Good morning and welcome to the Voya Financial Fourth Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Michael Katz, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you and good morning. Welcome to Voya Financials' fourth quarter and full-year 2019 earnings conference call. We appreciate all of you who have joined us for this call. As a reminder, materials for today’s call are available on our website at investor's.voya.com or via the webcast. Turning to slide 2. Some of the comments made during this conference call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities law. I refer you to this slide for more information. We will also be referring today to certain non-GAAP financial measures. GAAP reconciliations are available in our press release and financial supplement found on our website, investors.voya.com. Joining me on the call are Rod Martin, Voya Financials' Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; as well as Mike Smith, Voya's Chief Financial Officer. After their prepared remarks, we will take your questions. For the Q&A session, we have also invited the heads of our businesses, specifically Charlie Nelson, Retirement; Christine Hurtsellers, Investment Management; and Rob Grubka, Employee Benefits. With that, let's turn to slide 3, as I would like to turn the call over to Rod.

Good morning. Let's begin on slide 4 with some key themes. 2019 was a strong and successful year for Voya, our shareholders, and our customers. On a normalized basis, our full-year EPS was $4.22, representing an 18% increase in adjusted operating earnings per share compared with 2018. This earnings growth was driven by the significant progress we have made in reducing costs and in returning capital to shareholders. It also reflects the sale of our Individual Life business which we announced in December. The Life transaction accelerates our plans to generate free cash flow from the business, reduces risk, and marks the completion of a fundamental restructuring of Voya. The transaction will remove five regulated insurance companies, a broker dealer, and 15 administrative systems, creating significant opportunities for Voya to become even more efficient. Looking ahead, we expect normalized adjusted operating earnings per share to reach a quarterly run rate of $1.80 to $1.90 by the end of 2021, representing a 10%-plus growth from the 2018 base that included Life earnings. We remain committed to growing normalized adjusted operating EPS by at least 10% in both 2020 and 2021 while generating a strong return on equity. We have purposefully evolved Strong return on equity. We have purposely evolved to become a company with a clear focus and strategy centered on high-growth, high-return capital-light businesses. There are three reasons why we're confident in our continued EPS growth potential and the power of our core businesses. First, we're delivering cost savings. We remain on track to achieve the run rate cost savings of at least $250 million by the end of 2020. As of the fourth quarter, we successfully eliminated all of the stranded costs associated with our 2018 annuities transactions. We will bring the same focus in addressing stranded costs related…

Thank you, Rod. Before we get to the numbers, I will talk through the most significant changes in the presentation of our financial results due to the sale of our Individual Life business. All earnings from our Individual Life business and the other legacy blocks included in the transaction are now reported outside of adjusted operating earnings, both for historical periods and for future periods until close. These results are included, however, in GAAP net income. The transaction results in GAAP book value adjustments that we will recognize in stages between fourth quarter 2019 and close. Consistent with our communication, when we announced the sale in the fourth quarter of 2019, we recognize that GAAP book value reduction of $1.1 billion. This represents the estimated loss on sale from the portion of the transaction that is structured as a sale of legal entities. At close, we will recognize a further adjustment to GAAP book value associated with the portion of the transaction that involves a sale through reinsurance. Our current estimate is that we would expect to realize a partially offsetting book value gain such that the total reduction in GAAP book value due to the transaction would be in the range of $250 million to $750 million. The transaction will also have an effect on the manner in which we report expenses associated with the businesses we have sold. Although, earnings from these businesses are classified as non-operating, GAAP held for sale accounting requires us to include associated indirect expenses as stranded costs in operating earnings. Because we continue to receive earnings from these businesses until the transaction closes, we will normalize for these costs when we report normalized adjusted operating earnings until close. After close, we will include the remaining stranded costs in our normalized adjusted operating earnings…

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is coming from Ryan Krueger of KBW. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks. Good morning. Could you provide some perspective on how quickly you expect the Life stranded costs to dissipate following the close of the sale?

Hey. Ryan, this is Mike. I'll take that. At close, the first thing to keep in mind is that we'll have transition service fees to offset a meaningful portion of what we've identified right now is stranded costs. So, right out of the gate you'll see a change there in what we report. We have some work to do yet to determine the exact pacing, by which we're going to remove the stranded costs. But I think it will – maybe the best way to think about is they'll be fully addressed by the time we exit 2021. The exact pace and timing of that is to be determined. I would – look, we just announced that we've completely eliminated the stranded costs from the annuity transaction. We've got the right kind of discipline in place to do it. As Rod said in his comments, this significantly simplifies our organization. We removed five of legal entities. We removed a number of administrative systems. It will, I think, it’s not going to be easy but we are experienced and ready and we’ll be able to address that fully.

Thanks. And then on investment management, the institutional fee rates came down some in the quarter. Can you provide some more details on that as well as your expectations for fee rates in investment management overall going forward?

Christine?

Sure. Good morning, Ryan. As far as…

Good morning.

…how to think about the fee rate on the institutional assets, certainly the basis points and the fees that we earned is one health indicator of the business that we track. But also as we think about it basis points also don't equal margin. So what do I mean by that is, certainly some of the larger scale mandates that we win tends to be lower fees for the size. But we're very disciplined in thinking about the margin because those can be quite accretive because we have a very scalable business notably in fixed income. But let me just pivot very quickly to the fourth quarter for you and talk a little bit about how we see 2020 unfolding. So in the fourth quarter, we did have a larger deviation of the basis points earns between inflows versus outflows. So outflows were 10 basis points approximately higher than inflows and that was largely driven by a redemption in what we call CMOB. For an insurance company that was related to a change in ownership. And so you saw the very strong performance fees in the leveraged version of that mortgage investment hedge fund. So it's a capacity constrained asset. And so that's sort of a onetime thing and we should be able to replace those assets over time. So that was a lot of what was driving the fourth quarter. Now how are we looking at what we can see right now in 2020? We are launching a couple of higher-margin products in 2020. Examples would be an infrastructure debt fund, as well as Pomona 10. We're going to be back in the market, and you might see a first close there as early as June of 2020, but certainly in the back half of the year, and again, those are higher basis points. But one thing that we're seeing now, we have a very strong pipeline in 2020, and we do have some unfunded and some finals and some pretty more scaled product. So you may see that basis point dynamic persist through the first half of 2020. However, that's going to be associated with commensurate volume and will be very margin-accretive. So, again, we're on pace to hit our Investment Day – Investor Day target margin of 30% to 32%, have a very strong pipeline and confidence that we're going to continue that strong organic growth of 2% to 4%.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Humphrey Lee of Dowling & Partners. Please go ahead.

Good morning and thank you for taking my questions. Just to stay on investment management, looking back in the past couple of quarters, you have seen benefit from the sub-advisor replacements in your flows. Even though I know these replacements can be episodic, I was just wondering, can you give a sense in terms of the portion of the sub-advisory AUM that could be in play, meaning you either have comparable products with performance in line with kind of the existing sub-advised product?

Humphrey, Christine will take that also.

Sure. Humphrey, as you said, really the sub-advisory replacements are episodic. They are related to strong performance on investment management product that we have. But really it’s the mutual fund board that oversees the full variable portfolio product that looks for these opportunities and recommends where they think there are underperforming managers that needs to be replaced. So, that being said, again it's episodic when you think about our growth. We're relying on our organic, institutional and retail flows to hit that 2% to 4 % margin. So, not relying on sub-advisory replacements in our pipeline or what we see. So, again, it's really the organic growth that we have. And notably, another point where we're getting really strong momentum that also we'll go back to building our basis points is really on retail. And so, if you take a look at the trajectory of our retail flows, institute Voya Investment Management retail flows, very strong for the second half of the year, and we see a good strong start to the first half of the year there.

Thank you for the color. And then shifting gear back to the stranded costs, and I appreciate Mike's comment about how the TSA and the ASA will come in immediately after the deal close to provide some level of offsets, but I was wondering if you'd be able to size the impacts from the TSA or the ASA that will kick in

Humphrey, it's too early for us to be able to do that. We actually are still in the midst of negotiating exactly what the scope and breadth of those services will be and consequently we don't have any ability to talk about the fee level.

Humphrey, the thing I would add having just completed the fact we did it a quarter early, the venerable transaction, it terms of the TSA/ASA piece, We have a absolutely terrific blueprint and a team that just did a very complicated transaction that is transitioning to this, that finishes again the transformation of Voya. So we will report as we did with the Venerable transaction. As we go further in these discussions, we're targeting a third quarter close. We're very encouraged about the partner and the cooperation and the early stages. But as Mike said, it's simply too early at this point.

Got it. And I appreciate the color and I don't disagree with you about your ability to execute in terms of eliminate these stranded cost so good luck. Thanks.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Tom Gallagher of Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Just a quick one on $1.80 to $1.90 guide for 4Q 2021. Can you quantify the level of performance fees in asset management that are embedded in that estimate whether it's in an average of what you've been getting or how should we think about that?

Hey, Tom. This is Mike. I'll start. Look, I think it's still a little early for us to be giving that kind of specific guidance. I think it'll be a meaningful part of the growth picture that we report for IM. Those – that growth was something that we anticipated at Investor Day. And so, it's been part of the story all along and part of what fuels our overall expectation of the CAGR of 5% to 8% that we talked about from 2018 to 2021. I think the ramp that we're looking at to go from our current earnings level to the $1.80 to $1.90 is going to be fueled by that as well as growth and retirement. And we talked about the flows there. The continued growth and employee benefits. Turbo charged by our cost saves and by the share repurchases that will come from the capital management that we've got coming. So there'll be a number of factors driving the growth to get us to that $1.80 to $1.90.

Tom, I would just add to what Mike said. As you’ve heard in the call just now we guided up in employee benefits. We've guided up when we announced the live transaction, our ROE including the DTA and we have released more capital earlier as a result of the transaction or will be upon closings than we anticipated. So I'm really excited about the position that puts Voya in at this point in our ability to execute this over the 2020 and 2021 year. And again as you heard and frankly just to summarize, the $1.80 and to $1.90 includes the baseline that started with the life insurance business. So, the 10-plus percent earnings growth that's gone away. Our growth is inclusive of that over this glide path in 2020 and 2021, again, that we're highly confident in our ability to execute on it.

Thanks for that Rob. I guess the – just as a follow up, I just wanted to – and I asked that specific question because I know it was a good quarter for performance fees this past quarter. So I wanted to see are you assuming you're going to build on that or that it's something more normal just from kind of a higher level standpoint?

Tom, I may have – I may not have quite fully gotten the gist of your question. We don’t build in any meaningful performance fees there. So, to the extent that we have strong performance like we had last year, then that would be gravy. That would be in addition to what we're talking about.

Got it. Yeah. I just wanted to make sure of that.

Okay.

Okay that's helpful. And then just a quick follow up. Mike, I heard your comment on excess capital, yeah, that came in surprisingly strong. And you had mentioned, I think it was $200 million was freed up from the securitization of the Life block, and then you also mentioned some capital optimization strategies. Can you elaborate a bit more on what went on there?

Yeah. I think the way to think about the growth was there was just a little more than $200 million from the reserved financing. There was roughly $100 million on non-Life dividends that drove that. They're not – that's not accounted an excess capital until we actually dividend it up from the non-Life companies. There was a meaningful portion that was just ongoing earnings. And then the balance was a couple of initiatives. I think the way to think about that is anytime you're doing a transaction, it generates the creative juices and ways to think about structuring your organization, how you can stack entities. Cut gives you an opportunity to rethink some of your strategies more broadly and how you're funding benefits and so on. So, I think those are both onetime in nature. But I think it's consistent with our ongoing focus on optimizing capital. I think we've consistently found over the years opportunities to make the company more efficient. That was – I think been shown very clearly in our growth in ROE over the last now seven years where we’re now reporting an ROE, including the DTA of north of 14%. So I think we’re – we feel good about that. We'll continue to look for future opportunities, and I – while I don't have any on the front burner, I can't say that there won't be some, so we'll continue to try and harvest those as best as we can.

Okay. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Andrew Kligerman of Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning. So following up on the capital, $896 million of excess, a check coming in third quarter of $1.5 billion, and the ability to return 85% to 95% of free cash flow, and we’re talking about $1 billion-plus of repurchases this year. So could you give us a sense of what the plus part of the $1 billion has potential to be?

Andrew, look, I think we've got a track record that is second to none in terms of our focus in delivering value to shareholders and our willingness to pull the trigger on share repurchases. I think we’re in incredibly enviable position right now. We've got enormous flexibility. We've got a transaction in the balance sheet coming that we're going to need to get into the place that we want to be in so that we have the best possible position to go forward. So I think the numbers you shared are absolutely right-on. And so it creates a meaningful upside. So, we’ll continue to use the same discipline we have in the past. I think, we’ll see how events unfold. Obviously there's a lot going on in the world right now and so we're going to be judicious and prudent but also very focused on delivering shareholder value. And as you point out.

Got it.

Upon closer the transaction is when those funds are available. So we've got a couple of quarters to observe exactly what Mike has just outlined. And again I just want to – just to state again $7 billion in seven years, pretty significant number. And I love the position that Voya is in at the close of this transaction. In the choices and options we have to continue to invest in our business and to continue to return capital to shareholders in the best interest of the aggregate stakeholders.

Yeah. Great. And then shifting over to the Employee Benefit segment. So a terrific benefits ratio of 70.2% and you said on the call that you're going to take the benefit ratios guidance to an improvement to 70% to 73% now. And you elaborated on the Stop Loss and how competition seems very rational going forward. Could you talk about the group life and disability area in terms of pricing? And then also the voluntary benefits. I mean, both of those areas too have been incredibly strong. And I'm wondering how long it can persist.

Rob will take that Andrew.

Yeah. Andrew thanks for the question on that. As Mike underscored resetting the range from an aggregate view and we think about that, it’s not only influenced but what we saw in Stop Loss, how we see the voluntary benefit business and that mix growing. We've talked consistently about the Life business as being a bit more sort of steady and flat but an important part of the business still. I'd say, overall, from a pricing perspective and just rationality in the marketplace, it's disciplined. We're not seeing dramatic sort of year-over-year shifts in competitiveness. And while the player may change here or there or a new player emerges here or there, those are dynamics that I think across all of Voya’s businesses we're used to adapting to, adjusting to, and finding our way forward. But from a growth perspective, Stop Loss, we did a lot of work to get the margin. We’ll continue to be disciplined about striking that balance from growth and margin as we move forward. Voluntary has certainly been performing very well. We expect that to continue but potentially moderate. And from a Life perspective, certainly, very happy where the results came in. You can look back over the last couple of years, so quarter-to-quarter, you're just – you're going to have noise there and it'll be lumpy at times, but we've done a lot of work on our renewal approach with the Life business as well as the Stop Loss business and feel like we're really positioned well to maintain that margin, and again ultimately feed into what might reset instead of talking about 7% to 10% growth over the Investor Day horizon here over the next couple of years. We're talking about 11% to 14%, and all of these products got to operate well to get there.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Suneet Kamath of Citi. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning. On the cost savings, I just wanted to make sure we’re tracking this correctly. So you’re on track to realize the – at least the $250 million of run rate cost savings by the end of 2020, and then you have the stranded overhead takeout associated with the Life deal. Are those two sort of distinct buckets of expenses, or is there some overlap between the two?

Suneet, there is a degree of overlap to the extent we're able to meaningfully outperform the $250 million-plus, right? So that'll be part of the way we solve some of the stranded costs. But there will be additional savings that we’ll need to generate beyond what we had contemplated from the original guidance. We have not yet quantified that. We were – as I said earlier, we have work to do in terms of how we're going to go about that. We have TSAs and other things to work out that will affect our ability to remove those costs. So stay tuned, but we'll certainly give very clear guidance or as clear as we can in terms of what our expectations are as those plans come together.

Suneet, this is Rod. What we're really guiding to is the landing spot, and again that's the $1.80 to $1.90 EPS at the end of 2021. There are two complex transactions. We've just finished the Venerable transaction and the ASA/TSA. We're taking that blueprint. You're asking a precisely correct question on there will be costs associated with that. We will have TSA/ASA piece. What we're really trying to do is give you the glide path to where we end in 2021, and that's back to the $.1.80, $1.90 with the life insurance out but off the base that included the life insurance. and significantly simplified organization, significantly reduced credit risk, and none of the tail liabilities associated with those form of businesses.

Yes. Got it. It makes sense. And then just going back to the retirement growth outlook, it seems like maybe the disclosure changed a little bit versus last quarter. I think maybe changed the time period from 2019 to 2021 to 2018 to 2021. I'm not sure if that had an impact. But you also talked about moving the pension costs outside of retirement into corporate. So I guess I just want to try to unpack that a little bit, just get a sense of is the lower growth rate that you're expecting from 4% to 7% to 1% to 4%, is that really just all interest rates or is there anything else going on in there that we need to understand?

Suneet, the short answer is it really is just the interest rate environment. There have been some other gives and takes. I think we've been happy with the level of underlying organic growth we're generating in retirement. But as we said in our disclosure of backlash over the course of last year, the interest rate impact in 2019 of 100-basis-point drop was about 2% of earnings for Voya in total. It's about the same impact for retirement. It's actually now a little bit more than 100-basis-point drop from Investor Day, at least that last look. And so the idea here is to say if interest rates stay mainly where they are, then we'll have additional pressure that would take away 4% at the end of that period and kind of look at the 1% to 4% – going from 4% to 7% to 1% to 4% is basically entirely in line with about a 4% drag. And moving the pension cost, look, there is a shift of the baseline year, 2018 included some benefits from net pension costs that we're not giving back now that it's the market conditions have changed. So, we're keeping that incorporate to make it easier to understand the ongoing run rate of the various – of the business segments. But that's a little bit of extra headwind and the growth to think about. It's probably worth 1% of the CAGR.

And it affects all of the business.

Yeah. Have you just…

But Retirement is the lion's share to be sure.

And do you have the total, like, pension cost that you expect for 2020? I think you said something about $20 million reduction but what's the real cost?

It’s about a $20 million improvement over last year in pension costs that will come through corporate.

Right. And that the total pension cost, do you have that number?

That's the net. So, that's basically the net pension costs, which is the service costs, and interest costs, less the turns that come from the portfolio. And keep in mind that the way the pension cost works is it's all marked to the point in time as of 12/31/2019. And so, as assets fluctuate throughout the year, it doesn't change, right?

So, we happen to catch a pretty high mark whereas last year we caught a fairly low mark, right?

Got it. Okay, thanks.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Erik Bass of Autonomous Research. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you. I wanted to go back to the investment Management business. It sounds like there’ll be a few moving pieces in the earnings in 2020 with I think the real estate sale and then the loss that you end with the Life sale. So, can you just help us think about the earnings power for the business in 2020 and then how the margin will ramp over time?

Erik, I’ll start and then I’ll let Christine fill in. but -- so the impact of the sale of the real estate is $2 million to $3 million spread over the -- that's an annual impact. So spread over the whole year. I mean that's pretty absorbable. From a life transaction standpoint that looks like closes in the third quarter. To some extent depend on when in this first quarter But the amount of assets that are leaving initially is actually quite small. We have not yet quantified the earnings impact because we have a little bit more negotiation to do, it will depend on which assets transfer. The fee rates do vary depending on which assets go to resolution and which ones we keep and manage. But you should think of it and certainly for the balance of 2020 it'll be in the single digit millions. It's not going to be a particularly large number partly if for no other reason then it's just going to be for – no more than six months and it could be four or five.

Got it. So it's building to that $10 million to $15 million over time but that's more of the drag in 2021.

Yeah. That will the 2021 drag and we'll give more specificity as we narrow down the exact terms of which assets are moving.

Got it. Okay. And then maybe for retirement. I mean you mentioned obviously you got large record keeping win in the fourth quarter and then a couple of losses. Can you just provide an update on competitive dynamics and it sounds like your outlook for flows is still pretty robust but any additional color you can provide on the pipeline there?

Charlie?

Sure. Thank you. We are on track for our net $38 billion and 0.5 million participants actually that we spoke about last year. We had a couple of known terminations that were accelerated on a couple of M&As. So these were some clients that were acquired, and they just merged their plan into their acquired one. We actually had some M&As where we actually are winning from our existing clients that will benefit us in the first half of 2020. What we were trying to align to in terms of guidance for 2020 on recordkeeping is an additional – is the $26 billion in net flows to be achieved in 2020, largely coming by the fourth quarter. It will kind of emerge through the year but largely in the fourth quarter. And I would note that that will come with what we expect as well, about 350,000 additional participants which was on top of – if you look at our total growth of full-service and record keeping in 2019, we added nearly 0.5 million participants at 470,000 net new participants in our retirement business in 2019. So that was very strong growth. We feel very good about our pipeline in both the recordkeeping and our full-service business, both the corporate and tax-exempt. I think, as I’ve said, we’ve got about 20% more plans in the process of implementation today than what we had on 09/30, so at the end of the last third quarter, so really good continued momentum, and look forward to kind of building on that in 2020.

Thank you. And I guess just one follow-up in terms of are there costs associated with onboarding those assets coming in that will be sort of weighted more in the beginning of the year and then you'll obviously get the revenue as the assets come in and then you’ll obviously get the revenues as the assets come in?

So the cost onboarding, it does differ a bit between recordkeeping and the full service. So I would say, generally, there is implementation cost as we look at onboarding the larger plans. But that a lot of that work was underway in 2019 and I think that was some of the things that we guided to last year in our investments and growth and the development and the onboarding of our new business, just the growth that we had both in full service and recordkeeping in 2019. With our continued momentum, we would expect to continue to see that. But I’d also note that our expenses in 2020 will be lower than in 2019, in that range that Mike guided to. And that we expect to see continued unit cost improvements as we get the benefits of all of our expense saves realized in retirement. So, we are looking at really having our expenses actually be a contributor to our earnings growth in 2020.

Thank you.

Thank you. We're showing time for one last question today. Our last question will be coming from Alex Scott of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Yeah. The first question I had was just on the passing of SECURE Act and if there are any initiatives that you have underway whether it's the multiemployer pools or anything else we should consider? And if there's any way how we can think about the tailwind that that could provide to flows?

Charlie?

Yeah. Thank you. Certainly, we're very pleased with the passage of the SECURE Act. I think it advances, as we've said, coverage, the inclusion of lifetime income or annuities and retirement plans and certainly facilitates some additional savings. I would note that the passage of the SECURE Act, a lot of those provisions become effective over the next number of years, they weren’t all effective on kind of the signing date if you will. And many of those provisions actually require individual plans, sponsors and employers to adopt them to take advantage of them, if you will. I think we expect the impact to the business really to emerge over time. So we are excited about the Secure Act passage. It is going to help in advance coverage, you know that we are – we have the capabilities and we have a number of multiple employer plans today. As I've mentioned in previous calls, so we think we're well poised for that but we also are pleased that it does advance the coverage and focus on savings rates that will be helpful to us which our two central tenants I think where Voya is focused on.

Got it. A follow-up question. It's unrelated. I think around the time you did this CBVA transaction, on the other side of it I think some of the assets that you ended up retaining that were part of the net investment income going forward were a little bit higher yielding and it benefited the overall yield you're achieving. Is that something that we should contemplate here with the resolution deal, I mean once you finalize the decisions around what assets are going there could we see shifts here or there that could benefit the yield or hurt the yield. Anything to consider…

Thank you. You certainly characterize the impact of the annuities transaction appropriately. There was a bit of a lift in yield for the ongoing businesses post-close, and it was due to exactly that, the residual assets that we kept. Too early to say for the new – for this transaction. It’s a different buyer with a different attitude towards this kind of things. And so we'll certainly post you and others as the negotiations unfold. But I don't have – it's possible, but too early to feel confident in any of that.

One thing I’d add is, as you may recall, we are one of the preferred providers in asset management for Venerable. One of the reasons they had lots of ambitions to get off of the TSA/ASA as fast as they could is they have ambitions of adding other blocks of business and other books of business to their platform, and in doing so will have an opportunity to participate in that growth. So, again, stay tuned on that. But we're excited about what that opportunity is. And again, as we've got to know each other more closely over the last few years, I think they've come to appreciate the particular capabilities that Christine’s teams has in how we're managing the assets that they've selected.

Thank you. Excuse me. This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Rod Martin for closing comments.

Thank you. Our plans to continue to drive organic growth, effectively deploy capital, and to achieve cost savings are delivering results. In 2019, we demonstrated our ability to accomplish the targets that we have set while further transforming our company. The sale of our Individual Life business accelerates our plans to generate free cash flow from the business, reduces risks, and marks the completion of a fundamental restructuring of Voya. We have a clear strategy with high-growth, high-return capital-light businesses. Our focused and complementary business mix serves to expand our presence in the workplace and with institutional clients. It’s also creating a greater opportunity for investors, enabling us to continue growing EPS by at least 10%, while doing so with high free cash flow conversion. We're excited about 2020 and beyond. We look forward to further updating you on our progress as we continue to drive greater value for all of our stakeholders and pursue our vision to be America's retirement company. Thank you and good day.

Thank you. The conference has concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.