Thanks, Matt, and good afternoon. It is my pleasure to share with you the financial highlights from Blue Bird's Fiscal 2022 second quarter results. The quarter end is based on a closed April 2, 2022, whereas the prior year was based on our April 3, 2021, close date. We will file the 10-Q today, May 12, after the market closes. Our 10-Q includes additional material and disclosures regarding our business and financial performance. We encourage you to read the 10-Q and the important disclosures that it contains. The appendix attached to today's presentation includes reconciliations of differences between GAAP and non-GAAP measures mentioned in this call as well as important disclaimers. Slide 10 is a summary of second quarter results for fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2021. It was another tough quarter for Blue Bird with a difficult operating environment as a result of continued supply chain disruptions that have impacted many manufacturing industries. Despite those challenges, global unit sales volume of 1,931 units was 442 units higher than prior year due to the extraordinary efforts from our supply chain and manufacturing teams. As Matt already mentioned, this improvement we saw in January and February quickly reversed in March with the ramp-up of the war in Ukraine. Supply issues were experienced for multiple components across a number of suppliers. In addition, Blue Bird had a backlog of over 6,600 units at quarter end, 4,000 more than at the end of the second quarter of fiscal '21. At this time, our production capacity, which will remain constrained for the balance of the fiscal year is full, and we are feeling fiscal '23 Q1 slots. Our ability to complete and deliver all of these units on a timely basis will depend on supply stability of key components. Consolidated net revenue of $208 million was $43 million higher than prior year. Of that, bus net revenue was $188 million, up by $38 million versus prior year. On average, bus revenue per unit decreased from 101,000 to 98,000, which was largely the result of a higher mix of gasoline power buses, 29% this year versus 11% last year. Supply-constrained EV sales were at a level of 49 units less than the last year. Parts revenue for the quarter was $19 million, representing an improvement of $5 million compared to the prior year second quarter. Over the past few quarters, we have seen improvement in part sales, which is an indicator that the normal workforce school districts is starting to get back to pre-COVID levels, although there has been some disruption also in our parts business due to supplier shortages. Gross margin for the quarter was 1.5% for 970 basis points lower than the same period of last year. As we noted on the Q1 call, we expected to see significant margin compression in the second quarter due to raw material increases, component cost pressure and the low-margin backlog units that were priced nearly 12 months ago. I will discuss this in detail later in the presentation. In the second quarter of fiscal '22, adjusted net income was negative $10 million or $12 million lower than last year. Adjusted EBITDA of approximately negative $11 million was down compared with the prior year by $18 million. Adjusted diluted earnings per share of negative $0.51 was down $0.36 from the prior year. Slide 11 shows the walk from fiscal '21 second quarter adjusted EBITDA to the fiscal '22 second quarter results. Starting on the left with $7.5 million, higher bus volume in the period of additional 442 units and higher parts margin of $2.6 million resulted in a $6.5 million favorable impact. Pricing, net of economics, was negative $12.1 million in the quarter, driven by higher steel and commodity costs and margin compression as we work through the backlog. As we look to the balance of the year, we will more clearly see the impact of higher commodity costs. Plant efficiencies deteriorated by 9.7 million from last year, driven by higher freight costs, approximately $1,000 more per bus and supply disruptions and part shortages. SG&A and engineering expenses were close to $3 million higher than last year, primarily driven by higher wages. Recall that during the second quarter of fiscal '21, we had takeouts and furloughs in place in response to COVID-19 demand drop and key engineering projects were postponed. Since then, that has been restored and also increased due to high inflation and essential regulatory engineering projects have resumed. Additionally, in the other category, our joint venture results from Micro Bird were close to 1 million lower versus the prior year, but they have been also affected by supply chain shortages, predominantly the microchip shortage, which is impacting the chassis allocation from [indiscernible]. Moving to Slide 12. We wanted to give you a perspective of what the underlying normalized results for Q2 would have looked like absent of the supply chain constraints and margin compression from the old fiscal '21 backlog. On the volume side, our current capacity is close to 3,000 units per quarter. So we could have built and sold additional 1,000 units. [indiscernible] to approximately $30 million of net margin opportunity. As I explained before in prior calls, we are still working through the backlog of units and ordered almost a year ago. If the current prices we put into marketplace would have been fully affected during Q2 would have picked up additional $12 million from the pricing net of economics core. Finally, the supply chain shortages drove tremendous inefficiency in our manufacturing operations through increased rework and offline hours and multiple schedule changes. Absent of this effect and running at our historical efficiency, we would not have had to spend $11 million of variances in our operations. The operating expenses reflect the current wage rates and fixed cost for SG&A and engineering, so no adjustments needed there. So looking at the entire picture, our underlying operating performance would have yielded approximately $25 million of adjusted EBITDA on 3,000 units with price cost get closed and with smooth supply chain and operations performance. This is also our target level for the midterm in a normal year once the supply chain is returning back to normal levels, and our teams are making constant progress towards that goal. This was also our expectation for fiscal '22 Q4 at the time of our last earnings call. However, as you will see a bit later, many of the assumptions we had at the time did not go through anymore due to external geopolitical and macroeconomic factors. Moving on to the balance sheet and liquidity on Slide 13. We ended the quarter with cash of $15 million. That was at $167 million, $12 million lower than last year. Net debt of $142 million was $8 million lower than prior year and our revolver at 0 balance. It is worth noting that we are in compliance with all covenants for the end of the quarter. There are 2 active financial covenants in our credit agreement for the period. First, the trailing 12 months EBITDA, as defined under the credit agreement, was $12.3 million versus a minimum requirement of negative $4.5 million. Second, liquidity as defined under the credit agreement was $108.3 million versus [indiscernible] covenant of $5 million, that for remain in compliance with our credit agreement covenants. Moving on to Slide 14. We have already covered the cash and debt on the previous slide. The improvement in operating cash flow and adjusted free cash flow was primarily driven by trade working capital due to our increased production levels throughout the quarter. On Slide 15, we would like to give you some transparency regarding how we were planning to work through the backlog with oil pricing. As an analogy, it is like a snake eating the elephant. It is slow and painful at times, but we are making good progress. The area sections on the graph represent the unit volumes by month on the left axis. In white, you can see that approximately half of the volume we will build and sell in fiscal '22 comes from fiscal '21 orders, which in today's inflationary environment are yielding very low and sometimes even negative margins. In light blue, we are stacking up units orders during fiscal '22 Q1, although some were quoted also during the second half of fiscal '21. On the right axis, the horizontal lines, you can see the relative improvement in standard gross margin per unit with the 5% price increases announced in July 2021 taking forward. Beginning in June, we are planning to build and sell the first unit orders during Q2 fiscal '22 with 11% price increase in place. Please note that the additional 4% price increase we put in place in March is only now starting to affect future orders taken during Q3 of fiscal '22 for builds later in the year. The effects above combined with the improved supply chain situation in January and February and steadily decreasing steel and other raw material prices gave us confidence towards a good recovery during the second half of fiscal '22. And then February 24 happened, Russia decided to invade Ukraine and start on unnecessary conflict on the borders of Eastern Europe. The human suffering and refugee situation is staggering along with enormous economic consequences for the world. This conflict is driving significant effect in a globally connected economy. Ukraine provides critical gas for the worldwide chip production as well as iron is produced in the region and is used in steel manufacturing. Oil and gas markets were also shocked by the ensuing trade war. On Slide 16, you see our key raw material assumptions here in February. Steel prices were trending down and diesel was stable around $3.50 per gallon in the U.S. On Slide 17, you see how the steel prices shot back up, $300 to $500 per ton, and diesel went above $5 per gallon. While we are locking prices for the 20% of steel use in our own fabrication, our suppliers are mostly on a quarterly raw material escalator, which will hit our bottom line with these recent increases in Q4 of fiscal '22. These are impacted almost immediately our shipping costs via trucks and the general Tier 2, 3 and 4 supply chain disruptions with [indiscernible] drove more air freight and expedited shipments. The recent COVID lockdown in China further compounded the supply chain disruptions. All these events combined are slowing down and postponing our recovery, which we expected during second half of fiscal '22. We also had to reduce our rate of production growth for the remainder of this fiscal year. We are taking several countermeasures to address these facts on the ground. Announced an additional 10% price increase for new orders to be built before [indiscernible] 31, '22. Working with our dealer partners to improve backlog margins and optimize the production mix and deliveries. Working to improve the plant efficiency in a very difficult environment and adjust the speed to reflect the current supply chain capabilities. Continue to maintain very strict fixed cost control, reduced where possible, while still investing in critical areas for growth, for example, EV and chassis, to set ourselves out for success once the supply chain normalizes. Further pricing models and production swap management will be put in place during fiscal Q3 for future orders to reduce our margin exposure going forward. More to come on this during our next earnings call. On Slide 18, looking at fiscal 2022. As previously discussed, we had a difficult first half due to supply constraints and margin compression. We still expect to see gradual but slower relief in Q3 with the 11% price increase begins to take effect. By Q4, the situation is expected to further improve, but volume risk still exists and margins continue to be under pressure with inflationary effects accelerating. Therefore, we are reducing our adjusted EBITDA guidance for fiscal 2022 to a range of $20 million to $30 million on increased revenues of $800 million to $900 million. The adjusted free cash flow is expected to be positive on a range of $15 million to $25 million. With that, I will now turn the discussion back to Matt, who will walk you through an update on our business.