Good day, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Williams-Sonoma First Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] This call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Elise Wang, Vice President of Investor Relations, to discuss non-GAAP financial measures and forward-looking statements. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon. This call should be considered in conjunction with the press release that we issued earlier today. Our discussion today will relate to results and guidance based on certain non-GAAP measures. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and our explanation of why the non-GAAP financial measures may be useful are discussed in exhibit 1 of our press release. We adopted the new revenue recognition standard, ASU No. 2014-09, effective January 29, 2018, using the modified retrospective method. As a result, our Q1 2018 results and forward-looking guidance are provided using the standard. For additional detail, please see exhibit 2 of our press release. This call also contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which address the financial conditions, results of operations, business initiatives, trends, guidance, growth plans and prospects of the company in 2018 and beyond and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. Please refer to the company's current press release and SEC filings, including the most recent 10-K for more information on these risks and uncertainties. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this call. I will now turn the conference call over to Laura Alber, our President and Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. On the call with me are Julie Whalen, our Chief Financial Officer; Felix Carbullido, our Chief Marketing Officer; and Yasir Anwar, our Chief Technology Officer. Following a robust fourth quarter, we saw continued strength in the first quarter. We achieved strong results against our guidance range across all metrics with our e-commerce revenues outpacing to almost 54% of our total revenue. These results speak to the power of our multichannel model, distinctive brand portfolio and world-class customer service heritage, all of which are our company's competitive strengths. Based on this strong start to the year, we are raising our full year revenue guidance by $20 million and our EPS by $0.03. Now let me provide an overview of Q1 results and discuss some of our accomplishments this quarter against our strategic priorities. In the first quarter, revenue and comp growth exceeded the high end of our guidance range at 8.2% and 5.5%, respectively, driven by strong performance across all of our brands. The Pottery Barn brands delivered another strong quarter with broad-based growth, particularly in customer demand and e-commerce. Our Williams-Sonoma brand drove an outstanding comp of 5.6%, while our Pottery Barn children's business substantially improved to deliver a comp of 5.3%. In West Elm, comp was up 9% year-over-year and revenues continue to grow double digits. And our emerging brands, Rejuvenation and Mark and Graham, achieved another quarter of double-digit comp growth. Our EPS of $0.67 for the quarter also surpassed the high end of our guidance range. Now I'd like to talk about our strategic priorities. We've always put the customer at the center of everything we do, and hence, we continue to focus on execution in digital leadership, product innovation, retail transformation and operational excellence. Starting with digital leadership. We are…

Thank you, Laura, and good afternoon, everyone. We are pleased to start the year with a strong quarter of operational and financial performance. We outperformed on both the top and bottom line with high single-digit revenue growth, strong comps across all brands, a return to double-digit e-commerce growth and operating margin above last year and EPS above our expectations. These results demonstrate our ability to once again execute against our growth and operational initiatives while, at the same time, maintain strong financial discipline. Before I review our performance in more detail, I would like to remind everyone that our first quarter 2018 results include the financial impact from the implementation of a new accounting standard associated with revenue recognition. This standard primarily requires us to reclass other income from SG&A into net revenues to accelerate the timing of our revenue recognition for certain merchandise shipped to our customers and to accelerate the timing of our gift card breakage income. As a result, our Q1 2018 results include an approximate year-over-year benefit of $13.6 million in net revenues and $1.6 million or $0.01 in earnings associated with this change in accounting. From a rate perspective, this amounts to a benefit of approximately 130 basis points of revenue growth, including 150 basis points in e-commerce and 120 basis points in retail; 30 basis points of comparable brand revenue growth; 70 basis points of gross margin improvement; 60 basis points of SG&A deleverage; and 10 basis points of operating margin improvement, including 40 basis points of leverage in e-commerce and 10 basis points of deleverage in retail and corporate unallocated. Now I would like to review our first quarter results in more detail. During the first quarter, net revenues were $1,202,000,000 for a year-over-year growth of 8.2%, and comparable brand revenue growth was…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Kate McShane with Citi.

It's encouraging to see your guidance for the second quarter. Just looking at it on a 2-year stack, even at the low end of your comp revenue guidance, it does imply a noticeable acceleration. Just wondering if you could walk through some of the factors that are going to exist in Q2 that maybe didn't exist in Q1, which would drive that faster comp revenue growth on a sequential basis.

It's Laura. We have -- we are seeing great momentum in both our customer numbers but also in sales on programs that are just getting started. And with that, we also have an exciting pipeline of new product introductions, innovative collaborations across all of our brands. We also have a pretty robust e-commerce release plan for the second quarter and a real focus on content, which we're testing and seeing a lot of great response from, from our customers. We have some, as I said, technology rollouts that are substantial from BOPIS, and then we continue to further optimize our inventory to not only take down the levels of overstocks but also to get better in-stocks, which we've been seeing simultaneous to taking down the total levels. Usually, you see us take down the levels and then backorders and all those things climb, And actually, our backorder create rate is one of the best numbers we've seen in a long time. So there's a lot of good things happening, and I also mentioned in my script the next phase of loyalty with The Key. We're just getting started on that. So it's a combination of products and operational and technology improvements that I think should really benefit the second quarter and further for that matter.

That's helpful. And if I could just follow up with one question with regards to the remodels. I know you gave one dimension of a change in relocation and the comp lift you saw. Could you talk about the lift that you're getting from the remodels? And what is the commitment to how many stores you're remodeling this year?

We have different store model strategies in each of our brands, and we've really seen great response, particularly in the Pottery Barn brand. All the brands have been successful, but Pottery Barn, as our largest brand, is one where we see a lot of opportunity because the multi -- we've done enough of them now to see that it's sustaining. And so we're being aggressive about doing it where we re-up the lease and where it makes sense in the markets that are strong. And I don't believe we've given those numbers.

I think we said up to 10 before, but I think, as it continues to outperform that we might do more given the results that we've seen today.

Our next question will come from Matt Fassler with Goldman Sachs.

I have 2 questions, and the first relates to the Williams-Sonoma business. This is, in a sense, your most mature business, but it's putting up, among your 2 big businesses, the better comp and a very good comp at this moment. Kind of high level, if you think about the merchandise and culture of the organization, any kind of merchandising or marketing themes that are helping to lift the results here? What would you have us really focus on?

Yes. I would say that we continue to offer really differentiated product strategies, and we continue to introduce exclusive products with key vendor partners. And we have expanded our offerings substantially in the Williams-Sonoma-branded professional-quality cookware, our Open Kitchen value line, and we continue to increase the collaboration with celebrity chefs and style icons to further grow our brand reach. In addition, Williams-Sonoma Home continues to perform strongly and has a -- it's material in terms of dollars per square foot in our stores. And we added more to retail and in addition to that, we have a thriving e-commerce business, which has been a key driver of brand growth. We've directed more of our marketing spend to digital. We strengthened our content and messaging and improved the level of personalization we deliver. And we're really excited about also BOPIS and how it's attracting new customers and driving traffic and additional spend in-store. So there's a great DNA of the brand that we've always had as the premier multichannel retailer of high-quality housewares, and we continue to see strength in our ability to grow despite a competitive backdrop.

And then my follow-up, we spent a lot of the fourth quarter call talking about real estate and the message that you're essentially sending that there are a lot of renegotiations to be done and that you're willing to walk from quite a few sites as leases came up for renewal. Any update on what you're seeing from the landlord community as you go to market here?

Yes. I mean, we have great partnerships with some landlords, and we're making progress against that initiative. You saw us close some stores this quarter. We will continue to do that where the stores aren't strategically appropriate or where the landlords are not willing to be flexible and long term focused. But our stores remain one of our key competitive advantages, and they're critical to driving new customer acquisitions. So at the same time that we're closing, you also see us investing in the experience for our customers.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Michael Lasser with UBS.

There's a lot of moving pieces with the guidance and the updates to the guidance, both from the revenue classification perspective and then also in terms of the outperformance for the first quarter. Julie, can you just walk us through mechanically what changed to you -- from your previous guidance to where it stands today?

Sure. Basically, the simple way to answer that is we took half of the beat from Q1 on the top and the bottom line and rolled it through. Obviously, it's early in the year. There's a lot of 2018 ahead of us, and so we thought that was prudent at this time. And so if you look at the outperformance, you can do the back math and see that's how we came up with it.

And so your margins in the first quarter ex the reclassification came in basically where you thought they're going to be. And did you change any of your assumptions between the geography of your gross margin and your SG&A, excluding the reclassification for the rest of the year?

No. Excluding the reclassification for accounting for the rest of the year, no. We still should be coming in about 60 to 70 basis points of a margin shift between gross margin and SG&A. We did not obviously, based on our guidance for Q1, assume that we would come in, if you're talking about operating margin, above operating margin. That's because we outperformed in the top line and allowed us to leverage in flow-through.

We'll continue on to Peter Benedict with Baird.

First question, the move to 1 inventory, can you just give us some benchmarks or milestones over the next 12 months, 24 months that we should be looking for? And just remind us of kind of the key benefits that you expected to get as you kind of execute that.

As I said, it's one of the biggest breakthroughs. We've been working on this for a couple of years. And our Pottery Barn brand is moving first on this initiative, and we've been building the tools to look at it this way and getting the teams trained. And it's going to be a multiyear process, but it's one that we're very excited about. And we will report each quarter on how we're doing, and you'll see it both not just in our total inventory levels but also how we do with our in-stock.

And then just on the Outward business, can you talk a little bit more about the strategic value of that asset, how you're leveraging it within the business today? I mean, you alluded to some stuff in your prepared remarks, Laura, but just trying to think about that. And as we think about the hit to earnings, I know that's backed out of the adjusted earnings. But should -- is it that first quarter run rate something we should think kind of persists as we look through the balance of the year?

I'm going to -- Yasir's here, and I'm going to pass the question over to him on Outward.

Yes. I think Outward is our strategic, in my mind, strength in the world of 3D visualization, and we strongly believe that we will be industry leaders in the space given our business of decorating homes, which is so difficult. And Outward is going to allow us and our customers to have a seamless experience to do that. Two, three things like which are tactical in my mind and then there are a lot more to come in the long term. One is that, as Laura mentioned, that we are going to digitize our assets. If you look at the benefit of Outward comps is in the part of scaling that thing because having an augmented reality experience with 1,000 products, 2,000 products, 10,000 products, it's doable, and I think, everybody is doing it in the market. The key is can you have hundreds of thousands of your product digitized in a 3D way very quickly and fast and then can you make them available for a customer experience. And that's where, I think, we want to put Outward to work. That's the first basic foundational thing, which Laura talked about. Then, how can we build great designing, room planning, home planning experiences with all kind of angles of that somebody can even visualize long term in terms of the lighting arrangements, the places there, they can pick themes of their homes and their rooms, that's what we are working on. And that's not too far out. If you will watch us in June and July, we will be launching products and experiences, which will be much better than what's available in the market and what we even did ourselves where we would provide customer facing as well as designer facing experiences and be able to connect the 2 experiences together to make sure the customer experience is very frictionless there.

And from a financial perspective, we, obviously believe that all that Yasir just spoke to will help with conversion and improve return rates, so drive sales. We also believe there is synergies and cost reductions that they can drive through various areas such as product development, samples, photography and creative costs and a whole host of other opportunities. You mentioned the backout from the non-GAAP perspective. You should expect that run rate going forward, but I think what's important to make crystal clear about that backout is that the majority of it has to do with the amortization of the transaction costs and how we have to account for it. The smallest piece of it has to do with their ongoing operations.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our next caller, Greg Melich with MoffettNathanson.

I think I'll stick on SG&A, particularly advertising marketing. I think, Laura, you mentioned -- or, Julie, you mentioned that, that helped on the SG&A side getting more effectiveness out of advertising, but it also sounds like the move to digital and more targeted is giving more lift on the top line. So I'd love to hear what's really changing there. Any sort of metrics in terms of how much of advertising now is digital versus traditional, where the catalog is, to help understand that dynamic that it seems -- maybe to spend less and leverage it and get more on the top line, it seems to be like a real shift. So if you can walk us through, that would be great.

Sure. Most of the spend, as we've been telling you guys for a while now, has been shifting more towards digital, so it's tipped over to be greater than 50% of our total spend for the company, and we're continuing to optimize our catalog spend. So you saw that continue into this quarter. We did heavily invest in digital as part of our, also, reinvestment of our tax savings and when -- we believe that will continue going forward. The big difference this quarter was the outperformance on the top line, and it's a great reminder. As we return to outperforming on the top line, it leverages all, including advertising, and allows us to outperform in the bottom. But I'll turn it over to Felix to walk through a little more detail as to what our investments are and how they're working.

Sure, and thank you for the question. Our media mix spend is in the channels where customers engage with us most, and more and more, that's online. And it's not just about spend in digital. It's also about finding efficiencies. So while our investments are aggressive in the digital space, we're also finding efficiencies to deliver strong ROIs. As of last year, we insourced over 90% of our marketing campaigns and media spend. We now have a team of Williams-Sonoma, Inc. employees with our own hands on our own keyboards ensuring our spend is most efficient. And I would say secondly, with 7 brands in our portfolio, we're able to develop a cross-company test-and-learn strategy, where we can test on one brand and quickly roll to the other brands in a very efficient manner if the tactic makes sense for each brand's key initiatives.

We'll continue on to Chris Horvers with JPMorgan.

Can you talk about trends in operating income. Last year, EBIT dollars declined 3%, down 4% in 4Q. This quarter, you turned it up sharply, up 10% year-over-year ex NOI -- ex the accounting change. So what changed there? Looking at the guidance, it does look like you're expecting operating income to turn down in 2Q again. So was there something unique to the first quarter that helped drive that higher? Or are there unique costs that hit in the second quarter?

So it's a little bit of both. The first quarter, truly, it's the outperformance and the leverage that creates throughout the P&L. So when you drive that kind of revenue on the top line, especially in the e-commerce channel, you leverage advertising, you leverage occupancy, you leverage just about everything, employment as well. So all of that roll-through helped us on the bottom line from an earnings perspective. Going forward, the difference is that we have more investments from the tax savings we received in the second quarter, and so we mentioned last call that we have -- we're going to be investing in our associates and taking our hourly associates up to $12 per hour. That kicks in, in the second quarter. So it does put more pressure on the operating margin and operating income for the second quarter, different than the first.

Understood. And then a quick follow-up on the selling margins. Selling margin's down 90, it looks like, ex the accounting change in the first quarter, but this comparison gets a lot easier going into the back half of the year as you start to lap the price and shipping investments. So can you sort of lay out the timing of those investments? And do you think the shipping margin sort of -- or selling margin degradation moderates and flattens out in the back half?

So I mean, for first of all, I want to make sure we're clear on that, on how we performed on the gross margin this quarter. We did have the benefit from the accounting, but we also had 50 basis points, so 70 basis points of leverage, but 50 ex accounting, for occupancy. Plus, we had supply chain benefits. So we had incredible leverage that came through the P&L. We then did, yes, have some investments in merchandise margins and higher shipping costs. From how that's going to play out moving forward, we absolutely expect to have occupancy to continue to leverage as it has. We expect supply chains to continue as they have. Obviously, I've mentioned that we'll have the accounting impact. Shipping costs, we said we'll lap that in Q3 when we lap the higher UPS shipping cost, and we should get some pressure off of that. And we lapped West Elm in this second quarter from the flat rate shipping that we started last year. So we should get some pressure removal from some of those levers, but it obviously depends.

Our next quarter will come from Simeon Gutman with Morgan Stanley.

I wanted to follow up on that, I guess, the EBIT margins guidance as well, and Julie, you mentioned you flowed through about half the beat, which makes sense. I did also want to ask about the move to the flat rate shipping because I would expect that to improve, meaning accelerate, the benefit would accelerate as the year goes on. And then occupancy improvements, that, too, was great this quarter but also would improve. And then bigger picture, you mentioned our goal was to grow EBIT dollars roughly in line with sales. I don't know, you don't have like long-term guidance out there. But is that still the goal long term in that you keep reinvesting back into sales? Or do you try to get the margins up over time?

Well, our definite goal is to have operating income dollars be in line -- relatively in line with revenues. Certainly, we believe, over time, our margins will stabilize, and I think this quarter is the perfect example of the second we start to outperform, it dropped straight down to the bottom. And look where we landed above last year. And so that is where we expect to be over time. But certainly in the short term, we believe that having operating income dollars in line with revenue growth is where the short-term target is.

Our next question will come from Chuck Grom with Gordon Haskett.

Just wondering if you could just break out for us new customer acquisitions across the -- across your banners. And then also, if you look at exhibit 2, in terms of the cadence of the gross margin and SG&A changes over the balance of the year, I think you called out 70 basis points of a swing to the gross and about 60 to SG&A. When we think about our models for 2Q to 4Q, does that seem like a good proxy for the rest of the year?

Well, what I can tell you -- and we don't disclose the customer numbers by brand, but what I can tell you is that they're positive across-the-board. And where we are most excited about is in our direct channel, where we saw double-digit increase in all of our brands. And so that gives us, again, more confidence in our marketing strategy being more invested into the digital space.

And as far as your question, if I understood it correctly on SG&A and gross margin, yes, I believe, throughout the rest of the year, due to the accounting, adoption of the new standard, that we will have a shift of 60 to 70 basis points between gross margin and SG&A. I didn't say specifically that it will be 70 for gross margin and 60 for SG&A. But it will be between those 2 numbers for either 1.

We'll continue on to Brad Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

I want to follow up on the momentum that you have here in the direct business, the strongest quarter in a number of years. It was against a bit of an easier comparison. Could you maybe talk about how confident you are in maybe keeping up this elevated performance and the ability to drive more share gains within the direct channel?

Sure. We are quite pleased to raise our full year guidance today. When we last spoke to you, we were excited about the momentum in our business and the strong finish to the year and with the momentum continuing to accelerate in all of our brands and in both channels by the way. We feel very confident in raising our full year outlook to reflect the strong start. And as I said before, we have a large number of exciting initiatives that we're executing against. We've made great progress, and we have strong trends in the customer metrics. And combined with all of the products and operational initiatives we have in the pipeline, we're very optimistic about our ability to maintain this momentum.

We'll continue on to Brian Nagel with Oppenheimer.

So my question, I guess, is for Julie, a bit of a follow-up to a prior question. But with regard to shipping costs, we've called this out now as a headwind for a while, including today. Now you mentioned that later this year, you'll lap sort of pricing dynamics, which would help that, I guess, alleviate that headwind. How -- bigger picture, are there other factors that could, over time, limit, sort of say, the impact of shipping costs on your overall business simply -- beyond just simply lapping these pricing dynamics?

Yes. I'll take that question because I'm passionate about the opportunities we have, and I know -- this is Laura by the way. I know that we made improvements in our inventory, but I think it's going to be very interesting to see, as we continue forward in our operational improvements to our customer, how much we can further reduce our costs. There's still -- as good as we are doing with large cube, we want to be #1 in large cube delivery, and we have that as a goal. And there's a lot of costs to continue to take out of the supply chain, frankly, and we're very excited about going after that. And that's a big chunk of money from returns, damages. And we're set up really well with this network of regional distribution centers so that we can be as close to the customer as possible, and that allows us to be faster and cheaper than our competition. And we know that the more you haul furniture, the more damage you get. So we see a lot of other vectors that will give us improvement over the long haul.

And our final question from today goes to Cristina Fernandez with Telsey Advisory Group.

I wanted to follow up on the shipping topic. It looked like, during the quarter, you used free shipping more as a promotional tool than in the past. How is the customer responding to that versus other types of promotion such as pricing? And based on the competitive landscape, where do you think your dollars are better spent?

I mean, the customer always loves free shipping. In fact, I don't think we've done more promotions this quarter year-over-year, but certainly, it's something that's effective. It's just another promotion tool that we use, and so we're going to continue to do that.

I'd just say that in terms of total promotional activity, we actually have seen positive trends in reducing and streamlining what we're doing and really focusing on where we have overstock. So as much as you might see a few more free ship days, it's not material.

At this time, I'd like to go ahead and turn the conference back over to our speakers for any additional or closing remarks.

Well, I want to thank all of you. I appreciate -- we all appreciate your interest in Williams-Sonoma and your support, and we look forward to talking to you again next quarter.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, again, that does conclude today's conference. Thank you all again for your participation. You may now disconnect.