Charlie Boero Hughes
Analyst
Thank you, Mariano. Good morning, everyone. Let's start on Page 4 with a brief analysis on the rains in Mato Grosso do Sul. As seen on the top charts range in our [indiscernible] third quarter of 2021, we are lower than during the same period last year and the 10-year average. However, increased precipitations during April were very favorable for the recovery of sugarcane yields. Before turning to the following slide, I would like to briefly comment on the cold front that hit most Brazil's key productive area at the beginning of the quarter. As you know, low temperatures at the end of June and July caused severe frost damage on sugarcane plantations in regions including South Paulo and Parana states, as well as Mato Grosso do Sul and Minas Gerais. This caused a negative impact in yields, which were already affected by the dry weather observed through all the year in the center, south region of Brazil. In light of this, market estimates of Brazil shirking supply were cut in as much as 15% by some analysts. While expectations at the beginning of the year pointed at a crushing volume of 590 million tons of sugarcane. Current expectations range between 520 million and 510 million tons. The pressure on the supply side translated into higher prices for all three products. This made the price scenario even more constructive than it already was. As we'll see in the following slides, we were in an excellent position to capture this upside because of our strategy to hedge at the low end of our commercial policy. In fact, for the 2022 and '23 campaign, we still have over 90% of TRS unhedged. Please jump to Page 5, where I would like to walk you through our agriculture productivity. During the third quarter of 2021, sugarcane yields marked a 27.2% reduction compared to the same period of last year, reaching 59 tons per hectare. TRS content, in turn, presented at 6.9% reduction and total 132 kilograms per ton. The lower-than-expected agriculture productivity indicators were fully explained by the adverse weather conditions, as most of the harvested area was came below optimal growth stage. It is worth mentioning that accelerating harvesting pace is very important to avoid the frost from causing additional damage on the cane. The combined effect in yields and TRS content resulted in a TRS production per hectare of 7.8 tons during the quarter resulting in a 32.2% reduction year-over-year. On a 9 month basis, the year-over-year reduction of 11.7% in sugarcane yields, and 12.5% in TRS per hectare, is fully explained by the third quarter dynamics. Going forward, it is expected that productivity will return to normal levels as sugarcane continues to recover favored by increased precipitation during October. Now let's continue with Slide 6, where we'd like to discuss our sugarcane crushing strategy. Because we have in place an integrated business, our crushing volume during the third quarter of 2021 was only 200,000 tons lower year-over-year, despite lower-than-expected agricultural productivity indicators. This achievement was possible because we harvested 28.2% more area than during the same period of last year, and increased the amount of gain purchased from third parties in 15.5%. In addition to this, our team responded quickly and leased third-party harvesters in order to accelerate harvesting activities to minimize the weather impact. By doing so, we achieved a crushing volume of 4.1 million tons during the quarter, only 5.2% lower year-over-year. As of September the 30, crushing volume reached 9.7 million tons, 11.1 million tons or 13% higher year-over-year. This increase was explained by the good Kane availability, an early start of crushing activities during the first quarter of the year as opposed to last year, and by the favorable weather during the second quarter of 2021. Let's move ahead to Slide 7, where I would like to discuss our production mix. As you can see in the top left chart during the third quarter of 2021,hydrous and anhydrous ethanol Mato Grosso do Sul traded at an average price of 19.2 and 21.2 cents per pound sugar equivalent, representing a 2.8% and 13.2% premium to sugar respectively. It is worth pointing out that the evolution of sugar prices during the quarter was also very positive. In line with our strategy to maximize production of the product with the highest marginal contribution, during the quarter we diverted 55% of TRS to ethanol not to profit from higher relative prices. To further take advantage of price premiums, 63% of total ethanol production was anhydrous ethanol compared to 41% during the third quarter of 2020. This increase in anhydrous ethanol production was possible thanks to the recent incorporation of our molecular sieve in Ivinhema which increased our dehydration capacity in 50%. Total production of both ethanol and sugar was 11.2% and 7.3% lower compared to the third quarter of 2020, respectively. As previously mentioned, this was explained by the lower production of TRS, but it was more than offset by an increase in prices. As Brazil is one of the world's main producers and exporters of sugar, any weather event that might impact supply will result in an increase in prices. Our low hedging volumes enabled us to capture the benefit that this natural hedge offered. On a year-to-date basis, production mix was in line with the first 9 months of 2020, standing at 58% ethanol and 42% sugar. Volumes produced were 14.4% and 13.6% higher, respectively, favored by a strong production in the first 6 months of the year. In 2021, we maximized sugar production in the first quarter to benefit from higher relative prices and switched to ethanol during the second and third quarter. The opposite was observed in 2020 when we maximized ethanol during the first quarter, then switched to sugar as ethanol prices plummeted in light of the pandemic, and went back to maximizing ethanol in the third quarter. This high degree in flexibility constitutes one of our most important competitive advantages, since it allows us to make a more efficient use of our fixed assets and profit from higher relative prices. Year-to-date, ethanol accounted for 61.7% of total adjusted EBITDA generation in sugar ethanol and energy business considering other operating income, while sugar accounted for 30.2%. Please turn to Slide 8, where I would like to comment on our energy production strategy. As you know, Brazil's energy matrix is heavily reliant on hydroelectric energy. Due to the prolonged period of dry weather in the center south region of Brazil, the level of water in the reservoirs was low. As can be seen in the top right chart, this resulted in a hike in spot prices, which increased from BRL92 per megawatt hour last year, to BRL582 per megawatt in the third quarter of 2021. To profit from this situation, we increased our energy production by burning bagasse, both owned as well as purchase from third parties, wood chips purchased from third parties and sugarcane straw collected from the field. Exported energy during the quarter totaled 263,000 megawatt hour, 4% higher compared to the same period of 2020, while our Cogen efficiency ratio was 9.6% higher. Let's please turn to Slide 9, where I would like to discuss quarterly sales. As you can see on the right chart, net ethanol sales during the third quarter of 2021 amounted to 83.4 million, 121.7% higher year-over-year. This was mostly explained by an increase in average selling prices measured both in real as well as U.S dollars, resulting in a 70.8% increase mostly led by anhydrous ethanol. Despite a lower production of ethanol during the quarter, and an aggressive carryover strategy to benefit from higher expected prices, ethanol sales volume presented a 15% increase compared to the third quarter of 2020. This was fully explained by the lockdown measures adopted in 2020 in response to the COVID-19, which negatively affected demand for fuels resulting in a decrease in sales and our stock build up. On a year-to-date basis, ethanol sales were 69.6% higher than during the first 9 months of 2020. This was explained by a 49.3% increase in average selling prices and 13.6% increase in selling volumes. A brief comment on CBios. During the quarter, we sold 255.8000 CBios under the RenovaBio program at an average price of BRL46 per CBio, approximately $8.7 per CBio. Year-to-date, we sold 367.9000 CBios at BRL41.6 per CBio, approximately $7.8 per CBio. In the case of energy, selling volumes during the quarter reached 319,000 megawatt hour, marking a 2.6% year-over-year increase; average selling prices were higher both measured in real as well in U.S dollars, standing at $58.9 per megawatt hour, implying a 64% increase compared to the same period of last year. As mentioned before, this was driven by the low levels of water reservoirs, which reduced the supply of hydroelectric energy. All in all, net sales of energy in the third quarter of 2021 were 18.8 million, 68.3% higher year-over-year. On a 9 month basis, net sales of energy were 37.7% higher year-over-year as a consequence of the increase in selling volume and average selling prices. Net sales of sugar during the third quarter of 2021 reached 46.6 million , 27.2% lower year-over-year. This decrease was driven by a 50.7% decrease in selling volumes, partially offset by a 52.1% increase in average prices, which reached $0.172 per pound. There are two points worth highlighting. During the third quarter of 2020, we increased the volume of sugar sold as the market for ethanol was fairly illiquid, and prices were low due to the pandemic and due to our commercial strategy to carry over stocks in order to profit from high expected prices. Stocks of sugar in the current quarter almost doubled compared to last year. On a 9 month basis, sugar sales reached 143.3 million led by a 48.7% increase in average selling prices which fully offset the 2.4% decrease in selling volume. Finally, to conclude with the sugar ethanol and energy business, please turn to Slide 10, where I would like to discuss financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA during the third quarter of 2021 was 138.1 million, 51.7 million or 59.8% higher compared to the same period of last year. The main driver behind EBITDA growth was the 36 million increase in net sales coupled with a 20 million year-over-year gain in the mark-to-market of our harvested cane, led by an increase in Consecana prices of 67%. The increase in adjusted EBITDA was partially offset by a 25.2 million increase in cost, mainly explained by the increase in harvested area to make up for the lower productivity of the cane, which resulted in higher salaries, higher use of diesel and higher maintenance costs, among others as well as by the higher purchase volume of third-party cane, bagasse and wood chip, among others. Year-to-date, adjusted EBITDA stood at 269.8 million, 56.2% or 97.1 million higher than during the same period of last year. Higher results were explained by 60% increase in net sales coupled with a 39.7 million gain derived from the mark-to-market of our sugar cane, mostly related to harvested cane. This was partially offset by an increase in cost combined with a 23.7 million loss in our commodity hedge position and 8.8 million increase in selling expenses in line with the increase in sales. End of period stocks amounted to over a $135.1 million, marking a year-over-year increase of 2.3x, led by our commercial strategy to carry stocks in order to benefit from higher expected prices. I would now like to move on to the Farming business. Please direct your attention to Slide 12. As of the end of October 2021, we harvested over 260,000 hectares successfully completing the 2020 and '21 harvest season. This amounts to over 1 million tons of agricultural products harvested and transported across 10 provinces in Argentina and in Uruguay. We are currently engaged in planting activities for the 2021 and '22 harvest season, so far observing normal weather conditions. We expect to plant 282,880 hectares, 7.9% higher than the previous harvest season. Let's move to Page 13, where I would like to walk you through the financial performance of our Farming and Land Transformation Businesses. Adjusted EBITDA in the Farming and Land Transformation businesses reached $24.8 million in the third quarter of 2021 and $113.4 million in the first 9 month of the year. This marked a year-over-year increase of 19.9% and 32.6%, respectively. Solely focusing on the Farming business, results stood at $23.9 million during the quarter and $107 million on a 9 month basis, marking a year-over-year increase of 30.6% and 55.7%, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA in our Crops segment was $13.7 million during the quarter, $7.9 million higher compared to the same period of last year. This was explained by an increase in average selling prices $127 per ton increase in the case of soybean and $71 per ton in the case of corn, coupled with a year-over-year gain in the mark-to-market of our biological asset on the account of an increase in hectares, yield and prices. This was partially offset by an increase in costs driven by inflation in U.S dollars terms. Year-to-date, adjusted EBITDA amounted to $47.9 million, 89.5% higher compared to the same period last year. The improved performance was also mostly explained by a year-over-year gain in the mark-to-market of our biological asset on account of an increasing prices. End of period stocks were 2.3x higher than last year, amounting to over $15 million mainly as a consequence of commercial strategy to carry stocks in order to benefit from higher prices. In the case of rice, most of the margin was already captured during the first quarter of the year. In this line, adjusted EBITDA reached $2.8 million during the third quarter, marking a year-over-year loss of 54.3%. However, during the 9 month period adjusted EBITDA stood at $40.7 million, 37.9% higher year-over-year. The positive financial performance was mostly explained by an increase in yields, which reached a record high of 7.8 tons per hectare and increasing area and an increase in prices which led to a year-over-year gain in the value of our biological asset and agricultural produce. These results were possible due to our continuous focus on productivity, enhanced efficiencies and the consolidation of our team. The Dairy business generating an adjusted EBITDA of $7.2 million during the third quarter of 2021 and $19.3 million during the first 9 months, an increase of 13.5% and 32.6% compared to the same period of last year, respectively. In both cases, higher results were explained by an increase in gross sales and achieved efficiencies in our vertically integrated operations, including high productivity at the farm level, and the flexibility of our industrial assets. In the case of Land Transformation, a minor gain was registered in the current year compared to a $16.3 million result in 2020, which reflects the sale of [indiscernible] of our [indiscernible] farm. Let's now turn to Page 15, which shows the evolution of the Adecoagro's consolidated operational and financial performance. On a year-to-date basis, gross sales reached $777 million and adjusted EBITDA $368 million, marking a year-over-year increase of 33.9% and 50.4%, respectively. During the quarter, gross sales reached $317 million, while adjusted EBITDA totaled $157 million marking up 33.2% and 53.7% increase compared to the same period of last year. From an operational point of view, we continue increasing our planted area both in our Farming and sugar, ethanol and energy business. This in line with our enhanced efficiencies on the farm and industry level has led to an 8.2% increase in our production of crops and rice, and a 13% increase in crushed volume as previously mentioned. To conclude, please turn to Slide 16 to take a look at our net debt position. As you may see in the bottom left chart, our net debt as of September 30, 2021 reached $725 million, $19.4 million or 2.6% lower than the previous quarter. This was explained by the combined effect of a 1.6% reduction in gross debt and that 2.5% increase in our cash position, even though marketable inventories in the third quarter of 2021 were $66 million higher compared to the previous quarter. The increase in cash position was a consequence of a greater collections, lower working capital requirements since in the second semester of the year, planting and harvesting costs have already been incurred, and we start selling and collecting income from most of our products. On a year-over-year basis, net debt increased by 1.9% compared to the same period of last year. The 1.1% reduction in gross debt was fully offset by an 11.2% decrease in our cash position. This reduction in our cash position was mostly explained by an increase in marketable inventories of $124 million compared to the same period of last year. We believe that our balance sheet is in a healthy position not only based on the adequate over the debt levels, but also on the term of our indebtedness, most of which is long-term debt. As of September 30, 2021, our net debt ratio reached 1.56x. As can be seen, we continue the downward trend compared to both the previous quarter of 2021 and the same period of last year, marking a reduction of 14.1% and 31.9%, respectively. At the same time, our liquidity ratio which is calculated as cash and equivalents plus marketable inventories divided by short-term debt reached 2x, 8.9% above last quarter's ratio of 1.84x and 33.8% higher than the same period of last year, which reached 1.49x. This clearly shows the full capacity of the company to repay short-term debt with cash balance without raising stronger capital. Thank you very much for your time. We are now open to questions.