Greetings, and welcome to the Take-Two Interactive Software Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2019 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now pleasure to introduce your host, Hank Diamond, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications. Thank you, sir. You may begin.

Good afternoon. Welcome and thank you for joining Take-Two's conference call to discuss its results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2019 ended March 31, 2019. Today's call will be led by Strauss Zelnick, Take-Two's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Karl Slatoff, our President; and Lainie Goldstein, our Chief Financial Officer. We will be available to answer your questions during the Q&A session following our prepared remarks. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that statements made during this call that are not historical facts are considered forward-looking statements under federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to us. We have no obligation to update these forward-looking statements. Actual operating results may vary significantly from these forward-looking statements based on a variety of factors. These important factors are described in our filings with the SEC, including the company's most recent annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including the risks summarized in the section entitled Risk Factors. I'd also like to note that unless otherwise stated, all numbers we will be discussing today are GAAP and all comparisons are year-over-year. Additional details regarding our actual results and outlook are contained in our press release, including the items that our management uses internally to adjust our GAAP financial results in order to evaluate our operating performance. In addition, we have posted to our website a slide deck that visually presents our results and financial outlook. Our press release and filings with the SEC may be obtained from our website at www.take2games.com. And now I'll turn the call over to Strauss.

Thanks, Hank. Good afternoon and thank you for joining us today. Take-Two finished a stellar year with strong fourth quarter operating results highlighted by the outperformance of Grand Theft Auto and NBA 2K19 and significant ongoing sales of our blockbuster hit, Red Dead Redemption 2. For the full fiscal year, we generated record net bookings and adjusted operating cash flow, which exceeded our outlook at the start of the year, along with strong earnings growth driven by the record-breaking launch of Red Dead Redemption 2 and the outstanding performance of NBA 2K and better-than-expected results from Grand Theft Auto Online and Grand Theft Auto V. Our industry-leading basketball series continues to expand its audience and underscores that NBA 2K has been the perennial favorite among both basketball and pop culture fans for more than a decade. During the fourth quarter, net bookings growth from NBA 2K19 exceeded our expectations driven primarily by strong recurrent consumer spend. So today, NBA 2K19 has sold in more than 9 million units. During the fourth quarter, recurrent consumer spending on NBA 2K grew 79% and for the full fiscal year grew 45%. In both periods, recurrent consumer spending on NBA 2K reached a new record and was the single largest contributor to that part of our business. Over the past year, we've seen a substantial increase in average games played, with NBA 2K19 outperforming its predecessor by over 20%. In addition, during the fourth quarter, daily active users outpaced NBA 2K team by 13%, due largely to a consistent and robust content schedule. We expect that lifetime net bookings for NBA 2K19 will be the highest ever for a 2K sports title driven by record recurrent consumer spending. The NBA 2K brand continues to expand across a myriad of offerings, and we believe there…

Thanks, Strauss. I'd like to begin by thanking our teams for delivering an incredible year, marked by creative excellence, significant growth in consumer engagement and superb financial results for our organization. It is a well-coordinated effort and an insatiable drive for success across our entire organization to achieve these results. I'm immensely proud of and grateful for our thousands of colleagues around the world that each played a role in our company's outstanding performance. Turning to our recent and upcoming releases. On April 3, to celebrate the announcement of Borderlands 3, 2K and Gearbox Software released the Borderlands: Game of the Year Edition for PlayStation 4, Xbox One and PC. Borderlands: Game of the Year Edition features all new ultra-HD visuals, significant gameplay improvements and all 4 originally released add-on packs. Players who previously enjoyed Borderlands can import their saved progress and pick up exactly where they left off, all in stunning HD. Players should also keep an eye out for new loot drops that include rare weapons and Vault Hunter heads. In addition, Gearbox and 2K released the Borderlands Ultra HD Texture Pack that increases the visual fidelity of Borderlands: The Handsome Collection on consoles and provides a visual upgrade for Borderlands 2, Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel and all the add-ons for both titles on PC. On April 17, 2K and Cat Daddy studios launched NBA 2K Mobile for Android devices. Downloadable for free, NBA 2K Mobile was released for iOS last fall and delivers console-quality graphics and lifelike NBA 2K action on the go. NBA 2K Mobile lets gamers experience their favorite NBA moments, collect player cards to build dream teams and step onto the court in 5-on-5 matchups. On May 9, Social Point launched Word Life, our free latest free-to-play mobile offering for iOS and Android devices. Word…

Thanks, Karl, and good afternoon, everyone. Today, I'll discuss our fourth quarter fiscal 2019 results and then review our financial outlook for the first quarter and fiscal year 2020. Please note that additional details regarding our actual results and outlook are contained in our press release. Strauss mentioned we finished an outstanding year with strong fourth quarter operating results. For the full fiscal year, we generated record net bookings and adjusted operating cash flow, which exceeded our outlook at the start of the year, along with strong earnings growth. Starting with the fourth quarter. Total net bookings grew 19% to $488 million as compared to our outlook of $450 million to $500 million. Recurrent consumer spending grew 27% and accounted for 62% of total net bookings as compared to our outlook for 10% growth. Recurrent consumer spending exceeded our outlook, due primarily to the outperformance of Grand Theft Auto Online and NBA 2K. Digitally delivered net bookings grew 26% and accounted for 86% of the total as compared to our outlook of 10% growth. This result exceeded our outlook due to the outperformance of recurrent consumer spending and a higher-than-expected mix of digitally delivered full games out. During the fourth quarter, 57% of sales of current generation console games were delivered digitally, up from 44% last year. Turning to some details from our fourth quarter income statement. GAAP net revenue grew to $539 million, and cost of goods sold increased to $259 million. Operating expenses increased by 28% to $222 million, due primarily to higher marketing spend, personnel expense and stock-based compensation. And GAAP net income was $57 million or $0.50 per share as compared to $91 million or $0.77 per share in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018. Turning to our fiscal 2019 results. Total net bookings grew 47%…

Thanks, Lainie and Karl. On behalf of our entire management team, I'd like to thank our colleagues for their hard work and for delivering an outstanding year. To our shareholders, I want to express our appreciation for your continued support. We'll now take your questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Tim O'Shea with Jefferies.

My question is about how you think about the free-to-play model. You've obviously had great success selling games for full price. I mean I think Strauss mentioned 110 million units of GTA V, 24 million units of Red Dead. But for services like Red Dead Online, it seems like a large audience is key. I'm curious if there's a point where these services could be decoupled from the full-price version of the game, so a player could still purchase Red Dead for $60 but could play Red Dead Online for free? Just love to hear any thoughts on free-to-play.

Well, I think it's a great question. And clearly, when you have the right title like a Fortnite or Apex Legends, free-to-play can be a powerful model. We also have some great free-to-play games, NBA 2K Online in China with 45 million registered users and recurrent consumer spending was up over 70% in the fiscal year. So we've -- and WWE SuperCard has been downloaded over 19 million times, and that's up net of platform fees, I think, 13% in the fiscal year. So we have numerous games here that are free-to-play. Social Point's entire business is a free-to-play business. That said, I don't really see the business transitioning to a free-to-play model, primarily because the hit ratios are so very low. And the hit ratios for our core business are exceedingly high because of our attention to quality, or at least that's what we attribute it to, something like 80-plus percent hit ratios. It's practically unheard of in the entertainment business, broadly. In terms of your broader question, which is could you imagine a situation where in maturity, you decouple one experience from another, I think the answer is we tend to be very flexible about business models over time and we want to be where the consumer is. Those business model decisions, when they -- with regard to a particular title are driven by our labels, although we all are pretty tight-knit group, consult with one another. But you'd want to look to our labels for any updates on how business models might shift. I think the answer is we're open-minded. We want to deliver to the consumer on an ongoing basis.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Olson with Piper Jaffray.

I realized you let Rockstar speak for itself related to new content. But just conceptually, could you say if it would make sense to see a content drop of some sort that's coincident with the timing of Red Dead Online coming out of beta? Or should we, I guess, not assume that, that's the case? And then second, industry chatter suggests that next-gen consoles are coming late next year. Do you think about timing of release of titles, at least the non-annual release titles at all, related to the timing of console releases? Or is that just not a consideration relative to your new release schedule?

Yes. Thanks for your questions. Rockstar said that Red Dead Online will be coming out of beta in the current quarter, and there's content to come on an ongoing basis, including when it comes out of beta. So I think we have very high expectations for that title going forward. And I would observe that if you compare how Red Dead Online is doing at this stage of the game in terms of the initial release and the movement into beta, Red Dead Online is performing better than Grand Theft Auto Online did at the same stage of the game. So we have terrific expectations, as does everyone in the company. And of course, the folks at Rockstar feel great about the upcoming content drops. In terms of next-gen consoles, we certainly pay attention to when new hardware offerings are coming, new business model offerings are coming, and that would inform our decision-making around releases. We don't really see the next generation as being particularly disruptive because technology is pretty fluent or we're pretty fluent with technology at this point. So the last time we had a cycle that was challenging, I think, for us and for the industry was not this past one, it was the one before where a couple of companies really landed in trouble. And that historically had been the case for the interactive entertainment business. That didn't happen in this past console shift, and I don't expect it'll happen here. So the answer is, of course, we'll be mindful of the change, but it wouldn't be determinant of what we would do.

Our next question is from the line of Evan Wingren with KeyBanc.

Just wondering if you could provide some context on your Borderlands expectations that you've initially embedded within guidance and perhaps versus the prior game or however you'd like. And second, if you could just remind us how the margins of a license title like that might compare to some of your internally developed titles, that would be helpful.

We're not providing sales estimates for Borderlands 3, but it's always our goal to grow sales with each new release from our popular series. Borderlands 2 launched in September 2012, and by the end of October 2012, we announced that we had sold in more than 5 million units. And then on October 29, 2013, a year later, we announced we had sold in more than 7.5 million units. And to date, Borderlands 2 has sold in nearly 20 million units. So for Borderlands 2, we have really high expectations, and we're really excited about the title. In terms of the margins on Borderlands 3 compared to our other titles, it's in line with our internally developed titles.

And just to clarify, is that on an EBIT basis or is that a gross margin basis? Or how would you characterize it?

It's on both. It's on both basis.

Our next question is from the line of Mike Ng with Goldman Sachs.

I have a few. Strauss, can you just talk about your view and willingness to participate in third-party video games subscription products? And then separately, what's your philosophy for developing for streaming products like Google Stadia? It seems like there's a long-term opportunity there to create larger and more powerful games, but it seems like it could still be early days. And I have a quick follow-up.

Yes. On subscription services, we're open-minded. We want to be where the consumer is. We also have to be in a place where it makes sense for our creative folks and for our shareholders. So you need to find that intersection in business models that serve the customers successfully and also serve everyone else who participates in the value chain. And that may prove to be a little challenging for subscriptions in this space because I think people will consume -- people do consume video games differently than they consume linear entertainment. Just to put in context, American households consume on average about 5 hours a day of linear programming, about 150 hours a month and about 1.5 hours a day of interactive entertainment, so 45 hours a month. And if you watch 0.5-hour show or 1-hour show or 2-hour movie, you tend to watch it once unless you're a kid, who may watch things multiple times, which implies a whole lot of products consumed in a month. So you could imagine an all-you-could-eat offering or offerings would be appealing to consumers. In the case of video games, it's possible that an average user in those 45 hours might be playing 1, 2, maybe 3 titles, certainly not 70 titles. And so in that event, if you play 1, 2 or 3 titles and you play them for months in a row, which often happens in our world, then a subscription model may not be such a great deal for the customer. So this all remains to be seen. And again, we're open-minded. We want to be where the customer is. But I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that subscription will be as massive for interactive entertainment as it has proven to be for music and motion pictures and television. But we'll see. With regard to streaming technology and what it could mean for us, we're very optimistic about the notion of streaming technology, bringing our titles to consumers who currently don't have access to them. The promise of being able to sign on to a service with virtually no barriers, without a box in between and being able to play our games on any device whatsoever around the world and to do with low latency, well, that's very compelling if that can be delivered. And the folks at Google minimally have said it will be delivered and will be delivered in relatively short order. Conceptually, we want to be where the consumer is and we'll support new entrants. And we are a believer in streaming services. Again, we need to have business models that make sense for us. So far, we're pretty optimistic.

Great. And I just had a housekeeping question around RCS. So a 20% growth outlook for the first quarter, low single digits for the year. What can you tell us about the comps in the rest of the year that gets us to low single digits? What's flowing?

Yes, so as we mentioned, Grand Theft Auto Online is going to be lower throughout the year. And we have growth for NBA 2K and for Red Dead Online. And then we'll also have recurrent consumer spending for Borderlands towards the end of the year.

Our next question is from the line of Eric Handler with MKM Partners.

So you talked about significant increase in R&D cost as you continue to invest in your pipeline. I wondered if you could maybe talk directionally about releases in terms of are we at the point where we might be seeing 2 2K releases a year or a couple private label or private business releases a year and a Rockstar release once every other year? Maybe you can give a little bit of color around that.

It's Karl. So yes, our R&D expense -- spending is definitely up. And we said it many times before, one of our biggest priorities is building scale in the organization, and we specifically want to do that through organic initiatives. And all of that is reflected on higher R&D. In terms of what you're going to see in the pipeline, it really is all over the entire company. We've got new investments at Social Point, we've got new investments in Private Division. You're already seeing 2 new titles coming out in this coming fiscal year in Private Division. So obviously, the pace is starting to pick up in there. There's also a lot of investment at the 2K level. Michael Condrey is coming onboard. We haven't said much about that game yet because it's very early. But it stands to reason that we're not just investing to invest for years and years and years without actually getting the releases coming out. You will expect to see these investments coming to fruition over the next few years. So I think you will, in fact, see the velocity pick up on this. Exactly what that means, I can't tell you right now, but I can tell you that there's certainly a lot of titles in the pipeline.

Our next question comes from the line of Drew Crum with Stifel.

Maybe you could start by talking about the company's decision to do a timed exclusive on Epic Games Borderlands 3 and in addition to the Private Division games? And then separately, Lainie, I just want to make sure I'm interpreting your commentary on guidance correctly. You're suggesting that recurrent consumer spending will be up low single digits, GTA Online will be down. Can we assume then that Rockstar online will be down for the fiscal year versus '19?

So Rockstar online, the 2 games together will be slightly down over this year, but the plan is for the 2 together to be growing over the long term.

Okay. Got it.

And in terms of supporting the Epic Games, look, we think, as I said earlier, more distribution is a good thing. And while it's rare that we'll do exclusives for any period of time, we'll continue to support Steam with our title, with catalog, and these titles will be going to Steam relatively quickly after their initial availability exclusively on the Epic Games store.

Our next question comes from the line of Ben Schachter with Macquarie Group.

A few if I could. First, I noticed in the prepared comments when you were talking about investing in mobile, you're using the word mobile and not just Social Point. So beyond the usual non-Social Point stuff like WWE, are you broadening investment in mobile at Rockstar and 2K? And then separately, Strauss, any thoughts on what's going on in Washington as it relates to China trade talks and how that might impact video games? And then, Lainie, 2 for you. Anything in the guidance for new platform for Google -- from Google or for others? And then just to clarify, when you talk about ramping the R&D spent, I'm a little confused on how that works relative to R&D spend being capitalized versus flowing through. Can you help me understand that?

In terms of mobile strategy, yes, obviously, we are investing in Social Point and new IP and Social Point and also around their existing games. So that is one component of our mobile strategy. We continue to invest outside of Social Point. Obviously, Social Point is a significant part of our strategy going forward, but we have been investing in other parts of the company at Rockstar and at 2K all along. Certainly, with 2K, with WWE SuperCard, the idea is to bring our current franchises into mobile environments. And we really do that by coming up with new games, SuperCard is one example of that; bringing our existing titles on to platforms for those titles that can actually be played on those platforms from a technological perspective; and also, companion apps. We've had a number of titles that have companion offerings that can be played alongside of our main games. So we've been doing that all along, and I think you can expect us to continue to do that and invest towards that. But a huge part of our strategy obviously is Social Point.

Yes. And turning to your question about China, without regard to the most recent news about tariffs, we remain very optimistic about the opportunities in China. We obviously have a big title there with NBA 2K Online 2 in China with 45 million registered users. We just received approval for the NBA title in China on PS 4, which is great news. So the approvals have restarted. We've great partner in Tencent. We have other partners there as well. And we think it's a big and growing market. I mean like everyone else, we feel it's important to have an appropriate resolution on trade with China. I think it's right that our government is taking it seriously. I probably won't make any other comments about tactics. It's not really what I do for a living. But I do think it is a serious matter, and for the entertainment business broadly, a very serious matter. Entertainment is America's second largest export after aerospace. So we do think it's important that we have appropriate reciprocal trade policies around the world. And we do believe that those -- the issues that we're currently facing will be sorted out. Can't call the timing, though.

So in terms of Google Stadia, as Strauss mentioned, it presents some new and exciting opportunities. And as with all platforms, our development teams are hard at work to maximize our product performance, take advantage of USPs so they'll work outside IP and create unique engagement opportunities through each platform and offering. With that said, we've not formally announced any titles for the platform at this time. And in terms of R&D expense and capitalization, since we have a lot more titles -- projects that we're starting up in our early stages, there'll be more going to the R&D expense versus starting to be capitalized at this time for this year.

Our next question is from the line of Todd Juenger with Sanford Bernstein.

If I could just focus my attention, if you don't mind, on NBA 2K, clearly having a very strong year this year. You've talked about it growing in your guidance for next year. You also mentioned the big opportunity globally for that franchise and talked a little bit about China. I guess, I'd just love to -- relative to the global population of basketball and the NBA in particular, relative to the size of that game for you, how should we think about your pursuit of what seems like a lot of people interested in basketball, not just in Asia, in Europe and other places around the world? And how do you unlock that and what are you -- is it a marketing effort, is it a distribution effort? I'm sure you're on it, would love to hear your thoughts of how you're trying to capture what seems like a big interest in the sport and opportunity for that franchise?

It's Karl. I agree. I mean the NBA, generally speaking, is just growing leaps and bounds, I guess, pun intended in that regard. And it's really exciting for us. And we like to think that we're part of that because what we do at -- what 2K does with the NBA game is they really are part of the fabric and the culture of that organization and of the fan base. And it's been a very symbiotic relationship between our 2 organizations, and I think we feed off each other and it's been a terrific partnership and it is exciting. When you've got expansion and interest in Europe and in Asia, we try to follow that expansion. And from a marketing perspective, a distribution perspective and also at times from the development perspective, if we think that there's a certain category or certain area or a certain player that resonates in a specific area, then we will try to market towards that player or towards that particular organization, like The European Leagues, et cetera. So there's a lot that we can do, not to mention all the localization work that we do as well. So it is really exciting. It still is a predominantly American -- North American business for us, as you would expect. But our international component is growing, and I think that we've an opportunity to over-index internationally.

Our next question is from the line of Justin Post with Merrill Lynch.

Strauss, first on the 24 million units of Red Dead sold, can you tell us anything about how those are converting to online players? Anything on MAUs or how you're seeing the activity levels for those buyers? And then secondly, when you said you're in development for sequels for some of your biggest franchises, just wondering if that includes Rockstar?

So we haven't given out statistics, particularly on conversion from people who purchase Red Dead Redemption 2 into Red Dead Online. But we did say that more than 90 million people were engaged with Rockstar Games titles in the last fiscal year, which is nothing short of extraordinary and the progress looks terrific. So our expectations are high, and we feel really good about how things are going. And in terms of our labels being hard at work on ongoing titles, including new IP and sequels, we were talking about everyone who works around here, yes.

Our next question is from the line of Ray Stochel with Consumer Edge.

Can you discuss how players have engaged with the role-play mod within Grand Theft Auto Online and how that may have impacted results? If that's something that's monetizable for you all? And then my second question would be, is it fair to say that The Outer Worlds' higher booking expectations within fiscal '20 than WWE since you mentioned it first in your prepared remarks?

Could you ask your first question just one more time to make sure that we're going to answer it correctly?

Sure. So we've noticed someone buzz, specifically within Twitch viewership, around sort of a role-playing mod within Grand Theft Auto Online. And I was wondering if that in any way impacted results in GTA Online during the quarter?

We don't monetize that. What was your -- sorry, your second question?

Sure. And the second question was whether or not The Outer Worlds had higher booking expectations than WWE since it was mentioned first in prepared remarks?

Yes. In my prepared remarks, the titles are listed in order of contribution, so yes.

The next question is from the line of Ryan Gee with Barclays.

A quick one on NBA and then on Red Dead. So a soccer game from one of your peers is seeing online revenue per payer north of $100 and in-game payer conversion kind of in this 30% to 40% range. And so not sure if you agree that soccer is a good proxy for your NBA business, but assuming that it is, could you comment maybe on how close you guys are to seeing similar levels of monetization and conversion? Because I think it's a really good gauge of how much runway that franchise has left to grow for you guys? And then real quick on Red Dead. Rockstar, for the last 3 games, they've had a PC version out of each one of them, albeit at a later date. So are you guys reserving the right to launch Red Dead 2 on PC maybe later in fiscal '20?

So in terms of comparing ourselves to other games in the sport business, specifically to soccer, we don't really give out those kind of -- that kind of data, that kind of comparison. But I can tell you this is that we believe we have a lot of room there to go in terms of our specific opportunity around NBA 2K and our recurrent consumer spending model. And it's important to note that our recurrent consumer spending model is also pretty broad. It's not just one specific thing. It's not just card battle, for example. And there's other things as well. And we do believe that, that broad monetization strategy gives us a lot of upside in the future. But in terms of comparing ourselves to FIFA, for example, we just haven't done that.

In terms of upcoming releases, we do let our labels talk about what's coming next. We leave those announcements to them.

Our next question comes from the line of Brian Nowak with Morgan Stanley.

Just 2. First one, NBA 2K, you've had a lot of success driving the in-game monetization. Was wondering could you just give us a couple of examples of different types of content drops, different types of experiences that the team has found that have been particularly helpful in driving that business? Where is the team really succeeding? And then the second one, I think you mentioned -- Karl, I think you said 10 new games in development on the mobile side or maybe from just one of the mobile businesses or the mobile side. Just talk to us a little bit about how you think about the types of mobile genres that you think are sort of -- fit best in the portfolio?

Yes, the reference of the 10 games was to Social Point specifically. So that's what that was referring to. So there is a broad pipeline there and a lot of games that are coming out to release. In terms of recurrent consumer spending model around NBA, it does monetize -- there are a lot of things that you can do to draw content. The most important -- to drive engagement. And the most important thing is that you want the players engaged. If people are engaged and they're engaged with the game, then the monetization takes care of itself. And whether that's buying cosmetics or training modes for the Road to 99 or something around one-on-one matchups, it's pretty, it's well diverse or the car battles, all of these things monetize well. They monetize differently, but that's not really the point. I think the point is as long as people are playing the games, and our philosophy is we want them to play the entire game, not just one mode, though specifically that may happen to monetize better than another mode. That's -- our focus, though, is to have people play as much of the game as they possibly can, and we worry about the monetization piece later.

Our next question comes from the line of Brandon Ross with BTIG.

First, how do you think the lag between the release of RDR 2 and Red Dead Online coming out of beta will affect the success of the online mode in the world wherein now -- do your titles need to have a strong backlog of new content ready to go before they launch? And then I think you spoke to growth in marketing expenditure. Curious why this would be the case when you're comping against RDR 2 in -- from fiscal 2019?

Yes. I think your question was regarding the initial launch of Red Dead Redemption 2 and then the beta of Red Dead Online and then ultimately coming out of beta and how that timing looks. And answer is we think it looks just fine. There'll be marketing around the coming out of beta. There'll be marketing around the new content. And as I said earlier, if you compare it to how Grand Theft Auto Online developed, we're ahead of where we were with that title, and that's turned out to be a great success. So we feel really good about it. Your second question was, are we putting together a backlog of content to release later after an initial release. And the answer is, sometimes we do, often we don't. It depends on the title and nature of the content and which label it's coming from. So it all depends. But generally speaking, when we put out a title initially, we are putting out the full release. That is a well thought out, complete, entire start-to-finish title. We're not holding something back in hopes of monetizing it later in a different way. We're driven by delivering the best experiences known to men. And Karl said this earlier, we believe if we focus on engaging the consumer and giving them way, way, way more than they expected and way more value than they paid for, then good things will follow, including monetization.

In terms of the marketing expense, we have a greater number of titles releasing this year, which is why the marketing expense is higher. So even with Red Dead Redemption marketing coming down from last year, we have marketing for Borderlands 3, Outer Worlds, Ancestors, I've got marketing for Red Dead Online, NBA and WWE. So that's why marketing expense is higher this year.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Hickey with The Benchmark Company.

Congrats on the quarter, guys. Just, I guess, first, Strauss, you made some comments that RDR Online is performing better than GT Online in a similar time period. Just hopefully, you could maybe expand on that tidbit for us. And I was also curious if you played the planned content for RDR Online. Any impressions maybe that you had on how you expect it will monetize out of beta versus GTA Online. Obviously, you have a lower player base. It appears it will monetize at the same level. And I have a follow-up.

Yes, I was referring to the nature of the engagement and where we are technically in the process. Obviously, we have vastly more experienced today than we did when we launched Grand Theft Auto Online and much more sophisticated infrastructure. So that's what I was really referring to. And on the rest, we don't have any specific information to give. We're very enthusiastic and optimistic. And the next thing we'll be talking about is how it's doing.

All right. Last question from me. On your announced fiscal '20 pipeline, is this your full slate as it relates to your guidance? Or should we -- or could we expect another major release or platform expansion coming over the coming quarters? And then on RDR Online, should we expect a similar cadence of content as what we've seen for Grand Theft Auto Online? And then for Grand Theft Auto Online, in fiscal '20, should we kind of expect the same again cadence of content that we've seen from that online experience historically?

So just on the content side, there is more to come for -- obviously for Red Dead Online and for Grand Theft Auto Online. And now Rockstar will make those announcements in the fullness of time, but there is more to come for both, and we feel very good about it. We do have titles coming in the fiscal year that have not been announced yet. They are part of our guidance, however.

Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Harrigan with Buckingham Research Group.

I have a couple, I guess, abstruse questions. People over Europe are concerned about the implications for Twitch off Article 13, and I guess, rechristened 17 on copyrights for the Internet. Do you see any second order effects for the video game industry that would affect you over there? And then secondly, would you have any further comment on Senator Josh Hawley's proposal, him particularly being Republican, that would seem to raise a risk? I know you're much less dependent on loot boxes than some of your peers. But just, I guess, in relation to those 2 questions and to your general posture on regulatory developments, both stateside and overseas?

Sorry, just in terms of Article 17, we haven't heard that it reflects on the video game space at all. So as far as we know, there's no impact whatsoever. On the loot boxes question, just to put in context, that mechanic is responsible for less than 3% of our net bookings in the past fiscal year, so it's not material to us. We have used the mechanic in the past. So it is something we've seen and we think it's just fine. There has been some noise around it, particularly internationally. As I said, we think it's a perfectly reasonable mechanic; however, it forms a very small part of our business.

We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. So I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for any additional concluding comments.

Well, I just wanted to say thank you very much for joining us today. We're proud of the year that just finished. We are incredibly optimistic about the year to come. We have a great lineup and wonderful titles in development, and all that's driven by a phenomenal creative and business team, nearly 5,000 people strong all around the world, and those are the people that we want to thank. We're grateful to all of our colleagues for these terrific results. Thank you so much for joining us today.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's conference. Again, we thank you for your participation, and you may disconnect your lines at this time.