John Hrudicka
Analyst · William Blair
Thanks, Paul. Good morning, everyone. Well Q1 was a challenging quarter for us as stated by both Maury and Paul. The story continues to be the erosion of sales relatively to our end markets. So let's jump into the sales story. So sales for the quarter were $322 million, this was down $80 million, or 20% from prior year. A quarter-over-quarter decrease was driven across all segments with North America Ag and currency impact comprising $58 million, or73% of the variance. As has been the trend the majority portion of the North America Ag decline is attributable to high horsepower product. Our reference currency, this drove reduction sales of $26 million on the quarter versus prior year. Half of this impact was driven by the Brazilian Real with smaller impact scattered across our other international businesses. If you adjust for the currency impact, sales declined 13.4% versus the reported 20%. So let's talk a little bit about Ag. As stated earlier, Ag was a key driver in our sales decline. Ag in total was down $30 million, or 15.5% when you exclude currency impact. At a gross level, North America Ag represents this entire decline. Nearly three quarters of the North America Ag decline is driven by the OEs as they continue to scale back production commeasure with the lower demand. And as a result, they are putting more pressure on suppliers like us to lower price. On the aftermarket side, they are only buying a need and that's a lowest price. So product availability is critical to realizing these sales and we are very focused on that. From a product perspective while we are experiencing just slight erosion in small Ag, the driving force continuous to be high horsepower equipment. While there is still long ways to go in terms of recovery. There are some very bright spots to know. The USDA is projecting flat farm income for 2016. So some stabilization appears to be occurring. Used equipment values look as if they are starting to buck the negative trend as there was a slight increase in Q1 over Q4 first time since Q2 of 2013. And also on the side of the dealers, and I believe Paul mentioned this; they are becoming more optimistic based on recent survey results. Our Europe Ag business actually grew slightly when excluding currency. While the business climate is still challenging the sales decline appears to have stopped. And we continue to win new business there .Our adjustable track waffle wheel value proposition project continues to progress with the strong belief. There is a real branding solution that could take us upstream from commodity product categories. Latin America namely Brazil is down significantly to prior year for reasons I will discuss a little later. Russia has been a great story. They continue to grow on volume and they are realizing price increases as well. The Russian government continues to support agriculture through an increasing monetary support to both the Russian farmers and Ag machinery producers. So let's turn our attention to earthmoving construction. Productivity improvement and reducing capital expenditures appear to still be holding fort in this segment. Our sales for earthmoving construction were down $21 million, or 14% from prior year when you exclude currency impact. Our international businesses were either flat to slightly growing when you exclude currency. I wanted to note our undercarriage mining aftermarket projects that were started years earlier are now paying dividends as we gain share in Latin America, Russia and the Far East with our new products and enhancement of existing products. In North America, a large mining tire sales continued to be stagnate while the sales representing smaller mining applications and construction were down 22%. A number of OEs have scale back purchases commeasure the continued slowdown. Commodity prices have increased recently but they are still in excess supply. Is this sustainable or will have an impact on new equipment purchases, nobody really knows this at this point. So let's talk about the consumer segment. Our Sales for consumers were down $5 million, or 9% when you exclude currency. The primary drivers of this decline and its further erosion in Brazil truck tires in the high speed train brake supporting the China railway system development. Frankly, Brazil is just a mess right now relatively to government corruption and their recession worse they have experienced since the 1930s. Government insolvency is a distinct possibility. And regards to the China high speed train brakes, we plan for decline in 2016 as the slowdown associated with the Chinese market began back in Q3, 2015. I move on to gross margins. Our gross margin dollars were down $11 million to prior year. Our gross margin rate performance at 9.9% was down 70 basis points to prior year on 20% less sales. Our consumer segment was particularly challenging this quarter. And I'll talk about that here shortly. If you would exclude our consumer segment, our gross margin rate as a percentage of sales actually improves slightly at 10.2%. Another highlight our Ag gross margin improved 84 basis points on a 21% reduction in sales. So there has been a lot of effort improving profitability on that side of the business. Paul spoke about this and we spoke a lot of about this at the year end call relative to our business improvement framework. Being integral to improve, we actually improving our 2015 gross margin despite a 26% reduction in sales. We continue to leverage this framework to drive profitability improvements in the face of declining revenues and unfavorable mix. I mentioned our consumer segment earlier relative to gross profit. Our consumer segment gross profit eroded $4 million with gross profit as a percent of sales falling to 7.6% from 14.1% one year ago. There are three primary drivers behind this. First of all, overall lower sales and loss leverage. Secondly, lower China high speed train brake sales. These are somewhat very high margin. Brazil, unfavorable mix and higher raw materials link to the US dollar there as well. Our overall material cost declined from prior year driven mostly by North America and pricing reduction in steel and natural rubbers, synthetic rubber and carbon black. And as a function of our long-term agreement, we passed the good portion of this back our OEs mostly neutralizing the positive impact to our P&L. Under our business improvement framework there are number of design and sourcing initiatives underway on both wheel and tire to take cost out of the material content of our products. And it's fully anticipate this design changes will also lower the cost to manufacture these products and improve quality as well. Quick note on operating expenses. SG&A, R&D, royalty were down $2 million to prior year at 12.4% of sales we are up 200 basis points up to prior year. This being just a mathematical function of lower sales. There are series of puts and takes across the various expenditure categories. Paul mentioned the addition of Kim Boccardi; we are investing more heavily and marking specifically in support of LSW as well as our investment in the antidumping case. We have reduced spending in other areas in order to fund these investments and achieve a net overall reduction in our spending. Moving down to P&L, let's discuss foreign exchange gain. These gains primarily reflect the translation within our company loans at foreign subsidiaries denominating currencies other than their function of currencies. You notice in Q1 we generated an FX gain of $5 million. Over the course of 2015, we took a number of steps to mitigate exposure to currency as it impacts our inner company loans and balances. We did this through balance reductions, debt reclassification, conversion and hedging and as a result of these actions we fully expect significantly less volatility to earnings now in going forward. So let's summarize and bring this to bottom line for profit. Our Q1 adjusted net income attributable to Titan stands at a $9.2 million loss and EBITDA at $11.2 million. This compares to adjusted net income attributable to Titan of $3.2 million and adjusted EBITDA at $25 million from prior year. So I want to touch on a few balance sheet items briefly. We typically experience a build in both AR and inventory coming off lower Q4 level. While this occurred with AR, our inventory went down. For the quarter AR is up $39 million from 2015 year end, down $23 million from Q1 of prior year. The increase in Q1 from year end was driven in part by an increase in sales, but we are also using terms to selectively battle for business in this very competitive market which has had an unfavorable impact on our DSO performance. Our DSO performance typically rose approximately 7 days from year end to Q1; this quarter is consistent in that regard. Inventory, inventory actually went down in Q1 defined the customary Q4 to Q1 pattern. With the downturn we have been steadfast managing inventory levels more efficiently. We kicked off a series of initiatives this year; they are starting to impact this favorably and fully expect the impact to grow over the course of the year. AP has also increased $15 million primarily from a five-day improvement in DPO. We just kicked off a fire supplier financing program that we believe could generate another $10 million to $15 million of cash when fully executed. In regards to PP&E, we continue to spend under our depreciation by scrutinizing our capital appropriation to ensure strategic alignment, positive EDA returns in cash generation. May have note PP&E went up $8 million total beyond the net capital reduction. This is due to $16 million of CTA. Cash, so we talk about cash. Cash ended the quarter at $191 million compared to $200 million at the beginning of the year. We continue to be aware of the concerns of our liquidity and cash flow as we fight through these down markets. And we are very mindful of this and continue to manage it diligently. Outside any exceptional liquidity events, we are planning to be roughly flat to our prior year balance. In fact, we are back over $200 million as I speak. In regards to Q1, there are just a handful of key drivers comprising our $9 million reduction in cash flow. Primary drivers of the cash reduction are accounts receivable of $32 million and our $9 million of net loss. This was in part offset by $10 million accounts payable growth, $12 million of inventory reduction and $8 million net capital reduction as I indicated earlier. From a debt perspective, while our net debt to trailing EBITDA measure has risen, our actual debt level is slightly down from a year ago. So this is just a function of math as during the downturn we dropped our higher earning quarters and substitute lower earning quarter. So wrapping up, our markets continued to be challenging but we remain diligent and managing what we control. I want to make a few comments relative to the new role which I am very excited about. But first before I get into those comments. Mr. Jim Froisland has joined us in an interim capacity as CFO. He has extensive experience as chief financial officer, chief information officer, chief operating officer, corporate secretary and board member for both domestic and international public and private equity owned company. So he has joined us effectively yesterday in fact. So turning to the comments about the new role. We've actually been talking about our business leadership role almost from the time I joined Titan. And I have had experience in executive business leadership role in prior like before Titan. I am an operational CFO with the strategic bent. This is what I enjoy. While on a CFO role I have had significant engagement and many operational aspects of the business, at the IT pricing and supply chain functions all reported to me as CFO. I believe I can contribute significantly to the company coupling my financial acumen with my operational mindset. Over the next six-eight weeks I'll be spending a lot of time at the plant with sales, marketing and other business functions, listening and learning as much as I can about the business and operation. And at the end of that time I'll present a plan to Paul comprising my ideas, thoughts and strategy and how to move forward in this new business leadership role. So with that I'd like to turn the call over to the operator for questions.