Charlie Boero Hughes
Analyst · JPMorgan. Please go ahead
Thank you, Mariano. Good morning, everyone. Let's start on Page 4 with a brief analysis on the rains in Mato Grosso do Sul. As seen on the top tables, rains in our cluster during the fourth quarter of 2021, were 4.3% lower than during the same period of last year, and 15.6% below the 10-year average. After a very humid month of October, starting in November, rains in our region were lower than the average for this time of the year. It is worth pointing out that the March rains have returned to average levels, favoring the recovery of our sugarcane plantation. As we had anticipated here, diverse weather conditions that impacted Brazil's main productive areas throughout the year, caused a reduction in sugarcane availability towards year-end, resulting in an early start of in the harvest season for all players in Brazil’s sugar and ethanol industry. Thus, expectations for the 2021 and ‘22 season point a total sugarcane production of $525 million compared to the $608 million tons in the previous harvest year. Evidently, the reduction in supply generated a positive impact in the prices of sugar and ethanol, which we were able to capture thanks to our production flexibility and through our hedging strategy. Before turning to the following slide, I would like to briefly comment on our expectation going forward. Although current weather conditions in our cluster are good, we foresee below average agricultural productivity indicators during the first semester of the year, given the lagging impact of 2021’s adverse weather. Nevertheless, our recovering productivity towards the second half, along with strong prices, should continue to drive solid results. We are in a good position to keep on capturing the increasing prices, as 76% of our expected sugar production, and 100% of ethanol production relating to the ‘22 and ‘23 campaign, remain unhedged. Now, let's continue with Slide 5, where I would like to discuss our sugarcane crushing strategy. During the last quarter of 2021, our crushing volume decreased by 50.4% year-over-year due to both weaker agricultural productivity indicators, and lower sugarcane availability. The latter was explained by the fact that during the third quarter of 2021, we accelerated harvesting activities, as anticipating area was critical to minimize the impact of the frost in our sugarcane plantation. Therefore, despite having a continuous harvest model in place, by beginning of December of 2021, we entered into the harvest period. We expect to resume operations in March 2022, making this a shortened harvest period compared to other players. On an annual basis, crushing volume reached 10.9 million tons, marking a slight decrease of 1.5% compared to 2020, even though agricultural productivity indicators presented a decrease of approximately 15%. Despite the challenges presented by the weather during 2021, to mitigate the damage, we accelerated our harvesting pace, anticipated the purchase of five two-line harvesters, and three one-line harvesters, and were able to enter into 15.5% more area thanks to our ongoing strategy of expanding our sugarcane plantation. Please jump to Page 6, where I would like to walk you through our agricultural productivity. During the fourth quarter of 2021, yields were down 20.4% compared to the same period last year, reaching 65 tons per hectare. Moreover, TRS per ton decreased 12.2% year-over-year to 120 kilograms per ton. The combined effect in yields and TRS content resulting in a TRS production per hectare of 7.9 tons, marking up 30.1% reduction year-over-year. The lower-than-expected agricultural productivity indicators were fully explained by the adverse weather conditions, as most of the harvested area was - came below optimal growth stage. Looking at the full year, the year-over-year reduction of 13.3% in sugarcane yields and 15.7% in TRS per hectare, is fully explained by both the third and fourth quarter dynamics. Nevertheless, the decreasing agriculture productivity indicators, was almost fully offset by a 15.5% increase in harvested area, as mentioned before. Let's move ahead to Slide 7, where I would like to discuss our production mix. Both hydrous and anhydrous ethanol traded at an average price of 20.2 and 22.20 cents per pound sugar equivalent during the fourth quarter, marking a 3.8% and 14% premium to sugar, respectively. It is worth highlighting that we had the flexibility to increase ethanol production, the product that was offering a premium, as we remained at the low end of our sugar hedge throughout 2021, and thus had low volumes committed. As a result, we diverted 93% of the TRS to ethanol to profit from higher relative prices during the fourth quarter. Out of our total ethanol production, 64% was anhydrous ethanol, compared to 40% during the same period of last year. This was possibly thanks to the recent incorporation of our molecular sieve in Ivinhema, which increased our dehydration capacity in 50% Nevertheless, total production of both ethanol and sugar was lower compared to the fourth quarter of 2020, due to lower crushing, even though this was more than offset by higher prices. Production mix for the full year favored ethanol, to which we diverted 62% of TRS compared to 56% the previous year. Thus, volumes produced for sugar decreased 15.5% on a year-over-year basis, whereas ethanol volumes increased by 6.5% compared to 2020. Anhydrous ethanol during the year amounted to 45% of total ethanol production, compared to 37% during the same period of last year. In 2021, we maximized sugar production during the first quarter to benefit from higher relative prices, and switched to ethanol during the rest of the year. The opposite was observed in 2020 when we maximize ethanol during the first quarter, then switched to sugar as ethanol prices plummeted in light of the pandemic. Went back to maximizing ethanol in the third quarter, and then returned to sugar maximization in the fourth quarter. This high degree flexibility constitutes one of our most important competitive advantages, since it allows to make a more efficient use of our fixed assets and profit from higher relative prices. In 2021, ethanol accounted for 62.2% of total adjusted EBITDA generation in the sugar, ethanol, and energy business, considering other operating income, while sugar accounted for 29.8%. Please turn to Slide 8. I would like to comment on our energy production strategy. As you know, Brazil’s energy matrix is heavily reliant on hydroelectric energy. Due to the prolonged period of dry weather in the center-south region of Brazil, the average level of water in reservoirs for 2021 ended 33.3% lower compared to last year. Thus, average spot prices increased from 117 BRL per megawatt hour in 2020, to 220 BRL per megawatt hour in 2021. To profit from this situation, we increased our energy production by owning bagasse, both owned as well as purchased from third parties, wood chips purchased from third parties, and sugarcane straw collected from the field. Our higher energy production enabled us to participate in high margin operations as well, as we'll see next. As a result, exported energy totaled 731,000 megawatt hours, marking a 1.8% increase compared to 2020, whereas our cogen efficiency ratio was 3.3% higher. Let's please turn to Slide 9 where I would like to discuss annual sales. As you can see on the right chart, net ethanol sales from the full year amounted to $172 million, marking a 50.4% increase year-over-year. This was mostly explained by a 46.1% increase in average selling prices, despite the 3.3% drop in ethanol volumes compared to 2020. Looking at the fourth quarter, ethanol net sales increased 18.2% on a year-over-year basis to $80 million, driven by a 76.4% increase in average selling prices measured in US dollars, mainly led by anhydrous ethanol. This was partially offset by a 33% year-over-year decrease in ethanol selling volumes due to lower crushing, which resulted in lower ethanol production despite full maximization, combined with a 55.6% increase in our inventory levels to benefit from higher expected prices. A brief common on CBios. Due to the efficiency and sustainability in our operations ranked among the highest in the industry, we have the right to issue carbon credits every time we sell ethanol. During 2021, we sold 503,500 CBios under the RenovaBio program, at an average price of 41.2 BRL per CBio, approximately $7 per CBio. In the case of energy, net sales amounted $43 million, 17.3% higher compared to 2020. This was fully attributable to an 18.5% increase in average prices measured in US dollars, standing at $46 per megawatt hour. Driven by the low levels of water in the reservoirs during most of the year, energy spot prices increased, especially during the third quarter of 2021. And by increasing our energy production, we were able to capture the upside. The Brazilian government program called Portaria 17, through which companies that generated more energy than they did in the previous year, could make a price offer. This enabled us to sell 15,321 megawatt hours at an average price of 1,659 BRL per megawatt hour, approximately $300 per megawatt hour. Lastly, net states of sugar during the full year reached 207 million, 23.1% higher year-over-year. Positive results were driven by a 46.8% increase in average selling prices measured in US dollars, which stood at 17.40 cents per pound. Higher average selling prices were partially offset by a 16.2% reduction in selling volumes explained by lower sugar production on account of full ethanol maximization, along with an increasing inventory levels in line with our commercial strategy to carry over stock in order to profit from higher expected prices. On a quarterly basis, sugar sales decreased 10.7% to $64 million on lower selling volumes due to the same dynamics of the full year. Let's move to Slide 10, where I would like to explain our total cost of production. Total cost of production describes, on a cash basis, how much it cost us to reduce one pound of sugar and ethanol in sugar equivalent. Maintenance CapEx is included in the calculation, since it is a recurring investment necessary to maintain the productivity of the sugarcane plantation. As we are calculating sugar and ethanol cost, energy is deemed a byproduct and thus deducted from total cost. As for the tax recovery line, it includes the ICMS tax incentive that the State of Mato Grosso do Sul granted us until 2032. As shown in the table, total cash costs on a per unit basis in 2021, increased by 33.4% compared to the previous year, reaching 10.50 cents per pound of short equivalent. Higher cost per unit is explained by a 44.8% increase in total production costs due to a 15.5% increase in harvested area, an increase in agricultural partnership costs driven by an increase in Consecana prices, and increasing the cost of inputs, higher costs of idle capacity due to the early start of interharvest season, and lower dilution of fixed costs on lower productivity. Moreover, there was an increase of 25.6% in maintenance costs related to higher replanting costs as a consequence of the frost and the anticipation of the purchase of equipment to accelerate harvesting activities. On the other hand, these negative effects were partially offset by 36.4% higher tax recovery on account of higher ethanol sales, and a 32.8% higher energy cogeneration. It's important to point out that since we own 95% of the cane we crush, every time Consecana’s prices increase, our agricultural margin also increases. Regarding the hike in fertilizer costs, our exposure to potash fertilizers is marginal, as we replaced it with concentrated vinasse, generated in our own operations. Finally, to conclude with the sugar, ethanol and energy business, please turn to Slide 11, where I would like to discuss financial performance. During the quarter adjusted EBITDA amounted to $65 million, marking a 19.8% decrease compared to the same period last year. The main driver behind EBITDA decline was in increasing costs, mostly driven by fertilizers, fuels, and lubricants, in addition to high costs associated with idle capacity in our mills due to low sugarcane availability during the quarter. however, adjusted EBITDA for the full year marked a new record at $335 million, 31.9% higher than during the same period of last year. Higher results were explained by a 38.7% increase in net sales, coupled with a $38.3 million gain derived from the mark-to-market of our harvested cane due to higher Consecana prices. This was partially offset by an increasing cost combined with a loss in our commodity hedge position, and a $7.3 million increase in selling expenses. I would now like to move on to the farming business. Please direct your attention to Slide 13. We ended our 2021 harvest season with over $1 million tons of agricultural products harvested and transported across 10 provinces in Argentina and in Uruguay. For this new campaign that we are currently engaging, we have increased our total planted area by 8.1% compared to the previous harvest season, to over 280,000 hectares. The increase is driven by a greater leased area. In most of our regions, abundant rainfalls was registered, favoring planting activities and crop development. However, other regions experienced dry weather throughout December until mid-January, which, coupled with high temperatures, caused a minor delay in the completion of planting activities across a few hectares. Since then, precipitations have increased. Nevertheless, we're following closely the water requirements as we are going through a critical phase in the development of most of the crops. Let's move to Page 14, where I would like to work you through the financial performance of our farming and land transformation businesses. adjusted EBITDA in the farming and land transformation business amounted $124 million for the full year, marking a 15.8% year-over-year increase. The increase is mostly explained by an overperformance of our farming business. In the case of land reformation, we have not conducted any farm sale throughout the year. Starting with our crop business, adjusted EBITDA for the full year amounted to $52 million, marking a 48.9% year-over-year increase. The main drivers towards this growth were, a $59 million increase in gross sales, $25 million year-over-year gain related to the mark-to-market of our biological assets, giving an increase in hectares, yield, and prices, and $9 million year-over-year gain driven by our commodity hedge position. This was partially offset by an increase in costs due to inflation in US dollar terms. In our rice business, adjusted EBITDA reached $41 million, a 19.5% increase compared to 2020. The increase is mainly explained by, an increase in sales led by higher years, which reached a record high of 7.8 tons per hectare, along with an increasing area and prices, and an $18 million year-over-year gain in the value of our biological assets and agriculture produce. Positive results were partially offset by greater costs related to inflation in US dollar terms. Moving on to the dairy business, adjusted EBITDA marked year-over-year increase of 26.2% to $23 million for the full year. Higher results were explained by, an increase in both volumes and average prices, and our continuous focus on achieving efficiencies in our vertical integrated operations, together with increasing our productivity levels in every stage of the value chain. On the other hand, results were partially offset by higher costs due to inflation in US dollar terms. Although no farm sales were conducted during 2021, the land transformation business reported an adjusted EBITDA of $7 million. The positive result reflects the mark-to-market of an account receivable corresponding to the latest sale of farms in Brazil, which tracks the evolution of soybean prices. Let's now turn to Page 16, which shows the evolution of Adecoagro’s consolidated operation and financial performance. During the year, our operations delivered a new record in gross sales, which exceeded $1 billion, and in adjusted EBITDA which amounted $437 million, marking a 27.8% increase compared to the previous year. At the same time, 2021 marked the last year of our five-year plan in which we invested and expanded our business lines in order to integrate vertically our operations, improve efficiencies, and enhance our competitive advantages. Thus, our operations delivered $152 million of adjusted free cashflow from operations during 2021, compared to the $109 million generated in the prior year. This amounts to a minimum distribution of $61 million to be paid during 2022 through dividends and buyback. $35 million will be paid via dividend in two installments of $17.5 million each in May and November. The balance will be distributed via share repurchase under our existing program, as the case may be. Year-to-date, we have already repurchased $10.6 million in shares. From an operational point of view, we are continuously increasing our planted area each year, while enhancing our efficiencies at the farm and industrial industry level. Thus, our production of crops and rice increased 8.2% year-over-year, whereas a greater area planted in the sugar, ethanol, and energy business, allowed us to mitigate the impact related to frost and dry weather during 2021 at the industry level. To conclude, please turn to Slide 17, to take a look at our net debt position. As of December 31, of 2021, net debt amounted to $618 million, marking a $107 million or 14.8% decrease compared to the previous quarter. Lower debt levels from our farming business, along with a 5.3% quarter-over-quarter increase in our cash position, were the main drivers towards debt reduction. Cash generation was driven by greater collections throughout the quarter, whereas positive free cashflow allowed us to pay down debt at the farming level. On the other hand, net debt decreased by 2.7% on a year-over-year basis, due to the higher cash, which enabled us to pay down debt, as well as distributing it with shareholders. However, cash and equivalents dropped 40.6% compared to the previous year, mostly explained by an increase in marketable inventories of $60 million in order to benefit from higher expected prices. It’s worth to mention that our cash position for the fourth quarter of 2020, reflects the short-term working capital lines we raised throughout the year in light of the COVID-19 pandemic as part of our risk management program. We believe that our balance sheet is in a healthy position, not only based on the adequate overall debt levels, but also on the term of our indebtedness, both of which is long term. Our net debt ratio went down to 1.4 times in this quarter, compared to the 1.6 times and 1.9 times seen in the previous quarter and last year, respectively. At the same time, our liquidity ratio, which is calculated as cash and equivalents plus marketable inventory, divided by short-term debt, reached three times, 50.3% above last quarter’s ratio of two times and 14.6% higher than the same period of last year, which reached 2.6 times. This clearly shows the full capacity of the company to replace short term debt with cash balance without raising external capital. Thank you very much for your time. We are now open to questions.