Greetings, and welcome to the Columbia Sportswear Fourth Quarter 2011 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Ron Parham, Senior Director of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications for Columbia Sportswear. Thank you. Mr. Parham, you may begin.

Thanks, Bob. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us this afternoon. Earlier today, we issued a press release, announcing our fourth quarter and full year 2011 financial results and establishing our preliminary outlook for 2012. In addition to the press release, we posted a detailed CFO commentary to our Investor Relations website about 45 minutes ago, which we hope you had a chance to review prior to the call. With me today on the call are President and CEO, Tim Boyle; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Tom Cusick; Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Bryan Timm; and Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Peter Bragdon. I'm going to ask our Chairman, Gert Boyle, to cover the Safe Harbor language before we get started.

Good afternoon. This conference call will contain forward-looking statements regarding Columbia business opportunities and anticipated results of operations. Please bear in mind that forward-looking information is subject to many risk and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from what is projected. Many of these risks and uncertainties are described in Columbia's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, and subsequent filing with the SEC. Forward-looking statement in this conference call are based on our current expectation and belief, and we do not undertake any duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this conference call to conform the forward-looking statement to actual results or to change in our expectation.

Thanks, Gert. Before I turn the call over to Tim, I want to take a minute to cover a couple of changes that we're making to our disclosure practices. The first is a change to our product category reporting structure to better align with our internal organization and management structure. Beginning with our fiscal 2011 results and continuing forward quarterly, we will report combined net sales of Apparel, Accessories & Equipment in a single line item, which together with Footwear will constitute our product category disclosure. Compared to the historical amounts will be recapped in all of our SEC filings and all other net sales disclosures by brand and geographic region remain unchanged at this time. I also want to draw your attention to the top of Page 6 in our CFO commentary, describing a change we will be making in our outlook protocol in an effort to provide greater clarity for investors and to bring our public disclosures in line with how we internally plan, forecast and manage our business. Our business and internal management processes have evolved significantly in recent years, including a broader geographic scope, larger international distributor and direct-to-consumer operations, increased automatic replenishment programs, changes in the multiple data points we use to plan our business, and further changes in many of our business processes in connection with our upcoming ERP implementation. We will continue our current practice of communicating a preliminary full year financial outlook at the beginning of the year and update that outlook on a quarterly basis, along with a detailed outlook for the ensuing fiscal quarter that includes, among other things, our most up-to-date assessment of customer commitments, retailer sell-through and consumer trends, but we have concluded that the practice of providing 2 seasonal backlog reports as of March 31 and September 30 has become less relevant, increasingly confusing to investors and is not material to an understanding of our company and our future expectations. We'll be happy to address any questions about that later on the call. And now I'd like to turn it over to Tim.

Thanks, Ron. Welcome, everyone, and thanks for joining us this afternoon. I have attracted a cold, so I'm going to try to make it through this script without hacking. So please understand if I do. So looking back at 2011, we're very pleased that we achieved many financial and operational goals that we set for ourselves at the beginning of the year. And we'll just never know how much better 2011 could have been had we enjoyed anything resembling a normal winter in the Northern Hemisphere during the fourth quarter. We finished the year with record revenues of $1.69 billion, up 14% from 2010, despite unseasonably warm weather and a sluggish European economy that caused our full year sales to be slightly below our October outlook. Our fourth quarter and full year earnings per share were within the range of our October outlook, thanks to firm gross margins and controlled spending. Fiscal year 2011 operating margins improved to 8.1%, up 110 basis points from last year's 7.0% operating margins. And the fourth quarter and full year net income grew 40% and 34%, respectively. While this is moving in the right direction, we remain intently focused on driving further improvements in profitability in the years ahead. Each of our brands grew stronger as we continue to lead the outdoor industry with clearly differentiating innovation. We have a pipeline of innovation across our brand portfolio that will continue to drive the business over the next several years. In the Columbia brand, expansion of our Omni reflective technology into base layer and electric products created a complete warmth portfolio that continues to build consumer awareness and adoption. In addition, Columbia Footwear sales grew 16%. During 2011, brand-enhancing specialty and outdoor retailers represented the Columbia brand's largest channel distribution in the U.S. for the…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Bob Drbul with Barclays Capital.

I guess the first question I have, Tim, for you is, so the inventory levels ended up -- I think it was at 16%. And when you look at your gross margin guidance for the first quarter and for the full year, I think down 16% for the first quarter but up for the full year. Can you just put a little bit of color around how you feel comfortable with that guidance given the inventory levels where you are right now?

Yes, I mean, I want Tom to speak specifically on it, but as you know, we've done a lot of work and have a significant amount of our order book in. And we've got an opportunity to view our margins on the products that we're selling for fall which, as you remember, is the bulk of the company's revenue and profitability. So we have a high degree of confidence in that projection. But as it relates to the -- how the inventory is plays into that, I’m going to let Tom to speak to that specifically.

Yes, Bob, maybe just separating spring and fall. Obviously, we believe we've got much more pricing power in the fall season than we do spring. So we're confident that we're going to be able to expand gross margin in the second half of the year. But given the full price closeout mix in the first half with the excess inventory, that's going to put some pressure on gross margin.

Okay, and then I guess 2 other questions that I have for you. I mean, have you seen any price resistance? I mean, I know weather was a major issue, but in '11, from consumers or even retailers, have you seen any price resistance around some of the increases that you have passed or are passing through?

Surprisingly, it's been minimal. We're known as a value brand, and in some areas, we're able to be -- to maintain those values. But frankly, we've been pretty pleased that the results on sell-through for some of our basic product that we had to raise prices on and the sell-throughs there have been pretty encouraging. In some areas, not only did we raise prices, but we enhanced the retailer gross margin by changing the method we sell, with using suggested prices instead of a discounted price for the retailers. So we're pretty pleased with how well the stuff has sold through. And we can't say there's no pressure, but we're pleased that we've seen less than maybe we had anticipated.

Bob, this is Tom. Just maybe one follow-up on the inventory question. As we look at the composition of the inventory, I think as we stated in my commentary, a little under 90% of the inventory is current spring '12 and fall '11 inventory. And of that, we intend to clear roughly 2/3 of that through our own retail channel and about 1/3 through existing customers and putting the value channel in 2012.

Got it, that's helpful. And then I just had one sort of overall question for you. Can you give us an update where your distribution channels are today in terms of sporting goods, specialty department stores and sort of -- actually, how that has trended over the last few years?

Well, I don't know if we have in front of us the specifics, but I know that the sporting goods and outdoor segment has grown fairly dramatically over the last several years. The department store channel has, in fact, been reduced as a percentage and as an actual number, numerically. So the focus has been on growing the business in specialty and outdoor, and that's been quite successful here in the U.S. but frankly, even more so in Europe.

Our next question comes from the line of Reed Anderson with Northland Securities.

A couple of questions, just to fall back on Bob's inventory question. I mean, Tim, I'm just curious. What's your view on kind of what the inventory situation looks like at retail in -- particularly in the outerwear category. Do you feel like it's getting cleared out? Or do you think it's still taking a long time?

Well, I think this January, February and in Europe certainly in March are good sales of winter merchandise. So we've had, obviously, a tough January. I think we heard today, it was the warmest in 50 years or something like that. So I'm expecting that the inventories would be higher than they were in the previous 2 seasons. But the bulk of our retailers, certainly the biggest ones, would have marked that stuff down. So they'll be cleaner than they are today or maybe that they -- otherwise would be if they hadn't marked the merchandise down. It does dampen their appetite for refilling the stores for next year. So we're pleased with our results to date as it relates to how warm the winter was, but it's really a function of how much risk retailers want to take on winter merchandise as opposed to having merchandise left over.

Yes, that makes sense. And then getting to the -- talking about the guidance piece or kind of the preliminary outlook on fiscal '12, I'm just curious if you were to think about that from the way you're now breaking out product categories, essentially Footwear and then versus everything else, would it be fair to say that the outlook you're giving today, the preliminary outlook, more or less contemplates continued growth in Footwear and sort of flattish apparel and accessories and outerwear? Or is it too early to tell at this point?

Yes, I'm going to let Tom speak specifically on that. But basically, that's our expectation, I think, it is that our Footwear continue to move forward and we'll have good business in outerwear, but it's against a season where it was very warm through most of the Northern Hemisphere.

Yes, and just given, Reed, that Footwear is a smaller base of business, I think we could expect Footwear grow slightly faster than the apparel business in 2012.

Yes, that makes sense. Where did you come out -- Tom, I think last quarter, and I don't have the notes in front of me, but you kind of broke out precisely kind of where your direct-to-consumer business was as a percent of the overall mix. Where did you end up for the year? And then what is kind of the thought on that? Is it going to grow again this year? Or is that starting to kind of flatten out as a percent?

Yes. So we ended at about -- a little over 25% direct-to-consumer relative to the total business. And we expect that part of the business to remain about that size, maybe slightly larger as we look at 2012 but not significantly larger.

Good. And then one last one. I'll let everybody else jump in. Can you quantify or at least put around rough parameters what the benefit was from the sales that shifted from the earlier distributor shipments in the 4Q out of 1Q last year?

It was in the double-digit millions of dollars, Reed.

Our next question comes from the line of Michelle Tan.

This is Tiffany in for Michelle today. Just a couple of quick questions. So looking ahead of 2012 and given the environment, Tim, you mentioned that you have already identified and implemented some changes across the business to significantly slow spending growth. So I was wondering if you could go into a little more detail on the areas where you see you can cut back on spending in 2012 and, on the flip side, kind of what your spending priorities are for the year.

Well, as I said, we're focused on continuing to fund these innovation concepts that we have in the pipeline already fully baked or under construction. Those things are going to continue to get funded, as well as our direct-to-consumer business. But we're really looking at almost every lever that we have in the business as it relates to our SG&A, including hiring freezes. We've done a significant amount of travel reduction, including moving meetings and other kinds of travel that we felt was not critical to the business. We've suspended 2012 merit increases in most of our regions, contractors' and interns' reduction, professional fees reduced. Actually, my mom and myself are taking a voluntary 50% salary reduction for 2012 to make sure that teams globally know how important it is to reduce our expenses. We're focusing on discretionary items of all types and really in streamlining the organization overall. Marketing spend, frankly, will be at about last year's percentage level as a percent of sales. So we're going to continue to focus on our marketing of the company's innovative products, but we're really looking in many ways to control our expense levels. They are growing over last year, but we want to have leverage this year, and we're focused on making that happen.

Great, that's good to know. And just a quick follow-on, so it seems like the growth in Sorel has still been strong. I was wondering if you can share with us some of the strategic initiatives for the Sorel brand in 2012 and kind of what you're excited about there.

Well, as you know, the focus for us is on the women's side of the business and on really exciting that female consumer as it relates to winter and protective footwear. So we've got more interesting products for the female consumer, and we're focusing on increasing the amount of exposure that the brand gets in these publications, as we discussed in the script. I'm talking about where we're focusing on our -- as an example, on Sundance to get that female consumer who's fashion oriented to review that. We also have a significant investment in the slipper category, which has been one of the biggest selling product categories for the company, specifically Sorel slippers, of any product category that we have. So that we've got an expanded slipper assortment. And we're just basically enhancing and continuing to expand the distribution to fashion stores across really globally.

Our next question comes from the line of Robby Ohmes.

Tim, just a couple of quick follow-ups. On the sort of the -- as you move through the inventories through 2012, in the guidance you gave, can you talk a little bit about the outlet store profitability assumptions? I mean, will it -- is it a -- will it impair the margin of the outlet stores significantly? Or do you think you're going to be able to work through that inventory in a profitable way in your outlet stores? And the other question I had, sort of within your guidance, as you look to 2012, what is the growth assumption of Columbia's wholesale apparel growth in the U.S.? So -- I know your DTC is still growing in 25% of your business. Are you still transitioning out of the mid-tier channel to the point that you could have down apparel growth? Or can you sort of just paint the picture for how the continued transition looks?

Certainly. Well, to speak to your point regarding the margins on liquidation for us versus -- through our outlet stores, we actually had high percentage of our excess from the prior periods liquidating in 2011 and we had significant margin. So we don't expect that the margins will be impacted at all in our outlet operation based on the liquidations that we have planned from our fall '11 product. It's all great products. As Tom said, it's very fresh. And we did a good job of keeping that in good shape. And so we don't expect any margin degradation on the direct-to-consumer for outlet side as it relates to the winter product we're carrying over from fall '11. Our growth assumptions on Columbia apparel, we will grow, we believe. And it will be low single digits sort of on the average of the business. And our expectations are that we're going to continue to have solid business is in that area.

And Robby, this is Tom, just a follow-on. As we look at our direct-to-consumer business, we fully expect the operating margin in that business to continue to expand through 2012, similar to 2011.

Got it. And just a follow-up on the wholesale Columbia apparel business. Tim, do you expect the growth to be more consistent by channel? So what I'm trying to get at is that sort of shift back into REI and Dick's Sporting Goods. Is that -- was 2011 the big year of that and 2012 you're sort of through that? Or is there more of that in 2012 so that we should expect sporting goods in independents to grow at a healthy rate?

Yes -- no, I'm sorry. Our expectation is that our growth will happen, in fact, in sporting as in outdoor. And I'm guessing that our department store business is going to be about flat to maybe slightly down. So the growth will come from the sporting goods and outdoor section globally, really.

Our next question comes from the line of Kate McShane.

[Audio Gap] is growing faster?

Can you -- I'm sorry, we missed the first part of your question, I think, sorry.

I'm sorry. I have a very raspy situation as well. My questions are on the mix of the business. So I assume that based on the warm weather, at least in shelves, possibly sold through fairly well and it could be that you see retailers gravitate more towards that. And I wondered, with the possible shifting in mix towards light or a layered type product, what it would mean for gross margin and also combined with the faster Footwear growth, what would it mean for gross margin?

Well, I'm going to have Tom speak specifically to the gross margin, which we're anticipating, but I don't think mix is going to play a big part in our -- in any potential change here. But Tom, do you want to be more specific there?

Yes. Kate, as it relates to the Footwear side of the business, as we look at the Sorel margins and the excellent growth we realized there and we expect to continue, as we've said, Sorel margins are more outerwear-like margins than the traditional Columbia Footwear. So with continued growth there, that should actually be helpful to gross margins as we look at fall '12 and the Footwear for the business.

Okay, and with Omni-Heat, will Omni-Heat continue to become a bigger part of your mix in 2012?

Absolutely. We're finding really nice questions to use. In fact, we launched a line of sleeping bags for spring '12 which contain Omni-Heat, and they've been very well received.

Okay, great. And my last question is just with the change in the head of apparel. Will it be spring 2013 in terms of the first line she'll be directly touching? Or is it fall 2013?

Well, Adrienne has been here for maybe almost 2.5, 3 years. So she's been involved in the construction of the lines for quite some time. So she's involved today in the 2012 spring and fall merchandise, as well as beginning '13 and beyond.

Our next question comes from the line of Claire Gallacher with Auriga USA.

I wanted to ask about your Spring business. You've done such a great job creating a lot of buzz and a lot of great technical products for your winter products. So given the warm winter we've had, it makes us look at spring a little bit more critically. So how do you see your Spring business evolving? And do you have a plan to increase that percent of sales going forward?

Well, it's been a goal for of us for a long time, actually, the biggest components of our Spring business, frankly our PFG, which is our fishing apparel product which has been extremely successful. The line is probably, I don't know, maybe 15 or 20 years old, and it's really the de facto fishing apparel and casual sportswear apparel for most of the South and Southeast United States. And then into Central and South America, it's been a big part of the business there. That's continued to grow well and we've been able, frankly, to increase our gross profit margins on that product pretty significantly. But as I said earlier, we're finding ways to use Omni-Heat in spring, including sleeping bags. And then we have a significant amount of business that we're generating with insect repellent apparel. And then lastly, talking about our innovations, we have a significant amount now of apparel which is designed to actually cool the wearer. So it really is what we call sweat-activated clothing. And that continues to grow in sales, and we become better at making the product perform better. There's a constant focus on us on that part of the business for spring because in addition to spring being an important season in the U.S. and in Europe, there's many parts of the world that it never gets cold, and we'd like to sell lots of stuff in those parts of the world as well.

Okay, great. And then just following up on Kate's question, the Omni-Heat for fall '12, I believe last year, you were talking about 40% of your SKUs, I believe it was 40% of your SKUs for fall '11. Omni-Heat was somehow involved. Is that number, 40% -- is that going to jump significantly as we look at fall '12? Or how big is the delta?

It's grown for sure. I don't have the delta specifically, but I'm sure that it's -- I'm sure it's grown and I'm sure -- without having the stuff in front of me, I know that our best-selling styles all contain Omni-Heat. So it's probably a larger percentage of our sales.

Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Burns with D. A. Davidson.

I was hoping you could help me reconcile the first quarter guidance for revenue up 1%, with spring backlog up 7%. And then with increased clearance of the fall '11 product in your direct-to-consumer channel, I thought that might actually boost revenue slightly in the first quarter as well.

Andrew, your question is specifically why we're moving away from reporting backlog going forward because it's a constant reconciliation process. But I would say, to answer your question, the single biggest reason is we shift a greater proportion of our distributor shipments in December. Earlier to Reed's question, I said that was a double-digit, millions of dollars increase year-over-year. So that's really why you're seeing the muted growth in the first quarter. It's really a shift in timing of those specific shipments.

Okay. And just in terms of retailers being cautious on pre-order, how does that affect you in terms of your timing for placing orders from -- with your manufacturers for the fall '12 line? What's sort of the drop date where you have to place those orders to have the inventory in time? And how does that conservative prebook limit your ability there?

Sure. Well, outerwear, because of the multiple components in the garment, that actually has the largest lead time -- the longest lead time of any of the product categories that we manufacture. So our order book is filling up now and we're placing our orders against that order book. And frankly, by middle March, we'll be completely booked from a production standpoint and customers who have bought from us will get deliveries on time as they request, but we're not going to be building additional inventories on a speculative basis. So it really -- we're limited by the time we get to mid-March for purchasing any product for fall '12. The problem we get buying products beyond mid-March is it becomes at risk for any late delivery, its immediately a closeout, and we just don't want to take that risk ourselves. So we'll be taking all the orders our customers are willing to give us all the way through mid-March and then we'll be -- not closing the book, but we'll be done in terms of purchasing.

Okay. Last question, just in terms of the tax rate guidance, 27% to 28% seems a bit higher than years past. I'm wondering what's the long-term tax rate assumptions we should be thinking about for our model.

Yes, I would say mid to high 20s is the normalized rate and it's going to vary depending on mix of income, statutes tolling on open tax years and various tax strategies that we implement over time. But I think mid to high 20s is a reasonable range.

Our next question comes from the line of Mitch Kummetz with Robert W. Baird.

I've got a few questions for Tom. So the first one, on the SG&A outlook, starting with Q1, when I run the math on Q1, 1% sales increase, SG&A deleveraging by at least 350 basis points. I mean, on a dollar amount, I've got SG&A up $13 million year-over-year. I mean, that's before these cost containment measures go into effect. But how quickly does that ramp down from a dollar standpoint? And do you actually think that SG&A will be down in the back half of the year in terms of dollars year-over-year?

Yes, I do think that SG&A can be flat to down in the back half. We're contemplating low single-digit SG&A growth. And as you can see, we're going to realize between 1/4 and 1/3 of that growth in the first quarter. And really, that's a function of the anniversary effect of a lot of the investments missed that we made in 2011, for example, a lot of the merit increases and so forth going to affect late in the first quarter. So that's of 2011. So we're still absorbing the anniversary effect of those costs in Q1. So our expectation is that rate of SG&A growth ramps down significantly in the back half.

Okay, that's helpful. And then Tom, in your script or your commentary in the 8-K, you talked about on the gross margin side that you still expect higher input costs on the year. Can you talk a little bit about that in terms of the first half versus the second half. Do you expect some relief in the back half or even to the extent where input cost might be down year-over-year?

Yes, we're not planning input cost down in the back half, but I think we've done a very good job of pricing the fall line. And we've -- like I mentioned earlier, we've got much more pricing power in fall than we do spring just given the innovative technologies in the fall product. So we feel pretty good about our ability to expand gross margin in the back half of the year coupled with the affect that we'll have some fairly nice currency tailwinds from a hedging standpoint in fall '12.

And then the international distributor revenues that got pulled forward from Q1 into Q4, does that have any impact on Q2? Or should we expect Q2 revenues to look more like the backlog, the spring backlog increase that you guys reported on a couple -- last call?

Yes, the second quarter is really the most difficult one for us to forecast because we're winding down spring and we're beginning to ship fall. And we shipped a large volume of distributor shipments in June and July, and they can fall in either month. And a large percentage of those shipments fell in June in 2011. So it's a little early to tell. I think in April we'll have better visibility on how those quarters break down.

Okay. And then maybe just a last one. On your direct business, on your own stores, I don't recall if you said this or not, but what was the comp for the order on your stores, U.S. and then also on a global basis? I don't know if you can give that.

We haven't historically given comp store growth rates for our direct-to-consumer business. Our comp store growth rates for 2011 were quite healthy.

Our next question comes from the line of Christian Buss.

I have 2 questions. One, can you explain how conservative your guidance is relative to what you're seeing, particularly as get through the early parts of the order book here for the back half?

Well, as you can imagine, the business is quite complicated and complex. And so our view that we've given you today is really our best view of the future, taking into account all those variables which all run from currency to customer acceptance. I mean, there's so many variables here that it's almost impossible to list them all, but that's our best view of what we think will happen.

And I would just add. I think our forecasting process has been relatively consistent, whether you call that conservative or aggressive, we'll leave that to you. But we're certainly consistent in our approach.

Okay. And if we can maybe helicopter up a bit. You spent a lot of time over the last couple of years talking about product innovation. How much of the product portfolio is now at the point where you think it's competitive from a feature set, from a technology set, or leading?

Well, it continues to improve but -- so when we look at the product line itself numerically, we probably have significant investment there but when we -- and a significant amount of the products have technology. So when we look at the actual sales, the sales are being produced and the margin is being produced by the innovative product. So looking at it from a revenue standpoint, we're certainly generating revenue on the enhanced innovative products.

Our next question comes from the line of Camilo Lyon with Canaccord Genuity.

You guys were talking about price increases as a gross margin offset to the higher input cost. Could you share a little bit of the thinking around why you think the price increases will be accepted, especially in the light of some of the clearance product that is currently trying to work its way through the channel?

Well, primarily because we've had success with the merchandise selling through at retail at the prices that we expect them to be at. So we've seen successes in sell-through. We have visibility. We have about 85% of the selling of our retailers around the United States. And so we have that visibility of the products performing.

Got it. So am I to read that the price increases are going to be more on the technical product than across the spectrum of the portfolio brand?

Well, we have price increases on virtually everything that we have been selling over the last several years, and we've seen sales rates in a reasonably active to better. So the expectation is that the brand can sustain reasonable price increases, which we believe we've accomplished.

And did you say what that price increase range is going to be?

No, I didn't say, but -- in fact, I don't think we've talked about what our price increases are as it relates to spring '12 at all.

And it really varies by region, by product, by category.

Okay, fair enough. And then my second question relates, if you could just share a little bit of maybe cadence around the timing of the ERP implementation and what product categories or what regions will be feeling that. Personally [ph], you talked a little about that in your prepared remarks with respect to Canada, but maybe a little bit more color would be helpful.

Yes. I'll ask Bryan, Bryan Timm was managing that project for us, to talk a little bit about it.

Yes, I think we've commented in the past that we plan on going live with our pilots. In the prepared remarks, we commented that's our Canadian facility. And the cadence there is -- as we mentioned, is we plan for early spring when they wind down some of their spring shipping and it's minimally disruptive to that business. From there, we've got a cadence with the other geographies. It's not going to be by product categorical installation. It's going to be by geographic region.

And so when would the U.S. be -- when would that part of the business be affected in the U.S.?

That, right now, has yet to be determined.

But it's a 2012 event though?

No.

Okay. So what else in 2012?

Right now, our plans are for the Canadian facilities to go live, and we are currently reviewing whether or not we have other parts of the business that we would want to go live in '12 or whether or not we want to push that to the first part of '13?

Okay, got it. And then my last question relates to Sorel, obviously a phenomenal success story there. Can you just talk about how you think about growing the brand, whether it's either SKU growth, channel growth, regional growth or a mix of all 3? And where would you prioritize those growth opportunities?

Well, I think we're going to be continuing to open the stores when we find operations that we think can successfully sell relatively expensive and certainly fashion-forward product. We'll be adding points of distribution, but we're going to be continuing to flesh out Spring initiative. So we've been successful in growing our Spring business. It's still not anywhere near where it needs to be in order to make that brand a year-round brand. And then we also have these ancillary products, as I said slippers, which have been very successful. We want to expand that. But I think at the end of the day, the focus is going to on continuing to have interesting innovative fashion performance footwear for women. And there's lots of opportunity there for us to continue to expand the line size and to continue to push forward with more fashionable and more interesting women's protective product.

Our next question comes from the line of Liz Dunn with Macquarie.

I was first wondering about the composition of your inventory. How clean is it heading into first quarter? And then I was also wondering regarding the ERP program and -- or implementation in some your cost-cutting initiatives. Are there any things you're delaying as a result of some of the more cost-conscious positioning?

Yes, this is Tim. So I would let Tom speak specifically because he's got some fairly detailed information on the inventory. But suffice it to say that by far, the majority of it is spring '12 and fall '11 merchandise. And we have strategic homes for all this stuff which -- in revenues and margin that we expect to make on that are baked into the outlook that we gave you today. The ERP installation is one of -- as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, one of our focus areas strategically and that will continue to be funded and there won't be any postponement there. But let me have Tom speak to the inventory, and then if you have further questions, I can answer those.

Liz, this Tom. As I had mentioned earlier and perhaps you missed this, but a little under 90% of our existing inventory is comprised of both spring '12 and fall '11 inventories. So it's very current and clean, and we expect to liquidate that inventory. The excess elements of that inventory, about 2/3 through our retail channel and roughly 1/3 of the excess through our existing wholesale, including the value channel. And the unit volume is actually down. So this is all a function of unit cost and mix.

Okay. Have you ever shared what sort of recovery rates you get in your own retail stores versus the value channel in terms of liquidating excess inventory?

No, we really haven't, but I could say that our retail margins are quite healthy.

Okay, great. And then just in terms of the cost savings program -- again, I apologize. I just had real connection problems today but -- so when exactly will these cuts take effect because obviously, the first quarter guidance versus the year, there's a big delta there? How should we think about the year as we go forward in terms of when we'll reach leverage?

Yes, many of these reductions are underway. But I think as we look at the business, especially with Q2 being a low-volume quarter and just how the anniversary effect of cost have rolled on, particularly in Q1, we would expect SG&A to be flat to down-ish in the back half of the year. So most of the measures will be realized more so in the back half than the front half of the year.

Our next question comes from the line of Ken Stumphauzer with Sterne Agee.

I have just one question, I guess, philosophically on the move from reporting backlogs. It seems like the business really meaningfully changed a couple of years ago when you opened a lot of outlets. So I'm just curious to know if 75% or 80% of your business is still dictated by backlogs, why the change and then why now as opposed to a year ago or 2 years ago.

Well, it's a great question because when we began analyzing this, we're really behind in terms of changing the reporting method as it relates to backlog. It's become a much more complex business adding the geographies and the various kinds of ways that we distribute products. And frankly, it's just become increasingly a distraction when we describe the business to investors because we have to constantly recalibrate the backlog against the future business specifics. And I think as we began to install this SAP system, it really showed us that we're just in the process of trying to make the business more understandable for investors at the end of the day. I know Tom has got maybe some additional information that might help, but it just really is about making sure that our investors follow the business the way we manage it and backlog for us, internally. We're just becoming a really minor part of how we manage the business.

Yes. We put a lot more thought and effort and thinking into the -- for the outlooks that we provide of the investment committee on a quarterly basis with all the variables, cancel rates, replenishment programs, the direct-to-consumer business, the timing shifts with the Distributor business. All those moving parts have led us to believe that staying with the quarterly outlook solely is a more relevant way to communicate with investors and hopefully, significantly less confusing going forward.

Okay. And then my next question was regarding kind of backlogs or the way the business, you think, is going to be planned next year. A lot of what we heard at outdoor retailers that retailers were kind of looking at the business myopically and were ultimately planning on ordering backlogs on the basis of what sell-through was in 2011. And it appears as if sell-through is obviously meaningfully less than what most people had anticipated entering the year. So I'm curious to know if you feel that more the business next year will be replenishment driven and hence, a little bit more unpredictable, or if you think it's going to adhere to kind of historic rates?

Well, again, we have the visibility of our order book today and we see conservatism. As you recognize when we talked about the outlook for the year, we see conservatism as it relates to the purchases. And we know intuitively what our own revenues are going to be from our own direct-to-consumer business. And so that's analyzed together with our expectations for the future and on a customer-specific basis going all the way through the detail. And that's how we drive the business and drive the outlook as we've given you today. The outlook today is frankly the same methodology that we've used for many, many years. It's just the add in to backlog coefficient. It just ends up being a reconciliation nightmare for our investors. So that we can take the timing and all the other components out. It just -- at the end of the day, it's just a distraction and a more difficult way to look at the business.

I guess what I'm asking at the end of the day is whether there's different assumptions than you would make historically regarding replenishment rates just assuming that things move back to more normal weather patterns or if you feel like things are going to kind of hold to where they've been historically and hence, there's an element of conservatism in there.

No. What we -- we've used the same methodology we've used for many, many years to create today's outlook. And so nothing has really changed and -- but backlog is a diminishing factor. And we felt it was important to make sure investors knew that by removing it.

Okay. And then just one last question, if I can. Obviously, there is a significant proliferation of Omni-Heat SKUs in 2011. It unfortunately happened to coincide with unfavorably warm weather. So there's obviously been a decent amount of markdowns at retail. Inventories are a little bit inflated. I wonder if there's any concern that, perhaps, some of the momentum that you guys have managed to build over the past couple of years could be tapering off just given the markdown activity.

No. Omni was among the best-selling merchandise that our retailers had from us. And really, when they compared it against merchandise they have from others, it was still very, very good. So whoever bought it on markdown here late got a good deal, but we're very excited about it and so are our retailers.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Bill Dezellem with Tieton Capital Management.

Would you please discuss the magnitude of order cancellations that you experienced in the fourth quarter and what you're seeing so far here in the first quarter?

Yes. This is Tom. So I would say, as you can probably imagine, given we've just come through 2009 and '10, 2 of the best winters in many, many years, so our cancel rates were quite low in both of those seasons compared to the winter that we've just come through, where our cancel rates have increased, which has driven the increased closeout activity in Q4 and Q1 of 2012.

And presumably, those cancellation rates were higher than normal versus the lower than normal in the prior couple of years?

I think that's an accurate assessment.

And so your ability to get the units in inventory to be -- to actually be down, that was a result of the discounting that you were doing?

No, that's a function of the higher input costs over the last several years where we've had a higher dollar-denominated inventory than unit-denominated.

As well as just the mix of product, outerwear and higher value, cold weather footwear.

There are no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for closing comments.

Thank you very much for listening in. We appreciate your help and support, and we will talk to you in April.

Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.