Good morning, everyone and welcome to the Triumph Bancorp Q4 2017 and 2017 Annual Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Please note today’s event is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference call over to Mr. Luke Wyse, SVP, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Welcome to the Triumph Bancorp conference call to discuss our fourth quarter 2017 financial results. Before we get started, I would like to remind you that this presentation may include forward-looking statements. Those statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual anticipated results to differ. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements. If you are logged into our webcast, please refer to the slide presentation available online including our Safe Harbor statement on Slide 2. For those joining by phone, please note that the Safe Harbor statement and presentation are available on our website at www.triumphbancorp.com. All comments made during today’s call are subject to that Safe Harbor statement. I am joined this morning by Triumph’s Vice Chairman and CEO, Aaron Graft, our Chief Financial Officer, Bryce Fowler and Dan Karas, our Chief Lending Officer. After the presentation, we will be happy to address any questions you may have. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Aaron. Aaron?

Thank you, Luke. We have a lot of things to cover in this call. To signpost the presentation, I am going to use three categories: the unusual, the unexpected and the unique. First category, the unusual, three unusual items created noise in our Q4 numbers; first, accounting for our acquisitions, which is the most usual of these unusual items. The fourth quarter results include the impact of our acquisition of nine Independent Bank Colorado branches, which closed on October 6 and the acquisition of Valley Bancorp Inc., which included 7 Colorado branches which was effective on December 9. These acquisitions further strengthened our position in growth markets of the Northern front range region of Colorado. In addition, these acquisitions improved our core deposit base and funding capacity. TBK Bank now operates 53 branches, with 32 located in Colorado. We acquired $267 million in loans and $454 million of deposits in these two acquisitions and recognized a total of $9.3 million of core deposit intangibles and $16.3 million of goodwill. We incurred $1.7 million in transaction costs, which reduced our diluted earnings per share by $0.05. We have added back this expense in calculating our adjusted earnings per share. Second, once in a generation unusual items, the effect of the new tax legislation, we recognized a non-cash charge of $3 million in the income tax expense in Q4, which reduced earnings per share by $0.14. That fact aside, we expect our future earnings to benefit greatly from a new lower expected effective tax rate of approximately 23% in 2018. We expect that a material portion of this benefit will fall to our bottom line. The third unusual item is the impairment charge of $1.3 million on core deposit intangible assets, which reflects the entire remaining unamortized core deposit intangible asset associated…

Thank you, Aaron. For the fourth quarter, we earned net income to common stockholders of $6.1 million or $0.29 per diluted share. As Aaron mentioned, earnings for the quarter include the impact of several items we feel should be highlighted for investors to consider when thinking about our go forward earnings profile. The cumulative impact of the $1.7 million of transaction cost, $1.3 million impairment of the core deposit intangible and $3 million revaluation of our deferred tax asset reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.23. Regarding operating expenses during our last earnings call, we communicated a $30.5 million fourth quarter expected expense run-rate incorporating the two acquisitions. Total non-interest expense for the quarter adjusted for the transaction cost and an impairment of the core deposit intangible was $30.2 million. We expect operating expenses for the first quarter of 2018 to increase approximately $34 million. Most of this increase is attributable to the inclusion of Valley Bank and the acquired branches for the full quarter. Clearly, business was strong as we not only had very good loan growth as Aaron outlined, but we also experienced across the board increases in loan yields and net interest margin during the quarter. This was primarily driven by the yields on our commercial finance portfolio, which increased 41 basis points to 11.03%. Additionally, the fourth quarter included $1.7 million of loan discount accretion, an increase of $300,000 compared to the prior quarter. As of December 31, we have $17.1 million of accretable loan purchase discount and expect approximately $6 million to accrete to interest income during 2018. Our loan to deposit ratio was 107% as of December 31. Our use of federal home loan bank advances to fund most of our mortgage warehouse portfolio and place this ratio about 9%. Total deposits for the quarter were up $609 million, which includes $454 million in acquired deposits. We experienced notable increases in our money market products in Dallas and took in about $80 million of brokered deposits. We remain confident in our ability to obtain funding for profitable loan growth given our ability to pay competitive deposit rates as our loan portfolio yield remains above 7%. With that, I will turn it back over to Aaron.

And I will turn it back over to the moderator for any questions.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question today comes from Brett Rabatin from Piper Jaffray. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, guys. Good morning.

Good morning, Brett.

I wanted to first ask on the tax rate you guys mentioned that most of the benefit would drop to the bottom line, can you maybe elaborate a little further on what you mean by most of the benefit will drop to bottom line, what things might not and what investments are you making?

Sure. So irrespective of whether or not there had been tax reform, we have a variety of initiatives for 2018 that we are going to increase on an absolute basis are non-interest expense. That would have included investment in technology both the specific technologies I intimated related to Triumph Business Capital. We are also improving some of our retail delivery channels. We are continuing to expand space. All of that would have happened whether or not there was tax reform. As a result of tax reform specifically, I would say we have identified less than $500,000 of actual spending. So, our view is if we were going to do these things anyway as a result of tax reform we didn’t make any changes. So the majority, the vast majority of our expected benefit is just going to flow to the bottom line.

Okay, great color there. And then it looks like you have a pretty good path this year for the commercial finance segment to push back to 40 fairly quickly, can you just talk about that? And then maybe you talked about the full service branch but kind of how you see your funding evolving as the year moves on and rates continue to move a little higher in terms of cost of funds?

Sure. So taking the first question, yes, the goal of commercial finance to be 40% of outstanding loans is really more of a ceiling than a managing to that number. You can see it from these numbers on an organic basis, commercial finance grows faster than any other segment we have. It would also be reasonable to expect we will engage in M&A in 2018 which will add community bank loans most likely into our balance sheet. So, I would be surprised if at the end of this year we were pushing against that 40% cap given some of the things we are working on. But on an organic basis, we expect commercial to be our fastest growing component of our loan portfolio. On the second question, the Dallas – full service Dallas branch, one of the reasons we are doing that, we already have significant lending in Dallas. One of the reasons we are doing this is to provide a way for us to capture deposits from some of these commercial relationships and many of the high net worth individuals who are investors with TBK or sit on our Board of Directors. So, as a result of those efforts we think we will generate core transactional accounts from those individuals. I don’t know if by itself that branch swings the funding mix, but we do think it will become our largest branch almost immediately just because of the relationships we have. With respect to the rest of the funding mix, I would say again you would look at M&A. As we look at M&A that is the most strategic priority we consider is funding. And we will continue to grow deposits through some of our initiatives that exist in our existing retail framework.

Okay, great. I appreciate the color.

No problem.

And our next question comes from Jared Shaw from Wells Fargo Securities. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, good morning. This is actually Timur Braziler, filling in our Jared. First question is on the factoring business, really a tremendous three quarters here to end 2017 as far as dollars purchased and average invoice amount, as you look at the 2018, how much of that is market share gain, how much of that is true, I guess overall business growth and as you look at 2018, how should we be thinking about the growth prospects of that business?

Yes. Or it has been a remarkable run and so I suppose the first thing we should say is trees don’t grow to the sky, right. We know that you couldn’t continue on this pace forever, but just in couple of things to point out. We grew net clients 30% year-over-year from ‘16 to the end of ‘17 on the same period. And average the number of invoices purchased grew 33%. So those are pretty logical correlated numbers if you grow clients by 30% and your clients are fully deployed, your invoices are to grow at about the same rate. Of course, the gross revenues grew 52%. So the delta there, the reason revenues grew disproportionately to the number of clients would of course be tied to the average invoice size. Average invoice sizes have continued to strengthen all year, we believe they are going to continue to strengthen in 2018, as a result of the strong economy, but we said before that we think factoring or transportation factoring specifically is a pretty good leading indicator, it feels pretty good right now. The second reason, we think it’s growing is the supply demand imbalance created by even – even though it’s not fully implemented, but by the trucking industry trying to absorb the effect of the ELD mandate, the electronic logging mandate, which is going to reduce generally speaking the number of miles driven by a lot of these independent owner operators. So when you got a strong economy and you have got tight – a very tight labor market in the transportation space, specifically, we think that bodes very well for us. We think secondly, we just have a better mousetrap, what we spend on technology, our mobile app has now been downloaded by I think close to 700…

Okay, that’s excellent color. Next one, maybe just following-up on the public funds, can you remind us what the balance of the public funds are and then what the associate costs where those deposits are?

Yes. This is Bryce. So, I got it a quarter ago total public funds were in round numbers $115 million or $120 million or so. I would say 70% of that probably has at this point left the building or is on the way out. The cost of those was probably on an average around 40 basis points, 45 basis points in interest costs. But along with that we weren’t each year being able to completely pace down the cost of the services we were providing to them. So that’s part of the economic decision to get them along with pledging requirements that we had.

Okay. And those that exit from the public funds phase, is that at all indicative of your optimism for either organic growth in the near-term or near-term M&A to kind of, supplement that base?

Yes. To some degree, but if kind of grow through on the funding side, the math of those, I mean where most of that big dollars associated with the public fund clients we have, we were around to carry 105% or 110% of the total largest expected deposit amounts from those customers in securities, so really want to helping us from a liquidity standpoint overall.

Yes. If I could just jump in on that, Timur that look I think banks naturally want to do this and we are trying to help those clients. But look we have to look at everything through the lens of being a for-profit company and when you look at the pledging requirements to transactional costs of operating those funds, we think the ROE on that business or those funds is less than 5%, which is an unacceptable return for us given overall where we want to take our enterprise. So because we are fully loaned up and we tend to stay that way, we just don’t think that this is practical for us to stay in this line of business, so we have made other arrangements that allow these customers to deploy their deposits not on our balance sheet, but you still get the services they need.

Okay. And last one for me on TriumphPay, anymore color you can provide on when kind of soft launch is expected to happen and if you have done any work around the potential revenue stream that you could eventually generate from that business?

Yes. Well, we have done lots of work, none of which we are willing to share at this time. But I would say the soft launch is out there. The sales cycle for TriumphPay is much longer than the sales cycle for a traditional factoring client. We can turnaround our traditional factoring client in a few days. For TriumphPay, especially the first ones we do, you are talking about 6 to 9 month integrations with the transportation management software. And if you think about the TMS providers out there, there is three to four that dominate the market. Well, for us, we are in the process of completing the integrations with those three or four leading providers. And once you get the first integration done, you probably cut two-thirds the time of the next integration, because you have already written the interface. So, what I would say is it’s an accelerating thing that we have 74 active freight brokers on the system right now. We have processed thousands of invoices through it, but what is in the pipeline that excites us is some very large potential clients. And of course, we are marketers at heart, so once one of those folks is signed up and live you can imagine we will be advertising that throughout the industry, because we think there will be many people to follow, because it’s such a great thing for our freight broker and third-party logistics clients once they are done. So net-net, I think you will start to see the numbers show up in the second half of ‘18, but this is a really big year for TriumphPay.

Great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Brad Milsaps from Sandler O’Neill. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, good morning guys.

Good morning, Brad.

Hey, Aaron, great quarter. Just wanted to follow-up on some of the guidance on Page 8 of your slide deck where you kind of breakdown your ROA goal. I guess there was one change, your previous goal on the net overhead ratio was around 2%, now you are kind of aiming for less than 3%, is that just more of a realistic goal, any other big changes there aside from what you talked about in terms of things you are investing in and how does that sort of speak to your M&A strategy for the rest the year? Is it going to be more traditional type banks maybe it’s more specialty finance, which will keep that higher just kind of curious any color around that change?

Yes. So, here is what I would say, Brad. Well, first of all, if you know we have upped our goal from a 1.5% to a 1.8% number. The second thing – yes, so and that’s effect of the tax rate, etcetera. As far as on the net overhead ratio look I think that’s recognition of and that I mean number one we are building that technology platform here. There are some costs to that. Over and above what other traditional community banks would have, but we also happen to think it’s something that could be significantly valuable into the future. We also think our factoring and commercial finance businesses are going to grow at a more rapid clip, which may have a higher overhead ratio than traditional banking. I suspect that we will over the long-term beat that 3% goal as we continue to grow, you asked the question about what do acquisitions look like for us in 2018, I would tell you that almost 100% of our attention would be on the acquisition of traditional depositories. The stuff we are doing in commercial finance and technology wise is being driven internally and organically. So we just looked at those numbers and we also feel that we have been able to maintain a yield on earning assets or net interest income to total average assets well above where we had set the numbers and our long-term goals and so we think the shift we made is more appropriate to reflect the granular nature of our business. The fact that we generate very high yields on some niche markets that require a lot of attention and as a result of the technology we are working on.

That’s helpful. And just a follow-up on the M&A piece of it, you guys multiples up quite a bit over the last six months to nine months, just kind of curious how has that changed all things you would look at, I kind of know your history as a buyer and you kind of always look for things that are on sale, but has the strong multiple on your performance is that opened up maybe more acquisition avenues that you might not have pursued before, just kind of curious kind of what deals might look like if it’s the same, that’s great, but just kind of curious if there is any change in that regard?

No, definitely. Definitely the multiple helps. And so we can look at more of our Texas peers, right, we have long expressed the desire to be in Texas, we are doing it organically, but that multiple expansion now makes some of those deals actionable and accretive. We will continue to do what we have always done, which is look for opportunities that we think we are buying at the right price, in more rural markets, we continue to believe notwithstanding the Dallas footprint and I think we will have more growth in Texas. But that some of these markets where we are locking up funding in a dominant presence in those markets, where you don’t get the same amount of growth, we think you can buy those institutions well inside of where we trade. So it’s accretive. And we also think that funding base is stable and so that’s where we will continue to look.

Great. Thanks, guys.

Our next question comes from Steve Moss from B. Riley. Please go with your question.

Good morning.

Good morning.

I just – I am just wondering, if you could give us any updated thoughts with regard to specific line items within loan growth in terms of the commercial finance side of the business and also commercial real estate?

Sure. Good morning Steve, it’s Dan Karas. So in commercial real estate, just to point that out for us fourth quarter growth about $84 million. That continues to be comprised of some expansion in our community banks in the Midwest and in the West, but in large part, its higher credit quality strong sponsors have the Dallas market, most of that is even multifamily or office. So we feel pretty good about continuing that growth trend as well. In commercial finance, in the fourth quarter, we had growth not only in prime business capital of north $32 million, but we had growth in equipment finance with the best quarter that that group has ever had and we think in large part of both the geographic expansion of the origination team, but strong fundamentals economically, some of the same characteristics that we experienced in Triumph business capital. And then in general ABL that’s expansion of existing credit facilities for clients that continue to grow as well as its geographic reach is broad and so have some new clients in different spots of the country as well.

That’s helpful. Appreciate that. And with regard to the margin, just wondering what we should expect for purchase accounting accretion here in the first quarter?

I think, we have mentioned on the introductory remarks that we are looking at about $1 million of total accretion for all of ‘18 that’s probably not a straight line I think it’s little heavier in the first quarter $6 million – I am sorry $6 million over the year. But that will be a little heavier in the first quarter.

Okay. Thank you very much. Good quarter.

Our next question comes from Matt Olney from Stephens. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, thanks. Good morning, guys.

Good morning, Matt.

I am curious about the strategic exit of the healthcare ABL portfolio, why now and how much of this decision is based of concerns you have about healthcare ABL industry versus just more opportunities you see elsewhere for TBK?

Sure. So, let’s start off with just from a market perspective. We know that the healthcare segment is going to expand and that the ABL opportunities that are out there probably will continue to expand. From our past experience with healthcare, we found those credits to be more difficult for us to underwrite and understand than some of our others and that may just be on us as senior management not being as comfortable with those as transportation and other areas, where we have a longer experience. And so really the assessment came down to Matt that you can be good at a lot of things, but you probably need to be great at a few things and so we see the opportunity to exit this business at a small gain. We think it’s a good transaction for the team that’s in it. We see a lot of more opportunities in the segments we are in and in more deeply and that are core and that will run out of our Dallas office versus healthcare finance which was run out of Portland, Oregon. And so as just a result of all those factors, we viewed that we were simplifying and de-risking ourselves just a bit by exiting that business and focusing on fewer initiatives and so that’s why we chose to do it.

And Aaron is there a tentative date you have out there for closing that transaction?

Well, we expect to close it in Q1.

And then maybe for Bryce on the margins with a full quarter impact of the acquisition in the first quarter, I assume that consists of downward pressure on the margin near-term. Anymore color you can provide as far as the near-term margin outlook?

I think you are framing that right. I mean, it’s a little difficult to be real precise, but certainly, the acquired portfolio will be included in the average for the whole quarter, will push it down a few more basis points as accretion as we just mentioned is pretty large upfront, but that will burn off a bunch of it over the first year, but starting this first quarter should be down a little bit overall.

Okay, great. Thank you, guys.

Thank you.

Thanks, Matt.

Our next question comes from Nick Grant from KBW. Please go ahead with your question.

Hey, good morning guys.

Good morning, Nick.

Alright. So kind of going back to your Page 8 targets here on the slides, I mean, we have talked in the past about kind of your scalability and at what points you can hit these targets. In a post tax reform world, does it look more like after a couple of deals if you are at $4 billion in assets or is $5 billion still a number where you feel you achieved that scalability necessary to generate this ROA?

Yes, I would say, we still think its $5 billion or above is where we think we will achieve that. I mean, I would expect we will close this year above $4 billion, there is a good chance of that just on an organic basis even and I suspect we will do M&A, I can’t predict the timing of that. But I think you will see us take material steps closer and I think by $5 billion we believe this as a core run-rate is achievable. And so that’s what we are focused on.

Okay, great. Thanks for the color. And then kind of maybe stepping back and thinking more big picture strategy, so in the past year you exited the CLO business, now healthcare, took steps to simplify and optimize from a risk adjusted standpoint, you are also looking at the branch in Dallas, so I mean, how are you guys thinking about your strategy of shifting kind of more big picture and how does TBK look different in 3 years if at all?

Yes, great question. I think you will see continued expansion both personnel and geographies and branches of just traditional core retail banking focused on generating full-service customer relationships. I think in 3 years you won’t find many if any new commercial finance lines of business. I think you will find us just to have expanded the ones we are in. I don’t expect you will find us in any asset management business like the CLO business. So, I don’t know that the next 3-year plan has a lot new in it. I think it will have a lot of growth, a lot of excitement. I continue to remain extremely excited about some of the technology things we are doing both alongside the Blockchain integration and just a traditional TriumphPay model that we think can be expanded to maybe other industries, but built on the same platform. So when we sit back and look at ourselves and we say look we can at $5 billion plus with the traditional franchise, we think we can generate a lot of value for investors, we think we can generate even more value by our excellence in commercial finance and continuing to invest in that. And then we think we can create extreme returns and we don’t know when, but in some of these technology initiatives that exploit niches that other people don’t play. And so that’s really where we are focused and I don’t think you’ll see us deviate from that.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Gary Tenner from D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead with your question.

Thanks guys. Good morning, just a couple of questions for me, just one more on the healthcare business exit, were there any charge-offs associated with that business during the fourth quarter?

Yes. There was one small charge-off that we had previously had a specific provision for, but in our net overall charge-off number you would find it in there, so nothing material.

Okay. Thanks. And then with the tax cut and the reduction in your effective tax rate, you talked about capital, obviously you will be accreting capital at a higher pace, your capital ratios are roughly back to where they were before the July capital raise that went towards these recent acquisitions, so if you can talk about how you are thinking about capital given those combination of factors currently?

Well, if we just run on an organic basis, we clearly have plenty of capital on a rate of capital formation is now at a point where it’s keeping up with or exceeding our growth. I suspect we will do M&A in 2018. So that will create an opportunity to use our currency and our capital will change as a result of that. I mean one of the things I think about is once we are at $5 billion and perhaps even before there – before that time if we continue at the same return metrics that we have now, we are going to cross over $1 billion in market capitalization, which as you know creates some efficiencies and the capital markets bring some new investors to look at us and probably create some expansion opportunity for where we trade and so that’s an exciting proposition. And once we cross over that mark there is the open questions of do we at that point initiate a dividend, we haven’t made those decisions at this time. I know we won’t do it, unless and until we cross over that mark. And I know that we very likely won’t do a capital raise unless it’s – in 2018 unless it’s in conjunction with an M&A opportunity.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And ladies and gentlemen, at this time I am showing no questions. I would like to turn the conference call back over to Aaron Graft for any closing remarks.

Thank you all for joining us. We hope you have a great day.

And with that we will conclude today’s conference call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect your lines.