Charlie Boero Hughes
Analyst
Thank you, Mariano. Good morning, everyone. Let’s start on page four with a brief analysis on the Mato Grosso do Sul. As seen on the top tables, rainfall cluster during the second quarter of 2022 were 103.4% higher and during the same period of last year and 3% higher than the 10-year average. After a dry start of the year, receiving above average rainfall during March and April allowed our short implantation to continue to recover from the impact of 2021 first event. Better cane availability in turn, enabled us to increase our crushing pace and continue to take advantage of the constructive price scenario. Let’s move ahead to Slide 5, where I would like to discuss our sugarcane crushing. During the second quarter, our crushing volume amounted to 3.3 million tons of sugarcane only 5% lower than last year. Thanks to our 27.3% increase in harvested area, which allowed us to compensate for lower productivity indicators as we will see next. On a year-to-date basis, crushing volume reach 3.6 million tons 35.7% lower compared to the same period of last year. This was fully explained by the dynamics of the first quarter, namely the late start of crushing activities as expected, and the fact that harvesting activities were mostly concentrated on reform areas with limited growth potential. Nevertheless, we expect it to make up for the slow starting the following quarters and reach a crushing volume in line with last year. For instance, we accelerated our crushing pace and in July 2022, we marked a new monthly record of 1.5 million tons crushed in our cluster. Please turn to Page 6, where I would like to walk you through our agricultural productivity. As we are expecting, sugarcane yields during the quarter were 24.5% lower compared to the same period of last year, reaching 60 tons per hectare while TRS content presented on 11.8% reduction to 119 kilograms per time. These reductions, which resulted in a 33.4% drop in TRS production per hectare were fully explained by the lagging impact of 2021’s adverse weather conditions. As most of the harvested area was came below its optimal growth stage. Sugarcane yields during the first half of the year reached 59 tons per hector while TRS content reached 117 kilograms per time, mark a year-over-year reduction of 24.6% and 7% respectively. Our strategy of mostly harvesting reform areas enabled us to allow areas with greater potential to continue to grow, leverage area to plant new high yielding cane available for next harvest season and maximize ethanol production and capture attractive prices. Let’s move ahead to Side 7, where I would like to discuss our production mix. In the second quarter of 2022, both hydrous and anhydrous ethanol traded an average price of 23 and 25.02 per pound to equivalent 19.1% and 30.6% premium to sugar respectively. Thus, we diverted as much as 79% of our TRS to ethanol to profit from higher relative prices compared to the 59% report in the previous year. To further take advantage of price premiums43% of our total ethanol production was anhydrous ethanol compared to 34% during the second quarter of 2021. This high degree in flexibility constitutes one of our most important competitive advantages, since it allow us to make a more efficient use of our fixed assets and profit from higher relative prices. Year-to-date, we diverted as much as 80% of our TRS to ethanol the product trading enterprise premium. Although production of both ethanol and sugar was lower as a consequence of the reduction in crushing volume, this was offset by higher average prices. We were able to capture attractive prices, thanks to our high inventories at the start of this year, which were 56% higher than in 2021. In the case of ethanol and 75% in the case of sugar. Let’s please turn to Slide 8, where I would like to discuss our selling volumes and average selling prices by product. As you can see on the left chart, ethanol reported as 16.6% increase in selling volumes to 258,000 cubic meters, mostly driven by and hydrous sales, which increased by 37.5% or over average selling prices were up 45.4% year-over-year to 4.90 per pound. Thanks to our commercial strategy of clearing out our tanks at the peak of prices and our flexibility to sell it to the domestic market and export markets. In the case of sugar, there was a 75.8% decrease in volume, which partially offset the 19.7% increase in average selling prices. The lower volume sold were driven by lower production due to both lower crushing and lower mix, as well as by higher carryover relative to sales. In energy, higher average selling prices were fully upset by a decrease in selling volumes as a consequence of lower crushing and off our commercial decision to carry over bio gas in order to benefit from higher expected prices. Regarding carbon credits, let me remind you that you to the efficiency and sustain sustainability in our operations rank among the highest in the industry, we have the right to issue carbon credits every time we sell ethanol. Year-to-date, we sold 387,000 CBios, 2.5 times higher than the previous year at an average price of $18.30 per CBios. Following the end of the first semester, we cleared it out our stock of CBios at an average price of $29 per CBios, achieving prices as high as $40 per CBios before the drop in prices mid-July. Please jump to Page 9, where I would like to walk you through our sales. Net sales amounted to 164 million in the second quarter of 2022 marking a 10.9% increase compared to the same period of last year. Higher revenues are fully explained by a 98.8% increase in ethanol sales during the quarter. Volume sold were mostly concentrated in April when ethanol prices peaked driven by a delay in the beginning of harvesting activities in Brazil. We took advantage of this scenario and conducted a monthly record sale of 125,000 cubic meters effectively clearing out tanks at an average price of 26.4 cents per pound sure equivalent. During June, we began building inventory to be sold towards year end at higher expected prices. In addition to profit from higher prices abroad during the quarter, we exported 10,000 cubic meters at a time when domestic prices traded at lower levels. This represents a competitive advantage as we are one of the few players in Brazil certified to export ethanol and who can reach the level of purity required in Europe. Moreover we sold 5.2 million worth of CBios under the Renova VO program. On the other hand, sugar sales were 20.2 million marking a year-over-year reduction of 71.7% whereas energy sales amounted to 9.5 million, 15.6% lower versus prior year. On a year-to-date basis, net sales amounted to 232 million marking a 5.6% year-over-year increase. Out of this amount ethanol sales were 186 million, 71.7% higher compared to the previous year partially offsetting the 71.1% reduction in sugar sales. CBios sales reached 7.1 million during the first six month of the year, whereas energy sales were 11.2 million marking a 24.6% year-over-year reduction. Despite the late start of harvesting activities and thus the lower production, our commercial strategy to carry over stocks from 2021 enabled us to benefit from the constructive price scenario, in particular, to capture the hike in ethanol prices, both domestically and in export markets. Finally, to conclude with the sugar, ethanol and energy business, please turn to Slide 10 where I would like to discuss the financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA during the second quarter was 104 million, 41.8% higher year-over-year. These solid results were mainly driven by the aforementioned increase in sales, a 10 million year-over-year gain in the mark-to-market of our unharvested cane led by higher expected sales and prices coupled with an increase in Consecana prices, which resulted in again in the mark-to-market of our harvested cane. And a 9 million year-over-year gain in the mark-to-market of our commodity hedge position, driven by decreasing prices. Results were partially offset by an increasing costs mostly fertilizers, fuels, lubricants in addition to the slight reduction in volume. These same drivers explain the 22.7% year-over-year increase in adjusted EBITDA during the first semester, which amounted to 162 million. In terms of breakdown, during the first half of the year ethanol accounted for 81.5% of total adjusted EBITDA generation in the sugar, ethanol and energy business, considering other operating income, while sugar accounted for 14.5%. To conclude with this section, I would like to briefly comment on the outlook of our sugar ethanol and energy business for the second semester. One year-ago, when our sugar gain plantations was hit by original frost, we communicated to the market what we believed would be the potential implications for our business. In-line with our expectations and as explained above, we entered into an harvest period from December 2021 to mid-March 2022, to allow our sugar to continue to recover from the impact of frost. In terms of productivity, yields were impacted during the first semester as expected, but presented a gradual recovery between the first and second quarter. We expect it will return to normal levels towards the second half of the year, as there will no longer be sugarcane impact it by the frost. Lastly, we are now accelerating our crushing pace to make up for the slow start of the year. That being said, our operational focus for the year was designed it with these events in mind and seeing as our view has so far materialized, our focus for the full-year remains and change. I would now like to move on the farming business, this direct your attention to Slide 12. As of the end of July 2022, we have 271,000 hectares or 93% of total area and produce over 1 million tons of aggregate grains. The remaining hectares are expected to be fully harvested in August. Regarding our rice business, this quarter, we included 12,000 hectares related to our recent acquisition of Viterra rice operations, which had an average yield of 7.3 times per hectares and marginally increased this campaign average yield from 6.8 to 6.9 times per hectares. As anticipated, being geographically diversified enabled us as to mitigate where risk. Let’s move to Page 13, where would like to walk you through the financial performance of our Farming & Land Transformation Businesses. Adjusted EBITDA in the Farming & Land Transformation Businesses amounted for 20 million for the second quarter, 38.4% below the same period of last year. The decline is fully explained by a lower contribution from our crops and rice businesses into the overall results. Year-to-date, adjusted a BDITDA was 56 million 37.3% lower than the previous year due to the aforementioned lower contribution, which full-year offset the improved the performance in our daily business. Higher costs driven by a global inflation environment, coupled with a mixed performance of yields and prices are the main reasons towards the decrease. As known, inflation in the United States amounted to 8.5 for the last 12-months whereas in Europe it reached 8.9%. This cost a pressure on margins across industries and geographies. In our crop businesses, adjusted the BBITDA amounted to six million in the second quarter, marking a 63.4% reduction compared to the same period of last year. Results were mainly impacted by higher costs in U.S. dollar terms, mostly seen in agricultural input costs such as fertilizers and diesel, as well as logistics costs. Moreover, we reported a year-over-year loss of six million in the mark-to-market of our forward contracts due to higher commodity prices. Nevertheless, results were partially offset by a 66.9% increase in gross sales coupled with a year-over-year gain of five million in the mark-to-market of our biological assets on higher harvested area and better prices. Year-to-date adjusted EBITDA was 24 million, 28.5% lower versus the previous year. It was mostly explained by higher cost in U.S. dollar terms driven by global inflation are mixed performance in terms of yields with peanut and corn second crop presenting our 4% and 11% reduction respectively, coupled with our 12 million loss in the mark-to-market of our forward contracts. Adjusted EBITDA in our rise business was five million during the quarter and 13 million in the first semester, marking up 49.4% and 65.4% year-over-year reduction respectively. Results were mainly impacted by lower yield and the 9% decline in prices at the moment of harvest. Thus, this resulted in a year-over-year loss in the mark-to-market of our biological asset and in the net realizable value of our agriculture produce of the harvest of 30 million in the second quarter and of 20 million in the first six months of the year. Regarding years, the decrease was caused by the impact of an area in some of our rice farms, we are confident that the acquisition of Viterra rice operations will contribute to mitigate weather risk and increase our geographic diversification in the region. Moreover, EBITDA generation was also negatively impacted by higher cost in U.S. dollar terms, which pressured margins. Moving on to the dairy business, adjusted EBITDA amounted to seven million during the second quarter, flattish compared to the previous year whereas during the first half it amounted to 14 million marking a year-over-year increase of 17.6%. In both cases, results were explained by an increase in both volume and average prices and our continuous focus on achieving efficiencies in our vertical integrated operations. Again, results were partially offset by higher cost in U.S. dollar terms driven by the global inflation environment. In the case of Land Transformation, although no farm sales were conducted, the positive results reflected the mart-to-market of an account receivable corresponding to latest sale of farms in Brazil, which tracks the evolution of soybean prices. Let’s now turn to Page 15, which shows the evolution of Adecoagro’s consolidated operation and financial performance. On a year-to-date basis gross sales expanded 27.7% year-over-year to 588 million, where as adjusted EBITDA amounted to 205 million marking at 2.7% decline compared to the same period of last year. In terms of production, we expect crushing volume to end in line with last year, as we are accelerating a crushing pace. However, it is worth to highlight that despite lower year-to-date crushing, we are able to capture high prices. Thanks to our commercial strategy. To conclude, please turn to Slide 16, to take a look at our net debt position. As of June 30th of 2022 net data amounted to 830 million, a 5.3% higher compared to the previous quarter. This was fully explained by a 9.4% increase in gross debt partially offset by a 31.8% increase in our cash position. As a reminder cash generation is concentrating second semester of the year. Whereas the first has the highest working capital requirements, as our crops are planted and harvested. Thus, we expect to reduce our indebtedness as we finish with harvesting activities and start collecting sales throughout the next quarter. On a year-over-year basis net debt increased by 11.5%. This was mainly driven by the impact of adverse weather conditions in Brazil resulting in a year-over-year reduction of 3.5 million tons in our crushing volume and negatively impacting our last 12-month results coupled with higher working capital up, mostly on account of higher input costs. We believe that our balance sheet is in a healthy position, not only based on the overall debt levels, but also on the term of our indebtedness most of which is long term. Our net debt ratio was 1.9 times in this quarter that is versus the previous quarter. At the same time, our liquidity ratio reached 1.3 times. This clearly shows the full capacity of the company to repay shorten debt with cash balance with operating external capital. Thank you very much for your time. We are now open to questions.