John Hrudicka
Analyst · Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead
Thanks, Paul. Good morning everyone. Well, as both Maurice and Paul had mentioned, 2015 was a very challenging year, but despite the difficult year, we have adapted well by focusing on what we control. Quality continues to improve, costs have been managed diligently and we continue to reduce headcount commensurate with volume. Our business improvement framework that Paul referred to, best as we pointed, has made 2015 a relative success in terms of being able to mitigate the negative consequence associated with our significant sales decline. While our sales were down 26% to prior year adjusted gross margin, as a percent of sales in 2015 actually improved 40 basis points. Income from operations was a loss of $24 million. This was only $3 million worse versus the prior year after adjustment. So on a $500 million reduction sales, we held operating income nearly flat. This resulted in only 0.6% decremental margin, so it’s less than 1%. So let’s turn our attention to operations and talk about revenue. Sales for the year were $1.4 billion, this was down $500 million or 26%. The year-over-year decrease was driven mostly by currency and ag at $198 million and $208 million respectively. The remaining $95 million variance comprises our earthmoving/construction and consumer segments. I referenced currency, this drove a reduction in sales of $198 million or 40% of our revenue decline. This impact was helped depress all the international locations, our Latin America, Undercarriage, Russia, Europe and Australia businesses. The most significant rate movements were represented by the ruble 59%, the real at 42% and euro 20%. If you adjust for the currency impact that I just outlined, sales declined only 16% versus the reported 26%. As we break down our segment, let’s start with Ag. Ag continues to be the key driver to our sales decline. Ag in total was down $208 million or 20.5% when you exclude currency impact the North American Ag was down $199 million or 29%. $177 million or 89% of this particular erosion is driven by reductions associated with our OE customers. From a product perspective, $176 million or 88% of the same North American Ag reduction was a result of reduced demand for high horsepower equipment. In Europe, the continued decline in Ag is still driving our main OE customers to reduce production volumes. It is the buyer’s market as low demand levels along with falling steel prices and new competition from low-cost producers all put pressure on price and margins. And offset to that we continue to win new business in Italy, France and Turkey that will drive an additional 80,000 units in 2016. We are still the market leader as we continue to be rewarded by the market for providing innovative products that our customers want. The Goodyear tire project is now underway in Europe with the initial orders being supplied from the US. The early reception to the re-entry of Good year is very encouraging and demonstrates the brand still holds tremendous value in Europe. Latin America, Maurice talked about this a little bit, if they continue to suffer from a number of negative forces, deep political crisis, weak GDP, increasing unemployment, high inflation. But in spite of these challenges, Titan has actually gained market share with our OEs increasing from 38% from 44%. Our Titan team in Brazil has been admirable in terms of their performance and perseverance to drive forward in the face of all these obstacles. They had been very diligent to reduce costs and ensure competitiveness in a very difficult market. Quick comment on undercarriage Russia and Australia businesses. When you exclude currency impact both undercarriage and Russia show positive growth for the year, while Australia was basically flat. Let's turn our attention to earthmoving/construction. Our sales for earthmoving/construction were down $39 million or 6.4% when you exclude currency impact. A good portion of the $66 million currency impact was attributable to euro devaluation negatively impacting our undercarriage business. Our North America business experienced a 20% decline, primarily driven by reductions with our OEs. When adjusting for currency, our rest of world businesses were nearly flat year over year. So I want to talk about the consumer segment briefly because I think the reported sales performance results could be misleading. Our sales for consumer were down $56 million or 20.8% when adjusting for currency. Another view of that variance, $82 million of the gross [ph] $103 million miss for our consumer segment is driven by Latin America. 76% of this Latin American miss comprises FX and supply agreements. Supply agreements primarily represented by the Goodyear compound activity broaden has to improve profits. So we had another initiative towards business improvement framework that you heard a lot about. When we adjust for currency and the Latin America supply agreement, sales declined only $10 million or 3.7% versus the reported variance of 38%. So with the book closed on 2015 have put sales just at $1. 4 billion compared to $1.9 billion last year represented an erosion of $500 million. As evidenced by the past couple of years, these markets have been very difficult to gauge. We continue to focus on the delivery and marketing of innovative products that make our customer's equipment better. So let’s move on to gross margin where we have performed exceptionally well despite the significant sales decline. So, as noted a number of times, our gross margin dollars were down $2.8 million to prior year or $43 million on an adjusted basis. Our adjusted gross margin of 9.9% of sales was an improvement of 40 basis points to prior year on $500 million less sales. As I continue to state on these calls we have battled to overcome the sales decline, we've also had to contend with weaker mix as most of the Ag erosion was related to high horsepower equipment which represents a higher margin product category for us. We've been talking for several quarters regarding our business improvement framework, you heard Paul talk about it quite a bit. We continue to realize the benefits of our efforts and the impact of our initiatives continue to accumulate. In fact, this is the only manner in which you could explain or rationalize improved gross margin performance in the face of both significant sales declines and unfavorable mix. Net material cost reduction across the board have enhanced our margins, you heard a lot both from Maurice and Paul in terms of not only are we getting reductions on price of commodities that we pay but we’re also engineering out material costs. So reductions we've seen across steel, natural rubber, synthetic rubber, carbon black, fabric and chemicals, I continue to reference on these calls we have significantly improved the procurement of raw materials through the centralization of purchasing into our new supply chain organization. We've been procuring better than the benchmarks but generally this was not the case historically. We continue to demonstrate that we’ve been proactive in real time in reducing headcount and our plans to measure with anticipated lower production levels. Over the course of 2015, we reduced an excess of 500 headcount across our global plant footprint. Early in 2016, we reduced yet another 100 plus employees at our Bryan plant. Quick note on operating expenses, SG&A, R&D and royalty are down $76 million to prior year, this dropped to $40 million when you adjust for the 2014 goodwill impairment. While there are series of puts and takes across these categories, this decrease is primarily a function of our Business Improvement Framework initiatives or BIF and currency impact. And as I've stated on previous call, our operating expense structure has been historically lean but we continue to drive alignment of our strategic objectives and the elimination or redeployment of lower value expenditures. So moving down the P&L, let's discuss foreign exchange loss. This is a really good story in ‘15. If you recall last year, we lost $32 million to FX on our intercompany loans and balances, but to remind everybody this does not impact cash. In 2015, our foreign exchange loss was only $4.8 million, an improvement to earnings of $27 million. So as we discussed over the course of 2015, we’ve taken a number of actions to mitigate risk in foreign exchange through balanced reductions, reclassification and our new hedging practice. Our hedge settled and positively impacted both earnings and cash by nearly $5 million. In 2015, we re-classed Brazil debt to long-term and by our calculations averted a $5 million loss in doing so. During Q4 and into Q1 of this year, we lowered our ruble exposure by 25 million, this was accomplished through the capitalization of intercompany loan resulting in the purchase of additional shares of Titan Tire Russia. This action combined with US dollar repayments from Voltyre-Prom eliminating nearly three quarters of our total ruble exposure relating to launch. So this will really help us in 2015 in further mitigating risk. And we will continue to explore additional opportunities to mitigate FX exposure, we have a couple of ideas that we're kind of banging on right now. Let's summarize and bring this to bottom line relative to profit. Our income from operations was a loss of $24 million; this is $73 million better than prior year, just $3 million worse after adjustments result in NOI decremental margin of 0.6%. And this is a testament to the diligent effort of our One Titan team to reduce cost and drive profit improvement. Net income applicable to common shareholders was a loss of $93 million or $1.74 per share for 2015 as compared to a loss of $129 million or $2.43 per share for 2014. Adjusted net income attributable to Titan was a loss of $7.1 million or $0.13 per share and adjusted EBITDA at $54 million. That compares to prior year adjusted net income attributable to Titan at $26 million loss or $0.49 per share in adjusted EBITDA at $89 million. In regards to net income and Maurice spoke about this, referenced it a little bit earlier, I’m sure everybody knows our effective tax rate was disproportionate with our pre-tax loss. Under US GAAP Principles, our recent US cumulative losses indicate that Titan needed to report evaluation allowance against US deferred tax assets. Titan evaluated the realization of these deferred tax assets and recorded evaluation allowance of $50 million. In addition, Titan continued to record evaluation allowance on certain foreign entities that resulted in additional $25 million in 2015. So in total, Titan reported evaluation allowance of $75 million in 2015. The reporting of the evaluation allowance does not affect cash and the majority of the deferred tax assets are related to net operating loss carryforwards in various jurisdictions. The US losses have a lifespan of 20 years and Titan expects that it will be able to fully utilize these losses in the future and you heard Maurice reference it and this is what he meant by this. So as Titan generates income in future years, we will be able to utilize this evaluation allowance to offset future tax liabilities, thereby increasing net income. So let’s touch on a new balance sheet items briefly. For the year, AR was down $22 million after the netting of revenue impact and DSO erosion this primarily represents currency translation. Inventory dropped $62 million almost evenly split between inventory reductions and currency translation. We've been using terms consignment programs holding most of the battle for more share. This has had some unfavorable impact on working capital. AP was down $23 million primarily a function of currency translation offset in part by a 5 day improvement in DPO. As I stated last quarter, our EVA framework had the initial focus and emphasis on productivity and profitable growth as evidenced through our strides with gross margin. Working capital has become an acute focus in 2016 for additional value creation and cash flow. In regards to PP&E, we’ve stated in previous quarters, we have been carefully scrutinizing capital to ensure strategic alignment, positive EVA returns and cash generation. As a consequence, we spent $48 million versus $58 million one year ago generating positive cash. Cash ended the quarter nearly flat to 2014 year end at $200 million. What makes this even more impressive, this overcame a currency translation impact of $50 million. So our cash balance would have been $250 million excluding the impact of currency. We are all well aware of the concerns that have existed and continue to persist our liquidity and cash flows as we fight through these down markets. We continue to be mindful of our cash position manage it diligently as evidenced by our performance this year. So let's discuss our debt position for a moment. At 5.38, our net debt to trailing adjusted EBITDA has deteriorated from one year ago at 3.6 but only slightly to the previous quarter. Our actual debt level is slightly down from one year ago. So this is just a function of math as during this downturn, we have dropped off higher earning quarters and substituted lower earning quarters. As I did last quarter, I want to make everybody where our convertible bonds are due January 2017. We are proactively managing this having discussions with our Board and exploring a number of alternatives to address this maturity. So wrapping up, I believe our 2015 results were admirable in the face of some more difficult end markets accompanied by significant sales decline. We have improved our adjusted gross margin performance by 40 basis points on 26% less sales with decremental margin of 0.6%. And while there has been much accomplished by our One Titan team, we fully understand conviction and perseverance will be the necessary ingredients to come through these challenging times a stronger company for our future. And I will continue to say this because I genuinely believe it is true. We One Titan will be in position and couple the ultimate market recovery with the significant improvements we've made and the manner we operate the business that will result in a very possible outcome for our shareholders in the future. So with that I’d like to turn the call over to the operator for questions.