Bruce Spohler
Analyst · Ladenburg. Your line is open
Thank you, Rich. First and foremost, let me say, how pleased we are with the portfolio and how well it is whether the crisis so far. This supports our underwriting pieces, but minimizing the risk of loss by investing at the top of the capital structure in cash flow loans to non-cyclical industries, and allocating the significant exposure to asset based loans through our specialty finance lending verticals. At quarter end, the weighted average investment risk rating of SUNS portfolio remained at 2 based on our 1 to 4 risk rating scale, with one representing the least amount of risk. As further indication of the current resiliency of our portfolio 100% of our investments were performing at quarter end. At June 30, our $532 million comprehensive investment portfolio was highly diversified, encompassing 215 borrowers across 115 industries. Approximately 45% of the portfolio was invested in our senior secured, asset based and life science lending strategies, and the remaining 55% was invested in senior secured cash flow loans. Our largest industry exposures are healthcare providers, professional services, and insurance brokerage. The average investment per issuer was $2.5 million or approximately 0.5% of the total portfolio. At June 30, approximately 100% of our portfolio consisted of senior secured loans, comprised of 99% first lien, and 1% second lien senior secured loans. We believe that our efforts to position our portfolio to almost entirely invested in first lien loans, which carry less risk than second lien and subordinated loans will result in greater capital preservation during this crisis. At quarter end, our weighted average asset level yield was 9.2%. By focusing on our commercial finance verticals, we’ve been able to maintain asset level yields approaching 10%, despite the sharp drop in LIBOR resulting from the Federal Reserve’s efforts to aid the economy. Including activity across our 4 business lines, originations totaled just over $23 million and repayments were just over $128 million, resulting in a net portfolio reduction of $105 million. Substantially all of our portfolio contraction in the second quarter resulted from revolver pay downs in our 2 ABL businesses by the borrowers who had received government fiscal support. I’ll now provide an update on our investment verticals, including valuation updates. Let’s start with the cash flow segment. We believe the cash flow portfolio is well positioned to withstand prolonged recession. Our cash flow portfolio does not have direct exposure to cyclical industries, such as energy, travel, retail, leisure, heavy manufacturing, or consumer discretionary sectors. We’ve been in regular dialogue with the management teams and sponsors of our portfolio companies regarding their business prospects during COVID. We are encouraged by the steps taken by our portfolio companies to preserve liquidity, as well as the continued strong sponsor support. Our 99% first lien portfolio, relatively modest average, first lien leverage of 5 times, significant junior capital cushion and strong sponsor support positions as well to withstand economic headwinds. We view the majority of our portfolio companies as providing essential services in non-cyclical sectors that will continue to be required during periods of regional stay in place mandates. As a reminder, our evaluation framework incorporates sector specific market spread movements in the quarter, adjusting for the existence of LIBOR floors, weighted average life of the investments, the existence of covenants, and other borrower specific factors such as their liquidity profile, sponsor support and our investment position in the capital structure. The majority of the increase in our portfolio marks this quarter, a reflective of market spread movements. To provide further context market spreads for the LCD first lien single B index tightened approximately 300 basis points, or 68% from the end of the first quarter to the end of the second quarter. Given the fundamental strength of our portfolio, we expect to recoup the remaining unrealized appreciation over the coming quarters. At June 30, our cash flow portfolio was $295 million, or approximately 55% of the total portfolio. It was invested across 32 borrowers with an average investment of just over $9 million. These companies had a weighted average EBITDA of $107 million, which highlights our longstanding commitment to finance larger businesses, which we believe are better positioned to withstand economic headwinds. The weighted average yield on our cash flow portfolio was just under 7%. The 32 cash flow borrowers, 2 portfolio companies had a temporary covenant waiver to support a decline in revenues as a result of stay at home during COVID. Well, it’s early days revenues are recovering strongly by more than 80% in the majority of cases, our borrowers are well capitalized with ample liquidity and strong sponsor support. Majority of the amendments that we executed were related to request for audit extensions, as a result of the disruption caused by stay at home orders. And the instances where we provided covenant release, we’ve managed to get some combination of increased fees and improved documentation terms. Overall, we are optimistic concerning your portfolio’s performance. In addition, we had no instances where cash interest payments were either partially or fully converted to pick interest payments. During the second quarter, period of inactivity for the middle market landscape, as sponsors focused their efforts on supporting existing portfolio companies. We originated roughly $4 million of first lien senior secured cash flow loans and experienced a similar amount of repayments. Our significant available liquidity of SUNS enables us to be active while maintaining our selectivity as new issue activity increases. Over the last few years, we’ve made a conscious decision to shrink our cash flow portfolio owing to frothy market conditions, resulting in highly leveraged deals with loose documentation. We’ve begun to see more opportunities to finance larger upper middle market companies have lower leverage levels and with better covenants and call protection. We will continue to maintain our discipline of investing in non-cyclical sectors focused on the upper end of the middle market in our cash flow segment. Now, let me turn to our asset based lending businesses. As a reminder, SUNS owned 2 commercial finance companies that specialize in making senior secured asset based loans collateralized on a first lien basis, primarily by accounts receivable. These portfolio companies lend to small- and mid-sized U.S. businesses, who typically have limited access to traditional bank financing. Gemino Healthcare is focused on providing revolving accounts receivable facilities exclusively to healthcare service providers. Collateral includes Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance receivables. North Mill finances companies primarily in the distribution, business services and manufacturing industries. North Mill is typically the sole lender to its borrowers, and its financing structures primarily include revolving accounts receivable financing, as well as factoring agreements. In addition, all factoring arrangements have recourse to the underlying borrowers. Both Gemino and North Mill are led by teams of seasoned professionals who have been an asset based lending for 25 to 40 years. The management teams are experienced risk underwriters across multiple economic cycles. Their business models are highly resilient, relationship driven, and serve as a lifeline of working capital to small businesses across the U.S. In addition, the collaboration across Gemino and North Mill business developments efforts. Together with North Mill’s acquisition last year of Summit Finance, has broadened and deepened the coverage across any regions and enhance the pipeline of investment opportunities. In prior economic downturns, asset based loans collateralized with cash receivable generally provide higher recovery rates than those supported only by cash flows with few or no maintenance covenants. Let me now provide an update on each of these businesses. Our valuation approach and the current investment environment they’re facing. I’ll start with North Mill, at quarter end, North Mill’s portfolio was over $134 million representing 25% of SUNS total portfolio. It consisted of 145 borrowers with an average investment of just under $1 million. Over 99% of the borrowers are deemed essential businesses and the PPP has been highly beneficial to North Mills portfolio companies. Importantly, North Mill’s portfolio is defensively positioned with approximately one-third of its exposure in the distribution industry with a concentration and food distribution, one-third in staffing with an emphasis on outsourced and remote IT staffing, and one-third in manufacturing with many borrowers operating in essential industries. At June 30, there were no defaults or delinquencies across North Mill’s portfolio. The yield on its portfolio was just over 13% compared to 12.5% during the first quarter. In the second quarter, North Mill funded just over $14 million of new and existing asset based investments and I’ve repayments of approximately $62 million. The heightened repayment activity occurred as North Mill’s borrowers pay down their credit line with North Mill with the proceeds from their paycheck protection program loans from the government, 87% of this total pay down during the quarter, related to revolving credit facilities that continue to remain in place and for which we expect to be drawn down yet again, as these borrowers liquidity profiles normalize. At quarter end, the fair value of our investment in North Mill was marked up slightly from the first quarter in line with improved valuations of the comparable companies we use in our valuation process. SUNS’ uses the services of an independent third-party to this valuation. Our framework is primarily driven by price to book values of pure comparables as well as private market transactions for similar businesses. Knowing where comparable businesses have been bought and sold over the past few years, we believe North Mill remains conservatively marked. During the second quarter, North Mill paid the company, cash dividend of approximately $1.25 million consistent with the first quarter and in line with North Mills current earnings power. This summer marks the one year anniversary of North Mills acquisition of Summit. The integration is complete and has been faster than we had expected. We’re encouraged by the discipline and shared culture, credit culture, broader geographic coverage, an expanded pipeline of investments across both asset base and factoring opportunities. We view factoring is a highly attractive asset class, and this portfolio as well as the addition of the core underwriting and business development team has increased North Mills exposure and expertise in factoring. Importantly, North Mill takes a conservative approach by prioritizing factoring agreements with recourse to the underlying borrowers. We anticipate continued steady performance for the North Mill. Now let me turn to Gemino. Gemino’s portfolio was $75 million at quarter end, representing 14% of SUNS total portfolio. Portfolio was comprised of loans to 29 borrowers, with an average investment of just over $2.5 million. The impairment risk remains extremely low, given Gemino’s disciplined underwriting and focus on financing health service providers, who have government and high quality insurance company accounts receivable is their collateral. Cash collections typically go directly into lockboxes and fees and interest payments are debited by Gemino automatically. At quarter end, there were no defaults across Gemino’s borrowers. The yield on Gemino’s portfolio was 10.8%. During the first – during the second quarter, we funded no new or existing investments and had repayments of approximately $62 million. The significant repayment activity resulted from pay downs on its borrower’s facilities with Gemino, with proceeds from the Medicare advanced payment program, HSS Grants, and the PPP… As with North Mill, we expect the amount drawn on Gemino’s borrower facilities to normalize over time. During the second quarter Gemino paid SUNS a cash dividend of just under $1 million, consistent with the first quarter, and in line with Gemino’s earnings power. During the quarter, Gemino delivered an 11% return on equity. At quarter end, fair value of our equity investment in Gemino was marked up 1% from the prior quarter, in line with improved valuations of the companies that we use in our valuation process. SUNS uses the services of an independent third-party as part of this process. While evaluation framework is fundamentally grounded in assessment of pure price to book values, there are not great comparable public companies. So we rely more on private transaction values for this highly specialized business. Since owning Gemino, our price to book value has been conservative relative to commercial finance companies with similar risk profiles. As we look forward, we’re confident in the portfolio quality of Gemino and believe the company is well positioned to capture additional growth as the market settles. Now, let me turn to Life Science lending. Overall, our portfolio is largely insulated from short-term market and economic dislocations given the long-dated equity investment periods and product development cycles. The impact of COVID has had a de-minimis impact on the underlying Life Science portfolio. 100% of our loans are performing and we continue to expect to incur no losses in this segment. As a reminder, we have never realized a loss in our Life Science investments. Currently, 100% of our Life Science portfolio have more than 12 months of cash runway. This is largely a result of our investment focus on public and venture capital backed late-stage pharmaceutical and medical device companies that are close to or entering commercialization. It’s important to remember that our discipline is to make Life Science investments at loan to values generally less than 20%. Here value is defined as actual cash invested in the business and not the enterprise value post the most recent VC funding ramp or market capitalization if the company is public. While the FDA may be slowing trials in favor of fast-tracking COVID treatments or vaccines, patients may be somewhat reluctant to participate in trials given the pandemic. The projected short-term delay for some companies is very short in relation to the 5- to 15-year development process, as well as the significant capital invested in these companies relative to the investment size of our loan. In addition, there are some late-stage companies whose revenues may be deferred as a result of delays in procedures or elective surgeries. The financial viability of hospitals, doctors and healthcare providers depend upon these sources of revenues, and we expect these services to continue to ramp back up during the rest of 2020. At quarter end, our Life Science portfolio was $27 million. The portfolio consisted of 8 borrowers, with an average investment of just over $3 million. The weighted average yield on this portfolio was 9.4%, excluding any success fees or warrants. Our valuation framework for Life Sciences is based on marking each investment at approximately its amortized cost, including the final fee received as a contractual payoff. There is no liquid market for private life science venture debt. We do not use equity benchmarks for determining our values. In accordance with this methodology the weighted average mark on our life science loans was approximately par at quarter end. The healthcare space in general continues to be attractive, and we are not seeing any slowdown in new Life Science investment opportunities. Also, the increased scale of the broad Solar platform enhances the opportunity set for investments in later larger-stage public pharma and medical device companies. We will continue to be highly disciplined in evaluating these new investment opportunities. In conclusion, we believe SUNS is well positioned to weather this crisis. As we continue to navigate this challenging environment, we will remain in close contact with our portfolio companies, their management teams and sponsor owners. We support them. We will also work with our extensive network of relationships to continue to source new investment opportunities. Our commercial finance platform and significant dry powder enable us to provide structured solutions including both cash flow and asset based loans for capital-constrained companies during these times. Solar Senior will be able to participate in these financings while maintaining significant diversification in its portfolio. Now, let me turn the call back to Michael.