Thank you, Sandra. I will begin by highlighting the key drivers of our consolidated results and then turn to our view of each of our segments. For my prepared remarks, I will be focusing primarily on Tiptree Operating Company as their results drive those of the public entity. On Page 17, we highlight our three months and six months consolidated results for Tiptree Operating Company and Tiptree Financial for the period ended June 30. As mentioned earlier, we reported net income before non-controlling interest of $19.8 million for the quarter, and $17.8 million for the first half of 2015. The $15.8 million increase in that metric in Q2 and $10.2 million for the year-to-date period were both driven by four key factors. One, the $16.3 million after-tax gain on the sale of PFG reported in discontinued operation; two, the inclusion of Fortegra’s earnings for the full period; three, the expansion of our real estate investment at Care; and four, realized losses on the sale of our subordinated notes in Telos 2 and 4. Growth in first half adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations was primarily driven by Fortegra’s positive results and the increase in Care’s portfolio of real estate investment. Just a quick note, as we move through an understanding of our financial results in more detail, much of the benefit from the historical ownership of the subordinated notes that we sold this quarter have actually been reported in previous period through distribution income. In addition, the earnings from the reinvested proceeds have yet to be reported in our current results and will flow through future periods. As a result, the current period results provide us with only a partial picture of the impact of these actions on shareholder value. Turning to Page 18, let’s walk through the financial results of our insurance and insurance services segment. Just a remainder that since Fortegra was not a part of Tiptree during the prior year, we have no comparable period in 2014 to address due to the effective purchase accounting. Our discussion here will focus on growth factors and the underlying trends in the business. Net income in this segment was $6.3 million in the quarter and $10.3 million for the first half. The key drivers of these results were strong sales of credit life insurance product and auto warranty and insurance products, partially dampened by slowing growth in our cellphone warranty business. Credit life insurance is often a key component to ensuring access to credit for the average wage earner. Access to credit is also translating into strong consumer sales in auto, auto warranty products, consumer electronics, and durable goods warranty product as growing sales of cars, electronics, and household appliances support the additional value, these associated products bring to the consumer. Our Specialty Finance segment benefited from strong industry fundamentals in the quarter. On Page 19; we highlight the year-over-year earnings improvement for both the quarter and the year-to-date period. Pre-tax income grew to $568,000 for the three months ended June 30 as compared to a pre-tax loss of $731,000 in the 2014 period. Year-to-date results also turn positive with $1 million in pre-tax earnings versus the pre-tax loss of $1.5 million in the previous year. Revenues in the segment increased by 107% in the quarter and 146% year-to-date, due to the volume growth driven by industry fundamentals. Scale also benefited the businesses as census increased at a slower pace than the growth in revenues. Turning to Page 20, let’s breakdown the results in our real estate segment. As mentioned earlier, we have invested significantly in our real estate portfolio over the last year. The results in the segment reflect revenue growth of 155% in the quarter and 121% year-to-date, due to both higher rental income and higher fee growth. The increase in revenue however was more than offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses as a result of the increased value attributable to acquired assets. Similar to senior housing REIT, increases in adjusted EBITDA reflect the trends demonstrated by the revenue profile of the business. That metrics adds back the increased depreciation and amortization with the result being adjusted EBITDA growth of 160% in the quarter and 69% year-to-date. On Page 21, we began our discussion of the asset management segment. As a reminder, we split the results of our net income attributable to the CLOs into two of our segments. In the asset management segment results, we report the management fees paid by the CLOs to the company. The income attributable to our principle investment in the subordinated notes of the CLOs composed of distribution income and realized and unrealized gains and losses on the sub notes we own is reported in our corporate and other segment along with our other principle investment. The key driver of our management fees and that’s our pre-tax income in the asset management segment is assets under management. For the three months and six months ended June 30th, the modest decline in asset management fees is a function of declining assets under management as the older CLOs are past their reinvestment period and have begun to amortize combined with lower overall fees on the more recent CLO. We currently manage six CLOs under the Telos brand name, the first two of which were issued in 2006 and 2007 and are past their reinvestment period. Telos 3 and 4 were issued in 2013 and Telos 5 and 6 were issued in 2014. At the beginning of the Q3 2015, we invested in warehouse in anticipation of launching Telos 7. With respect to the second component of earnings from the CLO business, the key drivers of earrings on our principle investments in the subordinated notes are distribution over time, reflected in both distribution income and the realized and unrealized gain or loss on the fair value of the note to sell. As a reminder, the fair value of our subordinated note is equivalent to the net present value of future expected distribution. As distributions are paid accruing into income and we get closer to the maturity of the notes, the fair value will naturally decline. On Page 22, we see the impact of this natural transition in the components of our corporate and other segment relating to the CLO. The line item in this segment net income attributable to the CLOs combined both the distribution income and the realized and unrealized gains and losses of the CLO subordinated notes we own. The pre-tax loss in the corporate and other segments for the year-to-date period of $17.1 million was primarily driven by unrealized and realized losses of $11.9 million on the CLO subordinated notes that we own of which $8 million was attributable to the sale of Telos 2 and 4. The comparisons to last year also included $2.1 million of earnings on a loan warehouse in the prior year, which we held in advance of issuing Telos 5 and 6. To put the realized losses on this quarter’s sub note sale in context, over the time we have owned the sub-notes in Telos 2 and 4. We have earned $94.3 million in distribution income and had a total of $22 million in realized and unrealized losses inclusive of $8 million taken in 2015. We received $39.7 million of proceeds from the sale of sub notes at Telos 2 and 4 and generated tax losses of approximately $12.5 million to Tiptree Financial. The remainder of the incremental loss in the period in our corporate and other segment includes increases in expenses at our corporate head office to support the growth and increased complexity of our business. With that, I will turn the call back to Geoffrey.