Good day, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the trivago Q1 Earnings Call 2019. [Operator Instructions]. I must advise you the call is being recorded today, Wednesday, the 1st of May 2019. I would now like to hand to your presenter today, to Elie Matta, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you. Good afternoon, everybody. Welcome to trivago NV's financial results conference call for the first quarter ended March 31, 2019. I am pleased to be joined on the call today by Rolf Schrömgens, trivago's CEO and Managing Director; and Axel Hefer, our CFO and Managing Director. The following discussion, including responses to your questions, reflects management's views as of today, May 1, 2019, only. We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise this information. As always, some of the statements made on today's call are forward-looking, typically preceded by words such as we expect, we believe, we anticipate or similar statements. Please refer to today's press release and the company filings with the SEC for information about factors which could cause our actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. You will find reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures discussed today in our earnings release, which is posted on the company's IR website at ir.trivago.com. I encourage you to periodically visit our Investor Relations site for important content, including today's earnings release. Finally, unless otherwise stated, all comparisons on this call will be against our results for the comparable period of 2019 -- '18. With that, let me turn the call over to Rolf. Rolf Schrömgens: Welcome, everybody. Many thanks for joining our first quarterly earnings call in 2019. Let me start with thanking the team for a very good quarter, not only in terms of financial results, but especially for how they showed progress on important operational topics. We are very pleased with the start into the new year. We've repeatedly said that the key improvement we want to see for the first 2 quarters is on profitability of our business, and profits turned out stronger than we expected. This will…

Thanks, Rolf. Looking at our KPIs, our advertising spend optimization is working. We reduced our advertising spend Q1 '19 over '18 by 37%, which resulted in a reduction of referral revenue of only 20% Q1 2019 over Q1 2018. We have started our optimization late in the second quarter 2018, which means that our year-over-year comparisons will start to ease end of the second quarter. As Rolf has already mentioned, the product and marketing optimizations also had a significant impact on our key KPIs. As you can see on Slide 12, our qualified referrals dropped by 32% to €129.3 million while our global revenue per qualified referral increased by 18% to €1.59. Looking at our segments. Developed Europe, on Page 13, benefited from our strong loyal user base increasing revenue per qualified referral by 26% while advertising spend and qualified referrals dropped 28% and 32%. In Americas, on Page 14, our revenue per qualified referral improved by 13%, while our advertising spend and qualified referrals decreased by 40% and 35%. The Rest of the World segment, on Page 15, showed an increase in revenue per qualified referral of 13%, advertising spend and qualified referrals decreased by 43% and 29%. Coming to our guidance, on Page 17, we are on the path we set ourselves in 2018 and are pleased with our performance to date. Given our performance in the first quarter and the momentum we see in the second quarter, we expect to reach the higher end of our adjusted EBITDA guidance of €50 million to €75 million. The strong start in 2019 is giving us the flexibility to invest into opportunities that might arise in the course of the year. We expect both advertising expense and referral revenue to decline in the second quarter and to grow in the third and the fourth quarter. I think with that, we can move over to questions. So. operator, can we open the floor for Q&A, please?

[Operator Instructions]. Now from Deutsche Bank, your first question comes from the line of Lloyd Walmsley.

This is Chris on for Lloyd. Just a question on loyalty rates. Are you guys making any progress on getting them integrated? We've seen the headlines in some recent hotel deals with some of the OTAs. I'm just curious how this has changed how hotels are able to syndicate their loyalty pricing in metasearch. Rolf Schrömgens: Yes. You might have seen that we currently have already an implementation of the first loyalty rates on trivago, and we are currently working on integrating more advertisers to that. Still, this is -- we are still in an early stage, and we are continuously like trying to engage more advertisers into showing loyalty rates. Currently, we're focusing more on hotel chains because this seems to be the most attractive start for us, but we're also interested in getting OTAs on board.

Your next question from Cowen and Company comes from the line of Kevin Kopelman.

Great. So I have a question on Q2 trends, given the bumpy comps as you start to anniversary the beginnings of your profit optimization. Can you give us more color on how you're expecting the second quarter revenue growth and ad spend growth to look year-over-year as compared to the first quarter?

Yes, sure. So as I said, we started to -- we start our marketing optimization in the second quarter end of -- in the end of the second quarter 2018. So we expect the second quarter to have a slower reduction in advertising expense than the first quarter 2019 compared year-over-year and an improved revenue trajectory. However, revenue and advertising spends, we expect to be down year-over-year.

Okay. Got it. And then you alluded to the Q1 -- the stronger start to profitability to the year, allowing you to invest more later in the year. Can you give us a sense of the magnitude that you're contemplating on advertising spend growth for the second half of the year?

I mean, we only guide the adjusted EBITDA overall, but we expect to ramp up where we see opportunity in the third and the fourth quarter. So we are expecting, in both quarters, an increase.

Okay. And then just one last one on free cash flow. You had a strong free cash flow conversion in the first quarter. Is there anything to call out there? And how do you see that playing out relative to EBITDA this year?

There are no fundamental changes in our cash conversion. Quarter-over-quarter, you can have some volatility, particularly on the working capital side. But overall, there is no fundamental change in our cash conversion coming out of adjusted EBITDA.

Now from SunTrust, your next question comes from the line of Naved Khan.

Just a couple. So in your prepared commentary, I think you guys call out some muted performance in the U.K. and weakness in Australia. I wonder what was driving that. And was there any Easter impact to the quarter as well? And then just on the RPQR front, Europe seems to be doing better versus the other markets. Is that something that's structural just because that's your core market or the earliest market? What's the right way to think about it?

Yes. Absolutely. So in terms of regional performance, we indeed see some softness in the U.K. in the first quarter. To what extent that has been impacted by the Brexit suggestion is very difficult for us to say, but the U.K. underperformed the overall Developed Europe segment in the first quarter. That is correct. In Australia, the first quarter was also weaker than you would normally expect the first quarter to be, so a different seasonal trend. And it might have been impacted by the ongoing investigations in Australia and the publicity around that. But again, it is very difficult to say for sure. On your third question, the development in Europe. Indeed, we see a stronger development in Developed Europe, which is the region where we've been active for the longest time, where our brand is strongest and where our loyal user base is strongest. And we believe that, that foundation that we've built over the last years has led to the better performance compared to our newer and more recent markets.

Okay. And then mainly on Easter, was there any shift in revenue possibly from Q1 into second quarter? Rolf Schrömgens: So looking at the previous years, we have not seen a lot of Easter seasonality overall in our business. So we also would not see a big shift into Q2.

Now from Mizuho Securities, you have a question from the line of James Lee.

A couple of questions here. First one, just curious what you guys think what is the implication, the new agreement, between Marriott and Expedia? It seems like the agreement is more favorable towards the hotel at this point in time. And how are you adjusting your strategy accordingly here? And secondly on your lending page assessment, anything new that you learn from the consumer perspective? Obviously, the reason you're doing this, you want to be able to drive better conversion. You've been doing that for more than a year. Just wanted to see if there's a meaningful lift to conversion that makes this exercise worthwhile. Rolf Schrömgens: I think in general, it's really difficult for us to comment on -- like Expedia's contracts. They arrange with their hotel chains. In total, you have to say like what is currently the total part of the Marriott inventory on trivago, like what is going in -- coming in through Expedia. So I would not assume that a change in that contract would have a significant impact on the trivago business.

On your second question, are we -- on the relevance assessment, we continuously optimize our algorithms and continue to test what the impact is and what the results are and calibrate the algorithm. Other than that, there is not much to say. We believe that it is in the interest of our users and of trivago overall. But yes, we are continuously optimizing and measuring the impact.

And if I could ask a follow-up question. Obviously, you guys made some product change last quarter. And one of the thing you did is showing the total price per stay instead of per night, and that's kind of reducing click out. I'm just curious what is the benefit of doing that from your perspective. It seems like you're giving -- is the reason doing that is you want to give advertiser a better ROI? Are you willing to sacrifice revenue in the near term to make your advertiser happy? Is that the reason why you're doing it? And also, secondly, on advertising plan for 2019, anything different that you're doing this year versus last year? And maybe can you give us -- maybe update or break out your channel or your traffic mix by channel? Rolf Schrömgens: Yes. Thanks a lot. I think that's a very good observation. It was -- though it was one of the changes we did, I think there were several changes that all went into that direction that you described. And it's correct to say that we are sacrificing short-term revenue for, like, creating higher lead quality on one hand, but on the other hand, also a higher engagement, high interaction on the trivago side. So if you keep in mind that in the long run, it will be very -- it will be vital for us to focus on retention. Retention can be only built up if you connect a strong brand with a strong product experience. Product experience is depending on like how you engage, how much you engage with the website. So we are very interested in delivering as much information as possible. So if we can get clarity to telling our users, give users more information like providing next to the date the weekly rate -- sorry, the daily rate, providing the rate for the full stay, this is more information. And more information will also lead, of course, to less click-outs to check on the advertiser side, will lead to a higher interaction on trivago, and ultimately, we hope that it also leads then to a higher retention in the future. And that is the basic strategy that is shown in several product improvements that we did over the last year and the last quarter.

On your question regarding the marketing strategy for the year and the mix, we continuously believe that a mix of roughly 50-50 between branded and performance is a healthy mix. Branded advertisement explains our value proposition whereas performance advertisement does show the benefit of our product life. And our experience over has been that the combination of those two marketing channels in balance is very effective and works very well for our product. If you now look into the specific sub-channels, in brand, online video is obviously becoming over time more and more important with the younger generations not consuming as much linear TV as the older generations. So that needs to be substituted by other means of brand advertisement. On the performance marketing side, Google Hotel Ads is becoming more and more important for us, A, because it gets more and more visibility overall in the market; and B, because we have scaled up significantly, now being live in more than 50 markets, but we haven't fully scaled up our inventory in all of these markets. So we don't fully leverage the breadth of our offering and the breadth of the rates that are available on trivago that should lead to an increase in Google Hotel Ads as in our performance marketing mix.

Great. And sorry for being so nosy, do you have updated mix by channel -- traffic mix by channel?

No, we don't.

Now from Goldman Sachs, your next question comes from the line of Heath Terry.

Great. I was wondering if you could maybe help us just aggregate the improvement in ROAS this quarter. How much of that is coming from just simple reduction and the lower-performing spend on the platform versus actually seeing any sort of improvement in efficiency either from the prices of the ad units that you're buying coming down or your conversion rates going up. And if there was a way to look at this spend, the spend that you have this quarter on a like-for-like or sort of same-store sales basis, would we be seeing an improvement in ROAS on a year-over-year basis just looking at the remaining spend versus the comparable spend last year?

It is a combination of both. That is true for sure. So we have various initiatives where we are optimizing our marketing spend, improving our efficiency on the bidding in performance marketing, our bidding algorithms, bidding efficiency, the targeting of our bidding. But also on the branded marketing side, on our messaging, we have, as Rolf said earlier, we are now running more variety of creatives in parallel, testing them against each other and getting positive impacts out of that. In the selection of the ad breaks that we're using for our creatives, we are making progress. To disassemble the overall spend optimization from the improved efficiency is very difficult. And yes, I mean, I can only say that we have -- we are benefiting from both trends definitely, and that has led to the significant improvement. On the product-driven improvements, improved conversion, you can see part of that in the revenue per qualified referral. However, you can't take the full effect because there is also a mix effect in there. So the revenue per qualified referral is also benefiting from the more targeted and more optimized marketing spend, which is increasing the average quality of the traffic as well. So it's not all coming from product; it's also impacted by our marketing strategy.

Great. And then to follow up on one of the questions before or really one of your comments about looking to bring more hotels onto the platform. As we increasingly see hotels focusing on their direct-booking options, what are the reasons that you get from hotels as to why they're not leveraging trivago to drive bookings directly to their hotels? It would seem like the metasearch model, particularly the way that you guys have built your metasearch model, would be an appealing option for them in terms of driving additional direct traffic. Rolf Schrömgens: Yes, I think it's very true. I think, intuitively, you would assume there it's very appealing and there is really no rationale reason not to be present on trivago. Still, like, managing a small hotel has also large complexity. Like, I mean, you have to do a lot of stuff at the same time and, like, focusing on your online marketing is just one of the many things that you have to do as a hotel owner. So we should not underestimate that hotel owners are confronted with the high complexity. So for them, I think we have to make it as easy as possible, and that's what we're working on. That when we talk to individual hoteliers, that we show, like, how easy it is to integrate on the trivago platform, to running campaigns on the trivago platform. We are successful with that, but it's also like a process. It's a process to talk to every individual hotelier. And you see it, when you're looking at the different OTAs in the market, you see also a difference in like how strong their inventory is. So they also have to put effort into that, although it's probably also a no-brainer to put your inventory on several OTAs. But still, you have to convince every single individual hotelier one by one, and that's just a continuing effort and that takes time.

Now your next question from Morgan Stanley comes from the line of Brian Nowak.

It's Alex Wang sitting in for Brian. Just 2 questions. One, you talked about, I think, your branded marketing, new spots concept. Can you maybe just talk a little bit more about that and how maybe that messaging differs? And understanding that you still believe a 50-50 mix between brand and performance is still the right long-term mix, but are you perhaps leaning into branded marketing more heavily in the second half of 2019? And the second question around, I think, Rolf mentioned the advertiser summit you guys held in 1Q. Maybe if you could just talk to us about maybe some broad themes that came out of that and how that might differ for your larger advertisers versus some of the other advertisers.

Sure. So on the creatives that we are currently running globally, you obviously have the Mr. Trivago concept, the studio or limbo world concept. That is still working very well. In addition to that, we are running real-world Mr. Trivago concept, where you have a real-world, non-studio situation that people can relate to very easily that have some anchoring with our very known spokesperson. And a third category that we are testing is basically with a passive narrator with a real-life situation, which has the benefit that it can be translated into other markets much more quickly and much cheaper, which means that you can produce a lot more of these spots for the same budget. And we see positive results of all 3. And overall, more -- not hedge, it sounds a bit negative, but have more variety and more things to choose from for every individual market. So I think we've made a significant progress there, and we'll continue to test various different concepts against each other. In terms of spend, that doesn't necessarily mean that we will increase the share of branded spend and the overall mix. As I said before, we believe roughly in a 50-50 traffic usage mix, and I don't see a reason why we should deviate from that. In terms of messaging, the messaging focus is clearly on our main value proposition, which is breadth of inventory and attractiveness of rates. And the secondary messaging that we have launched recently and so far is performing very well is the alternative accommodation apartment value proposition that Rolf talked about and that we are, again, seeing more and more traction on the platform. And we believe our offering is getting better and better as we speak. Rolf Schrömgens: And on the advertiser summits, of course,…

Got it. And just one more quick follow-up. I know in your prepared remarks, you talked about expecting to see more stability in QR and RPQR drivers going forward. We've had to, obviously, given a variety of developments, deal with a lot of comps over the last couple of years. But as you start to invest in advertising in the second half of this year, maybe if you can just talk about, conceptually, how we should kind of frame the development of QR versus RPQR for revenue drivers going forward.

Yes, sure. So in Q3, you will still see some comp effect because there are some product optimizations that started to kick in end of Q3 in Q4. But as of Q4, I would expect the QR, RPQR trend to be more in line with the historic trends, with a slight shift structurally towards RPQR coming out of continuous product optimizations. So when we said in the past, base assumption per region is RPQR to be flat, we would now expect RPQR to be slightly up. Yes, so low single digits year-over-year once we've lapped the comp effects.

Now from Susquehanna, your next question comes from the line of Shyam Patil.

It's Ryan on for Shyam. Just two quick ones, if I could. So first, how should we be thinking about the cadence of ad spend and return on ad spend throughout 2019? And then secondly, could you just give us a quick update on your new strategy with regards to Google Hotel Finder?

So on the advertising spend cadence, as I said, we expect the advertising spend to be down year-over-year in the second quarter and start to increase in the third quarter and also be up year-over-year in the fourth quarter. We don't give any specific guidance on the return on advertisement spend, but we also expect the revenue to be down in Q2 and up in Q3 and Q4. Rolf Schrömgens: Could you just repeat the second part of your question because I couldn't hear it correctly.

Yes. Just asking for a quick update on your strategy with regards to Google Hotel Finder. Rolf Schrömgens: Yes. So as Axel said before, we are now live on most of our markets. So we ramped up significantly the number of markets beginning of the year. And -- but still, we have not leveraged all of our inventory, all of our price inventory right now. So we think that we are currently under-invested in the Google Hotel Ads channel, and we think that we will be able to have a catch-up over this year to reach a level which is in relation to the overall market share of CHA compared to nonbranded FAM.

And from JPMorgan, you now have a question from the line of Doug Anmuth.

First, I just wanted to ask, you talked about for EBITDA being toward the high end for the year and there are growth opportunities that you can invest in more. Can you give us a sense of what you're taking about there, what those opportunities are and where you can be focused? And then secondly, just given kind of revenue with the decline in the West in 2Q to 1Q and you talked about some of the improvements as you lap in the back half of the year, was there any commentary around full year revenue growth?

Yes. So let me start with your second question. We don't guide revenue for the full year. On your first question, opportunity to invest, we are running marketing across various channels in -- on 55 platforms covering roughly 70 markets. And we continuously, obviously, assess whether there are additional investment opportunities where we got -- get good marginal return for our investment. And with the comment that we made, I want to say that with the good start into the year, we believe that we have the financial flexibility to invest into opportunities when they might arise predominantly marketing-driven, and that will support our revenue trajectory particularly in the second half of the year.

Thank you very much indeed. Thank you. And there appear to be no further questions at this time.

So at this time, I would like to hand it over back to Rolf for some closing remarks. Rolf Schrömgens: Yes. So thanks a lot for participating in our Q1 2019 earnings call. As I mentioned before, we are very pleased with the start of the year. We were able to turn around profitability from a record adjusted EBITDA loss of €21.9 million to a record profit of €20.9 million. We made significant progress in many areas, continuing our path to optimize our products for retention and improving cooperation with our advertisers. We are confident that we can reach our profitability targets while returning to growth in the second part of the year. Thanks again, and we're looking forward to talking to you next quarter.

Thanks a lot, Rolf. And with that, operator, I think we can conclude the call.

Thank you very much indeed and with many thanks to all our speakers today. That does conclude the conference. Thank you all for participating and you may now all disconnect.