Good day, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the STAAR Surgical Second Quarter 2019 Financial Results Conference Call. During today’s presentation, all parties will be in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, the call will be open for questions. [Operator Instructions] This call is being recorded today, Wednesday, July 31, 2019. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Brian Moore, Senior Director, Investor and Media Relations and Corporate Development for STAAR Surgical.

Thank you, Catherine and good afternoon everyone. Thank you for joining us on the STAAR Surgical conference call this afternoon to review the company’s financial results for the second quarter of 2019 ended June 28, 2019. On the call today are Caren Mason, President and CEO and Deborah Andrews, Chief Financial Officer. The press release of our second quarter results was issued just after 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time and is now available on STAAR’s website at www.staar.com. Before we begin, let me quickly remind you that during the course of this conference call, the company will make forward-looking statements. We caution you that any statement that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement. This includes remarks about the company’s projections, expectations, plans, beliefs and prospects. These statements are based on judgment and analysis as of the date of this conference call and are subject to numerous important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties associated with the forward-looking statements made in this conference call and webcast are described in the Safe Harbor statement in today’s press release as well as STAAR’s public periodic filings with the SEC. Except as required by law, STAAR assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or actual outcomes and does not intend to do so. In addition, to supplement the GAAP numbers, we have provided non-GAAP adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share and sales in constant currency. We believe that these non-GAAP numbers provide meaningful supplemental information and are helpful in assessing our historical and future performance. A table reconciling the GAAP information to the non-GAAP information is included in today’s press release. Following our prepared remarks, we will open the line to questions from publishing analysts. We ask that analyst limit themselves to two initial questions then re-queue with any follow-ups. We thank everyone in advance for their cooperation with this process. Now, I’d turn the call over to Caren Mason, President and CEO of STAAR.

Thank you, Brian and good afternoon everyone. The record second quarter 2019 results we reported today represent excellent progress for STAAR Surgical as we target paradigm change in refractive vision correction with our family of proprietary collamer lenses. Growth metrics in the second quarter for ICL sales units, gross margin, operating margin and GAAP EPS were all up meaningfully as compared to our breakout financial results for the year ago period Q2 2018. When coupled with the solid first quarter, we believe our second quarter results put us firmly on track to achieve or exceed our full year targets for 30% ICL unit growth, 20% company revenue growth, achievement of year-over-year improvements in GAAP net income, positive cash flow generation and a higher level of cash on our balance sheet. Turning to the details for the second quarter, our top line growth was driven by 34% ICL unit growth on a global basis representing the eighth consecutive quarter of double-digit ICL unit growth. On a regional basis, ICL unit growth in the second quarter handily exceeded record year ago levels in several markets, with China units up 48%, Korea units up 42%, Japan units up 29% and India units up 22%. ICL revenue in the second quarter of 2019 increased 26% over the prior year quarter as reported and was up 28% on a constant currency basis. The currency headwind about $600,000 in Q2 continued from the first quarter. Through the first half of 2019, the currency headwind negatively impacted reported revenue by approximately $1.3 million. Our largest ICL market, China, is also the largest market for refractive procedures with more than 24% or $944,000 of the 4 million global procedures occurring annually in China according to Market Scope data. This certainly makes sense given a very high prevalence of…

Thank you, Caren and good afternoon everyone. I will start financial overview with a summary of top line results and then provide more detail down the income statement. STAAR reported net sales of $39.7 million in the second quarter of 2019, an increase of 17% over $33.9 million reported in the year ago period. Adjusted for current headwinds primarily the Europe, net sales would have increased by approximately 19% over the prior year period to $40.3 million. As Caren mentioned, the strong top line increase was driven by ICL revenue growth of 26% which represented 87% of total company net sales in the quarter partially offset by other product segment sales which declined 21% in the quarter. Moving down the income statement, our gross profit margin for the second quarter was 75.4%, up 100 basis points compared to the prior year quarter gross profit margin of 74.4%. The improvement in gross margin was due to favorable product mix, resulting from an increased sales of ICL and decreased other product sales partially offset by the effect of lower average selling prices for lower diopter ICLs. Total operating expenses for the second quarter were $25.3 million, an increase of 14% compared to the prior year quarter of $22.2 million. Taking a closer look at the components of operating expenses, G&A expense for the second quarter was $7.5 million as compared to $6.2 million a year ago. The increase in G&A spending is due to increased headcount and salary related expenses, including stock-based compensation and increased facility costs and professional fees. Marketing and selling expenses were $11.7 million as compared to $10.7 million and included increased headcount, travel and continued investments in digital, strategic and consumer marketing. Our R&D expenses were $6.1 million compared to $5.3 million in the year ago quarter. R&D…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Chris Cooley with Stephens. Your line is open.

Good afternoon and thank you for taking the questions.

Hi, Chris.

Hi. Just if you can start on China obviously then heightened level of earnings I think on the Street’s when we think about the Chinese opportunity, could you provide some additional color regarding the growth you alluded to in new accounts and how you work new accounts in conjunction with your already existing strategic partnerships maybe just how that kind of unfolds and then just the opposite of that, maybe little bit more granularity on terms of the level of growth whether it be units or as a percentage of total from those new accounts during the course of quarter? And then I have just got one follow-up.

Okay, Chris. So with regard to China, our business is booming. And what we see coming is lot based on how we are looking at the June results in terms of the number of implants and we also have visibility on July. And so I think what’s most important to understand is that our demand out to the surgeon’s offices to meet patient implant requirements is much higher than our growth in terms of what we have been selling traditionally. So the new accounts and the added efforts that we have had at patient outreach are paying great dividends as we see a much even stronger position in China going forward in the year as we are already experiencing during this beginning at the busiest season of the year.

Okay, thank you. Appreciate that. And then maybe I quickly try here, I think I know the answer, but when we think about the regulatory pathway you alluded to in the discussions with the agency and a prospective clinical trial design. Can you just provide us maybe some insight into maybe what you have been able to garner versus your prior submission, what gives you that added confidence that this is a possibility here sounds like hoping as we go into calendar year end maybe in terms of locking down as a pathway?

So, as I believe we have mentioned before, we had very positive discussions with the FDA at our 100-day meeting post our initial submission, which you may remember started last October and was in review for several months. During that time I believe we did an excellent job with the FDA outlining the original suggested retrospective pathway hoping that we might be able to successfully conclude with a limited post-approval study. And where we are today is in what we believe a respectful and excellent relationship with the FDA in talking about what remaining questions there are, what timeframe within a study could achieve a result, and what the post-approval timeframe would look like post the prospective clinical work. So, I think the bottom line here is that there is great recognition of least burdensome pathway within the FDA reflecting the statutory mandate to find efficiency when you have what will be considered I believe in our case outstanding data that you would be able to come up with a different and yet very effective method to be able to answer the questions that remain with the FDA.

Thank you and congrats again on the record June quarter.

Thank you. And we are really excited.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Jason Mills with Canaccord Genuity. Your line is open.

Hi, Caren and Deborah, it’s actually [indiscernible] on for Jason. I just want to say congrats on the high growth quarter. I guess just starting with EDOF in Europe, great progress with the submission and the clinical data is outstanding. I was just wondering could you talk about what you factored into your tiny expectations, I know you called out Q2, but just what you are seeing from a regulatory standpoint, everything going on in Europe today and then also when you might be able to see that clinical data?

Okay. So what we are determining in terms of time is based on our past experience, is based on the fact that this is a submission, an application for presbyopic indications to an already approved EDOF bispheric product. So it’s less potential time than you would normally have when you are talking about the introduction of the new product. So there is we believe substantial opportunity to be able to achieve that timeline. Could you repeat your second question please?

Just when you could see the data come out from that. And I guess if I could just follow-on as well, you talked about the IOL opportunity to piggyback with the win, I don’t think I heard you mentioned this before and I am just curious kind of what the past there would be and then just potential market upside from that?

Okay. So clinical data we will not disclose post what’s available until we have a determination from the reviewer that, that is acceptable. Normally, these situations if you do agree, you work with the reviewer to understand what they need and what they are willing to have us to disclose and when. In terms of the supplemental lens, when we get approval for a presbyopic indication for this lens, at the same time, we have already submitted for a supplement to our current lenses. So, the whole family of EVO lenses for the European Union and the 31 CE Mark countries all will encompass also an immediate we believe application of the supplemental lens. The supplemental lens as we will market it will be either the myopic or the presbyopic lens that will be positioned at the exact same place of the lens today. So it will sit in front of the capsulary bag in the posterior chamber and it will then become for those patients who only had a mono-focal lens that doesn’t give them spectacle independence. The opportunity to be able to with that going back in the capsulary bag which most surgeons do not want to do, very difficult procedure. So these patients millions and millions of who may have mono-focal lenses, if they want to be spectacle free, they don’t have a very good choice, so what we will be able to do is to provide this lens to the millions of patients who will have the opportunity to have an ICL just like they do today. Only it is in front of already an IOL, so there is even less concern about anything surgically related that could lead to cataracts as that patient already has an IOL lens. So, surgeons that we did a lot of market research with some doctors who have already thought to implant in this way. Between all of this, we are finding exceptional interest in a market where we are over 20 million patients annually globally undergo cataract surgery.

Great. Thank you for all the color on that. And I guess just asking about the U.S. market trends, you mentioned additional alliances that you signed, I was just wondering could you provide some more color just around growth interest you are seeing with your currently approved ones in the region and kind of where you expect this to try and going forward over the next few quarters out of EVO?

So, our goal in the United States is to reintroduce our company as a premium and primary partner to refractive surgeons now and in the future. And we have limited or had limited our time and our investments in commercial and strategic and digital marketing in the U.S. because we of course went through several years of not being able to a) market new product in the U.S. and b) having to prove that we really have an outstanding quality system which we have done. So, we have recently gotten approvals for submission for minor products or for updates or for changes. We have an approval on the full Toric post-approval study which is going to be underway quite soon. And with all of that, we are also signing already strategic partnerships where we are beginning to demonstrate that we are a company that when you come to lens based refractive care, we can provide not only extraordinary clinical excellence and you are happiest patients, but we are also beginning to work on how do we get a surgical suite built into a particular partners office complex, how are we able to provide practice development support and exceptional digital marketing and consumer marketing outreach and how do we being to build lens based is a huge growth endeavor in the United States versus the way lens based for many years has been ridiculously quiet. So I think the bottom line is that our Toric product even surprising to us has been exceptionally well received. Doctors are loving the results that their patients are getting. And so we are building on that and we are going to put more emphasis, more money and more build time into the U.S. as you have seen in the past. And we are also going to be getting ready for what we believe will be a very strong entrance of our EVO product when we are allowed.

Thank you, Caren. I appreciate all the color and congrats on the quarter.

Sure. Thank you very much. We will see you next week.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jim Sidoti with Sidoti & Company. Your line is open.

Good afternoon. Can you hear me?

I can, Jim. How you are doing?

Great, great. I just want to follow-up on the U.S., can you give us an idea of what the Toric sales growth was year-over-year in the quarter?

I think about 28% on sales.

Okay. And then it sounds to me as if you are really waiting to get the EVO approved before you go full speed here in the U.S., is that correct?

Well, I would say that we are – we have been successfully hiring very strong sales leaders. We have in place some extraordinary marketing, but what we won’t do is to go beyond into what I would say would be a concentrated effort to build stronger faster. I think what we are doing really here is issue the major markets, we are partnering with major surgeons and surgical practices and we will be building as we did in China the team along with the growth. The growth will lead the team. Right now, we have the right team to get this all going. So we are going to pace ourselves, but we are going to have a lot of really strong emphasis to the U.S. I have, for example, recently participated on panels at major refractive surgeons meetings like [indiscernible], also involved with activity with Octane here in George County that was directed toward ophthalmology leaders and I was proud to be one of them. So, I think STAAR is taking its place as it rightfully should in the U.S. market.

Alright. And then the last one for me, can you give us any sense on the size of the trial, you think you will have to do for EVO to get approval on what the follow-up period will be?

I can’t. We are in discussions. We have submitted that information. It must stay confidential, but least burdensome pathway continued to repeat.

Okay. Aright, thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Bruce Jackson with Benchmark Company. Your line is open.

Hi, congratulations on the quarter and thank you for taking the questions.

Sure Bruce.

So, starting off with the EDOF data, do you already have data for EDOF lens application?

Yes.

And then go ahead, no, no after you…

No, the piggyback lens is identical to the EDOF presby lens, so yes, it’s the same product. It’s just the application would as supplement to a mono-focal IOL in the eye versus as the primary refractive correction lens.

And then so you have done patients with IOLs and then implant the second lens just to be clear on that?

Well at this point, I can’t comment.

Okay. And then congratulations on the EDOF submission, I was wondering if you are going to be showing any additional data at the upcoming ESCRS meeting?

As I mentioned earlier, we are limited by what a reviewer will allow. So if we are able to, we will. We expect at our experts meeting since its surgeon to surgeon at a training environment that there maybe some mention of with the principle investigators who will be attending the meeting most likely through a panel where there will be what is approved from the reviewer shared with the audience.

Okay. And then if I can get just one more question and with China you said you opened some new accounts, I am just curious to know if there were still in the Tier 1, Tier 2 cities, what was the characterization of the new business geographically?

Well, the majority of new accounts are in Tier 1 and Tier 2, but we have been moving also to Tier 3 cities. Most of the time in the Tier 3 cities we are being invited by are larger current customers, because that is an area, where there has to be a lot of investment, because I am sure you are well aware there is very little infrastructure in Tier 3 cities in China. So we are still mostly expanding in Tier 1 and Tier 2, but remember we have a lot of opportunity in terms of current refractive procedures where we are able to move away from laser vision correction and into lens-based with ICL.

Alright. That’s great. Thank you very much.

Thanks Bruce.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Brian Weinstein with William Blair. Your line is open.

Hi guys. Good afternoon. This is actually Andrew Brackmann on for Brian. Maybe we can just go back to China for a minute, because by my math that represents somewhere around 95% of the dollar growth in the quarter. So maybe I would like to go back to Chris’s initial questions, but can you maybe provide some additional data around the number of surgeons who are actually doing the procedures in the country, how has that really trended over last several quarters? And then as it relates to high implant season, I know that the demographic here has been in question sort of the health of that Chinese consumer, what are your distributors telling you as it relates to the demographic?

Okay. In China, we have what we call a hybrid organization. And I think it’s extremely important that you understand that. We are not flying blind with a distributor network, where we are allowing our business to be purely built on numbers and slide references from uninvolved partnerships. Our relationships in China are built on over 50 top level employees of STAAR, led by an outstanding ophthalmic surgeon herself and we have built from 5 to over 50 and we understand every aspect of what’s going on with the Chinese consumer through the number of events that we co-sponsor and run with them through several months ahead of the busy season. Every weekend, we are on the road sponsoring road shows with our partners with the largest practices in the country, in coordination with them to get their patients excited about the product. There, we get interest from now families and friends and social media that are buzzing about ICL and how it’s dramatically improved their lives. So although I appreciate that you have a model to build, I think what’s most critical is that you clearly understand lot of dominance in what we are building and our confidence around it in China.

Okay, appreciate that. And then I guess one just question for Deborah on the guidance for the rest of the year. So as I think about that sort of the back half of the year and Q2 sort of being the strongest quarter that you have, how should we think about sort of the pacing through the back half, because by my math, it seems to be sort of – in order to hit just 20% sort of sequentially flat? Thanks.

Yes. I mean, if you look at the calendarization of sales last year, you are going to see similar trends in the calendarization this year. Just look at the percentage of contribution of each of the quarters that will tell you what to expect.

Okay, thank you. I am showing no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call back to Caren Mason for closing remarks.

Thank you very much everyone for our participation on our call today. We look forward to speaking with many of you in the coming weeks when we are on the road. We appreciate your interest and investment in STAAR Surgical. As always, the best to all of you. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today’s conference. This concludes today’s program. You may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.