J. Keith Lousteau
Analyst · Pierre Conner with Capital One
Good morning everyone. I would like to start off with a little bit of housekeeping comments here. You will notice that in the last 24 hours, we have had press releases covering our earnings release this morning. We've had a press release concerning the declaration of the dividend at the newly improved rate early today. We did have another press release on the addition of our fourth consecutive annual stock buyback program, and you will see a couple of press releases out there yesterday and today on personnel promotions and new personnel welcomed to Tidewater. We are able today to get back to our preferred historical practice of filing our Form 10-Q. Our Form 10-Q should be available through the EDGAR filing services no later than sometimes mid-day today. It's a preferable program and one that we're glad to be able to get back to you of having earnings release and full 10-Q disclosure at the same time. We think this morning's earnings release is one of as advertised in the conference call after the end of the March quarter. We told the investing community that we expected it to be one with a unusually high cost. Unfortunately, the unusually high came in even higher than we anticipated, but revenue numbers also seem to beat the anticipation at about the exact same level. Certainly there is a lot being said today about the unusually high gain on sales that we reported for the quarter. We reported $10.4 million, we acknowledged that that's an unusually high number. I remind those analytical minds looking at it that those are all taxed in the United States, they're taxed at a full 35% tax rate. So I would say that the proper calculation into my way of thinking of calculating the gain on loss as it relates to EPS included in $1.64 that we reported being a total gain on sale of about $0.13. And as Dean alluded to and some of the early reports on Tidewater have alluded to a normal quarter being more in line, a gain of $2.5 million; that will equate to about $0.03 at that level. So we're talking about an extraordinary rate of about $0.10 off of $1.64, therefore getting down to $1.53-$1.54, that Dean mentioned earlier. We are experiencing already in the September quarter again unusually high gains on sales, not as high yet as last quarter. But we would anticipate for those modeling out the company that gains sale for the September quarter will be at least in the $5 million to $6 million range. Another item of note at this stage, the effective tax rate for the year, although we had projected it to come in at 18%, we have now adjusted that to believe that the rate will be this year something closer to 17%. And the financial statements released today do have that anticipated annual rate. That annual rate is once again indicative of the shift of Tidewater from the ratio of our U.S. operations to our international operations. When we talk about costs here in a second, I will mention at that point in time the fact that we have an additional three vessels that operated in the U.S. Gulf even during the first quarter that are, as we speak today, moving to an international site, three... two of our bigger deepwater vessels; that type movement is what is affecting the projected tax rate for the year and little more about those vessels whenever, as I said, whenever we get into the cost numbers. Once again, we think the normalized quarter was at about $1.54. Looking at some specifics, revenues for the quarter increased to $328 million. That's a nice 4.5% gain from last quarter. When we get into individual class day rates, it will be quite obvious as to where that's coming from. Our story is very similar to what you have been hearing from some of the other U.S. operators; revenues in the Gulf of Mexico and other domestic sources really increased during the quarter at 8.8%, dayrates in the Gulf of Mexico and domestic operations are up nicely across the board for all operators across the industry. Our international revenues grew during the quarter at a 4% rate, of note is that at the end of the June quarter, or the revenues for the June quarter barely, slightly over 12% was generated from domestic activities and 88% was generated from international activities that continued movement of Tidewater into our international operations. Looking at actual cost numbers a little bit as we started off this call, we had given guidance to expect operating cost to be up significantly from the previous quarter, but unfortunately we had given guidance in the $166 million to $167 million range. We actually came in at $176.7 or closer to a $177 million range. Few unusual items that could not have been anticipated ahead of time we're involved in the increase above the anticipated level in particular in one of the foreign countries where we operate, the government dictated that all union laborers be given a retroactive, salary increase, the bad news was that that cost us $2.5 million, the so called good news was that we were able to pass it on to our customer, so in effect the $2.5 million which went straight into crude cost also went into international revenues having more effect on the bottom-line, but hurting margins. Our repair and maintenance once again in particular dry docks was up at a greater level than we had anticipated. I didn't want to spend this morning an awful lot of time going into the individual components of costs, because cost increases are an industry wide problem for all the service companies, almost everyone on their phone calls are acknowledging then and instead of talking about the individual components that caused us to get to this level, I wanted to reiterate my thoughts on projected cost for the September and the December quarter. You will remember that as we said here in March our story was... or after the March quarters excuse me, was to expect increased cost but then to expect some abatement of those cost as we move into the year. As we projected the September quarter three months ago, we told you it takes back a number of $164 and $165 million, that number in absolute terms is... I am going to have to update a little bit today give you number I expected it to be $166 million to $170 million, which you will notice that its still substantially down from last quarter's reported 177. How do I maintain credibility after having these numbers, how I can project to you that numbers are going to be down, well the basis to explain to you my basis for projecting you down in total cost for the quarter comes from three specific items; we know we had the $2.5 million dollar very unusual cost number last quarter, we told you about $3 million one off cost to get two boats out of the Caspian, and one of the items that we have to put [ph] good hand alone drydocking schedule for this quarter appear to be where they are going to be down another $6.5 to $7 million from last quarter. So I feel quite confident that we can take last year's quarter reduce those three items, which takes you back to a similar rate of 164. We've added some vessels, so we're not we're not giving the guidance of 166 up to 170 and hopefully we feel hopefully I guess, as we sit here at the end of next quarter, we will have returned to some level of credibility in being able to predict those numbers. On the positive side of that, when we talked about the September quarter, a quarter ago, we gave guidance that we expected margins to start returning to more historical margins. We had told you to expect September margins, even with increased costs to return to 51% to 52%. I reiterate today that we still really do believe that margins are going to return to the 50% to 51% level. Looking out, one additional quarter, into December, we certainly have got to raise the absolute guidance that we gave; we had given an absolute guidance for December where we thought the numbers might will back up to $157 million. We are now going to give guidance in the $163 to $165 range, but once again then we think margins by the December quarter are going to get back to their historical ranges. We had previously given you margin guidance for December in the 53% to 55% range those are cash operating margins. We now tell you we still believe quite strongly that the margins in December are going to be in the 53% to 54% range. The margins for the quarter just ended fell to a 46.1% rate. We had given guidance in the 47% range... 47.5%. So we missed it a little bit, but a lot of what we are seeing are mob costs, some additional cost of getting our new boats out into the market, and those generally are offset by some sort of additional revenue. One additional side note that kind of flows from the additions and the reduction in cost was last quarter we ended up having really a more substantial loss of revenue from days in drydock than we had anticipated. As it comes out, we believe that drydock days actually cost us something in the range of about $29 million. And we had about 2,400 days off charter. But the September quarter, we now estimate that those days off charter are going to be more down in the 1,600 days in lost revenue on a comparable basis, should be in the $18 million to $19 million range. And the significance of that is last quarter we had bigger, more expensive boats in drydockings, we had two of our biggest VS486s that were earning $55,000 a day that we had lost revenue on, just to give you an example. So, last quarter, the drydock days were costing us near $12,000 a day we anticipate that to be closer to $9,000 a day. So obviously, kind of guiding up here that we expect financial fortunes to have turned at the end of last transitional quarter, we're anticipating costs being down and we're certainly anticipating less lost revenue due to the drydocking cycle that we've been going through. Looking at individual dayrates, once again, it's a very positive story. It's a positive story that you've heard for a number of quarters and a number of years now. Our deepwater segment of our vessels in the Gulf of Mexico saw an average dayrate of $24,500. That was up about $600 from the March quarter. We will have two of these vessels we'll be mobilizing from the Gulf of Mexico and we'll be going to an international location for what's about a 20% increase in dayrating for three year fixed contracts. I would say that that mobilization should have no effect on our average dayrate as those two vessels were averaging in the 24.5 to 25 range. That class of vessel, to give you an idea of current dayrates in the Gulf for us, that class of vessels during the month of June, not the quarter, but for the last month in the quarter averaged $25,000 per day. We currently have 100% utilization going on with that class of vessel. Once again, as you've heard from most operators, the supply... tooling supply section of our domestic operation saw a substantial dayrate increase. Dayrates increased up to $11,633 for the quarter. This was a noticeable $1770 per day increase from the March quarter. So, obviously across the board, increased dayrates in the Gulf of Mexico, we're seeing a little bit better utilization in that fleet to where we reported right at 50% and 49.8% for the June quarter and today, we are operating at a little over 51%. Internationally, statistically, the dayrate for the deepwater vessels, the 31 that we had, statistically, the dayrate went down a few dollars, but let's be careful. We fell from an average dayrate the previous quarter of $25,474, down to an average of $24,728, about a $700 decrease. But as mentioned in the loss revenue section of my comments earlier, we had two of our absolute highest revenue generating boats in drydock, one for almost a whole quarter and one substantially for the quarter. You take two vessels out of your average dayrate both earning $55,000 a day and take a third one that was averaging $35,000 a day, and your average dayrate will come up with an average that can be misleading if you don't watch it. Today, as we sit here, our average dayrate now that the bigger boats are back at work, was right on the edge of $26,000 a day. So that's the kind of rates we're expecting today that we're generating today. Utilization for the quarter was absolutely flat with the previous quarter at 83.6 and utilization, as we sit here currently, is in the 81% to 82% range. So basically unchanged. The only thing that's going to happen in this class, as I said, we're going to be adding two boats from the Gulf of Mexico are going to move into this class and they're going to bring with them average dayrates slightly above $30,000 a day. The old backbone of Tidewater's historical business, our international supply and tooling supply vessels have once again I think exceeded expectations by showing an average dayrate increase of $543 for the quarter up to an average of $11,660. The month of June, once again the average dayrate for those 225 vessels was about $11,800, showing you that the ending dayrates were better than the average dayrate for the quarter. And certainly as we sit here today, the $11,800 would be an applicable rate or perhaps a few dollars less than what we might be enjoying today. Basically no utilization changes. In that class we reported 77.2% utilization for the June quarter and today, as we sit here, we're operating right at 78%. So nice growth in dayrates across all segments. Projected fewer days of drydocking time, projected drydocking of a mix of smaller vessels during the next quarter. We think the future beholds some pretty good things for revenue growth within Tidewater. Once again the balance sheet remains extremely strong. We, continue to carry only about $310,000 of debt or only about $160 million of net debt... a gross debt ratio to total capitalization of under 14%. I want to kind of wrap up my financial comments, and certainly will be available for additional questions and get into talking a little bit about our new construction program. Personal feeling is that Tidewater and Tidewater is not being given credit to the level that I think the significance of our... of the backlog of new-builds that we have at the moment. One reading the Q and looking at the press release we put out this morning, you'll come across the fact that we now have 59 vessels under construction around the world. Those 59 vessels have a total cost of right at $1.2 billion. $310 million of that has already been funded. We have ongoing capital cash requirements of only $881 million yet to be funded. The funding of that is spread out clearly evenly. The balance of fiscal '09 we think we have cash requirements of about $314 million. For fiscal '10 period, cash requirements on these vessels are about $278 million and then the balance of that fleet itself of about $289 million will be spent over the year 2011 and 2012. We have, as I said, 59 vessels under construction. Today, that's made up of 25 anchor handlers, 28 platform supply vessels, 4 crew boats and 2 tugs. For the balance of this fiscal year '09, we will deliver and take into the fleet 17 of that 59 vessels. Over the next three quarters, we will be taking in 10 anchor handlers, 5 PSVs and two crew boats. As I said, I don't think... I don't feel that Tidewater is being given ample credit for this. On an equal footing basis, these 59 vessels based on today's economics, not pie in the sky dayrates, a reasonable dayrate, reasonable utilization rates, those vessels today, were they are in the market, they would be expected to generate right at $1.5 billion of revenue not over their life, not over their contracted life, but on an annual basis. That's a number that would add about 40% to the revenue stream of Tidewater, and on an earnings basis, on the same pro forma revenue and same pro forma expense basis, that fleet stands to be able to add up to $4.75 to the operating profits of $4.75 on an EPS basis, calculated on an operating profits basis. So a significant asset of Tidewater, one that is joining the fleet now, joining the fleet at a time of increasing dayrates and strong utilization once again certainly a strong future for Tidewater in revenue and earnings generation. During the quarter, and last comment, we did buy back 916,000 shares of stock. We spent $53 million, which was the balance of our $250 million that we were authorized. We paid an average price of $58.56. Over the last three fiscal years, we have spent $516 million buying back $9.5 million. When you take the $516 million and you add to it the slightly over $100 million of dividends we paid during that period over the last 12 quarters, we have returned to our stockholders something in excess of $620 million. So not only have we seen significant growth of the fleet, we have done it at the time by paying attention to return... total returns to our stockholders. I will be available to answer any specific questions, but we'll turn the mike back over to Dean for the rest of his comments.