are not significant and not outside the ordinary course of business. You have to remember, maybe from our prior discussions regarding '12, a big portion of our retailers' liquidations of inventories happens in the first quarter of the year, January, February are great outerwear and cold weather footwear months. And we just had no liquidations on those months from our retailers, and so the order book was -- it didn't come up to its full expectations, based on those lack of liquidations.

Okay. And then I guess the other question I have is, on Sorel, in terms of the fall '12 positioning. When you think about what's happening competitively, can you just elaborate a little bit more in terms of -- with the order book as it stands right now, are you surprised that it isn't stronger, given the strong year from last year? And just -- maybe just a little bit more feedback that you received from retailers on that order book and considering, I think, you said it was going to be flattish, right?

Yes. So the Sorel brand, I think, is much more true performance footwear for women and men than many of our competitors, where there's a higher reliance on fashion show. The expectation would be that the warmer weather would impact us more. So we feel very strong about the Sorel brand. We've got lots and lots of compliments and we have lots of evidence that it really is a weather issue, including our own sales, our own e-com unit in days when weather was present and days when it wasn't. So we've got -- we have a very high reliance on that brand and we expect that we will continue to grow. I think there's evidence that there's lots and lots of growth for this brand that we have not yet realized.

Our next question comes from the line of Robbie Ohmes.

Hey Tim, just a follow-up on Bob's line of question. Can you sort of continue on the winter theme and remind us how this plays out on a multi-year basis? So obviously, last year was tough and order books are going to be tougher for a lot of your competitors as well. But what do you -- how do you think this plays out at retail in 2012 and then in order books in 2013 for you guys? That would be the first question. The second question is can you talk about, within the Columbia brand, what the relative impact has been on the growth of Omni-Heat versus initial expectations and new technology, say, versus your sportswear distribution and your more moderate channel distribution? And does this accelerate the shifting of your business towards the more technology-driven, higher-priced point product and that would be -- but I'll start with that.

So as it relates to fall '12 and fall '13, I mean it's really too early to predict where that's going to go, and we obviously haven't made any comments about '13 at all. But in my experience over the years that I've been in the business, retailers gain confidence and are more conservative, depending on the sales of the weather-dependent products that they've got in the store. So obviously, fall '11 is tough, but for footwear -- winter footwear and winter outerwear and winter accessories. So retailers are not abandoning those product categories, but are more conservative in terms of how they approach it. So the expectation on future seasons would be as a result of the weather that's actually happens in fall '12. When we talk about the Columbia brand and Omni-Heat, frankly, it's the single biggest differentiator for us from all of our competitors. We think it's got significant opportunity for the company to continue to expand and reenergize the outerwear categories and accessory categories that we've been, frankly -- we've lost share to competitors over the past several years. These have been products which have been well established by our retailers. And the new product category of base layer was very successful, especially when you contrast that with it a bad-weather year for all kinds of specific weather categories -- weather-dependent categories. Our Sportswear business, frankly, continues to do well. There are challenges in that business as well, but we believe that we've got the right approach with the innovations that we have in place. We mentioned, just quickly during my script, this upcoming innovation, an extension of our Omni-Freeze product for spring '13. And while we haven't talked much about it, except to a few retailers, this is going to be the first visible technology, which will basically offer us the ability to replicate the visibility and success of Omni-Heat in an area where there's lots and lots of opportunity for high-volume sales. All of these innovations are more difficult to explain to the consumer and require investment, not only on our part, but also on our retailer's part, to give us the space and the point-of-sale presentations that we need to make them successful. And we've gotten that help from retailers with Omni-Heat. We expect we'll get it with the new Omni-Freeze collection. And it's more difficult for these kinds of products to be successful in the moderate channel. So the expectation is that in those channels, we'll be relying on the brand more, but the focus is going to be on these innovations going into areas where we have the opportunity to have sales people on the floor and a more focused brand presentation.

And can I just put one more question in there. On Europe, can you give us a little more color on how much of a weakness in backlogs is the sort of warm winter they had versus issues with the macro environment? And also, can you sort of characterize how's Russia doing as a market for you guys versus Western Europe, and maybe just give a better flavor of what's going on over there.

Sure. Well, in our experience, in over the years we've been in the business, weather always trumps economics. So we've had a very tough winter over there, weather-wise. And then when you combine that with the rough economic conditions and -- it makes it more difficult. So Western Europe and our direct markets, we have some successes geographically. But all in all, it's been the toughest geographic territory that we work. Russia, on the other hand, had good weather. And in that market, our distributor controls the bulk of its distribution and they've done very well. So our business there is strong and is growing. So the expectation is we need to continue to work on our European business to make sure that we've got the right merchandise there. But it's a weather thing, in my opinion.

Our next question comes from the line of Liz Dunn.

I guess just a couple of questions, a couple of more questions on the inventory. Can you talk about the composition of the inventory between footwear and outerwear, in terms of the carryover product? And how does the close-out process work for Sorel? Like is it similar to outerwear? Or since you're dealing with sort of a different retail group, might that product end up in sort of a more traditional off-price channel? Or how should we think about that?

Well, let me ask Tom to talk specifically about the composition. But before I do that, let me just tell you that the bulk of our footwear sales go -- in terms of off-price, go to our own outlet business, as well as traditional retailers of footwear. So that's the primary disposition of the footwear excesses for Columbia, I guess. It's by far the largest component as our own outlet business. But I'll let Tom speak specifically to the composition of the inventories.

Yes, Liz. We focus mostly on the age of the inventory. And then secondarily, the categorical breakdown, and I don't have the outerwear, cold-weather footwear breakout in front of me, but that is the lion's share of the fall '11 component of the excess, would be both of those categories. And as I mentioned earlier, we intend to distribute roughly 2/3 to 3/2 of that through our own retail. And if we look at the age of our inventory, roughly 85%, a little over 85% of the total inventory composition, is fall '11 through fall '12. So it's quite current inventory.

Okay. But no fall versus spring breakdown at this point? Maybe off-line. Okay. And then can you just talk through what the expectations for kind of return on the systems implementations are and for what time period?

Go ahead, Tom.

We haven't published any return on the investment or the total investment work. We're probably in about the third inning on the system implementation itself. We just went live, with the first country being Canada. With the second implementation being next year. So I think it's probably a little bit too early to discuss return on that investment.

Our next question comes from the line of Kate McShane.

I was wondering if you could help us understand the composition of your orders for this upcoming winter. Are you seeing more orders of fleece and shells? I think it still falls into your Sportswear category, versus the heavier ski jackets, because of the previous winter that we just went through. And does that still have much to do with any kind of margin pressure that we can expect to see this year because of mix?

Well, so shells of any type would be in our outerwear category. So that's typically for us rainwear and soft-shells, et cetera. Fleece does fall into the Sportswear category. There's some mix shift, but I would say it's not outside the normal shift in mix between those 2 components that we've had in prior seasons. So we have -- the bulk of our Omni-Heat is in the Outerwear category and Accessories. So to the extent, that helps.

Okay. The previous question on the international component of your business and how much was weather and how much was economic related, I wondered if you had any comments just about what you've seen in terms of inventory levels of those retailers and just about the overall health of some of the bigger retailers in the international market.

Yes. I think we talked specifically about our European direct business, which is primarily Western Europe. And I think there's inventory -- I know that we -- our largest customer in Europe, which is the Intersport Collective Organization, actually sent letters out to their vendors saying that based on their inventory carryforward, their business was going to be down sort of across the board. I think those retailers -- and that's a buying group. So each individual retailer is responsible for their own credit. However, in order to maintain the position in the group, they have to maintain certain balance sheet measurements. So we feel comfortable about the strength of those retailers. We're very diligent at credit extension, whether it be here in the U.S., in Japan, Canada or Europe, that's one of the areas where we consider ourselves to be quite adept. So our traditional retailers, I think in Europe, are strong. Although they're managing their open device to maintain the proper inventory levels. So they were very conservative this year.

Okay, great. And then my last question was also in regards to inventory. Are you giving any guidance today about what you expect or where you expect inventory levels to be by the end of next quarter? How much you can work down between now and then?

Yes, Kate. This is Tom. In my commentary, I've indicated that exiting Q2, we expected relative inventory growth to be comparable to -- we were exiting Q1 at just over 20% growth. And then as we look to the back half of the year, we expect inventory levels to be comparable, exiting Q3 and exiting Q4 relative to last year in absolute dollar terms.

Our next question comes from the line of Reed Anderson with Northland Securities.

A couple things I want to focus on. One is, Tim, I think in your prepared remarks, you've made a comment about expectations for wholesale fall, I think, it was the U.S. or North America being comparable to '11. And first of all, I want to clarify if that's what you said. But then, I guess in relation to that -- you made a comment, I think, that you're picking up share, that sort of thing. I guess, I guess I want to see you add a little more color to that. So what is your sense of -- what categories, what channels do you see that most prominently? I think we've all seen your product evolve quite a bit on sales force. But I'd be curious what you see, from your end, that kind of supports that.

Well, thanks Reed. So yes, we did talk about the fact that our U.S. book would be -- our U.S. shipments -- wholesale shipments would be comparable to fall '11. And many of our customers, in fact our largest customers, have told us that they're hoping to buy plans were down between 10% and 20%. So we're gaining share. And where we've been focusing, as you know, recently has been on the sporting goods and specialty channel. And that's where we've been rewarded with bigger orders than would be indicated in the 10% to 20% down on an overall basis. So that's been primarily where we've been gaining share. And I think there's probably even some of our business we've gotten from private label, some we've gotten from other brands, and some has just been a function of categories, of merchandise that we've entered, i.e. base layer, that's showing real promise, but not necessarily the sell-through volumes that we all want to see, primarily because of weather. So that's, I guess, where I'd say we've been really working diligently and had the rewards that we think are better than our competitors.

And would you say, in terms of your categories, the gains are fairly even? Or are you seeing it more in a particular's product? I mean, obviously, base would be a new addition. But any color respective to categories, whether its Footwear apparel or within Foot apparel.

I think we're making progress on all these things. Obviously, with a flat order book, it's not -- even though it's in a down market, we're not happy with the kinds of growth that we've got there. But it shows that the retailers are giving us additional business. And it's in primarily in the Outerwear and Winter Footwear business where we've really done well, I think, in the Columbia business.

And then my second question was just -- I wanted to focus on the direct side because, obviously, it's become a very significant driver. And I was hoping you'd maybe just share a little more detail behind what drives that, and kind of give us a sense of when you think of that business growing, what is sort of appropriate growth expectation, whether you want to do it on a high level or give it by various sub-detail, I don't know. But just a little more behind that, because that's really evolved into a lot of different components and I think it's helpful to have that detail.

Great. Well, so we have really 3 ways that we do business direct to consumers. One is obviously through our brand stores, we've got about 1/2 a dozen of those things around the United States and several in Europe. And those are really an opportunity for us to lay out our strategies, lay out our business -- key business initiatives and the innovations are fairly complex and need some space to be describing. Those businesses have been very good for us in terms of brand enhancing. They're difficult to support from a profitability return basis. So we're being very selective on how we move forward in that area. From a financial return area, frankly, our outlet business has been good. We've had, as you saw from the inventory analysis that Tom gave you, we've had too much excess, and so we've had good returns from those businesses, but we prefer that we'd have a slightly lower reliance on excess inventories from prior seasons. So we aren't -- we can get a better turn and have less carryover. And -- but really the shining star for -- in terms of a combination of financial rewards and brand enhancing has been our e-com, where we can reach an enormous amount of people and really tell the stories of our innovations and our business goals in a very rich way. People can spend as much time as they want on the site. And we've been rewarded by good selling of our products on those sites as well. So that's sort of the 3 components of retail. It's been a good part of our business. We always consider ourselves a retail -- excuse me, a wholesaler at heart. And we've got a keen focus on making sure that our products resonate with retailers that carry our product, and that's been a key part of what we do. But as our products become more complex, it's important that we have the opportunity to really show these things and they're fully blown. So the e-com, just as a point of interest, we get about average conversion rates on our e-com business, which means we have a lot of people, millions of people that are going to the site, learning about the business, learning about the products and then going on to other retailers to buy it.

And in terms of -- just thinking about that direct piece, I mean, is there a growth rate that makes sense as you look at that, whether it's on a multi-year basis? I mean, what you'd like to see that growing or anything you can share with us would provide some perspective.

Well my preference would be to have our wholesale business grow so rapidly regardless of what happens. At direct-to-consumer, we still grow our Wholesale business. But we make sure that we're challenging ourselves about opportunities. We don't want to miss anything. And so we have discussions constantly about how we should approach that part of the business. And there may well be more to talk about later.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Burns with D.A. Davidson.

I got a longer-term question to start here. Just earlier in the comments, you mentioned that you're performing best where you have the greatest control over presentation. And my question was around how you're working towards improving Columbia brand presentation in key channels, such as specialty and sporting goods, whether it's about investing in-store fixtures as you're getting sales associates, getting the buyers to stock a less value-oriented mix. What are the keys there to elevating the brand presentation at your key retailers?

Certainly. Well, so our -- first and foremost for us is the product itself have the ability to tell the story. So as it relates to Omni-Heat, it's an immediate story that a consumer can, even with the poorest of in-store presentations, can open the garment, and recognize what's going on there. We hope that we have that with our new Omni-Freeze collection for spring '13, where it'll be visible much like Omni-Heat is. But in addition to those kinds of product-centric issues, we're doing a lot of QR codes attached to the garment, as well as to the fixture in the store. We've got fixturing systems, which we've installed with many of our retailers. And those have proven that they will have a high return in terms of the investment. And frankly, lastly, we're just want to make sure that the returns that our retailers see from selling our product will allow us to move into a premium location in the store. So it's really a combination of having the right product, having it with attractive and high information quotient point-of-purchase stuff and then having the sales results to move us forward in the store to a better location.

And I apologize if I missed this in -- so far here. But did you quantify the second quarter benefit from the timing of the distributor shipments?

No, we didn't. But with regard to that, as you may recall, we had a similar phenomena where we'd shipped spring '12. Distributor shipment is a higher percentage in the fourth quarter, and we've indicated that, that was a double digit million dollar number. It's a similar number between -- in Q2 versus Q3. But we've got a higher proportion planned to ship in the second quarter of this year.

Our next question comes from the line of Corbin Weyer with Robert W. Baird.

This is Corbin Weyer calling in for Mitch Kummetz. Just wanted to get back to inventory quickly. Looking for level to be comparable into last year come year end, third quarter, fourth quarter. Can you maybe talk about how you think about balancing that with the possibly the opportunity maybe to chase products in the fourth quarter? Or just the fact that you're going to be going up against some compares whether that's in cancellations or easier comp, given the tough challenging weather environment from last year?

Yes, I would say with regard to fall '12, we've pretty much bought the inventory for fall '12. So our ability to chase additional inventory at this point is pretty difficult, if not impossible. So really, when we look at the back half inventory, it's really going to be a function of sell-through weather. And then at year end, a function of what the spring book looks like and the timing and receipts of spring '13 inventory. So year end is a little tougher to call but really our ability to chase production for fall '12 is not really a reality at this point.

Sure. Sure, okay. And then just looking at -- you've broken out the buckets for second quarter gross margin. Can you maybe just kind of talk about the magnitude of those different puts and takes?

For which period?

Yes. Second quarter '12. I guess, I'm just surprised looking at the closeouts being a drag, given that the amount of closeouts happened last year with some of the weather in spring.

Yes. I would say the single biggest component of the planned 200 basis point contraction in the second quarter is the higher volume of promotional and closeout sales. Secondarily, we've got channel mix changes with the lower gross margin Distributor business, so there'll be a higher relative component of distributor shipments in Q2. And we plan to experience some costing -- input costing pressure and those components are partially, slightly partially offset by currency and a little bit of airfreight.

Our next question comes from the line of Sam Poser with Sterne Agee.

It's Ben Shamsian for Sam Poser. A question on Sorel. What is the sort of delay that you're seeing now in terms of [indiscernible] getting the brand back to growth and sort of being able to see whether it was weather or brand related? Is there anything you can update us on the latest?

I mean the brand still remains very popular. But it is, obviously, designed to be worn in cold weather. And with lots of water and snow, et cetera. The biggest impact we had on our sales volume was in Europe, because it relates to the Sorel business. So we have good healthy business in the U.S. and in North America. The primary area where we had issues was in Europe, as it relates to Sorel. We're very high on the brand. We think there's an enormous opportunity to grow that business. We do need some weather.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. And I would like to turn the floor back to management for closing comments.

Well, thank you, all, for tuning in and we're looking forward to talking to you again at the end of second quarter to report our results at that time. Thank you very much.

This does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.