Razvan Radulescu
Analyst · ROTH Capital Partners. Please proceed with your question
Thanks, Matt, and good afternoon. It is my pleasure to share with you the financial highlights from Blue Bird's fiscal 2022 first quarter results. The quarter end is based on a close date of January 1, 2022, whereas the prior year was based on a January 2, 2021, close date. We will file the 10-Q today, February 9 after the market closes. Our 10-Q includes additional material and disclosures regarding our business and financial performance. We encourage you to read the 10-Q and the important disclosures that it contains. The appendix attached to today's presentation includes reconciliations of differences between GAAP and non-GAAP measures mentioned on this call as well as important disclaimers. Slide 9 is a summary of first quarter results for fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2021. It was a very tough quarter for Blue Bird with a difficult operating environment as a result of supply chain disruptions that have impacted many industries, especially those that use microchips and resin in their products. Further compounding the challenge, raw material prices continue to rise during the entire calendar year 2021, especially still up approximately 300% and aluminum up approximately 150%. The cost of overseas transportation increased nearly tenfold. Blue Bird's unit sales volume of 1,149 units was 106 units lower than prior year due to supplier constraints that limited our rate of production. Supply issues were experienced for multiple components across a number of suppliers. While the disruptions continue to impact our business through the quarter, our team has been working hard to find alternative sources for several critical parts that are constrained. In addition, Blue Bird had a backlog of over 4,800 units at quarter end or 3,700 more than at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2021. Our definition of backlog unit is a firm order, which becomes non-cancelable within 14 weeks of the expected production date. At this time, our production capacity, which is constrained for the first half of the year, is filling up quickly with only approximately 2,500 slots left open for fiscal 2022. Our ability to complete and deliver all of these units on a timely basis will depend on supply stability of key components. Consolidated net revenue of $129 million was $1 million lower than prior year due to the lower production capability already mentioned. Of that, bus net revenue was $112 million, down by $5 million versus the prior year due to lower volume. In fact, our average bus revenue per unit increased from 94,000 to 98,000, which was largely the result of a higher mix of alternative power buses, 56% of bookings versus 46% last year due to the outstanding success of the new 7.3-liter engine in our gasoline and propane units. Supply-constrained EV sales were at a level of 40 units or 16 higher than last year. Parts revenue for the quarter was $17 million, representing an improvement of $4 million compared to the prior year first quarter. Over the past few quarters, we have seen improvement in part sales, which is an indicator that the normal work for school districts is starting to get back to pre-COVID levels, although there has been some disruption also in our parts business due to supplier shortages. Gross margin for the quarter was 12.5% or 140 basis points higher than the same period last year. The increase was driven mainly by the higher mix of part business relative to the bus business, combined with favorable product mix. As we noted on the fourth quarter call, we expected to see raw material and component cost pressure increase in the first quarter due to significant increases in steel and other commodities as well as the continuation of higher costs that are being experienced in all modes of freight. As Matt mentioned, we have previously implemented a total of 11% pricing increase to help offset these headwinds. However, this will only materialize during the second half of fiscal 2022 as we have to work through the current backlog first. Wherever possible, however, we took limited pricing increase actions even on the existing backlog with the impact expected to come during the remainder of the fiscal year. In the first quarter of fiscal 2022, adjusted net income was negative $2 million or $2 million lower than last year. Adjusted EBITDA of approximately $4 million was down compared with prior year, also by $2 million, while adjusted EBITDA margin was approximately 3% for a year-over-year decrease of 1.7 percentage points. Adjusted diluted earnings per share of negative $0.07 was also slightly down from the prior year. Slide 10 shows the walk from fiscal 2021 first quarter adjusted EBITDA to the fiscal 2022 first quarter results. Starting on the left at $5.8 million, lower bus volume in the period of 1,149 units, down 106 units, was offset by higher parts volume of 1.9, resulting in a $0.2 million favorable impact. Pricing net of economics was slightly positive in the quarter, driven by the positive effect of reevaluating the inventory we had on hand at the start of the fiscal year, which was bought at a lower cost than the new standard costs and partially offset by higher steel and commodity costs. As we look to the balance of the year, you will more clearly see the impact of higher commodity costs. Efficiencies were slightly better than last year. SG&A and engineering expenses were close to $3 million higher than last year, primarily driven by higher wages. Recall that during the first quarter of fiscal 2021, we had pay cuts and furloughs in place in response to COVID-19 demand drop and key engineering projects were postponed. Since then, pay has been restored and also increased due to high inflation and essential regulatory engineering projects have resumed. In order to align and energize our dealer body, we had our in-person annual dealer meeting in November 2021 in California, which was canceled the year prior. Additionally, in the other category, our joint venture results from Micro Bird were close to $1 million lower versus the prior year, but they have been also affected by supply chain shortages, predominantly the microchip shortage, which is impacting the chassis allocation from Ford and GM. Moving on to the balance sheet and liquidity on Slide 11. We ended the quarter with cash of $4 million, down $20 million from the same time last year. Debt was at $165 million or $5.7 million lower than last year. Net debt was $161 million, and it was $14 million higher versus the prior year. It is worth noting that we were in compliance with all covenants at the end of the quarter. There were two active financial covenants in our credit agreement for the period. First, the trailing 12-month EBITDA, as defined under the credit agreement was $28 million versus a minimum requirement of $14.5 million. Second, liquidity as defined under the credit agreement was $93 million at quarter end versus a minimum covenant of $10 million. Therefore, we remained in compliance with our credit agreement covenants. Moving on to Slide 12. We have already covered the cash and debt on the previous slide. The deterioration in operating cash flow and adjusted free cash flow was primarily driven by higher working capital and secondarily by lower profits due to lower volume. On Slide 13, going into fiscal 2022, our margins were and still are under pressure. We are facing increased cost for raw materials, freight, labor and generally supplier-driven disruptions. And while we have a substantial backlog, many of the buses will not benefit yet from the pricing actions we took in July and October of 2021. These effects, combined with current low throughput due to supply chain constraints will create a very low first half of 2022 profitability even by historical seasonally adjusted comparisons. We are taking actions as outlined on this slide in order to improve our costing stability over the medium term and reduce our pricing exposure going forward. Those actions will start to show results in Q3 of 2022 and become fully effective in Q4 of 2022 due to the time lag, especially on the pricing side given the current backlog. On the costing side, we have increased our steel hedging program and are working to extend it to our key suppliers. We have engineered second store suppliers for key components in order to increase plant throughput and are resourcing components where needed. We are also selectively exploring vertical integration options via make or buy analysis. On the pricing side, we implemented 11% price increase to recover non-cost increases. So far, the response has been positive, and we will continue to monitor our win/loss rate in the marketplace. To reduce our exposure, we already reduced our core guarantee from 90 to 60 days. Additionally, due to still higher raw material price and freight development, we have announced an additional 4% price increase effective March 1, 2022, for new orders. However, this will only minimally impact fiscal 2022 units sold. Another important change was the introduction in December of a variable pricing structure for our dealers and customers while maintaining a higher fixed price option is desired. While it is still early, the initial response is also favorable on this one. On Slide 14, looking at the balance of fiscal 2022. As previously discussed, we are expecting a difficult first half due to supply constraints and margin pressure, with the majority of the cost increases becoming effective on January 1 based on our supply contracts. We still expect to see gradual relief beginning in Q3. The supply chain constraints are resolved due to new suppliers coming on board and the 11% price increase begins to take effect. In Q4, we expect to be at higher production levels and with normalized margins as the full 11% price increase goes into effect and an additional minimal impact from the recently announced 4% price increase becomes also effective. Therefore, we are maintaining our guidance for fiscal 2022 previously released during our fiscal 2021 year-end call. With that, I will now turn the discussion back to Matt, who will walk you through an update on our business. Matt?