Thank you, Christine. So first of all, SSG for KFC, 2%, is actually slightly above our own expectation as well. It's also similar for KCOFFEE Cafes, right? Our own expectation, as Joey mentioned, was like 1,700 or so. And now in quarter 3, we already achieved 1,800 locations for KCOFFEE Cafes. So those are actually encouraging results, and we're happy to be wrong. We're happy to be wrong there. So it's slightly above our 0% to 1% target. And as to whether that level is sustainable, obviously, predicting SSSG is always difficult. The market is still quite dynamic, and consumers stay quite rational. But as we mentioned in the prepared remarks, we are working very hard to keep the quarter 4 SSSG at similar levels of the quarter 3 and achieve 12 consecutive quarters of same-store transaction growth. I think transaction growth is, I guess, slightly more within our control. And for SSG, in overall, it will be subject to different situations, including different factors, including competitive dynamics, including macro, et cetera, et cetera. So I will not be able to give outlook or guidance on whether this level of SSG will be sustainable. And on your second part of the question on KPRO economics, obviously, similar to KCOFFEE Cafes, KPRO is a module. It's a side-by-side module to our KFC mother store, and it contributes incremental sales and incremental profits. And as one can reasonably expect, the incremental sales contributed by KPRO will be larger than the incremental sales contributed by KCOFFEE Cafes because it's a restaurant concept, right, so restaurant module. But we have not given any guidance on the exact economics for KPRO because it's still in the early stage. We only have slightly more than 100 modules for KPRO and -- but the initial progress we made is encouraging. And we'll be ready to share more color on the economics and growth potential for KPRO as well as other modules or other initiatives, as some of the analysts asked during the early part of the call, in due course when we think we're ready. So hopefully, that addresses your question, Christine.