Good day ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the LendingTree Incorporated Fourth Quarter 2016 Earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session and instructions will follow at that time. If anyone should require operator assistance during today’s conference, please press star then zero on your touchtone telephone. I would like to introduce your host for today’s conference, Mr. Gabe Dalporto, Chief Financial Officer. Sir, please go ahead.

Thanks Operator, and thanks everyone for joining this morning for LendingTree’s fourth quarter 2016 earnings conference call. On today’s call, I will discuss our fourth quarter financial results as seen in today’s press release, then turn it over to Doug who will provide his thoughts on the quarter and an update on how we’re trending into 2017. But first, a quick disclaimer - during the call, we may discuss LendingTree’s plans, expectations, outlooks or forecasts for future performance. Forward-looking statements are typically preceded by words such as we expect, we believe, we anticipate, we are looking to, or other similar statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and LendingTree’s actual results could differ materially from the views expressed today. Many but not all of the risks we face are described in LendingTree’s periodic reports filed with the SEC. On this call, we will discuss a number of non-GAAP measures, and I refer you to today’s press release available on our website at investors.lendingtree.com for the comparable GAAP measures, definitions, and full reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to GAAP. With that, let’s get into the results. Today, I’m pleased to be discussing another quarter of strong financial performance at the company. Despite the typical seasonal headwinds we expect to see in the fourth quarter, we recorded new highs in revenue, variable marketing margin, and adjusted EBITDA. The mortgage business returned to sequential growth despite seasonality and increasing interest rates, providing further confidence in our outlook for that piece of the business in 2017. With the acquisition of CompareCards in November, our credit cards business exceeded expectations and is carrying terrific momentum into the new year. Taking a closer look at revenues, consolidated revenue of $100.8 million represents year-over-year growth of 29% and exceeded the high end of our previous…

Thank you, Gabe, and thanks to everyone for joining this call today. Since Gabe has taken you through the numbers, I would like to use this time to provide some color on the overall business, discuss performance in the context of our long-term strategy, and our outlook for 2017 and beyond. Overall, we had another outstanding quarter which caps off a year of strong and consistent growth in both revenue, which grew 51% over the prior year, and profitability with adjusted EBITDA increasing 71% year-over-year. At our investor day just a couple months ago in December, we laid out our four key strategic initiatives for the year ahead, which we believe are thoroughly aligned with Lending Tree’s mission to enable growth in market share and position the company for sustainable growth over the long term. As a reminder, these strategic initiatives are: one, to expand into new categories while still growing market share in our existing categories; two, to strengthen the consumer relationship through more options and improved intelligence, particularly around our MyLendingTree product; three, to re-imagine the consumer experience, particularly in mortgage; and four, to maniacally optimize our conversion funnel from add unit all the way through loan funding, which is something that we believe will substantially move our company forward. I’m proud to say that we’ve already made great progress even in the last months and are much more confident in our ability to execute on all of these initiatives. Now in the fourth quarter, total mortgage requests grew 25% year-over-year and revenue per loan request increased 14% substantially as interest rates have risen and lenders have leaned in, expanding filters and increasing demand. It’s imperative to note that we have successfully managed this business for a wide variety of interest rate environments time and time again. Our…

[Operator instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Kunal Madhukar with SunTrust. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking the question. As you look at the purchase mortgage space, how much more room do you think you have in terms of improving monetization as organic volumes for lenders grow?

So it’s a really good question. First off, purchase - there’s a lot of room for purchase to grow, and then I’ll talk about monetization. We’re not going to give you necessarily specific numbers, but we’ll give you some anecdotals. While we have a little over 2% share in the overall refinance market of originations, our share for purchase is substantially lower than that, so there is a ton of headwind to grow in purchase. A lot of the consumer experience initiatives behind that are what we’re really excited about. Those initiatives all relate to your second question, which was monetization, and I’d point you to our investor deck which shows you the leverage of changes in our funnel. So long story short, there’s a ton of room for upside in monetization of purchase, and the reason is because we will get lender close rates to continue to move up, which will then get them to continue to increase their bids. In addition to that, if you just look, and these are hypothetical numbers but they’re not far off, if you can match 50% of your borrowers with at least one lender and you just make that 60%, or 60% to 70%, but 50 to 60 is a 20% increase in monetization just there. If you can move from three lenders to an average of four, you pick up an additional one-third of monetization. If you move close rates from 2% to 4%, you’re not going to quite double monetization but you’ll probably get it up there by 50% to 70%, so suffice to say there’s a ton of room to move monetization as we continue to work with lenders. And by the way, in addition to our initiatives, a lot of that happens naturally because lenders who previously didn’t focus as much on purchase, now they’ve put a big focus on it, and they’ve cleaned up their internal processes too.

Thank you so much, Doug.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mark Mahaney with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Hi guys, this Jim Shaughnessy stepping in for Mark this morning. Thanks for taking my question. Just on mortgage, I think at the analyst day you mentioned that mortgage was likely a low to mid single digit grow over ’17. I’m just wondering, given the comments about January trends, January purchase trends year-to-date, is that still the expectation or do you think is it incrementally more positive based on those trends? Thanks.

Yes, I think it’s a great question. We’ve certainly seen a lot of momentum moving into the year, particularly on the purchase side, so we say kind of mid single digits, maybe mid to upper single digits. We are marginally more bullish on mortgage than we’ve been, and we think purchase has a lot of room to grow and a lot of legs.

Great, thank you. I have one more follow-up. It looks like personal loans might have been down a few million sequentially in the quarter. Is there anything else to call out here besides seasonality that we should be aware of?

Absolutely not. Seasonality is pretty much it. We had forecast it, told everybody it was coming, and it’s come out of the gates stronger in Q1 as well. Gabe, anything to add?

Yes, I’ll point to the personal loans business where, number one, we achieved record volume in Q4, which is a testament to our marketing, and we’ve kind of mentioned the fact that we might be seeing a little weakness in [indiscernible] issues and integration issues with an acquisition of one lender by another. But as we move into Q1, we’re looking at pretty--you know, for the first time in a while, increases in revenue per lead and a lot of lender demand. We also added a substantial lender in late Q4 that we’ll be getting the benefit of as we move into Q1. So that industry and that segment feels pretty good for us right now, and I think we have some tremendous opportunity for volume as well as finally some [indiscernible] increases as we go forward.

Got it, thanks guys.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Kerry Rice with Needham. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Thanks a lot. Maybe first on mortgage, as you had just highlighted Gabe, that you’re now maybe mid to higher single digits for mortgage revenue growth in 2017. Can you talk a little bit about seasonality in Q1? Does that generally accelerate in Q1, and maybe is it different this year because it’s more purchases than refis? Then maybe a similar question on the non-mortgage - clearly credit cards is doing well, home equity is doing well, but do you look at that growth trajectory as an acceleration in Q1 in the non-mortgage business, or any kind of guidance as we think about non-mortgage growth for 2017? Thank you.

So let me take the first part [indiscernible] numbers. So [indiscernible] business, we always see Q4 seasonally weaker, which is why we projected what we projected, and I know when we did that, some people didn’t understand what was behind it. But Q4 [indiscernible] people are buying stuff, not financing stuff. In Q1, people typically finance stuff at a greater rate, so you typically do see some stronger Q1, and we’ve got [indiscernible] guidance here as well. Now that said, we’re still seeing growth really across the board, I’ll probably get corrected here but sequentially I don’t think we have any products--I think almost all of our products [indiscernible] are up sequentially, and I believe go up year-over-year. So with growth everywhere, it’s happening through monetization, it’s happening through demand, it’s just happening through all of the things that we’ve said. We definitely see Q1 a little bit stronger than you do Q4. Now in addition to that, from what we’ve said, [indiscernible] mortgage [indiscernible] mid single digits to higher single digits, that not only is telling you that we have a lot of confidence in our ability to execute our plan, which I was obviously more confident than in December, but we also have confidence that we can now be even a little better on mortgage. Now, that doesn’t mean it’s going to be better in everything, but it gives us much more confidence about the overall year.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mike Grondahl with Northland Securities. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Hey guys, congratulations on the quarter. Sort of two quick questions - one, could you talk a little bit about what’s embedded for mortgage activity and credit card activity in 1Q; and then maybe secondly, could you talk a little bit about trends that you’re seeing at some of your larger mortgage customers, kind of where their demand is and what they’re thinking?

So the first one, can you just clarify what you mean by embedded?

Well, you have revenue guidance of 122 to 126. If you somewhat broke out mortgage and credit cards sequentially, how are they doing compared to 4Q?

So I’m going to let Gabe take the embedded one, and let me talk about the customers first. On the notion of the individual products, we don’t necessarily release very strict revenue on product-by-product. We do mortgage and non-mortgage, as you’ll see in our Q’s, because we consider that competitive. Now, the keys in our big mortgage customers, let me tell you what’s happening. They are expanding demand in every way you could think of, so they’re increasing their demand for purchase, they're also increasing their demand for refi. Now, keep in mind the increase in demand encompasses a number of things. It encompasses the number of customers they want, it encompasses how wide they’re willing to go, so for example they move their minimum loan amounts from, let’s say, $200,000 down to $100,000 and that creates that funnel effect. We add more lenders, which means we get more transmits per, and those lenders focus more on close rates, which does that. In addition, you have just the secular trend of moving from offline to online [indiscernible] investor deck, and that’s continuing to happen. As lenders increasingly want to lend, if you think about it, how do you drive volume? You can--as we’ve said since the very beginning, any individual lender trying to drive their own individual volume will be less efficient than LendingTree, and we can drive the entire market and then those lenders carve it up and slice it the way they want. So that’s what we’re--and that’s happening with our big customers as our smaller. Now, it’s definitely more accentuated with our big customers, and by the way, I’ll just take one more second to make this point. I just was looking yesterday at our top 10 lenders across the board, and you cannot believe how our top 10 spenders have moved from, call it smaller correspondent lenders five or six years ago into now the major money center banks and major credit card issuers and the major personal loan lenders. It’s a beautiful thing to see that transition happening. Gabe, you want to talk about the numbers?

Yes, so we already mentioned mortgage, mid to upper single digits. As you look at credit cards, obviously higher growth rate in credit cards. We’re seeing great momentum in the combined credit cards business, and that encompasses our own LendingTree branded efforts where we’re seeing really nice growth, as well as CompareCards - they’re seeing really nice sequential and year-over-year growth. So we’re very happy with how the credit card business is performing.

Got it, thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of John Campbell with Stephens. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Hey guys, congrats on a great quarter and a good start to the year. You guys mentioned that--I think the total loan requests were up 57% year-over-year and that’s against total rev up 29%, so just want to dig in on that growth rate differential. Was that less matches or lower rev per match, or maybe just a combination of the two?

It’s really a mix shift issue, so if you look at aggregate loan requests, personal loan requests, we’re up very, very significantly compared to mortgage. So it’s a really mix shift into just lower monetizing products, so I wouldn’t worry too much about it.

Okay, that’s helpful. Then on the match rates, just curious about your thoughts, how that’s going to fare this year. It seems like the average American balance sheet continues to improve, you’ve got improving credit scores. That’s obviously going to help a little bit, but can you talk about the expectations just around your customer appetites this year? Do you feel like with a bit of a wind-back in regulations and, I guess, just rising rates, that there could a widening of the credit box?

Yes, so thanks for that question. We’re already seeing substantial increases in demand. We’ve already talked about mortgage, where the match rates are up and matches per are up, so that’s already happening. We are--in personal loans, we see very, very strong demand for prime and improving demand for mid, sub-prime, so I think that’s a positive trend. Credit cards, the issuers are relatively insatiable, so there’s strong demand there; and home equity demand is really just exploding. The number of lenders has increased dramatically there and interest in that product has increased dramatically, and that’s working for the lenders. So I think what you’re seeing is pretty strong demand across the board for our product, and that’s benefiting obviously on the match rate side.

Okay, that’s helpful. If I could squeeze in one more, on the mortgage side, can you talk a little bit about the size of customers, how you’re seeing that split out across the board? Are you seeing some of those larger lenders pick up appetite over the last quarter or two?

Absolutely. When you think about these large lenders, they have a very, very big appetite, and when their volume closes, you just--I mean, if somebody’s got 2,000 loan officers and the volume goes down by a little bit, even 10%, they’ve got 200 people sitting around with nothing to do and they want to fill those guys up. So we’re definitely--so the bigger lenders on the network have a lot more experience with LendingTree and thus they can up their buys, and that’s been working really across the board. So it’s not only bigger lenders joining the network, it’s bigger lenders with bigger appetites and bigger budgets spending a lot more money with us, or wanting to spend more money with us. Quite frankly, we have so much under demand right now, we’re working diligently increasing around the marketing side to make sure we can get all the volume and fill it up for them.

Yes, and just to supplement Doug’s point, the number of lenders with $500,000-plus spend with us increased materially in the quarter, so we’re definitely seeing people move up the food chain.

That’s great to hear. Thanks guys.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Neil Doshi with Mizuho. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Great, thanks guys. Doug, can you maybe talk about some of the new markets that you’re trying got move into, like pre-prime or commercial real estate, insurance, etc.? I know it’s early days, but how are some of those products coming along, and any initial uptake there? Then secondly, how should we think about the growth of MyLendingTree users. That seems to tick up nicely. Will we see more effort, I guess in terms of marketing that app so that people will download that app, and what type of stickiness do you guys tend to see once someone downloads the app and starts using the MyLendingTree app? Thanks.

Got it. So on the first one, some of the things we’re looking at, and I don’t want to get too specific here because some of them are acquisitions, so I won’t go--I’ll give you some anecdotes. But one that’s actually launching today or tomorrow, believe it or not, is auto insurance. We’re doing it through a partnership, and we’re actually probably going to be marketing that directly in addition to cross-selling it on our site. The commercial mortgage business is one that is very broker-based with high middle man fees, low transparency, the developers need to flip those every five years, so we like that. We’re looking at every category of small business loans [indiscernible] small business, it breaks down in probably 10 different categories of lending, and then we’re looking at some of the niche areas, for example could even go as well as helping builders find individual investors where banks aren’t available - the so-called hard money market. We think that’s interesting, although early. We think life insurance may be interesting, but that’s a long time lag. By the way, we’ll start all these insurance things are partnerships, so we won’t have to distract from where we are. In each of these categories, by the way, there are a number of acquisitions that could potentially be available at decent prices. So that’s a little bit of a flavor of it all there.

To the second question, which I believe was MyLendingTree and marketing of MyLendingTree products, in January we started some paid marketing on MyLendingTree direct to the website, as well as [indiscernible] on our legacy app. As Doug says, the new app is fantastic. I highly encourage everyone to download it. We will be scaling up our app marketing on that product in the coming weeks, so we very much look forward to scaling up our marketing on MyLendingTree.

Thanks guys.

Thank you, and our next question comes from the line of Hamed Khorsand with BWS Financial. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. First off, just talk about mortgage. The trends you’re seeing there from your lenders, is that more of a secular trend, what you’re seeing with lenders coming on, spending more, or is that market share gains from a competitive standpoint?

It’s absolutely both. So the way we like to think about increases is, first off, you’ve got the size of the market growing, and I don’t have good data--if you look at our investor widget, that little bubble at the bottom, that’s definitely growing, which means there’s a secular trend of lenders getting more of their volume from online, which just makes total sense. I mean, we’ve talked about it before - this is really the last big category to move online, so you have that happening, and then you have the lender, which by the way is showing that lenders are increasing their demand, so they’re increasing their demand with us from that. We’re also seeing that lenders are increasing their wallet share with LendingTree, and we’re really going after that hard. We’re basically going to lenders and saying, what’s it going to take to get more and more of your wallet share? And we do that based on a really great analytics platform. We actually go in and tell the lenders where they can succeed, where they can’t, how much money they can make in each of their filter segments, and really going in and helping them do that. So it’s definitely stealing wallet share and it’s definitely moving online, and then you have this purchase-refi change which shows the offline market is going down, so now they’re going to shift even more money into areas where they can get volume.

Okay. Then just following up on MyLendingTree, now that it’s been a couple years, at least, could you provide some stat on how long before the actual subscriber takes action, actually wants to do something beyond just looking at their credit score?

Sure. So actually, we’re seeing monetization happen in the first couple months, and then quite frankly it will pale from there for a period of time, except for your sub-prime folks who are going to see an increase in their credit score and then they’re going to be able to lower pricing that way. Then for other people who obviously take action the first couple months, they’re going to have more needs continuing throughout their life as they buy homes and do other things. But they’re actually transacting fairly quickly, which gives us a lot of confidence that we can put together marketing campaigns to go after that.

Okay, but are you seeing anything from the inactive side, where customers sign up and they’re excited, they’re monitoring things, and how long before they become active, and what are you doing on that front to get them engaged again?

So every time we--so first off, the engagement is still there but you’re going to have fewer alerts, so you’re not going to--you don’t need to come back all the time unless we send you an alert. So the new features we add and the new alerts we add, we’re seeing it bring people back. They’re coming back not because they want to come play a game on MyLendingTree, they’re coming back because we sent them an alert that’s actionable for them and then they can take action. We’re both seeing a lot more customers taking action, we’re also getting better conversion rates from our alerts to them taking action, just by a number of blocking and tackling and just ongoing initiatives through conversion tunnels, like we do everywhere. By the way, the other thing I would add is one of the great things about this alert-based product, you get wonderful customer satisfaction out of something like that because you’re not calling them or you’re not touching them unless there’s actually a real savings, and consumers love it. And now we’re going to go start telling them about it with this bigger monetization and start marketing, which I know has been a long time coming, but we feel better about it. We’ll start small and scale into it.

Okay, appreciate it. Thank you.

Great, thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jed Kelly with Oppenheimer. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Great, thanks for taking my question. Looks like CompareCards grew about 30% in 2016, and the site still has much less website traffic than some of its larger competitors. Do you actually think it’s possible to accelerate CompareCards revenue growth by leaning in more into branded channels in ’17?

Yes, so absolutely I think it’s possible, and there’s been great collaboration between the teams across a variety of marketing channels. The great thing is, they are fantastic at things like paid search, we’re fantastic in things like display and some partnerships and things like that, and social, so we’re sharing that knowledge across the company so that we can leverage what they’re great at, they can leverage what we’re great at. I think that helps the combined companies, and we can also really focus the marketing efforts where we’ve made the highest payouts as well.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Tarkan with Compass Point. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Hey guys, this is actually Andrew Eskelsen on for Mike. Thanks for taking my questions. So with the dust now settling after you guys completed CompareCards, how can we think about capital allocation at this point? Should we think you’re going to skew more towards M&A or maybe go back to the buyback?

So buybacks, we are there every--typically every quarter, we have to [indiscernible] as Gabe said. We [indiscernible] based on price, and prices ran up and that’s why we didn’t get any buybacks this year. From a capital allocation standpoint, increasingly we are focusing on that. I can’t predict which way it will go. Basically we’re going to deploy capital in the most efficient way possible. We’re going to keep looking at leverage to make sure that we can do that, and look, it’s not lost on me but when I think about it, the companies that perform the best over time are the ones who make smart capital allocation decisions, which means you buy back your stock when it’s valued right and you use it for acquisitions carefully in a way that you can get things that are accretive and try to do that very efficiently over time, and we’re there. So I can’t tell you which one it’s going to be. I can tell you we are going to make more acquisitions, and one of the things that’s really thrilled me, as somebody working for the company, is seeing our company be able to actually execute an acquisition and have it come in, diligence it, get the right numbers. By the way, we’ve said no to probably 10-plus things recently, and we said yes to one, so I think it shows we can buy the right thing and we can execute it the right way and integrate the right way.

Just a clarification question from me - did you guys buy back any stock during 4Q?

No, we didn’t. Obviously we were in the middle of an M&A process, and [indiscernible] capital allocation, we want to make sure we have the right firepower there. I think the CompareCards acquisition is a great example and model of the type of thing we want to look for, which is growing, is profitable, it’s highly strategic, it complements our needs as a company and has a fantastic multiple. So those are the types of things we’re looking for, and those can be highly, highly accretive acquisitions, but we want to make sure we have the right amount of capital available there, but we think we’re very, very happy with that one.

And then one more from me - so on the injunction against--I guess it’s from NextAdvisor, are you seeing any impact there, and can you quantify that for us, if possible?

So we’re seeing a slight--let’s just clarify for everybody. That injunction basically says that we cannot do native advertising, which is basically writing an article and putting it out on the internet. We cannot do native advertising only through three ad networks that place those, so while that caused a short-term dip, like we’ve talked about before, now we’re doing direct deals where those ads used to get placed, and the injunction will have a little effect but it will--it is diminishing over time. You should also know the percentage of our profits that came from that native stuff was--Gabe will talk about it, but it was not very large, so really it is not that much of a factor. You want to give more detail on that?

Obviously we’d prefer it wasn’t there. It had a short-term impact, call it Q3, Q4 for our business. The team basically took the challenge and they’ve really blown up other marketing avenues, and our core business had a record month in January, CompareCards had a great month in January, neither of which had anything to do with native advertising. So we feel like we would like to have it not there, but we’ve done really well with it in place.

So another way to think about it is we’re doing fine with the injunction and we’re still growing and business is good. If we didn’t have the injunction, we’d be better.

Okay, thanks guys.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Blake Harper with Loop Capital. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Hi Doug, hi Gabe. Two questions. One, given that you had provided guidance at December 13 at your investor day and then were able to beat it pretty handily, looking back, given the upside there, would you be able to classify it as conservative outlook at the time, or was there an accelerated level of activity there in the last two weeks, two and a half weeks of the quarter that led to the upside, or something else related to the timing that you could call out that led to the upside from the outlook at that time? Then the second I had is related to--I wanted to see, Doug, if you could expand on the margin potential expansion from MyLendingTree, given the incremental SEM costs you don’t have with those customers. Would you be reinvesting some of that in some of the app marketing, Gabe I know you mentioned, or would be able to have some of that flow through to the bottom line potentially?

All very, very good questions. On the second one, it’s really a channel thing, so each marketing channel operates independently of another, so you don’t necessarily--in our business, it’s really direct marketing business. You don’t really move money from one channel to another or from one product to another unless you’re getting more demand and supply and you’re losing VMN, so basically, you always look at your VMN. If we’re getting a profitable--if we’re getting profit on anything we’re running, we’re going to keep running it. So we’re going to run MyLendingTree ads, and when we run them, stuff will fall to the bottom line. But we will look at the MyLendingTree ads not against all of MyLendingTree, but just based on the volume that comes in from there. So the organic volume and the cross-sell volume that comes to our site naturally will all drop to the bottom line, and we will evaluate the marketing based on just the volume that we’re driving in. By the way, that marketing is also--there’s another layer that you have to go, which is you have to target different demographic segments that have different monetization abilities, so there’s another sort of layer of complication there that, quite frankly, because we’re so good at marketing gives us a competitive advantage. My reaction from December to now is obviously things did get a little stronger, but in addition to that, at our investor day we weren’t focused on updating guidance that we had just given, we were really focused on the long-term thing and we were obviously incrementally more [indiscernible] investor day, and things came in a little better.

Okay, great. Thanks a lot, Doug.

Thank you. I’m showing no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Doug Lebda for closing remarks.

Fantastic. Thank you all again for being here, and thank you for your very thoughtful questions. As many of you know, I’m in the interesting position at this company where I get to think of it both as a CEO and as an investor. As a CEO, I can tell you this is a fantastic company with fantastic processes, hiring wonderful people who really get our core principles, and I’ve never been more thrilled with that. As an investor, I like to look at this and see what is the value of the company and how do I believe as an investor. When I look back over what this company has gone through over the last eight years, I feel very, very confident they can do anything. First, we went through the financial crisis and people worried that we were going to get through that. Second, we had a money losing, bleeding from owning a mortgage originator at the worst time, and we got rid of that, made a lot of money. Then people were worried about loan losses - we got out of that and we dealt with that. Then people were worried about diversification - I think we proved that one. Then along comes the fintech bubble and all these crazy valuations, and that bubble starts to pop, people thought we were going to pop, and obviously went right through that. Then follow it up with personal loan prices which had people worried, then the shift from refinance to purchase, and then lastly whether we were going to be able to actually buy and integrate an acquisition. We’ve come through, we’ve weathered every challenge, and I don’t know what the next worry is going to be but I feel very confident we’re going to figure that one out, too. This is a company that can weather the storm. In addition to that, the industry is setting up exactly like we said over the last 20 years, it just took a lot longer, and we are perfectly well positioned in the industry. Then last is our competitive position, where we continue to put a--we continue to gain share against competitors. You can see that in the public company revenue growth of us versus them, and you can just see how we’re continuing [indiscernible]. So as a CEO, I love being part of this company, and as an investor I have tremendous confidence, and I hope many of you continue to come along the ride with us, which we think is going to be very exciting. So thank you very much.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today’s conference. This does conclude the program and you may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.