Welcome to the First Quarter 2016 Stanley Black & Decker Incorporated Earnings Conference Call. My name is Kylie and I will be your operator for today’s call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Vice President of Investor and Government Relations, Greg Waybright. Mr. Waybright, you may begin.

Great, thank you, Kylie, and good morning everyone, and thanks for joining us for Stanley Black & Decker’s first quarter 2016 conference call. On the call in addition to myself is John Lundgren, our Chairman and CEO; Jim Loree, our President and COO, and Don Allan, our Senior Vice President and CFO. Our earnings release which was issued earlier this morning and a supplemental presentation, which we will refer to during the call, are available on the IR section of our website, as well as on our iPhone and iPad apps. And a replay of this morning’s call will also be available beginning at 2 p.m. today. The replay number and the access code are in our press release. This morning John, Jim, and Don will review our first quarter 2016 results and various other matters followed by Q&A session. And consistent with prior calls, we are going to be sticking with just one question per caller. And as we normally do, we will be making some forward-looking statements during the call. Such statements are based on assumptions of future events that may not prove to be accurate, and as such, they involve risk and uncertainty. It’s therefore possible that actual results may materially differ from any forward-looking statements that we might make today. We direct you to the cautionary statements in the 8-K that we filed with our press release and in our most recent 34 Act filing. With that I’ll now turn the call over to our Chairman and CEO, John Lundgren.

Thank you, Greg. Good morning, everybody. Thanks for joining us, and for those of you who have had a chance to look at our earnings release, it should point out that we remain strongly focused on generating above-market organic growth, meaningful operating leverage, and strong free cash flow conversion. We’ve really got a lot of really good news to report on the quarter, as well as some real excitement looking forward. So I’m going to be very quick through some of the highlights, before turning it over to Jim and Don for more granularity and then of course we’ll get on to the Q&A. Organically, we grew 5% total growth of 2%, the difference being currency. Really robust organic growth in Tools & Storage 8% with significant outperformance in the emerging markets which was nice to see that come back, 9%. Jim will give you a lot more detail on the strong global Tools & Storage performance in just a second. Industrial was down 3%, as we anticipated, and Security was up 1%, as the positive organic growth in Europe continues. It’s a trend that we’ve been very focused on and we’re very pleased to see it carrying on the way it has. Operating margin rate of 13.1% was 20 basis points below last year, the overwhelming majority of that was the impact of $35 million of currency pressure. Security industrial operating margin rates were up 110 basis points and 120 basis points respectively, and Tools & Storage was down slightly in the face of the currency headwinds as most of you are aware the overwhelming majority of our FX does impacts our global Tools & Storage business. That led to diluted earnings per share up 20%, $1.28, up 20% versus prior year, solid operating performance combined with lower share…

Okay, thanks, John. I’ll begin with our Tools & Storage business, which as John indicated started the year off with another strong showing, once again hitting an all cylinders and growing a robust 8% organically in the quarter against a 1Q 2015 comp of 10% growth. The Tools team continued to outperform the market globally as commercial excellence initiatives, supply chain efficiency and a laser focus on innovation and new product development translated into market share gains across product lines and around the world. This is being accomplished against a volatile macroeconomic backdrop, characterized by large and unpredictable swings in foreign currencies, geopolitical unrest and anemic global GDP growth. Total Tools revenue growth was 4%, after absorbing a 4% currency headwind. Currency also impacted operating margin more than offsetting volume leverage, price and modest commodity deflation resulting in a 40 basis point decline and the year-over-year operating margin rate. The consistency of organic growth across the regions and SBUs was particularly impressive with North America leading the way, up 10%, followed closely by very strong emerging markets at 9%, and Europe with a solid 5% growth performance. Regarding the global Tools & Storage SBUs, Power Tools posted 10% organic growth with its underlying product lines: professional, consumer, and accessories, each individually generating 10% growth. The Hand Tools & Storage business delivered a solid performance as well growing 5% organically with NPD and healthy end-markets, fueling 10% growth in construction hand tools. Automotive repair and industrial was a mixed bag with continued robust performance in Mac Tools, a flattish fathom, more than offsetting anticipated, but slightly better than expected negative pressure in North American industrial channels. Skew placement success stories were widespread with our new Porter-Cable cordless Nailer gaining listings in multiple outlets, gains with our mechanics Tools and Mac, high…

Thank you, Jim, good morning. Let’s begin with a look at our free cash flow for the first quarter which was an outflow of $158 million, an improvement of $85 million from the first quarter of 2015. The primary driver of the year over year improvement was a stronger working capital performance, specifically within inventory and accounts receivable. As our working capital turns were up four turns finishing the quarter at seven turns. Higher income in the current year quarter served to offset the majority of increased capital expenditures as well as some negative cash outflows in the other line. The other line items, which were primarily a reflection of timing of pension plan and miscellaneous accrual payments as compared to the prior year. As a reminder the outflow of cash in the first quarter is normal seasonality where our Tools & Storage inventory levels rise to ensure we’re adequately prepared for the Q2 and Q3 demands of our key customers in the developed market. As John mentioned earlier and as you can see here in the take away we’re reiterating our free cash flow guidance at a conversion rate of approximately 100% of net income. So let’s turn to page 10 as I would like to provide you with an updated outlook on our 2016 foreign exchange headwind. By this point all of you are likely very familiar with our currency trends chart which over the last two years has consistently depicted worsening FX headwinds on the back of perpetually strengthening U.S. dollar. For also the first time in what seems like quite a while we actually saw a tempering of the dollar momentum over the quarter followed by an eventual retreat against some of our key foreign currencies. Most notably the Canadian Dollar, the Brazilian Real and the…

Thanks, Don. Kylie, we can now open the call to Q&A please. Thank you

We’ll now begin the question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] our first question comes from the line of Jeremie Capron with CLSA. Your line is open.

Thank you, and good morning, gentlemen. Clearly there’s a lot of excitement around new product introductions, I think, Jim, you talked about breakthrough innovation, and we should stay tuned for that hitting in the second half. Can you maybe give us a little more color around that in terms of the scale of those new product launches, and maybe come back to what happened in Q1. Because I think you called out new products as a major reason for the strong performance in Tools & Storage, as well. Thanks.

Sure. This is Jim. The breakthrough innovation initiative is something that we started really started getting into in the early part of 2014, and the concept behind it is that we do a pretty good job in what we call core innovation, and we did this in both legacy Black & Decker and legacy Stanley, and those are the kind of things that are driving the, you know, the organic – big driver behind the organic growth today and some of the new product introductions that I alluded to in the core innovation area. But those are more things like, in the hand tools business for instance, we introduced a line of FatMax hammers and pry bars and knives and blades, innovative line in one of our large retailers and another large retailer we introduced DEWALT pry bars and pocket knives. And then in professional power tools, compact generation tools DC brushless, some really interesting innovations in the DEWALT Pneumatics line, a Mac impact wrench but you get the idea here. This is sort of the day-to-day innovation that just goes on as a matter of course, but I would say the level of activity in this area, and the freshness of the company’s product lines has never been greater in our recollection. So that goes on, and that drives the kind of growth, the organic growth, along with the commercial excellence initiatives, that you’ve been witnessing now here along with a little help from the U.S. DIY and construction markets. But you can see the growth all over the world. So in Europe which is relatively anemic in terms of its markets we still are growing an average of about 6% to 7% over 2, 2.5 year period. And so there’s something going on there. And it’s really a…

Our next question comes from the line of Ken Zener with KeyBanc. Your line is open.

Good morning, gentlemen.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Given the strength you have in, hand tools picking up, could you – in a very strong organic growth that you’re seeing in the U.S., could you kind of talk about how the landscape because since it looks like you’re going to be well over $6 this year. Currency is helping but I mean that was a long-term goal when you did the Black & Decker acquisition. Can you talk about how much that landscape has changed on the Power Tools relative to I don’t want to say it’s third-party competitors but your high margins that you have are obviously a very different business versus 5 years ago. It seems like you’re just gobbling up market share certainly on a dollar basis if not unit basis. Could you just talk about how that’s really structurally changed again given how strong we were this quarter?

Yes, it’s Jim again. I think what’s really going on here is that the Black & Decker and Stanley integration, the merger of the two companies and the successful integration, was a major home run. I think well beyond anybody’s wildest expectations. I think the cost synergies were just the beginning and we – I think we signed up for $350 million six years ago and we cut off the analysis at about $550 million of cost synergies and there was a huge outperformance. But the thing we never really expected was the revenue synergies that we also beat what we expected to accomplish but they just keep on coming and it has to do with the fact that the cultures gelled so well and got so focused on innovation, commercial excellence, all the kinds of things that I was just talking about, and really put all the BS from the typical integration politics, et cetera behind them, and focused on the customer, focused on the markets. And then the scale that we achieved by putting those two companies together and going to market with Power Tools and Hand Tools, and going to market with all these incredibly strong brands that we have, just gave us tremendous flexibility and we just continued to benefit from that as time goes on.

And I would say a current example of those revenue synergies we touch on here and there is what we’ve been doing in emerging markets where we’ve been rolling out the mid price point products in particularly Power Tools that have the Stanley brand on it. So that’s a great example of continued generation of revenue synergies six years after the merger.

Our next question comes from the line of Michael Rehaut with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Nice quarter. Specifically just had a question on the security margins as you highlighted a very good first quarter result, best since 2012. Just was curious if you could help out with kind of getting a little more granular in terms of the margin improvement there, off of the revenues down 1%, and perhaps just giving us a sense of perhaps the bigger components of that, also North America versus Europe and how you see that playing out over the next year or two, and perhaps also you can kind of revisit on a more broad basis just the future of the segment overall as you called it out in your Analyst Day as being, the strategic direction being under review, given the solid progress here, how does that affect that? So sorry, a couple of questions but all around the security progress.

Okay, Mike, this is John, I’ll start. There was I think more than one question there but we’ll try to do the best we can. Let me comment on two things. And then Don will give you a little bit more granularity. As it relates to our assessment of the segment, nothing’s changed. We love this business, and the fact that it continues to grow and margins continue to improve we’ve said on many occasions our single greatest self-help opportunity in terms of margin improvement and earnings growth is restoring security back to its historical levels. We continue that trend and that’s why Jim, expressed the gratification, or encouragement, that that trend’s continued for six consecutive quarters. As you know, margins in Europe in general are lower than the U.S. but the overwhelming majority of the improvement is coming from Europe, albeit from a low base. So we will not forecast margins by sub-segment because, A, it’s very difficult. And B, there’s not much in it for us if we get it right, and a lot of explaining to do if we don’t. But in terms of the assessment of the category itself, we love the business. We review its status with our board every board meeting. That included yesterday and the day before. A year and a half ago, we said in the second half, some time during the second half of 2016, we would be very public in terms of what our plans were. We’re sticking to that and we’re not going to accelerate it. Beyond that, Don, if you want to add a little granularity, please feel free to do so.

Sure. So, when you look at the first quarter performance, Jim mentioned that we are very pleased with the profitability of the segments. And really the improvement that we saw was in all three regions of the world, so the big regions really are North America and Europe where emerging markets is relatively small. And then both – those two large regions we saw really solid improvement year-over-year in the profitability as we continue to execute on the initiatives that we’ve been really discussing almost for two years now of improving field productivity in the electronic security business, in particular in both Europe and in North America. And then in Europe specifically looking at our, SG&A, our selling and general and administrative costs to making sure they’re in line with the revenue of the business as well as the percentage of revenue, we discussed it as a business that probably should be somewhere below 30% of revenue for SG&A and it’s above 30% today so we continue to take actions in those areas to improve the profitability of both businesses, and we’re seeing the benefits of that over the last two or three quarters in particular, as the profitability of the business year-over-year continues to improve. And at this point, based on our guidance for the year, we’re expecting that trend to continue, as we expect modest improvement in profitability of the segment for the full year.

Mike, and just one other point on the business in general, Jim has talked about it on past calls, but it just shouldn’t go unnoticed. There’s been a lot of organizational changes, where we think – and we’ve been talking about it for a while, but the majority of them have now been in place for about a year, where we think, to use Jim Collins’ often-used term, we think not only we have the right people on the bus, we have them in the right seats on the bus. And it really matters. Everyone knows that, but the fact that we’ve had a stable, capable, tested and proven team, in Europe and in the U.S. supplemented by a couple great new hires in the last six months or so, it’s really, really helped, first of all, stabilize that business, and then ultimately keep both organic growth and margins moving in the direction we want it to.

Our next question comes from the line of Jeff Sprague with Vertical Research Partners. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning, this is Brett Linzey on for Jeff. Hey, just want to come back to free cash flow. You guys had a strong working capital quarter and I suspect some of that was inventory drawdown on the industrial side to a line with weaker demand there. But could you just talk about where you guys feel you are relative to that 100% conversion for the year? I mean seemingly there’s a path higher. Is that the case? And is there anything in terms of inventory ahead of this product launch that we should be thinking about?

Sure, this is Don. I’ll take that. As I mentioned, we’re very pleased with the start to the year related to working capital. Part of it was due to the fact that we did have a very strong month of March. And so our inventory levels were brought down in line with that performance which was great to see. And we also were very focused on making sure that we collected the cash throughout the quarter so our accounts receivable was down at the right level, as well. So with our company we’re going to have a cash outflow, as I mentioned, in the first quarter every year, because of the way the Tools & Storage business seasonality impacts the company. But yet we really have to try to minimize that to achieve your objectives for the full year, and I think we’ve done this. This is the best performance we’ve had in Q1 in four years, related to Stanley Black & Decker and so as a result I feel very good about our ability to achieve 100% conversion rate, because we started the year in that regard. Now, your question to potentially additional inventory related to the product launch, yes, we will have some additional inventory. However, based on the current sales plans, as the year progresses, we would expect those inventory levels, vast majority of them, to be absorbed and shipped out to many of our major customers and so we don’t expect that to be a challenge for us as the year ends. But it could be a little bit of additional inventory as we go through the second and the third quarter, which we would normally see anyways in our Tools & Storage business. So at this stage we feel good about our ability to hit our objective of 100%, and we’ll continue to look at that to see how we could potentially outperform that as the year goes on.

Our next question comes from the line of Rich Kwas with Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning, everyone.

Hi, Rich. Good morning

Good morning.

Good I’m going to speak on a couple questions here. John and Jim, just wanted to get your thoughts on the mechanical business in North America so from a growth standpoint that continues to underperform key competitors out there and curious, John your reference to how you got the people in the right spots. Want to get your level of confidence around getting the growth rate up and going there considering the cycles turning in the favor in terms of non-res. And then quick second question Don in terms of the hedging strategies. Thanks for the sensitivity on the various currencies, but last year you went, you got opportunistic when you had a lot of volatility and just curious if we got volatility over the next few months on currencies? Would you take the same approach and just curious around risk as it relates to the updated guidance with currency and your comfort level with that? Thank you.

Yes, Rich, I’ll take the mechanical piece. I guess in – excuse me – and three bytes, margins are good, growth is below what we had expected to be. To a large extent historically that’s been a product issue where we have been behind our own expectations in some of the market. That being said, our sense is it’s going to be offset by two things. One is the leadership in that business, we believe is quite capable. We have a tested and proven individual who actually came from the DEWALT professional industrial channel. Very, very good person to lead, guide the business and focus on growth as opposed to just margins and things of that nature. So we feel good about it in that perspective. And last but absolutely not least, recall we just really completed and embedded the change to third-party or independent distribution model versus the direct model. And Jim has talked about this often on past calls, years ago we thought that was a distinct competitive advantage, and it was for a time. We made the decision, and I think it was the right one, that what we gain – we lost more than we gained. As a result of that it was a two-year process to, if you will, simply convert our distribution model. That’s behind us it’s beginning to gain traction. So right leader in place, growth-focused executive, and the right distribution model in place, product catching up, gives us cautious optimism that we’ll get that growth back in mechanical because it’s a great opportunity for us.

And let me just supplement that by saying. So as John described the operational condition of the business is good and getting better and we’re pleased with that. The question that we still have to answer is the one – is the strategic question, and, that we’ll put on hold until we come out in the second half of the year with our Securities portfolio review. So that’s, everything is fair game in security, including mechanical.

Yes and then I’ll touch on your question related to currencies. Clearly we always look at opportunities for hedging when we see shifts in currency and we will continue to do that and we’ve done that again this year. Sensitivities give you an indication of if currencies move in certain directions for the remainder of the year, what the impact could be to our operating margin. And we have thought through it, is there a potential for the $140 million to move back towards $180 million? There’s a scenario where that could play out if the Fed starts talking about potential interest rate increases that could actually result in strengthening of the U.S. dollar and a weakening of some of these currencies. However, we also feel like we’ve built contingency plans to address that scenario if that plays out. So we have certain actions that we would take up to $180 million that we believe would be capable of offsetting that, which is why we felt comfortable making this increase to our guidance.

Our next question comes from the line of Tim Wojs with Robert W. Baird. Your line is open.

Yes, hey, guys, nice job.

Thank you Tim.

I guess just on the Tools business, if we could go back to that for a second. So the full-year guidance is up mid single digits but you’ve got 8% in the first quarter, and then as you go through the year, the comps get a little bit easier in the second half, and you have some new product rollouts. So can you just talk about some of the puts and takes and why maybe we should see decelerating growth in the Tools business this year?

Well I think you might want to think about the first quarter performance and just we’ve mentioned some things about certainly the weather was an additional boost to us in Q1, in particular in North America, as we actually had a mild winter here for the first time in – well a long time for those of us in the northeast. And we benefited a point or two in our Tools & Storage business from that. So if you kind of regulate the growth, saying that’s not going to necessarily repeat itself for the next three quarters, then you’re down to something that’s closer to 6% to 6.5%, roughly. And then we had a fantastic performance in emerging markets in the first quarter, up 9%. We haven’t seen that type of performance in almost 2.5 years. And so we were pleased with that, feel very good about it, but at this stage we’re not necessarily ready to say that’s something that’s going to repeat itself in the next three quarters. We’re clearly focused on trying to maximize that opportunity, but to be able to project that and say for sure that’s going to happen at this stage would probably be a little bit overly optimistic. And those two factors in itself kind of gets you down to a mid single-digit number for the full year, for organic growth.

Our next question comes from the line of David MacGregor with Longbow Research. Your line is open.

Yes, congrats on a good quarter and all the progress. There’s a lot of data there right now including Bureau of Labor Statistics data just showing a clear shift in the United States of labour from energy and mining into construction. I’m just wondering if you feel this is having a meaningful impact on tool growth and talk about the extent to which you see that as a factor going forward.

Yes I’ll take it, David. The interest, yes, to quantify it would be very difficult, because it is happening and one of the constraints that we would listen to, some of the homebuilders’ calls as a good example was basically securing enough qualified, capable labor, because so much of it during the financial crisis shifted from construction into energy. As some of that variable labor pool, if I can call it that, shifts back, the answer is absolutely yes. The demand is there, but the qualified capable technically trained or properly trained workers aren’t, it’s going to be a governor on growth. So simply said, yes, it’s having an impact. I think it’s the early stages of that, but that’s clearly helping the North American residential and we think ultimately commercial construction market.

Our next question comes from the line of Jeff Kessler with Imperial Company. Your line is open.

Thank you. You’ve been talking, after the limitation of SFS, you’ve been talking, you mentioned it twice in the first, in your presentation. I’m wondering, and you mentioned that the implication and the actual evidence of that is going to be shown somewhere this year perhaps some time in the second half. Could you be a little more specific as to how we’re going to see SFS come out in the not so much in the numbers, but how it’s going to come out in the operations that you’re showing, which in turn affect the numbers.

Sure, well I talked about the five elements of SFS. We’ll start with the core SFS which is basically the continuation of the SFS that we started in 2006 that got us to 9.2 working capital turns last year and got us customer-facing metrics, we’re very, very strong in relation to competition and make most of our customers very happy. So that core SFS is at the heart of all this and that’s much more of an operations related initiative and it continues to become deeply rooted ten years into its existence. And now what we’re doing with core SFS is we are taking it to another level, largely through digitizing the supply chain, as well as implementing the smart factory across the company. That’s kind of in the early stages, but nonetheless, it is under way. So if we were at nine turns at the end of the year, and we typically generate about 4%, 3% to 4%, productivity, well our cost productivity a year in our factories, and we would expect that to continue on the basis of these investments that we’re making in some of the things that I’m talking about, as well as gradually push that working capital turns number up towards ten and maybe even someday north of ten. So that’s the core SFS. Then there are three elements that are far more growth-oriented, those are the digital excellence, commercial excellence and breakthrough innovation. Talked about breakthrough innovation, I think at length and I think that’s pretty clear. The commercial excellence is really taking some of the continuous improvement concepts that are very familiar to people in business and applying them to the customer-facing processes that drive growth. And so becoming world-class in some of these elements, like sales force effectiveness, like promotion planning, like…

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Dahl with Credit Suisse. Your line is open.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Say, a question around some of the M&A opportunities that you mentioned at the – in the initial commentary, looking at the bolt-ons in Tools and Industrials. Just curious with all of the market volatility in recent months, what’s your take on how seller expectations have shifted, if at all? What types of sellers are you hearing from? And again if that has changed over the past six months or so, and then just remind us again of kind of what specific areas you think you’re looking to fill some gaps in within Tools. Thanks.

Yes, sure. This is John. We’re not going to obviously talk specific targets. Never have, never will. And I know you understand and respect that. That being said, I think we’ve been very transparent in terms of where we’re going to grow, where we’re going to acquire. We’re going to continue to consolidate the global Tools & Storage industry, and we really, really like our position and our opportunity to grow our Engineered Fastening business. Having said that, I think importantly our pipeline is quite full and the reason being as you know we’ve been on somewhat of a moratorium, self-imposed for the last 18-plus months. But it doesn’t mean we stop looking at, assessing and in many cases keeping targets warm. So there’s plenty out there in our previously identified areas of strategic focus. In terms of expectations, not a lot has changed. Remember, much of these – many of these are not public companies, number one, but, there are always multiple expectations. But in terms of what’s out there and competition for target, double-edged sword, not too much has changed. Interest rates with obviously very, very low, which would help financial sponsors as they seek to acquire offset by the fact that most financial sponsors and most of the targets that we’re looking at have limited, if any, synergies. So our opportunity to acquire in spaces where we have a great footprint already, arguably the synergies that we could generate would more than offset. I’ll say lack of leverage given our desire insistent tense on maintaining strong tier investment grade rating.

Our next question comes from the line of Robert Barry with Susquehanna. Your line is open.

Hey, guys, good morning.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Wanted to actually touch on our follow-up on the strength in emerging market Tools. I think in your comments you referenced some pricing actions related to recouping currency. I was curious, were those materially higher in 1Q? And do you expect them to benefit future periods as well? And if you could also just remind us what the emerging market margins are tracking at in Tools versus in the developed markets. Thanks.

Yes. This is Don. I’ll take your question. Yes, we certainly had a benefit from price in the first quarter, as we communicated early this year back in January. And then we have over the last couple of years as we see these types of movements, we take appropriate price actions where we can to offset that impact at least partially or in some cases close to 100%, and we did do that in the first quarter. And a significant portion of that organic growth we saw was related to price, which is also why, you know, we’re not necessarily thinking this is a business that’s going to grow 9% for the full year, because we are going to see some pricing pressure that I touched on in some of those key markets because of the weakening of the U.S. dollar versus some of those key currencies that just occurred over the last 6 weeks to 8 weeks. So because of that our view is I think prudent, and it’s more reflective of a different pricing market because of the currency shift. You asked about profitability margins in emerging markets for Tools. That’s slightly below line average at this point for our Tools & Storage business, but it’s an area as we continue to ramp up some of the mid-price point initiatives and we continue to grow with the markets and outpace them, most likely 1.5 to 2.5 times GDP growth, that we expect with the leverage opportunity that it will get very close to line average.

Our next question comes from the line of Liam Burke with Wunderlich. Your line is open.

Yes. Thank you. Good morning. John, on the online strategy you have, especially in North America, are any brands doing particularly better or more geared towards online rather than your traditional distribution channels?

Yes, I think you almost answered the question, as you asked it. Brands do well online, and with the two different groups or via e-commerce. The Black & Decker brand for DIY users is extremely popular, both DIY Power Tools, outdoor products, et cetera, but a real driver is DEWALT. It’s the brand the pros go to. It’s available, it’s available online, and we’re very thoughtful in terms of the extent to which we promote it, make it available, push it, because prior to the Stanley Black & Decker merger, DEWALT actually, other than via a retailer’s own online opportunity, DEWALT wasn’t offered online. It is now. It’s doing well. But think of our three power brands, Stanley, DEWALT, Black & Decker, their specific end-user groups and to each and every one, they’re all doing encouragingly well. The biggest single dollar percentage, though, would be DEWALT.

It’s Jim. I’d also just add that very interestingly a couple years ago we did a complete refresh of the Black & Decker brand, and it had really gotten a little bit stale and it had lost a bit of its identity. And when we did the refresh, we tried to bring a millennial sort of focused element to it, and we added some lifestyle elements related to the millennial population, as well as the ECOSMART aspects, which is the sustainability of some of the products and packaging, and so on. And the Black & Decker brand has really made a lot of progress with the millennial population. It is definitely not your father’s Oldsmobile. It’s gone from sort of the mature demographic to the up and coming, so even though it’s not the dollar leader in terms of what we sell in e-commerce, it is, for the medium to long-term, has tremendous potential as the generational shift continues.

Our last question comes from the line of Dennis McGill with Zelman. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning, thank you. I just wanted to dig in a little bit on down on the Security outlook where you’re looking for the organic growth slide, the single-digit. The 3% to 4% in Europe seems to be pretty sustainable and consistent with what you guys have done, I assume that’s sort of baked into the outlook. So from the North American side, how do you think about the potential through the year going from the modest declines so far as you progress through the year and the end channel opportunity in general? Are you optimistic that the non-res market is accelerating? Is it more just self-driven to close the gap with the non-res market? Just curious how you’re thinking about that.

Sure. I think as the year progresses, and you’re right about Europe, I would imagine it would continue on this 3% trajectory we’ve been seeing for the rest of the year. I think North America, we will see a positive performance in our mechanical businesses in the low single-digits. And then our convergent business continues to be focused on a lot of different activities. And as a result, I do think that they’re behind the market pace a little bit, but as the year goes on, that will continue to improve, but we’ll probably see a little bit of pressure in the organic growth throughout the year. And then the last thing I’d mention is we will continue to see emerging market pressure within Security for organic growth. We definitely experienced that in Q1 although it’s a small part of the total business, I do think that will be a bit of a pressure point, as well.

Thank you. And I would now like to turn the call back to Mr. Waybright for closing remarks.

Kylie, thanks a lot. We’d like to thank everyone again for calling in this morning and for your participation on the call. And obviously please contact me if you have any further questions. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating on today’s conference. This does conclude the program and you may all disconnect. Everyone have a wonderful day.