Good morning. My name is Andrea, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Teradyne Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to our host, Mr. Andrew Blanchard, VP of Investor Relations. You may begin your conference, sir.

Thank you, Andrea. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our discussion of Teradyne's most recent financial results. I'm joined this morning by our Chief Executive Officer, Mike Bradley; and our Chief Financial Officer, Greg Beecher. Following our opening remarks, we'll provide details of our performance for the third quarter of 2012, as well as our outlook for the fourth quarter. First, I'd like to address several administrative issues. The press release containing our third quarter results was sent out via business letters[ph] last evening. Copies are available at teradyne.com, where this call is also being simulcast. Note that during this call, we're providing slides on the website that may be helpful to you in following the discussion. To view them, simply access the Investor page of the site, and click on the Live Webcast icon. In addition, replays of this call will be available via the same page about 24 hours after the call ends. The replay will be available along with the slides through November 11. The matters that we discuss today will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause Teradyne's results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release, as well as our most recent SEC filings for a complete description. Additionally, those forward-looking statements are made as of today, and we take no obligation to update them as a result of developments occurring after this call. During today's call, we will make reference to non-GAAP financial measures. We have posted additional information concerning these non-GAAP financial measures, including reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure where available on our website. To view them, go to the Investor page and click on the GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation link. Also, you may want to note that between now and our next conference call, Teradyne will be participating in investor conferences hosted by Piper Jaffray, UBS and Credit Suisse. Now let's get on with the rest of the agenda. First, our CEO, Mike Bradley, will review the state of the Company and the industry in the third quarter and provide our outlook for the fourth quarter. Then, our CFO Greg Beecher will provide more details on our quarterly performance along with our guidance for the fourth quarter. We'll then answer your questions. You should note that we intend to end this call after 1 hour. Mike?

Good morning, everyone. Thanks for being with us on the call this morning. I'd like to cover 3 things with you today, so that I'll address a range of short and longer-term questions that I suspect are on your mind. The first is a brief recap of the last quarter, which has a solid set of numbers as you've seen; second is a comment on the sharp downturn in bookings that are linked to both seasonal and program buying trends; and third is to give you a first look over the horizon in 2013. Anytime our industry has a slowdown, there are questions around what's temporary and what's permanent in nature. So I want to give you our perspective on that. And looking out into 2013 is the best way to see through the step down in the short-term environment. So a quick recap of the third quarter starts with better top and bottom line performance in the high end of our guidance range. SemiTest revenues were down 15% from Q2, in line with our expectations after a very strong first half. LitePoint posted back-to-back revenue records in the last 2 quarters, and our Systems Test business was steady in commercial board test and defense, but dropped sharply in storage test after a record first half and as worldwide HDD test utilization fell off. Bookings in all sectors saw a significant seasonal or program buying declines. And SemiTest bookings fell 60% from second quarter levels, a sharper reset than we usually have, but actually not out of line with the cumulative numbers we saw in our peak-to-trough pattern last year. You'll recall that SemiTest bookings dropped in Q3 last year to about $200 million, following 2 quarters that averaged $310 million. This year, the drop to $154 million comes after…

Thanks, Mike, and good morning, everyone. I'd like to first provide some perspective on 2012 before I update you on some model changes connected with our growth initiatives. I'll then cover third quarter highlights and fourth quarter guidance and close with some summary comments. So first, looking at 2012. As Mike said, we're projecting our third consecutive year of very solid bottom line performance, with a 23% operating profit and free cash flow of about $300 million, 18% of sales. Looking over the 3-year period starting in 2010, our operating profit rate has averaged 24%, putting us alongside the top-tier semi equipment suppliers. This strong multiyear performance is a result of an efficient business model, coupled with very selective growth investments. From a strategic point of view, this solid multiyear financial health provides the necessary foundation to expand selectively into new markets and grow earnings. Since 2008, as you know, we've entered 4 new markets with an aggregate market size of around 2 billion. We're on track with these new market entries to account for over 40% of our 2012 profitability. And we have further expansion plans in these newer businesses that I will update you on in 2013. Now coming back to the current year recap. We expect a top line of over $1.6 billion, operating profits of $373 million, or 23% and non-GAAP EPS of $1.61. This 2012 operating profit rate will be 17 points higher than prior to our remodeling at comparable SOC test market sizes. We have both a very strong balance sheet with gross cash and marketable securities of $1 billion, up from $755 million at the beginning of the year, and an operating model back in whether -- whatever macro headwinds get thrown at us. Rest assured, we'll continue to focus on close-to-the-core growth…

Thanks, Greg. Andrea, we'd now like to take some questions. And as a reminder, please limit yourself to one question and a follow-up.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from line of Weston Twigg with Pacific Crest Securities.

On the R&D line, you talked a little bit about it. But can you give us a little bit more color in terms of how R&D might trend through the year with the new products that you're releasing?

Yes, this is Greg. On the R&D line, we're upping our investment. In OpEx, in total, we're upping our quarterly investment on average about $12 million. Much more of that is in R&D, the substantial majority. Half of that is in LitePoint. As you know, LitePoint has grown quite remarkably. And with that, there's other opportunities for further growth.

Okay, good. And then on the SemiTest business, I think you mentioned this earlier, but can you give us an idea on the growth of rate you're expecting for next year in core SemiTest? Did you say it was going to be down a little?

We expect the markets to be down a little bit next year. It's been averaging between $2.5 billion and $2.6 billion. And our planning basis here says that, that is more on the $2.2 billion to $2.4 billion. There's not a buildup segment by segment that gets you to that. It's really an estimate of how strong the comeback is in the first half. Interestingly, last year, by January, we were expecting the full-year to be $2.1 billion. But there was such a strong first quarter demand that resulted in both first and second quarter shipments, that by the time we got to April, that looked closer to $2.5 billion and then we think it ends up at $2.6 billion. So the idea of having a little caution is an integration of a lot of different things. We do expect the third quarter bookings level to be the trough bookings for us. Traditionally, we've had an uptick in the fourth quarter. We think we will, this quarter, and then it gets stronger in first and second. But it's a little bit hard to call exactly when that would kick in next year. So we're being a little cautious, and we're sizing that down 10% to 15%.

Got it. Okay, that's very helpful. But you do expect a bookings uptick in the Q1 timeframe, or you're just sort of trying to wait and gauge that level of that uptick?

Yes, I think that if you were bending in and you looked at the patterns, you'd say that you had come up some in Q4, and then it would typically kicks in, in the Q1 and Q2. Calling it exactly whether it's going to be strong in Q1 these coming years, as it was last year. So that's a tough call.

Your next question comes from the line of Krish Sankar with Banc of America Merrill Lynch.

I have 2 of them. One, either Greg or Mike. When you look at LitePoint, especially with some of the test markets and you expect to gain some traction, how much mil [ph] of that is baked into your $260 million to $360 million guidance for next year?

Krish, are you asking about cellular?

Yes, something like that. How much revenue do -- what you expect from that?

Your line broke up, that's why we didn't hear it. Go ahead.

Krish, this is Greg. There's a -- you can imagine there's a wide range of scenarios we gave you sort of a tighter range as to what can happen. But there is cellular revenue in that range, so we do expect to have more meaningful cellular revenue in 2013. On the connectivity market, it was very strong in 2012. Our best guess is that market would be flat or down a little bit in 2013. We think the cellular gains we'd get can give us, in total, a very good result.

Got it. Got it. That's helpful. And then a question on what you called SemiTest business. It looks like SOC market as a whole would be down 12% next year from $2.6 billion to $2.3 billion. How will the mobile market that's in that be -- was it going to be done more than that? Or that it's going to be in line with the decline?

Krish, mobile has been very, very strong. And we think it's above the trend line. So we think there's some absorption on the Mobile Test sector. So I don't have the exact number, but if you drew an arrow, that could be flat to down next year. If it were up, that would be exceptional. So we think it's a bit above the trend line. The other sectors which have both the down quarter market in Teradyne, we think, have some potential for recovery during the course of next year. Net-net though, we think the overall totals are down in that 10% to 15% range.

Your next question comes from the line of Jim Covello with Goldman Sachs.

First question is relative to the product portfolio. You guys have done such a terrific job over the last whole bunch of years of being very [Audio Gap] and what to kind of take away over time. Obviously, we are in a cyclical downturn for a number of the businesses, but the one segment that feels a little more secular is Memory Test, in particular, DRAM test. That may be getting carried away in the cyclical downturn to think that's secular or do you think there might be some secular elements on the DRAM side that you would think about? And what kind of commitments you want to be making to that long term?

Jim, it's Mike. Obviously, the Memory Test market that used to be $1 billion plus, really up at its peak to $1.5 billion, is -- we now got 3 years where it's been between $500 million and $700 million. So from a total market, it's obviously disappointing to anybody supplying into that space. Our position in it is a 15% to 20% share position. So we haven't established the kind of position there that we have in SOC. I think the way these design ins go in the amount of capital, the new products that's being bought, it looks to us like these days are relatively subdued market. And even though we're making some progress on account front and in coverage of the various segments in the market, it's going to be a smaller player for us. Our commitment to it is going to be consistent. We build the products for Memory off of platforms that are both SOC and Memory platforms. So it's a hybrid investment for us that gets amortized over both of those markets. So I think you'll see a still in that space if that's the direct question you're asking.

Okay, great. Next question would be on the OSAT side of the market, ASE and SPEL are talking about better fourth quarters because of some pickup in mobility. Now I know we're in kind of a pretty deep hole, or starting in a pretty deep hole given the severity of the downturn. How much do think those kinds of customers need to pick up before you would see any kind of meaningful improvement in their orders to you guys?

This cycle has been a stronger OSAT cycle. And even with the downturn, the OSATs for us have not gone down to the trough that they were at last year. And I think that's clearly because they're bigger players on the mobility supply for the Fabless companies. Our expectation is for them that the trough for that segment in bookings will also be in the third quarter, and we think that comes gradually back. So I don't know how much they have to move, but we expect them to move a little bit back up here just in concert with the IDMs. They should move back up in the fourth quarter.

Okay, helpful. And then final question, if I might. You guys have talked about in the past a buyback at maybe a $12 level. I think it's a stock price number that you've thrown out there. When you think about the buyback, and you guys have been so thoughtful about not buying stock either at the top of the cycle or at a very elevated price and you have saved a lot of capital that way that you've used for smart acquisitions. But when you think about a buyback, do you think about it now more in terms of the dollar price, or do you think about it more in terms of, we're pretty clearly at or very near the bottom of the cycle, even if it could last a little while and may or may not. But do you think more about it in terms of having an opportunity to buy stock back at the bottom of a cycle even if that's a $14 or so? Or do you still think kind of something like a $12 price would still represent a better idea for us to think about when you could be more aggressive there?

Jim, there isn't an exact formula that we use because there are so many factors that go into, it including what nonorganic opportunities are out there, as well as what the price is at any one point in time. So we do look at it carefully, and we really want to be very patient. Because in our past, we bought back like many others at the wrong time, and it was a bad deal for long-term shareholders. So we'd rather be on the side, in fact even perhaps getting criticized that you guys are going too slow. And if that day comes when we buy aggressively, then hopefully our patience will be rewarding for the long-term shareholders. So we continue to look at it. And there is no exact formula.

Your next question comes from line of Stephen Chin with Barclays.

It's Stephen Chin actually, from UBS. Nice contribution[ph] on LitePoint. I just want to follow up, Mike, on your early views on 2013. It sounds like you think SemiTest CapEx is down next year and LitePoint is up slightly in 2013. So that would imply Teradyne's sales next year would be flat to down slightly. So I was just wondering if you could share with us some of the variables that you think could surprise on the upside. Is it mostly Wireless SemiTests?

First of all, I want to declare we're mortal here in our estimating the market sizes. As you know, last year at this time, as I said, actually later in January, our view of the market at that point was that it would have a relatively normal recovery, fourth quarter, first quarter, second quarter recovery. And we were looking at a market -- and I'm talking about SOC test now that we would be about $550 million a quarter. It actually was over $700 million in the first quarter. So we're mortal in our ability or inability to read the tea leaves that our customers are telling us, even on that short cycle. So for our own planning purposes, we're saying we integrate a series of things, it looks as if this could be a slightly more gradual recovery based upon inventories, utilization rates and so on. So you do all that math, and you're right, you get a smaller market. If our market share stays around where it is, then we end up with a smaller SOC business. So that's the SOC story. On LitePoint. LitePoint's an even shorter lead time environment. So the visibility on LitePoint is even tougher to call. And that's evidenced by the fact that when we walked into the year, we were -- we had an ambition to get to $160 million. And now we're going to do nearly twice that. So again, we're pretty mortal on that front. What's different in LitePoint is that we're making some gradual progress on the design -- and I said, we've won this year in terms of fanning out additional design ends. We've got a much bigger footprint in our Asia regions, both in Taiwan and China. So there's a lot more business in play for us, and that's why we're more optimistic on the LitePoint front and also, why there's such a wide range on what could happen with LitePoint next year. So there are a lot of balls in the air. But directionally, we've got a more conservative view with SOC test. We've got a kind of similar view to what Memory could be. In LitePoint, we're optimistic about having another very good year. But that will come from a lot of different pieces of the business than we might have built in our 2012 view.

Okay. Maybe just another follow-up question on LitePoint next year. Do you have any early thoughts on the percentage of LitePoint's sales next year that you think will be from connectivity versus LTE since it seems like LTE could be a good opportunity for you to gain more share?

Yes, connectivity will still be, clearly, more than 1/2. But it's possible. So it can be considerably larger than where it's been in the past.

Your next question comes from line of CJ Muse with Barclays.

I guess first question, it looks like based on your guide, you're going to gain about 100 bips a share in SOC test in calendar '12. I'm just curious. As you look to calendar '13, I've got to think NPU spend is lower, graphic spend is lower, and that your share will move higher. So I guess a, was the calculation correct in terms of '12? And then b, as you look to next year, what kind of share gains do you think you could take in terms of your greater share in mobility that will dominate the spend?

TJ, I think you're pretty close to right. I think the market will end up growing about 5% and will grow about 7-ish percent in the market this year. So we're going to take a little bit more. Remember the segments shift. So we can have an arithmetic variation and share year-to-year, and actually be gaining ground in it or losing ground in it. So -- but I think your short-term calculation is about right. For us, and this is a bit of an old record, but we gained share based on very, very small increments around individual sockets. That very good momentum on the socket front, if you cover it up, the socket were to take place. Our net gains there have been positive the last few years. But the ambition here is, it's in single digits, to be able to try to piece all of those together and get a point of share or 2-points a share, real share growth each year. So it'll move the needle very gradually in the coming years.

Okay, that's helpful. And then gross margin. If you look year-over-year, a much lower revenue guide for Q4, but up 200 or 300 bips. Is that strictly mix related to LitePoint or are there other issues helping out there?

C.J. it's mix. When you look at our gross margin quarter-to-quarter, invariably, it's going to move around considerably, simply based upon mix, whether it high SOC, LitePoint or high hard disk drive or some other mix. So there's nothing other than mix going on.

Okay, great. And then, I guess in HDD, can you comment on what your expectations are there? I get that visibility is extremely low, but curious whether you think that, that business can grow in calendar '13?

The sizing that we have is consistent with what we said in the past. And that is we've got to get about $125 million a year to hit our model investment rate. We'll be below that this year. We were above it on a 2-year basis. We're about on that rate. But this is -- if there's any business that's had a first half, second half dramatic difference, it's HDD. Virtually, all of our revenue was in the first half of this past year. So you're right that it's a very hard one to call. We do want, I expect to bring some new products to market this coming year. The idea there is to widen that TAM so that we can ensure that we get to this $125 million market, even if there is some compression in the total market. So that's the game plan there. We haven't sized up what the potential is. If you looked at just the history, you'd say that the potential is in a good year for the market and a good market share position for us. We've done above that $125 million. But right now, for planning purposes, were using $125 million.

Okay. If I could just follow-up on that. The new products you talked about. When will they be launched? Are they focused strictly on the 2.5-inch? And I guess how should we think about the potential for revenues off of that?

The new products are in the second half of the year, not the first half, so they would show up then.

And not to be too queued, we haven't disclosed what the target is for the new product development. And we're holding off on that until we get some market penetration with it. But we are opening up the TAM next year, so that the idea of getting to the $125 million and then getting above that is what's in our sights over the next couple of years.

As we get closer towards the end of the year, I think we're going to feel better about our position with the product coverage that we'll have.

Your next question comes from the line of Satya Kumar with Credit Suisse. Satya Kumar - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: On the Wireless SOC test side, perhaps there's a perception in the market that your market share is stronger than Korean-related ideas[ph] versus perhaps more even market share at the time in these OSATs. If you do end up seeing a significant shift in manufacturing from Korea over to Taiwan for its shift in general, is that a factor that we should think about in terms of SOC market share for Teradyne for 2013?

Yes. I don't think that, that would affect our market share if there is such a shift. Satya Kumar - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: And why is that? Is it because your market share is similar or...

It's because we've got a very solid IDM and OSAT installed base of the platform, the UltraFLEX platform that's used for those applications.

You want to stick with the tester that works well. And it's the leading tester, so you're not going to jump off the tester if you're moving. Satya Kumar - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Okay. The question on sort of the longer-term outlook for testing, I think you briefly alluded to this, that perhaps testing intensity may go up, but it's hard to say. 2012 has been largely a year of testing, leaning at 28-nanometer chips -- and if you try to just look at the SOC part reaching its maturity pretty nicely. We're starting to see 20 nanometers start to covering that. And there are some in the industry who claim that the trending mode in mechanisms that you start to see with 20-nanometer are a lot higher than we see at 28, how do you see, do you have any early sense of testing possibly, for 20-nanometer chips compared to 28-nanometer chips?

Satya, I think this is going to be the constant push-pull of failure modes, more testing, more integration on chips, more complexity, longer test times. That's the push, and then the pull is parallelism and pipelining of tests. And so I don't think there's a step function change in it. I think it's going to be that continuous tug-of-war between those 2 forces. If you were saying, well, who's going to win on that? Well, that's the increasing test. I think that the market has found the need to invest in SOC around $2.5 billion a year. And they're finding a way to do that and to get the coverage for these more advanced nodes and be able to keep the capital spend there. That's the constraint that we see, is that the market isn't going to be growing dramatically in total. So we've got to keep being able to do more testing -- more sophisticated testing, but doing it faster, and that's been the formula for progress in this on the whole front. Satya Kumar - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Okay. Lastly, on the balance sheet, I know there was a question with the buybacks. But I understand your point about wanting longer-term shareholders. I mean, if I look at the stock over the last few years, it's been a very typical sort of stock that moves with just the seasonal pattern, and there's no is underlying business sub because, there isn't any other mechanism, either buyback or the dividend that returns share cash to shareholders? Given that your business is likely to remain highly seasonal for the foreseeable future, how are you thinking about the situation around dividends in terms of cash if you generate some cash if you go along in order to award its long-term shareholders?

It's something we continually look at. We've balanced that again, LitePoint, Eagle and Nextest. Those were cash acquisitions. It's a lot easier to conduct a transaction with cash. So that the Company doesn't have to due diligence on your stock. You can move faster. So the path use of cash, we think has worked out quite well in the M&A front. If you look at our stock path, buybacks over a long period of time, that really hasn't worked out as well. So that's one kind of bucket of information. If you say going forward, we certainly recognize that as cash continues to grow, we need to continue to look at what's the best use of our hard-earned capital. And we've said that in many calls and with many of our investors. So consciously look at that, we know that dividend tax rate may go up, so that's not something we'd look to right away. But even if that tax rate didn't go up, we'd still look at what's the best use of our cash. And it could be continue to hold it for nonorganic acquisitions. And at some point, if cash grows too large, then we'd feel more pressured to do something returning capital. But we're planning on taking a steady course.

Your next question comes from line of Vishal Shah with Deutsche Bank.

I wanted to just a follow-up on the bookings guidance for next quarter. You said fourth quarter will be up. Are you assuming bookings recovery in just the high-end SOC segment or you're also looking at recovery in the microcontroller, auto or linear segments as well?

Vishal, I think it'll be across the board. Actually, we think it might be steady in the mobility sectors and with the recovery in the other sectors. But it's a very dynamic forecast. So that could change week-to-week. But if you ask me right today, you'd see that the sectors that have been quieter are the ones that, we think, in a very short-term might see a comeback during this quarter. But again, the step up in the fourth quarter that you've seen in the last 2 years, '10 and '11. I take '09 out because of the unusual nature of the overall markets then. You'd say that, that modest step up has been followed by a stronger step up in the following 2 quarters. But the direct answer to your question is, it would tend to be in all the other sectors with probably a steady level of business in the mobility sectors for us. And that's what helped us the best obviously, through the year.

That's helpful. And just on LitePoint, you mentioned 50%-plus revenues from the Connectivity segment. What do you think that percentage was this year?

In terms of the market share?

Mix of cellular versus connectivity, would it be 80:20 Connectivity-Cellular or even more than that?

Okay. In 2012, Connectivity was well over 90%.

Okay, great. And then as you think about that segment, I mean, I know you guys have gained some market share this year. But what is the competitive environment like? Are you seeing increased pressure in pricing and margins in that segment next year, and how should we think about margins for that segment next year?

Yes, we are seeing increased competition. We do still see that we have the best products that have been optimized and can do testing that the other parties can't quite do. But they had some spots that have some appealing products that they are pushing. So it is a little bit more competitive than the past. I don't think there's any significant impact that you'll see from that. We think we can continue to maintain our north of 50% market share looking into the future. On margins, what I'd like to say on margins is we're confident that the LitePoint margins will stay above the company model for margins. But where they are at any particular point in time, we don't want to get into that because there's so many different factors that we'd have to explain to you, so you'd understand why that could be a little bit higher, lower or sideways.

Your next question comes from the line of Mehdi Hosseini with Susquehanna International.

Greg, going back to your comment about the 15% EBIT margin at $375 million revenue, how should we think about operating drop through as your revenues are scaled above and beyond $375 million? Is there a metric or a range that you could offer us?

Yes, Mehdi. We used 52% in our modeling. There's a wide range. But if you average it out, 52% is a pretty good number. Again, sometimes it's going to be well above it, other times below it. You could look to this past year, and the drop through quarter-to-quarter has moved around considerably depending upon the mix. We've had drop through Q4 to Q1 only 36% at the PBIT line, Mehdi. I think Q1 to Q2 was 70%, then Q2 to Q3 is 53%. So my point is, it's all over the place. But if you average everything out and normalize everything, our estimate would be 52%.

Got it. And then going back to, as a follow-up to a prior question. You obviously put a lot of emphasis on longer-term return to shareholders. But you're also facing seasonality in your business. Is there any new thought that you discuss to help ease the volatility in the business as it relates to the stock? Because as much as you are focusing on long-term return to shareholders, you can't avoid the seasonality in the stock. And I'm just curious if these conversations come up at the Board meeting or there are new ideas that you are contemplating.

Yes, I mean, those discussions do come up, Mehdi. And we have looked at companies that are serving semi-equipment and in fact pay a dividend. And in truth, we see they have the same generally, peaks and troughs and stock price. And normally, you might think a dividend could give you less volatility. I don't know if the data [indiscernible] is convincing on that. But we have looked at that, and we continue to look at thoughts like to figure out what's the best use of our hard-earned capital.

Got it. And then just one question on the LitePoint. On the business or the opportunities in LTE, to what extent is that coming from gaining market share against the stronger incumbent versus consolidating market share among the smaller players?

It would be the former.

Your next question comes from the line of Jagadish Iyer with Piper Jaffray.

Two questions. First, how should we be thinking about LitePoint in terms of overall industry growth? Can you talk about how your market share growth is versus industry growth for next year, please? And I have a follow-up.

Yes. In Mike's comments and my comments, we did give a range for LitePoint for next year. I think it was $260 million to $360 million revenue. That's a wide range. But and they were $290 million this year. And I think we also commented that Connectivity market, LitePoint's major market, could be flat to down a bit next year. And Cellular is where we see the opportunity to get some meaningful business in 2013, which would put you to the upper side of that range. When you step back though, from what's going to happen next year, there are very favorable trends in both Connectivity and Cellular, where you have products that have short lives. They get obsolete quickly. New technology has longer test times. You have high unit growth. So new testers would be bought for that. So there's a number of very good factors going on for a period of time that, we think, putting aside where next year falls, we feel good about the year after and the year after. So we think it's going to be a very good market for some number of years, and you can just look around with some of the plans. Wireless is going virtually everywhere, whether it's Internet things, Machine-to-Machine. Those trends haven't really taken off, but it's really these smart devices is driving the business today. But there are some other things that will be coming.

My second one. Mike, if you look at 2010, your SemiTest revenues versus what would likely to end up this year, and there is a drop from about $1.4 billion to about $1.1 billion. Is that purely from how the market has kind of shrunk? And how should we be thinking about longer-term in terms of the next 2 to 3 years, in terms of how the associate market can potentially grow? Is that going to be just capped between 2.2 to 2.7? Is that the range that we should be thinking about?

First question is, the answer is yes. It's a -- there were segments that were growing faster in 2010. And the buy rates inside those segments are stronger, so our revenue was higher. Number 2, for planning purposes, we've actually thought about the market as being more compressed to force us to make tighter decisions around our investment portfolio. Three years ago, we were looking at a market that was -- we would size it between $2.0 billion and $2.2 billion. It's actually delivered $2.5 billion to $2.6 billion the last few years. So we think that's more sustainable, even though we've talked about this next year as being somewhat down from that. So in truth, the market has proven to be a stronger market than we had originally anticipated. So that's the bullish side. Looking forward, we still don't think this is a even a high single-digit natural growth in the market. What we said in the past and continue to believe, is that the segments will shift so that the buying that comes in these mobility products will be stronger and stronger. And that the PC-related SOC devices and the buy rates there in the ATE capital there will just redistribute into the other segments. So there is growth inside some of the segments. Those are the ones that we're trying to get stronger and stronger position, and have made real progress over the last 3 or 4 years. But we're not counting on a total growth in that market. We're counting more on segment growth that we can capitalize on.

And just to add to Mike's point. What that really has done for us over a number of years, is it's giving us a much better financial model with operating profit rates over 3 years, north of 20%. And when you have that level of financial strength, you can expand the business selectively. And that's in part how LitePoint fit in. And we can have these discussions as to what you'd do with the cash, excess cash. If we had not made these more conservative assumptions and put potential discipline in the Company, there's a whole set of other discussions you'd be having. Why can't you get to model comparability? So it's a good set of issues we have now. What do we do with the growing cash? What's the best use of it? So that's -- we spent much more time on that. Not the model because the model is in good shape.

Operator, we have time for just one more question, please.

And your final question comes from the line of Terence Whalen with Citi.

Just one quick question. You alluded earlier to margin differential between Cellular and Connectivity test in the LitePoint business. Can you help us understand what that differential is, just so we understand how to model that as Cellular picks up here as a portion of overall revenue for LitePoint?

I'm not going to get too specific because it's -- nothing's 100% settled right now. But it will be measurably lower, and this is often what's necessary to break into a market where there is entrenched competitors. We think over time we can do better, but the first break in, as has been in many of our other businesses, you tend to start lower then you work your way back through new instruments, new clever engineering. But I don't want to quantify because nothing's settled at this point.

Okay, folks. Thank you, all for joining us today. We look forward to talking to you in the weeks ahead. This concludes our call.

Thank you.

Thank you for your participation in today's conference call. You may now disconnect.