Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. Welcome everyone to BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. Q1 2025 Earnings Call. Today's conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the company's formal remarks [Operator Instructions]. And now I would like to turn the call over to Michaela Murray, a member of the BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. Investor Relations team. Michaela, please proceed.

Thank you. Before we begin, I'll note that this conference call may contain forward looking statements based on the estimates and assumptions of management at the time of such statements and are not guarantees of future performance. Forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and actual results could differ materially from those projected. Any forward looking statements made on this call are made as of today and are subject to change without notice. Additionally, certain information discussed and presented may have been derived from third party sources and has not been independently verified. Accordingly, we make no representation or warranty with respect to such information. Earlier today, we issued our earnings release for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025. We also posted a supplemental earnings presentation to our Web site at www.tcpcapital.com. To view the slide presentation, which we will refer to on today's call, please click on the Investor Relations link and select Events and Presentations. These documents should be reviewed in conjunction with the company's Form 10-Q, which was filed with the SEC earlier today. Now, I will turn the call over to our Chairman, Co-CIO and CEO, Phil Tseng.

Thank you, Michaela. And thank you all for joining our call. Today, I'll begin with a brief overview of our results for the quarter and then share an update on our portfolio. After that, I'll turn the call over to our President, Jason Mehring, to review details of our investment activity. Erik Cuellar, our CFO, will then review our financial results in more detail. I'll follow Erik's remarks with commentary on the current market environment before we open the call up for questions. We're also joined today by Dan Worrell, our Co-CIO; and Patrick Wolfe, our COO. I am pleased to report that during the first quarter, we made meaningful progress in strengthening the portfolio. Although the impact of global macroeconomic factors, including tariffs, remains uncertain, we are beginning to see signs of portfolio stabilization. We delivered solid results for the quarter. Adjusted net investment income was $0.36 per share, flat with the prior quarter. Annualized net investment income, ROE, was 15.4% and the net asset value per share was $9.18 compared to $9.23 in the fourth quarter. During the first quarter, no new names were added to the nonaccrual list and the number of portfolio companies on nonaccrual status at quarter end declined meaningfully to eight from 12 in the prior quarter. Nonaccruals now comprised 4.4% of our portfolio at fair value, down from 5.6% or 120 basis points sequentially. During the quarter, we exited our nonaccrual positions in Securus, McAfee, CIBT and Aventiv, all of which were broadly syndicated second lien loans that we believed offered limited near term upside. As we pointed out last quarter, we are primarily focused on investing in first lien loans and will only consider second lien loans in situations where we are a lender of influence. Subsequent to quarter end, we removed…

Thanks, Phil. I'll start with an overview of our portfolio, which had a fair market value of approximately $1.8 billion at the end of the quarter invested across 146 companies in over 20 industry sectors. Our average investment size was granular at $12.1 million or 0.7% of the portfolio. 90% of the portfolio was invested in senior secured debt and 94% of that amount was floating rate. Investment income was distributed broadly across our diverse portfolio with more than 74% of our portfolio companies each contributing less than 1% of the total. At quarter end, the weighted average annual effective yield of our portfolio was 12. 2% compared to 12.4% last quarter. New investments had a weighted average yield of 11.4%, although as we exited, had a weighted average yield of 11.2%. These yields reflect the exit of four investments on non-accrual that did not contribute to current yield. Excluding these four exits, the annual effective yield on deals exited in the period was 11.9%. Moving on to investment activity. We deployed $66 million of capital during the quarter with the two new and non-existing portfolio companies. Repeat borrowers remain an important source of originations and existing portfolio companies accounted for 89% of our first quarter investments. 100% of new investments were in first lien loans, which comprised 82.5% of our total portfolio at quarter end. Our largest new investment this quarter, a $6.7 million first lien term loan and revolver in Apparis retail demonstrates our focus on investing in first lien loans to high quality middle market companies. Apparis is a market leader in software that helps retailers combat returns fraud and employee theft. This sector is positioned for growth due to several factors, including increased cybercrime and the shift towards digital payments. With long term contracts with over 60 of the top 100 US retailers, Apparis has an attractive high margin business model with recurring revenue and strong free cash flow generation. In an environment of slowing consumer spending, this type of software is essential to helping retailers protect profit margins and reduce financial losses. As we evaluate new investment opportunities, we remain focused on the core pillars of our strategy Phil outlined last quarter. These include targeting core middle market companies, maintaining a well diversified portfolio, prioritizing first lien loans and leveraging the extensive resources of the BlackRock platform. We are taking a disciplined approach to new investments and continue to pass on opportunities that aren't aligned with our strategy. Now, I'll turn the call over to Erik, who will discuss our financial results along with our capital and liquidity position.

Thank you, Jason. Let me begin with our financial results for the quarter. As detailed in our earnings press release, adjusted net investment income excludes the amortization of the purchase accounting discount resulting from our merger with BCIC and is calculated in accordance with GAAP. A full reconciliation of adjusted net investment income to GAAP net investment income as well as other non-GAAP financial metrics is included in our earnings press release and 10-Q. As Phil noted, adjusted net investment income was $0.36 per share and gross investment income was $0.66 per share in the first quarter. This amount included recurring cash interest of $0.47, non-recurring income of $0.03, recurring discount and fee amortization of $0.05, PIK income of $0.08 and dividend income of 0.04 per share. PIK interest income for the quarter was 11.6% of total investment income. Operating expenses for the first quarter were $0.28 per share, including $0.20 per share of interest and other debt expenses. As of March 31, 2025, our cumulative total return did not exceed the total return hurdle, and as a result, no incentive compensation was accrued for the first quarter. Additionally, as Phil mentioned, our advisor has agreed to waive one third of our base management fee for three quarters beginning on January 01, 2025 and ending on September 30, 2025. Net realized losses for the quarter were approximately $41 million or $0.48 per share, driven by the disposition of our investments in Securus, McAfee, CIBT and Avanti. These losses were substantially already reflected in our net asset value at December 31, 2024. Net unrealized gains in the first quarter totaled $30 million or $0.35 per share, primarily reflecting the reversal of previous unrealized losses on our investments in Securus, McAfee, CIBT and Avanti, as well as unrealized markups on Job and…

Thanks, Erik. I'll now provide some market commentary. As you know, in the current volatile market environment, many companies are now operating under entirely different conditions compared to a year ago. Access to capital has tightened, financing costs are higher and global trade disruptions are impacting supply chains. After carefully reviewing our portfolio, we believe the immediate and direct impact from potential tariffs will be relatively limited and that it will take some time to fully quantify the downstream effects. We estimate that only a mid single digit percentage of our portfolio at fair market value will be directly impacted by tariffs. This includes the Amazon aggregators and others in the consumer, retail, semiconductor and energy sectors. While tariff impacts will vary by industry, we believe our focus on US based operators provides some insulation from supply chain disruption. Our portfolio has historically been weighted towards services based companies, which currently comprise the vast majority of the portfolio. These businesses are typically asset light and less reliant on global supply chain disruptions, reducing their exposure to trade related pressures. Turning to the demand side. Although the expected lift in M&A activity has not materialized, we continue to see strong interest from borrowers and referral sources for direct loans in the core middle market. With over 200,000 companies generating more than $10 trillion in annual revenue, the middle market is the fastest growing sector of the economy. We are seeing plenty of new opportunities from companies that are well positioned to grow even in this current environment. These companies need growth capital to take their business to the next phase by investing in organic growth initiatives, refinancing existing debt or making strategic tuck in acquisitions. In addition, incumbency has always been a strong competitive advantage for TCPC. And in the past…

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session [Operator Instructions]. Our first question today comes from Christopher Nolan with Ladenburg Thalmann.

First of all, congratulations on the quarter in terms of stabilizing the performance. Second, on the share repurchases, I saw there was a $50 million reauthorization. And just given where the stock price is trading and everything else, what's the thoughts in terms of the trajectory of repurchases going forward?

As you know, we've done historically repurchases when we believe them to be accretive and meaningfully accretive. We did a little bit in Q1. We did some more post Q1, as Phil noted. Certainly, we've been trading at levels that can make it accretive. Our thought is to continue to monitor the trading price but really to continue to do them as they are accretive. The stock is reacting well this morning but certainly, we'll continue to look at where we think it's accretive to repurchase shares.

And then given the commentary around the middle market companies, do most of your portfolio companies have sponsors or are they sort of don't have sponsors?

The vast majority of our companies do have sponsors or I would say institutional ownership in there. There are many -- many of our borrowers have institutional ownership but not control. So oftentimes decision making is and our negotiations on terms and the fields are structured with management teams, founders, entrepreneurs and businesses. But I think majority are sponsor backed.

And in this environment, what is the appetite of those sponsors are kicking in more equity when you do a financing?

So clearly, we've been in an environment where we're well into 2025. So think about the rate rise environment, we're probably in year three. So with higher rates, slower growth, right, causing some liquidity issues across the market. Sponsors have had several years of looking to support their companies, continuing to infuse capital when necessary, providing the operational expertise that they may bring to the table. But three years in now many of these sponsors, if they're not seeing their equity value continue to be sustainable or the equity option there, then they may be less supportive. We've seen a mix. Clearly, most of our companies are performing -- continue to perform well or if they're -- if they've had some declining performance, it hasn't been to a point where the value -- equity value is out of the money. So we have seen continued support and we're negotiating within a couple here and there in our portfolio where the sponsor is putting in additional equity and we're discussing ways to help accommodate that. And then to the extent that we don't get the right support from the equity then we're obviously very much comfortable with enforcing our rights and managing these companies on a post restructuring basis, which I think you've seen us do over the past two decades of running this business.

Our next question comes from Robert Dodd with Raymond James.

To echo Chris, congrats on resolving and exiting some of these things. On the aggregators, I mean, I appreciate you made some comments. I mean, I think it's still -- back to the environment, still more than half of the fair value of the nonaccruals is in the aggregator space. So I mean, just -- there's a lot of non-income producing fair value, let alone the cost basis potentially. I mean, could you give us any more color on like how long you think you're completing restructuring or repositioning those businesses is going to take from an earnings drag perspective it's obviously -- if there's recovery to be made then there's an earnings drag and it's dragging on your capacity to generate NII. So can you give us any thoughts on our timeline on those? Obviously, it's tricky but anything you could say?

That's a topic that we are keenly focused on as well. Obviously, we're looking at our nonaccruals very closely, working very hard in trying to work through those names. And you're right, the aggregators are a larger percentage of those. And we think that we should be through the restructurings probably in the next few quarters at the back end, could be sooner. I think we're making a lot of progress. That being said, we are seeing some good signs of improvement and thinking about the ability to have performing debt in there. Thrasio is certainly one that that's well on its way, that's not on nonaccrual but that's one I just bring up, because it's one of the aggregators. The other one, CellarX, they have some real promising brands in that business that continue to grow meaningfully year-over-year. So we're really excited about the prospects there in terms of the ability to kind of generate sustained income. But both CellarX and Razor are still in the restructuring process and those aren't necessarily easy to manage given that multiple stakeholders up and down the cap stack. So we're working on those but we expect to get those done in the next few quarters, and if we're to be optimistic then perhaps one of them sooner.

I mean just to that point, I mean, on the repositioning of the portfolio, et cetera, going forward, is -- to your point, like some of these aggregators there are -- there were broader club deals, so a lot of other people involved, which adds complexity if it does reach the point that restructuring is required. So is there any change or is there likely to be any change in kind of the types of deals you're going to do on a go forward basis in terms of like how many other lenders you're willing to be in a group with? And I mean, you said you didn't want to do the broadly syndicated or the second liens unless you had strong influence. I think you're wording something to that effect. I mean, is that going to be more true across the portfolio as well where there will be less of these broad group deals and more -- you're the dominant lender kind of deal? What are your thoughts there?

Robert, we are definitely taking that approach going forward. We feel that some of the errors of the past have been related to situations where we're not able to exercise our influence. The bucket of broadly second lien loans that were put on in 2021, that's clearly an area that we've seen, the shortcomings of not being able to exercise the experience, the skill set, the capabilities of our team in these situations. And that's definitely one of the stated areas of focus for us going forward. By the way, whether that's -- whether we look at second lien or even in first lien.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Paul Johnson with KBW.

I was wondering, can you just explain what happened here with the Job and Talent markup, what drove that? It appears to be there's a few different things going on with the investment this quarter. I'm not sure if you made a new investment in that company or exactly what's going on there. That would be helpful.

So Job and Talent is one of the tech enabled staffing agencies that we've had in our portfolio for some time. Job and Talent has been performing. It's seen year-over-year growth on both revenue and profitability. And this past quarter, we did have an opportunity to provide growth capital there. So one, I think the markup came from improved performance or continue to improve performance. Second is from the economics that we benefited from on this incremental growth capital. The company continues to invest in growth. And as part of that there is an opportunity as an incumbent lender to structure a really nice preferred debt investment in the business, which included really enhanced economics that accrue to our benefit here for TCPC.

Are you able to share any of the economics? How are your -- what sort of income you're receiving or what you guys hold there?

We're really not -- we haven't done so in the past but we're, for confidentiality reasons, not able to share the details.

I will add that we're just -- it's confidential with respect to the company and the terms of the deal, but I think it was a very attractive situation for us. It was one where a lot of the existing stakeholders in the business also stepped up. I think we were probably about closer to 50% of the deal, because a lot of the existing stakeholders want to come in as well on this piece of paper.

And then the last one I just had, I think I'd asked a few quarters ago. But I'm curious are you pursuing any new SBIC licenses or is there any plans to do so this year?

We do have plans to do so. We have a small tail amount still available under our current license, but we are underway in the process of obtaining a second license, which is, by the way, the max that you can get. You're only able to get two licenses.

And do you have any thoughts on that process? Is that window still open or any of the ongoing administration changes, has that disrupted kind of the expected timeline or anything for getting a license approved?

So far from what we can tell, it has not impacted either the availability or the timing, but it does take a little bit of time, it always has. But so far there's been no real changes to the process.

[Operator Instructions] At this time, we have no further questions registered. And so I'll turn the call back over to Phil Tseng for closing remarks.

Thank you. In closing, I want to thank our entire team at BlackRock TCP for all of their hard work, and our investors and analysts for your continued trust and support. Please reach out to us with any questions. Thank you.

Thank you everyone for joining us today. This concludes our call, and you may now disconnect your lines.