Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Fourth Quarter Smith & Wesson Holding Earnings Conference Call. My name is Philip, and I will be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host for today, Ms. Liz Sharp, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thank you, and good afternoon. Our comments today may contain predictions, estimates and other forward-looking statements. Our use of words like anticipate, project, estimate, expect, intend and other similar expressions is intended to identify those forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements also include statements regarding sales, margins, expenses and earnings for future periods, our product developments and strategies, and liquidity and anticipated cash needs and availability. Our forward-looking statements represent our current judgment about the future, and they are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Risk factors and other considerations that could cause our actual results to be materially different are described in our securities filings, including our Forms 8-K, 10-K and 10-Q. You can find those documents, as well as a replay of this call, on our website at smith-wesson.com. Today's call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of this time, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained herein. Our actual results could differ materially from our statements today. I have a few important items to note with regard to our comments on today's call. First, I want to remind everyone that when James and Jeff discuss backlog, the backlog is always cancelable until shipped. Second, we reference non-GAAP adjusted EBITDAS on this call. Note that the reconciliations of GAAP net income to non-GAAP adjusted EBITDAS and estimated GAAP income from continuing operations to estimated non-GAAP adjusted EBITDAS can be found in today's 8-K filing, as well as today's earnings press release, which are posted to our website. And lastly, you should note that this call references only our continuing operations. For the results of our discontinued operations, please refer to our 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2013, which filed this afternoon. I will now turn the call over to James Debney, President and CEO of Smith & Wesson.

Thank you, Liz. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us. With me on today's call is Jeff Buchanan, our Chief Financial Officer. Later in the call, Jeff will provide a recap of our financial performance as well as our first quarter and fiscal 2014 financial outlook. Fiscal 2013 was a year highlighted by several financial and operational achievements. Our successful performance was driven by solid marketing, innovative new products, disciplined manufacturing execution and strict financial management. All of our achievements aligned directly with our great strategy, which is underpinned by a focus on our core firearm business. We achieved record annual and fourth quarter net sales and profits from continuing operations, as well as substantial improvement in our gross margins. Performance gains over the year were driven by strong consumer demand for our products, which we believe is due to heightened awareness paired with our ability to significantly increase our manufacturing capacity. Full year sales growth of nearly 43% was driven in large part by our increased M&P production. Demand remains strong across our product portfolio, and we excelled in a very dynamic market environment by remaining focused on executing our key strategic growth initiative. While we significantly increased our production capacity in fiscal 2013, we remained capacity constrained as we have in the past 5 quarters. We plan to continue intelligently increasing capacity in fiscal 2014. Now let me provide some of the highlights from the fourth quarter. Sales for the quarter rose 37.6% year-over-year. Gross margins in the high 30s continue to expand as we successfully leveraged expense, lowered costs and increased sales. Our M&P polymer pistols continue to sell exceptionally well, and we believe there remains significant opportunity for growth and market share gains for this product's foundry. Of note is the recently launched M&P core pistol, as well as the M&P Shield, which continues to be one of the most highly desired firearms at retail. We received an enthusiastic response from customers to our new M&P 10 modern sporting rifle chambered in .308, the most recent expansion of our flagship M&P brand portfolio. Finally, robust cash flow during the quarter of $38.5 million helped us grow our year-end cash position to more than $100 million. Our strong year-end balance sheet allowed us to accelerate a number of strategic decisions in June. These are designed to optimize our capital structure, build a strong foundation for future growth, and most importantly, create value for our shareholders. Jeff will walk through these actions in more detail later in the call. Overall, our growth strategy remains concentrated on taking market share with our M&P polymer pistol, leveraging our established high-value product portfolio, and bringing to market innovative new products that meet the needs, wants and desires of a growing and diverse base of responsible firearm consumers. With that, I'll ask Jeff to review the financial results.

Thank you, James. Revenue for the quarter was $178.7 million. This is an increase over the prior year of $48.9 million or 37.6%, and well above the high end of our guidance. As James noted, we were at maximum capacity during the fourth quarter. Revenue for the year was $587.5 million; an increase of 42.6% over the prior year. Gross margins continue to rise and were 38.3% in the quarter as compared with 36.1% last year. This is a record gross margin. In fact, excluding the Thompson/Center recall expenses, the gross margins were 40%. This improvement primarily resulted from increased volumes and a planned shift in product mix. Our operating expenses continued to decline as a percentage of revenue. In fact, full year operating expenses have only risen 2% over the prior year, while revenue has risen almost at 43%. In the quarter, operating expenses were $21.6 million or 12.1% of revenue, versus last year's $21.2 million or 16.3% of revenue. We have made a conscious and successful effort to focus on spending less in operating expenses overall. As noted before, however, we do expect to spend more in support of our growth strategy. In fact, we expect our total operating expenses in the first quarter to rise sequentially by 10% to 20%. This leverage of our operating expenses, as well as our focus on achieving efficiencies in manufacturing, have combined to deliver operating income in the fourth quarter at a record level of 26.2% versus 19.8% in the year-ago quarter. For the year, the operating margin was 22.6%, also a record level and more than twice the 10.9% of the prior year. Net income in Q4 is $28.6 million, for a diluted EPS of $0.44, preceding the high end of our expectations by more than 10%. This is compared…

Thank you, Jeff. As I stated earlier, the fourth quarter demonstrated continuing strength in our core firearm business and in the overall U.S. consumer market for firearms as measured by the FBI's adjusted NICS background checks data. The reason that NICS checks are a good proxy for sales is that we only sell product to consumers via federally licensed firearms dealers who must, by law, conduct a background check on each transaction, whether such transaction occurred at a gun show, in a retail location or anywhere. Our total firearm unit sales into the consumer channel, excluding Walther, increased 35.8% for our fiscal fourth quarter on a year-over-year basis. This compares to adjusted NICS growth for the same period of 27.6% and leads us to believe that we took share in a rapidly expanding market. On an annualized basis, our unit sales into the consumer channel grew 41.4% in fiscal 2013, compared with adjusted NICS growth for the same period of 35.3%, indicating again that we gained market share in the year. In terms of dollars, total sales in our domestic consumer channel during the fourth quarter, excluding Walther products, were $151.4 million, which is almost 41% higher than last year. While sales have been constrained by the rate at which we can intelligently add capacity, we have remain focused on our long-term growth strategy. Our professional channel, which includes international sales, contributed strongly to our fourth quarter results. Fourth quarter revenue, again, excluding Walther products, was $19.8 million, an increase of about 75% over the comparable quarter last year. Growth in the channel was due to increased orders of M&P pistols and M&P modern sporting rifles to several domestic law-enforcement agencies, including the San Antonio Police Department, as well as increased shipments to Puerto Rico and Canada. May marked the…

Thanks, James. First, I want to point out that in fiscal year '13, we sold $41.6 million of Walther products under our recently concluded distribution agreements. Despite the absence of Walther revenue going forward, we expect net sales in fiscal '14 to be between $605 million and $615 million, which at the midpoint would represent about a 12% increase in non-Walther sales. Based on the expected increases in operating expenses, we believe that level of sales would yield an EPS of between $1.30 and $1.35 and an EBITDAS of approximately $160 million to $170 million. That estimate takes into account our bond repurchase and also assumes the successful execution of our tender for 7.5 million of shares, thus reducing our fully diluted average share count by the end of the year to approximately 58 million shares. We expect to see typical seasonality in our business with our strongest quarters being in the first and fourth quarters. Taking into account the reduction in Walther sales, we are estimating net for the first quarter of fiscal '14, net sales will be between $162 million and $167 million, which would represent year-over-year growth in non-Walther business at around 32% at the midpoint. Backlog continues to outstrip our ability to deliver and the channel is still relatively empty. Thus, this first quarter estimate is mostly based on our capacity. Based on that level of sales, we anticipate first quarter EPS of between $0.34 and $0.37. Note that a successful tender will have little impact on our weighted average share count in Q1. But the first quarter outlook does include estimated expenses of approximately $0.06 per share associated with the bond and stock repurchases. James?

Thanks, Jeff. And with that, operator, I'd like to open up the call for any questions from our analysts.

[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from the line of Reed Anderson from Northland Securities.

It's Dan Meyers on for Reed. Wondering how you view the current health of the firearm inventories in the retail versus distributor channel. And any shift in demand there between firearm categories like handguns versus pistols?

Certainly our inventory checks that we do, and as we said before, we do monitor inventory in the channel with our 2-step distribution partners, and we do, do some sampling at retail as well to give us what we feel is a good picture of the state of inventory. And we perform those checks in the quarter, and what we found in the quarter is that inventory remains at a very low level. In terms of NICS, again, a bit more difficult to judge how the NICS of inventory has changed, but I would say it's roughly stayed the same. But handguns performing very well, let's say.

Great. And then one more question. Can you give any details around new products releases that you have planned for this year?

We can't give, Dan. We can't give you any details. It's a closely guarded secret as you know. But what we can say is what we said before, we'd like to keep the pipeline very robust. It's very exciting. We do expect that we will launch a meaningful new product within the next 12 months. Now -- but remember, we always balance out new product launches with our existing product portfolio -- especially when you have products like the M&P Shields, who really have only just celebrated their one-year anniversary, and we will look to leverage that for many, many years to come, so we maximized the potential of both products and brands there. But we, as I said, we have an eye for new products, but, and as I sort of said before, we will only launch them strategically when we're ready and the time is right. So more news on that in the future.

Your next question comes from the line of Cai Von Rumohr from Cowen & Company.

Two questions, or a couple of questions. You mentioned that operating expenses would be up sequentially by $10 million to $20 million. Maybe give us a little bit more color on which of -- which part -- where is that going up and maybe, since that's quite a bit higher than I would've thought, what you might be thinking in terms of OpEx expenses for the year?

Actually, we said it was going to go up 10% to 20% in Q1, right? And we think that, that increase -- the level to which it increases will be at about the same rate throughout the year. That is mostly spending in sales and marketing, promotional expenses, advertising and programs associated with the take-market strategy that James has enumerated several times. Cai, we've really held back on any expenditures when you're -- when the demand is way above your capacity, there's really like no need to spend in these areas. So we are basically planning to return to more of a normalized growth in the firearms industry.

Okay, so but, Jeff, you said up 10% to 20% from the fourth quarter, which was $21.6 million. So when you say up the same amount for the year, should we think the full year should be up 10% to 20%? Or maybe give us a little more color on that?

Yes. I think so. So if you say 10% to 20% from $21 million, you're roughly, what, a $23 million to $24 million in that range. And that's just a range. It's going to be certain quarters have a little bit more because of the NRA. And for example in Q1, we had the NRA expenses versus last year was in Q4. So there's a difference right there.

And those expenses with regard to the NRA are for the annual meeting, which you obviously attended. Which is an ideal opportunity for us to interact directly with the consumer.

Right. So -- but at that, it's probably going to go up to around that level on a -- for the rest of the year.

Okay, great. And then, Jeff, you'd mentioned the seasonality that the first and fourth quarters were your strongest. Are you saying you expect your first and fourth quarter sales to be the strongest on an absolute basis?

Yes. Because of a couple of things. If you look at the NICS chart, you'll see there's always that dip in the summer. And we've also constructed our manufacturing base around that dip. So just -- for example, the manufacturing days in Q2 are 58 versus the manufacturing days in Q1 of 63. So a more than 10% difference on manufacturing days.

Yes, and in Q3, Cai, we have a summer shutdown just to remind everyone.

Q2.

Sorry.

In Q2 we have our summer shutdown. In Q3 we have our Christmas holiday. So if we took the exact same run rate this quarter and ran it like next quarter, sales would go down.

That's very, very helpful. Just so we kind of understand that, do you have handy the manufacturing days in the third and the fourth quarter just so we can kind of get that seasonality?

Yes. 65 in Quarter 1, 58 in Quarter 2, 57 in Quarter 3 and 63 in Quarter 4. Now that doesn't take into account unexpected closings, a blizzard or something like that. But that's as based on holidays and work schedule.

So really what you're saying is, given you're going flat -- and how many work days were there in the fourth quarter?

In the fourth quarter there was 65. So we actually are having 2 less days. We are going to have an ERP conversion at the end of Q1, and that is going to like eat into a couple of days in Quarter 1.

Got it. But so we really are looking at 10% plus decline sequentially, so we should be prepared for Q2 even though -- but with the hunting rifles, usually those are stronger. What you're saying is that's not as big a deal, so we should look for -- be prepared for bigger dip in the Q2 and then the normal pick up by the fourth quarter.

Yes, exactly.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from the line of Scott Stember from Sidoti & Company. Scott L. Stember - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Could you maybe talk about your assumptions for '14 as it applies to what you expect for the industry to do? Obviously, you have a pretty good picture with your backlog, where things stand right now with the NICS data. But just give us an idea of high-level what you guys are thinking as far as NICS and industry growth as the year progresses.

Really, we went back to what the growth rate that we've discussed before using history, which is around 11%, around 10% or 11% every year. As we all know, we're coming out of a surge period. There was no doubt some buy-forward there by the consumer. We've worked hard understanding that. We've done a lot of analysis about that. So factoring that alongside historical growth rates where we are, gives us a, let's say, a good understanding of how we see the market going forward. And really in answer to your question, I can come back to using those more average historical growth rates. It's a good number for you. Scott L. Stember - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Got you. And maybe also talk about how your capacity, basic or work capacity expansion, plays into that.

Well, the capacity expansion, again, it really focuses on our strategic growth vehicle for the future, which is the M&P polymer pistol family. So that's where we'll continue to invest, so that we can not only keep up with any market expansion, but also we can get some more serious traction on our share gain with that product family. And as I've said before, that's our focus. And that, in terms of when we add capacity both internally and externally, we will always look to focus on those products and any new product additions that we may make for that family in the future.

And, Scott, we've also spent quite a few on CapEx dollars on making our capacity flexible. So that should the demand unexpectedly decline for one product family, we could substitute by making more of a different product family. We're currently -- have backlog that exceeds our ability to deliver for all of our product families. Scott L. Stember - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Okay, got you. And just last question. The $0.06 in cost in the first quarter that you pointed to that is also embedded in your full year guidance as well, correct?

Yes, it is.

Your next question comes from the line of Ronald Bookbinder from The Benchmark Company.

You talked about new product launches that you're planning on this year. But given your capacity's constraint and given how big your backlog is, do you consider postponing new product launches until a time where it would have a greater impact?

Yes, naturally. Yes, we do. It's part of a process that we have where we strategically think about our product launches. And as I've said before, there's a number of criteria that we have to meet. In terms of our being capable, are we ready, and so on for a launch. But most importantly. Is the market receptive? Is it the right time to launch? So we do go through that valuation process on a regular basis. And that's why you heard me say earlier, we expect to launch in the next 12 months a meaningful product. But could it be delayed? Yes, it could be. If we don't need to launch it, we won't necessarily launch it.

And given the seasonality, shouldn't we expect the backlog to decrease in Q1?

There's no doubt we charged that before, we made it very available. We made it available. I'm just casting my memory back. We did charge it before in an investor presentation, I believe. Which does show the seasonality in how it does some track to the correlation with NICS background check data. But in terms of how we think about backlog, as you've heard me say before, we don't take it to the bank. It can be canceled for sure. We use it as a data point. Sometimes I think it's a metric or a number too closely looked at by certain individuals. I have to say that we are looking at a new way of thinking about our backlog, and that's really another step in our strategy just to simplify our business and continue to make us even more of a marketing driven company because in all the other consumer businesses I've worked, and I'm not used to working with this huge backlog company. So as I say, we're working on a new way of accessing and managing our backlog with customers. But hopefully we'll eliminate some of the noise and making it a much more meaningful number for managing the business. But we're only going to report it annually. You'll find it in our 10-K each year.

Okay. And you mentioned that the industry typically is growing 10%, 11% per year, and you're forecasting 12% revenue growth for 2014. But you guys are taking market share on top of that. So would you say that you're being conservative for 2014?

I would just say that we're being smart and intelligent. But that's just me, I'm biased. It's all built into the guidance, Ron. We won't obviously deviate from our comments there.

Yes, and, Ron, the 10% or 11% is the historical average. We did see that after the last surge in '08, '09, that it did drop the following year to sort of a flat number. So if you -- obviously, what the market's going to do is anybody's guess. This is us applying analytics and looking at our own, as you pointed out, our own belief and our own strategy with regard to taking market share.

Which I believe we've demonstrated some success with. So we're looking to continue that quite obviously.

Okay. And lastly, the Thompson/Center recall, is there any lingering impact that could -- would be included in Q1 or 2014?

I think it's in the guidance. Again, we identify the condition that we're unhappy with. And we're just doing the right thing there to recall those rifles. And we'll get them back out -- turned around and back out into the marketplace for our customers and consumers as quickly as possible.

But do you feel that, that was fully expensed in Q4 or...

Yes, we do. Yes, we do. Yes. As you can imagine, we went through great pains on that one.

And your next question comes from the line of Cai Von Rumohr from Cowen & Company.

So we have a -- what are you guys looking for, for your tax rate in 2014?

Around 37%.

37%. Okay. And then you went through the seasonality, but sort of if we back out, what you're saying about OpEx expenses it implies the gross margin in the first quarter in the area of 41%, is that essentially correct? And then I assume based on your comments on manufacturing days, it will be seasonally less in the second and third and then better in the fourth?

Cai, I'll leave it up to you to make the arithmetical calculations. But basically, I stand by our current forecast for Q1.

Ladies and gentlemen, that will conclude today's question-and-answer session for today's conference. I would now like to turn the call back over to James Debney for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. I want to thank the entire Smith & Wesson team for delivering a record year of growth and profitability. We're looking forward to another successful year in fiscal 2014. Thanks, everyone, for joining us, and we look forward to speaking with you next quarter. Thanks again, operator.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation, and you may now disconnect. Have a great day.