Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Weatherford International Fourth Quarter 2019 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. I'd now like to turn the call over to Sebastian Pellizzer, Senior Director, Investor Relations. Sir, you may begin.

Welcome, everyone, to the Weatherford International Fourth Quarter 2019 Conference Call. I'm joined today by Mark McCollum, President and CEO; Christian Garcia, Executive Vice President and CFO; and Karl Blanchard, Executive Vice President and COO. First, Christian and Mark will share their prepared remarks, and then we will open up for questions, and Karl will join in. I'd like to remind everyone that some of today's comments include forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to many risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any expectations expressed herein. Please refer to our latest Securities and Exchange Commission filings for risk factors and cautions regarding our forward-looking statements. Our comments today also include non-GAAP financial measures. And as noted in our press release, the company adopted fresh-start accounting. We are using the term combined to identify when we are adding the results of the predecessor and successor companies. The underlying details of the combined periods and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures are included in our fourth quarter press release, which can be found on our website. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Christian.

Thank you, Sebastian, and good morning, everyone. Before I begin, I just want to let everyone know that you might be hearing me cough during the call and it's because of allergies. I'm still acclimating back to Houston after being gone for 3 years, and it is currently allergy season here. But to be safe, Mark, Karl and Sebastian have stayed away from me. This is my first earnings call since I joined Weatherford, and it is certainly an interesting time to rejoin the oilfield. I'm looking forward to working with each of you. Let me begin my discussion with a summary of the fourth quarter of 2019, then provide comments on 2020 and how the first quarter of 2020 is shaping up for the company. Combined revenues in the fourth quarter of 2019 were $1.2 billion or 5% below the third quarter of 2019 and 13% below the same period in 2018. The sequential decline primarily resulted from significant activity reductions in the United States and Argentina. We have divested or are in the process of divesting our land rigs, surface data logging and reservoir services businesses, and excluding these, the year-over-year decline in combined fourth quarter revenues was 8%. In the fourth quarter of 2019, average rig count in the United States fell by 11% sequentially as operators exhausted their budgets before year-end and maintained disciplined controls on capital spending. Activity in Argentina fell sharply due to uncertainty surrounding a potential change in the regulatory environment as it pertains to natural gas pricing caps, high inflation and currency devaluation. Fourth quarter 2019 combined adjusted EBITDA was $151 million with margins of 12%. Margins reduced by about 100 basis points sequentially due to the fall-through of the revenue decline, nonrecurrence of a capital sale in the third quarter related…

Thanks, Christian, and good morning, everyone. As you know, 2019 was a very challenging year for Weatherford, and I'd like to take a moment to acknowledge the enormous support that we received from our stakeholders, including our shareholders, lenders, customers, vendors and particularly our Weatherford employees as we went through Chapter 11. I believe we're a better company today than we were a year ago, but it's not because we believe the financial restructuring resolved all of our challenges. As you know, Weatherford's issues were more than just its capital structure, we had operational and cost structure issues, too. We launched a transformation plan back in late 2017, early 2018, aimed at increasing our profitability by structurally changing our organization and streamlining decision-making to improve efficiency. Through this plan, we began the process of standardizing, simplifying and systematizing the way we work. We made steady progress toward these goals throughout 2018. And while market headwinds and our financial challenges in 2019 negatively impacted the pace of our transformation program, we did not stop working on improving our operations while we were in Chapter 11. In North America, we restructured our business to be more efficient and profitable by reducing our footprint, rightsizing our headcount and evaluating our product and service offerings. As Christian described earlier, we significantly reduced our manufacturing footprint and began optimizing those operations. We made meaningful progress on reducing our global support cost. We repaired our critical vendor relationships and began to make progress on realizing better terms and pricing. We've maintained our focus on safety and service quality, strengthened customer relationships and continued to be rewarded with new work from our customers. And finally, we continue driving the commercialization of disruptive new technologies, which included but weren't limited to Vero automated connection integrity, our Magnus rotary…

[Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from Marc Bianchi with Cowen.

Good to talk to you guys again. First question, just in terms of plans to list on a major exchange, could you offer any updated thoughts on that, please?

Yes. So Mark, this is Christian. Let me take that one and see if Mark has additional comments. So currently, the company is in the gray sheets, which allow for institution to institution trading, and we are expecting to be in the OTC pink sheets in the coming months. As for listing on a major exchange, we had a plan before the market volatility that occurred in the last couple of weeks now. We are now revisiting that plan with our Board. So at this point, we just stay tuned.

Yes, our hope, Marc, is to try to get out as obviously as soon as practical. We wanted to make sure -- we obviously needed to get fresh-start accounting finished and our filing done before it made any kind of sense. At one time, we were hoping that maybe having another quarter under our belt before it made time. We -- again, our Board will meet in a couple of weeks, and we'll be revisiting whether it makes sense to move faster than that, just given the market volatility. It was kind of a jump ball on our earlier decision-making.

Okay, okay. And in terms of the progression of results from here, looking at first quarter, you mentioned the kind of low double-digit revenue decline year-over-year, but EBITDA would be up slightly. If I just kind of put a normal decremental margin on your year-over-year revenue comment, that's about $50 million of headwind that you're obviously not going to see because of cost cuts. Could you talk about the cost cut that you're expecting in the first quarter and beyond? And what type of, kind of, benefit that could be for EBITDA? And if there's any cash associated with that, that we should be thinking of?

Right, right. Let me focus on the impact on cash because that's clearly an important component on how we are moving forward. So going into the year, we had actions in place to generate about $150 million to $200 million of savings for the year to address the reduction in the U.S. market and improve our profitability. In addition, we were putting in place processes to improve working capital by about $80 million. And we were having really good traction in the first 2 months of the year, that is why you see really good improvement in our EBITDA year-over-year. Now clearly, that is no longer enough. We are now augmenting those actions. And I provided a number of initiatives we are embarking on, increasing the headcount reductions in both U.S. and global support, reducing manufacturing capacity, exiting some countries and so forth. Now at this point, we do not want to be prescriptive on the total amount we're aiming for because this is going to be a moving target. We'll have to see how the industry will progress in the coming quarters. But just to give you how I'm thinking about this and as you know, Marc, the oilfield industry has very high decrementals, right, because it's a fixed cost business and generally, it's around 40% to 50% depending on geography and product line. So it gives you the magnitude of the impact of the lower revenues. For working capital, which is -- we expect to have a benefit of that to support cash. Our days working capital is about 110, 120 days, which we're trying to improve. There's always a lag, of course, between when you see the revenue decline and when the working capital improves, and we may not get all of that improvement for a variety of reasons. But this gives you an idea of the -- on the opportunity we have on the working capital side. And then the third component, as I mentioned, Marc, is lower CapEx. Last year's CapEx is $270 million, and we are reducing it to be somewhere in the $100 million to $150 million range this year. So I hope that helps.

Yes, that's great, Christian. And maybe if I could just, one more. Mark, you made a lot of comments about digitalization and as it relates to the lift offering that you have. Can you provide some commentary as to where Weatherford is today in terms of the mix of lift offerings? And maybe specifically on the rod lift side, that used to be very important business for Weatherford, and I think some investors are starting to have some questions about that market, especially with some of the other large competitors discussing about exiting the business.

So yes. So -- I mean today, particularly with some of our joint venture relationships, right, Weatherford can offer customers every form of lift. We've got everything in our portfolio and our catalog to be able to offer them. And what we've tried to do in building on our digitalization strategy is to make sure that, that platform can optimize any form of lift as well. Clearly, when you spoke specifically about the rod lift business, to be certain, the rod lift business has been stressed in North America, particularly as unconventionals in the Permian Basin, particularly, has been basically an ESP market. And so that certainly has been a struggle over the last couple of years. The good news about Weatherford and its portfolio is we're a global business, and we're in every basin across North America. And so while the Permian is somewhat stressed, there are other basins that are not. And of course, you go -- you step into the international markets, the rod lift business continues to do pretty well. And so I think that some who may be thinking about exiting, have a narrow platform, it's not possibly a fully integrated offering. You don't see it. But for me, as I think about production itself, if our customers are serious about generating returns and cash flows, and Wall Street becomes increasingly agnostic as to whether customers are spending CapEx or OpEx, but are really looking for what's delivering to the cash flow bottom line and returns, then that today means that the incremental barrel, the cheapest, highest return on barrel is that next barrel that can be produced out of an existing well. And I think increasingly, particularly in a stressed market when customers are trying to figure out how to generate more with substantially less recoveries, production has to get more attention than it is. And at some point, every single well needs to go on to rod lift. Economically, I mean, at some point, the rod lift business remains. And so we're -- if anything, I'm trying to, in some ways, lean into that business right now because I think it's going to be increasingly important. A little different strategy, but that's where I'm at.

And the next question comes from Sean Meakim with JPMorgan.

Mark, Christian, historically, there's been a lag between changes in oil prices and changes in your customer activity. North American E&P sound like they're going to be much more reactive. We've already heard from more than a dozen that they plan to reduce budgets. As you mentioned, perhaps down 30% or 40%. Internationally, budgets historically are pretty set in stone once we got into the year. But when now you've already heard from a few NOCs and IOCs that maybe there's going to be more flexibility, could you just talk about how that dynamic could be changing in the current environment? And then the read-through to the opportunity set for Weatherford?

Yes, thank you. This is Karl Blanchard. I'll take a shot at that. It is very dynamic. Clearly, the expectation is a dramatic drop off in cap spending in the United States. To be honest with you, while we're seeing those announcements and clearly, those actions will -- will execute, the activity internationally today is more disrupted. I mean the last couple of weeks has been more disrupted around COVID-19 and issues around movements of people and ability to execute. But on the capital side, we've actually had a couple of clients come to us talking about being prepared for increase in activity in the international sector. And this relates some to the results of the OPEC meeting a couple of weeks ago. So it is a mixed bag. But as a general rule, we are seeing steady as it goes in the international markets. There will be some up and there will be some down. But I don't think that we can forecast yet today, the actual impact that will happen in international markets. It's a little bit more clear and we've all seen history in the U.S. so we can see that a little bit with a clearer lens.

Right. Sean, so if I can add to that, and Karl is absolutely right, it varies by region. And the way we're thinking about this, there will be some components of the international regions that are susceptible to short-term fluctuations of the oil price, and therefore, you know how they would be going. There are others, as Karl mentioned, like the Middle East that are longer-term projects, plus their plants are actually getting more robust and therefore, maybe helps us provide some stability to our international operations.

Got it. And then in the prepared comments, you mentioned plans to reduce your footprint in certain geographies as part of your cost savings initiatives. Can we talk about how you see the overall portfolio today in terms of services and products? We talked about lift a little bit, but maybe kind of where are you best positioned? Where are there opportunities to high-grade? Or maybe exit other parts of the portfolio? Just -- and how that's impacting your CapEx budget for this year would be helpful.

All right. So Sean, let me take a stab at this and maybe Mark and Karl can provide additional color. First of all, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we're not going to provide kind of a more detail -- a lot of detail around this area, simply because there are customers involved here. So we really think about it in 3 segments of our international operations. Those that we absolutely need to fix, those are important countries for the oil and gas business, and therefore, we have to have a strategy on how to fix it. The second is those that are just unprofitable and will continue to be unprofitable, and they do not really matter much on the oil and gas industry. And as such, we will have to really materially shrink our footprint for those, and that's just a handful. And then there's those that, as you pointed out, is there a way to actually change the way we go-to-market there, whether it's using more product-focused rather than service and all of that. So those are the kind of the thought process that we're having to do right now. We've identified some of those that we will be exiting, it's just a handful, and those that we will be changing the way we go to market.

So you also asked the question about the portfolio, and just let me take a stab at that. You recall, prior to our financial restructuring, we sold several businesses. A couple of those were obviously very capital-intensive, not very profitable to generate cash flows, big capital requirements. The pressure pumping business in North America that we sold back in 2017 and then the international land rig business, which we've sold in pieces. We still have -- there's a few countries and things that we still have to wrap up, but we're basically about to finish all that up, wrap it up, hopefully, in the next quarter or so and get all those done. Then there are a couple of businesses that we sold in part, trying to find ways to address our financial situation, where they had -- we thought that they might have more traction to another buyer, a higher multiple than the broad business that we carried that would serve as a delevering mechanism. One was -- in particular, was our labs business. Beyond that, there was nothing that we felt like was unnecessary in the portfolio. And so on the other side of financial restructuring, I'm very happy with the portfolio that we have. I think it's kind of important for the markets that we address. And so we want to hang on to those. I still would like -- there are a couple of places that we would like to expand our business. We have a great fluids business in Latin America, which I think we would like to organically grow as we think about expanding our ability to execute integrated projects in the Middle East and elsewhere. We -- while we have alliances around ESP, I'd like to have a stronger and broader offering in the ESP business. We've always talked about that, and so that necessarily hadn't changed. But beyond that, we're pretty happy. Of course, we recognize currency is scarce right now for us. And I think that while I have those dreams, I don't see that as something that's probably here in the next little while until markets get their legs underneath them. And we particularly -- our first order business is generating cash flow and returns and getting our business profile operating the way it should before we decide we're going to take on too much more. But I think that the portfolio itself, I'm really happy with. And I think, as we said, we're going to make tweaks around the world based on where we do those. But I think what we do continues to be very, very important, having the current integrated profile we have.

And the next question comes from James West with Evercore ISI.

Mark, you're a returns guy. You always have been in your predecessor companies. You're at Weatherford, how do you think about maximizing your return profile in the context of a cost of capital that's going to go up a little bit here, a volatile market situation in North America and in the international environment? What are the levers that you can pull to make sure that Weatherford is earning its appropriate return relative to peers and then -- and just in general?

Well, it's a great question. And of course, there are multiple levers. When I came here, I saw -- it felt like Weatherford itself was an under-returning business. Its cost structure was too high relative to the business it was supporting. I think that the lack of integration across the portfolio required a too large footprint fixed cost structure relative to what it was doing. And so those are -- first and foremost, it's really working on and continuing this journey of integrating the company, standardizing the way that we do everything from the frontline in terms of locations and how we go to market, but then also even in the back office, in the support structure and how payroll is done, as something as basic as that. And so that -- continuing to reduce the fixed cost structure itself, is actually a pretty dramatic upward lift on returns itself. The second thing was, by introducing a different discipline in the way that we tender work, we plan projects and all that. I mean we've got now mechanisms built in so that they are business cases, around what our sales force bring in. If we're looking at participating in tenders around the world, it's got to be profitable, and we're going to make money out of it. We have to understand what the return -- what the capital investment is going to be and build that in. And doing so allows us to actually have a sharper pencil in the way that we execute CapEx. So rather than giving people a lot of discretion about spending, we're a bit stingier about continuing to use. And of course, then I thought everybody who's walked in the door sees significant working capital investment that sits on the balance sheet, continue to draw…

Okay. Okay, then I'll maybe...

We changed our compensation -- we changed our compensation structure coming into this year. We are now going to be -- our bonus scheme is going to be generated based on cash flow and returns. So we're -- that's -- Weatherford has come full circle. That's where we are.

That's good to hear. And then maybe just a follow-up for me on the international side of the business. There's obviously puts and takes. I know we're 7 days into oil price crash. But could you maybe give us at least your initial -- first blush of kind of how international plays out? Do you have some pockets where Weatherford is traditionally have been very strong, where spending should go up? And then, of course, there's going to be pockets where spending goes down. But how do you guys think about this year playing out? And again, I won't hold you to this as we are only 7 days in.

Let me start, and I may ask Karl to provide some additional color. But as he said, I think the puts and takes, it's been quite interesting, right? Something we didn't necessarily see. As the COVID-19 roll through -- everybody, of course, you in New York are shut down. Well, Kuwait has been shut down. The UAE has been shut down. I mean we're seeing that sort of rolling few -- 3 to 4 to 5-week kind of disruption through Asia and the Middle East and now moving into Europe, Romania and other -- Italy, of course, and other locations as the pandemic sort of moves around the world. So there's that little disruption thing. But separately, what we're -- we're also -- in the initial conversation, those countries that have basically said, we're dialing up production as a result of the lower oil prices or their commitments, their ability to dial up production in this price war, are also coming in and saying, okay, that dialing up production means we're -- we've got to be prepared to support that higher production level, and we need you guys to be prepared to be flexible and shipped with us. So you can kind of walk through -- I mean, who's talked about that, it's been Saudi Arabia. It's been Kuwait. The Emirates have mentioned those things. I mean clearly, even in Russia, Russia is talking about it. So we're just -- a lot of it is conversation right now, but we're trying to make sure that we retain plenty of flexibility to be responsive in those markets. And of course, for us in the Middle East, that's a hugely important market.

Yes. James, I think real quick, the other aspect is that in the international, the -- you've got a lot of large IOCs, a lot of offshore projects, and there's much more stability and steadiness, even in the recent few days, in those organizations about managing through this as opposed to any kind of big reaction. I mean I think it'd be a little bit not prudent to believe that it's not going to have an impact overall, but significantly less overall impact in the international arena between the NOCs being long-term and IOCs being long-term players.

And the next question comes from Kurt Hallead with RBC.

Christian, welcome back. Some might say you're a little bit crazy for doing that, but I can understand. I can understand the persuasion of Mark McCollum. So all good, all good. So I appreciate all the color and all the challenges, Mark, especially on your end you've gone through since you've taken over that role. I was just kind of curious in the context of -- maybe you can give us a little bit more color around kind of the free cash flow targets you have that kind of drive that compensation. And then just given all the dynamics that have played out over the course of the past week, how are you stress testing those cash flow dynamics? And maybe just give us some color around that. I know everybody is thinking about this on the fly but -- and in real time, but any additional color you could provide would be great.

Right, right. So maybe -- obviously, I talked about the working capital and widening of the working capital and the cost initiatives we have. But just to give you kind of what we -- what outgoing cash outflows we need to cover to breakeven and -- to breakeven on the free cash flow basis. So we have interest of $230 million, taxes of about $100 million and CapEx of $150 million, right? So -- and then we will have restructuring, obviously, and other sundry items that is about $150 million to $200 million. So those outflows need to be covered by both EBITDA, the cost initiatives that we have as well as the unwinding of the working capital. So it gives you kind of the math of how I'm thinking about how to cover this to make sure that we breakeven cash flow for this year.

Great. And then maybe a follow-up in terms of the debt reduction or how you can go about reducing your debt load over time, and what that might require from an overall activity or cash flow standpoint. Can you give us some color on that?

So in terms of the notes, we have $2.1 billion of notes that is -- matures in 2024, so we have a lot of time here. But the way we think about this is that there's $500 million that's callable, right? So depending on how we do it, either refinancing it or actually getting some sort of funding from a different funding source, then -- that is one of the things that we are very focused on.

With that, I'd like to turn it back over to the operator to close the call. Thank you all for joining us today.

Yes. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.