Charlie Boero Hughes
Analyst
Thank you, Mariano. Good morning, everyone. Let's start on Page 4 with a brief analysis on the rains in Mato Grosso do Sul. As seen on the top tables, rains in our cluster during the first three months of the year, were 31.3% lower than during the same period of last year and 18.6% below the 10-year average. Nevertheless, rainfalls during March and April were above-average, favoring the recovery of our sugarcane plantation. Our cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul normally operates based on our continuous harvest model. These means that subject to weather going normal, we can harvest and crush cane around even during the first quarter of the year, which is the traditional interharvest period of Brazil's sugar and ethanol industry. As we already knew, and had anticipated in several opportunities, the adverse weather conditions observed in 2021 caused a reduction in sugarcane availability towards year-end and beginning of 2022. As a result, in December 2021, we entered into an interharvest period until mid-March 2022 when we resumed activities. Thus, our crushing volumes decreased 86.9% year-over-year, reaching 272,000 tons. All of our hectares have already been planted and will be harvested at a later date to allow them to further recover. We expect to make up for the slow start in the following quarters and reach a crushing volume in line with last year. Please jump to page 5 where I would like to walk you through our agricultural productivity. As we were expecting during the first three months of the year, yields were down 40.9% year-over-year, reaching 44 tons per hectare. Whereas TRS per ton decreased 11% to a 100 kilograms per ton. As a result, the TRS production per hectare was 47.4% lower than last year. This decline is fully related to the fact that we focus on harvesting reform areas with limited growth potential, mainly related to the [Indiscernible] [Indiscernible] and above. By doing this, we were able to produce ethanol and capture attractive prices while allowing areas with greater potential to continue to grow and liberating area to plant new high yielding cane, which will be harvested next season. Before turning to the following slide, it is important to highlight that the results achieved are not a reflection of our expectations for the full-year. We have a positive outlook in terms of cane availability and productivity favored by good rains in March and April. This will allow us to increase our crushing pace and continue to take advantage of the constructed price scenario. Let's move ahead to Slide 6 where I would like to discuss our production mix. In the first quarter of 2022, both hydrous and anhydrous ethanol traded at an average price of 19.1 and 20.108 per pound sugar equivalent, marking a 3.2% and 12.5% premium to sugar respectively. Thus, we diverted 97% of our TRS to ethanol, to profit from higher relative prices. Out of our total ethanol production, 49% was anhydrous ethanol, compared to 11% during the same period of last year. This high degree in flexibility constitutes one of our most important competitive advantages since it allows us to make a more efficient use of our fixed assets and profit from higher relative prices. The decline issue in ethanol production due to lower crushing was offset by higher average selling prices. We were able to capture the increasing prices thanks to our beginning of period inventories, which were 56% higher than in the First Quarter of 2021 in the case of ethanol, and 75% in the case of sugar. To conclude with this slide, ethanol accounted for 65.7% of total adjusted EBITDA generation in sugar, ethanol, and energy business considering other operating income. While sugar accounted for 33.5% during the first quarter of the year. Let's please turn to Slide 7, where I would like to discuss our sales throughout the quarter. As you can see on the right chart, net ethanol sales for the quarter amounted to $57 million, marking a 31.1% increase year-over-year on higher average setting prices, mainly led by anhydrous ethanol. This will have to point out that attractive prices for ethanol during the quarter were driven by the late start of harvesting activities in the [Indiscernible] of Brazil, the hike in new the national oil prices, and a greater than expected rebound in hydrous ethanol consumption in March compared to February. Despite the year-over-year reduction in ethanol production, we were able to benefit from the pricing our yield due to our commercial strategy to push forward sales and high inventories. At the start of 2022, we had a carry over of 93,000 cubic meters of anhydrous ethanol and 61,000 cubic meters of hydrous ethanol. Half of these inventories were sold in the first quarter of 2022, while the other 50% were sold during April along with our monthly production. That being said, sales in April marked a new record high for ethanol amounting to 125,000 cubic meters at an average price of 26.4 cents per pound in sugar equivalent, including 10,000 cubic meters exported. A brief comment on CBios, due to the efficiency and sustainability in our operations ranked among the highest in the industry, we have the right to issue carbon credits every time we sell ethanol. During the first quarter of the year, we sold two million worth of CBios under the RenovaBio program. In the case of energy, net sales amounted to $2 million, marking a 53.6% year-over-year decrease. This was fully attributable to our 45.7% decline in average selling volumes, along with a 14.5% decrease in average selling prices on higher levels of water in reservoirs. Lastly, net sales of sugar during the quarter declined 69.1% year-over-year to net $8 million. This was driven by a 72.5% decrease in selling volumes due to the lower production, partially offset by a 12.4% increase in average prices, which reached 20.5 cents per pound. Nevertheless, we believe we are in a good position to continue capturing the increasing prices as we still have unhedged 62% of sugar and 95% of ethanol production related to the '22, '23 campaign. Finally, to conclude with the short ethanol and energy business, please turn to Slide eight where I would like to discuss the financial performance. Despite the Nate started harvesting activities and thus the low production adjusted EBITDA during the first quarter was $57 million in line with last year. These sorted results were mainly driven by 10 million gain in the mark-to-market of our sugarcane, along with a $6 million engaged in the mark-to-market of our commodity hedge position. Nevertheless, results were impacted by an increase in costs, mostly driven by fertilizers, fuels, and lubricants. Coupled with an appreciation of the Brazilian currency, as well as lower sales registered. I would now like to move on to the farming business. Please direct your attention to Slide 10. We have completed our accounting activities for the 2021 and '22 campaign in which we have planted a total of 281,000 hectares, marking a 7.4% increase in area compared to the previous season. Soybean, sunflower, and cotton, were the crops with the largest increase in planted area. We are currently undergoing harvesting activities for most of our grains. As of the end of April of 2022, we harvested 146,000 hectares, or 52% of total area and produced over 600,000 tons of aggregate grains. Let's move to Page 11 where I would like to to walk you through the financial performance of our farming and land transformation businesses. Adjusted EBITDA in the farming and land transformation businesses amounted to $36 million for the first quarter, 36.6% below the same period of last year. The decline is fully explained by a lower contribution from our rice business into the overall results. Adjusted EBITDA in our rice business reached $8 million, marking a 70.9% decrease compared to the same period of last year. The decline is mainly explained by lower yields due to the impact of La Niña in some of our farms, which reduced water availability and by an 8% year-over-year declining prices at the moment of harvest. In addition, higher costs due to inflation in Argentina and U.S. dollars also negatively impacted results. By expanding our rice business into Uruguay, we believe geographic diversification will enabled us to mitigate well the risks. Going into our crop business, adjusted EBITDA amounted to $18 million, marking a 3.2% year-over-year increase. The main drive is we're on $8 million increase in gross sales. And a 12 million year-over-year gain related to the mark-to-market of our biological assets due to the higher planted area and better prices. Results were partially offset by a loss in the mark-to-market of our commodity hedge position and inflation in U.S. dollar terms, which drove costs and expenses. Moving onto the dairy business, adjusted EBITDA marked the year-over-year increase of 48% to $7 million. Higher results were explained by an increase in both volumes and average prices and our continuous focus on achieving efficiencies in our vertically integrated operations. Again, results were partially offset by higher cost due to inflation in U.S. dollar terms and higher cost of feed due to higher prices of corn and soybean. In the case of of land transformation, although no farm sales were conducted, the positive results reflect the mark-to-market of an accounted receivable corresponding to the latest sale of farms in Brazil, which tracks the evolution of soybean prices. Let's now turn to Page 13, which shows the evolution of Adecoagro's consolidated operational financial performance. Our gross sales expanded 17.6% year-over-year to $205 million. Whereas, our adjusted EBITDA amounted to $86 million, marking a 20.8% decline compared to the same period of last year. It is worth to highlight that despite weather challenges, we were unable to capture high prices thanks to our commercial strategy to carry over stocks. As mentioned before, we expected to make up for the lower production volumes in the following quarters and continue to benefit from attractive prices. Lastly, the functional currencies in the regions where we operate may experience changes compared to the U.S. dollar, which is our reporting currency, consequently, causing an impact on our FX gain losses line with our P&L. During the first three months of this year, both of our functional currencies appreciate in real terms especially the Brazilian real, causing a decrease in our debt level in local currency. And hence again in our net income, but is later neutralized in our adjusted net income rich construction. For more details on the matter, please refer to Page 3 of our first quarter 2022 earnings release. To conclude, please turn to Slide 14 to take a look at our net debt position. As March the 31st of 2022, net debt amounted to 788 million, 170 million or 27.5% higher compared to the fourth quarter of 2021. This was fully explained by a 13.8% increase in gross debt, along with a 28.5% reduction in our cash position. The first semester has the highest working capital and CapEx requirements as we perform most of our maintenance in the sugarcane industry and our crops are planted. Whereas in the second semester, we collect all the cash generated by the sales of our products. Thus, it is important to highlight that our operations should be analyzed annually rather than by quarter, even the seasonality of our cash-generation. We expect to reduce the working capital requirements and our indebtedness as we continue with our harvesting activities throughout the second and third quarter. On a year-over-year basis, net debt increased by 7.6%. This is mostly explained by an increase in marketable inventories of $45 million compared to the first quarter of 2021, led by higher prices and higher carry over stock especially soybean and corn. We believe that our balance sheet is in a healthy position, not only based on the adequate overall debt levels, but also on the term of our indebtedness, most of which is long-term debt. Our net debt ratio went up to 1.9 times in this quarter compared to the 1.4 times in the previous quarter. Whereas, it did remain flattish versus the first quarter of 2021. At the same time, our liquidity ratio, which is calculated as cash and equivalence plus marketable inventories divided by short-term debt reached 1.5 times. This clearly shows the full capacity of the company to repay short-term debt with cash balance without raising external [Indiscernible]. Thank you very much for your time. We are now open to questions.