Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Sensata Technologies Q1 2019 Earnings Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. (Operator Instructions) Please note, that this event is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Joshua Young, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Denise and good morning everybody. I'd like to welcome you to Sensata's first quarter 2019 earnings conference call. Joining me on today's call are Martha Sullivan, Sensata's CEO; and Paul Vasington, Sensata's Chief Financial Officer. In addition to the earnings release, we issued earlier today, we will also be referencing a slide presentation during today's conference call. The PDF of this presentation can be downloaded from Sensata's Investor Relations website, and we will post a replay of today's webcast shortly at the conclusion of today's call. Before we begin, I'd like to reference Sensata's Safe Harbor statement on Slide number 2. During the course of this conference call, we will make forward-looking statements regarding future events or the financial performance of the Company that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual results may differ materially from the projections described in such statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in our Forms 10-Q and 10-K, as well as other subsequent filings with the SEC. On Slide number 3, we show Sensata's GAAP results for the first quarter of 2019. We encourage you to review our GAAP financial statements in addition to today's presentation. Most of the subsequent information that we will discuss during today's call will be related to non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of our GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures are included in our earnings release and in the back of our webcast presentation. The Company provides details of its segment performance on Slides 10 and 11 which are the primary measures management uses to evaluate the business. Martha will begin today's call with an overall business summary, Paul will then cover our financials for the first quarter of 2019 and provide guidance for the second quarter, as well as update full year 2019 guidance. We will then take your questions after our prepared remarks. Now, I'd like to turn the call over to Sensata's CEO, Martha Sullivan.

Thank you, Joshua, and thanks to everyone on the call for joining us this morning. We continue to significantly outgrow our end-markets in the first quarter while advancing important megatrend initiatives that will benefit our long-term growth. On Slide 4 I list some of the key highlights of the first quarter. For the first quarter, we reported revenues of $870.5 million, which exceeded the high-end of our revenue guidance and represented organic revenue growth of approximately 1%. We delivered adjusted EPS of $0.85, which is in line with the midpoint of our guidance for the quarter. Our revenue performance reflected a meaningful decline or slowdown in most of the end-markets we serve. The most notable declines in the first quarter were our China auto end-market which was down 17%, and our European auto end-market which was down 5%. Despite this difficult end-market environment, we continue to deliver strong secular growth. We outgrew our HVOR end-market by 850 basis points while our auto business outgrew underlying production by 490 basis points. Much of our revenue outperformance in the first quarter was driven by new products which initially have higher costs and margins that are below our company average initially. As a result of the rapid growth of these new products, our adjusted operating margins in Q1 were below our guidance. We expect that our operating margins will improve as new products scale and as new productivity initiatives gained traction during the remainder of the year, and into 2020. Next, we closed two important agreements for our electrification and smart and connected megatrend initiative. In electrification, we signed an agreement with a large Chinese auto manufacturer to develop our wireless battery management solution. In smart and connected, our major global truck OEM has selected some Sensata as the supplier of a wireless…

Thank you, Martha. Key highlights for the first quarter as shown on Slide 9 include revenue of $870.5 million in the quarter, a decrease of 1.8% from the first quarter of 2018. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates decreased revenues by 1.2%. The net effect of our valves divestiture and the acquisition of GIGAVAC decreased revenues by 1.4%. The net result was 0.8% organic revenue growth in the quarter. Adjusted operating income was $188.6 million in the quarter and declined 3.2% compared to the first quarter of 2018 or a decrease of 5% on a constant currency basis. Due to the effects of customer price changes that occurred at the beginning of the year, the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures, and new product launches, this was partially offset by lower operating expenses. Adjusted net income was $139.3 million in the quarter and declined 5.2% compared to the first quarter of 2018. Adjusted EPS was $0.85 in the first quarter, flat compared to the prior year quarter, which reflects a $0.04 decline and operational performance, a $0.03 decline from the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures, $0.03 increase from foreign currency and a $0.04 increase from share repurchases. Now I'd like to comment on our two business segments in the first quarter of 2019. I will start with Performance Sensing on Slide 10. Our Performance Sensing business reported revenues of $640 million for the first quarter, a decrease of 3.4% compared to the same quarter last year, reflecting both the negative impact from foreign exchange of 1.2% and the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures, which reduced revenue by 3.6%. Excluding these factors, we generated 1.4% organic revenue growth in the first quarter compared to the same period last year. Heavy vehicle and off-road business, which reported organic revenue growth…

Thank you. Denise, please assemble the Q&A roster.

Thank you, sir. [Operator Instructions] The first question will be from Wamsi Mohan of Bank of America Merrill Lynch, please go ahead.

Yes, thank you. Sorry, there's some background noise here at the airport this morning. Martha and Paul, it's nice to see the free cash flow performance here largely unchanged here despite this significant deterioration in the end-market, so great job on that. So clearly, China is weak in 1Q, but Martha, can you give us some sense of whether you saw any incremental improvement over the course of this past quarter? Did things get better or in March at all and so far this month is the stimulus is helping at all? Any color there would be helpful and I have a quick followup.

Sure, Wamsi, and thanks for the observation on the cash flow. We've seen a number of elements of working capital improve. Relative to the end-markets, let me just make it really clear that if we had to look at one end-market that's probably changed our perspective going forward from prior call, it would be Europe, particularly Europe Auto. But turning back to China, the leading indicator that we are watching really carefully is overall inventories. And so while we recognized and improved end demand rate in March, incrementally improved, we look at that overall inventory where it is sitting at about 4.6 months, which is very high for China. And our view of end-market, our production rate because that's what impacts our overall revenue, Wamsi; so that 4.6 sitting at where that's sitting today has us incrementally, and I'd say marginally worse in China. It's not a huge overall correction, but something that we continue to watch really closely.

Okay. Thanks Martha, that's helpful. And as you look at sort of the macro environment, clearly, it has a two-point worse auto assumption that you've made over here. Do you think that that's sort of the worst of it, I know it's hard to handicap sort of this early on in the year, but as we think about our models and about the risk that's embedded or captured within your assumptions, would you say that the potential for this number to down-take as we go through the course of the year is relatively low given some of the very weak fourth quarter of last year and the first quarter of this year? Thank you.

Sure. What we try to do in providing guidance and an outlook, is to look at a realistic base case. Having said that, I would say, we recognize that with down-markets there is momentum and we've followed that momentum into the guide. But I would be - I think it's important to recognize, we're trying to be as middle of the road in our outlook and our guide, using just objective analytics. So I think things could get better if the overall China incentives are more impactful. There is no question that when markets are volatile they can also go the other way; so just trying to be very balanced in our overall perspective.

Thanks Martha, very good execution.

The next question will be from Deepa Raghavan of Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Good morning all. Two questions to any updates on your underlying European production? I mean, especially as it fits to your 1% to 4% core revenue growth, what's the underlying production assumption at the low-end and high-end? And just curious on the overall Europe market there. How much of this weakness is still from WLTP lingering versus newer macro headwinds? And just curious if you're expecting any recovery into next year at all? That's my first, and I have a followup.

Yes. So, when we just look at it quantitatively, Europe we're expecting to be close to 4% down for the overall year, and that is incrementally down from our previous guide. As it relates to WLTP, we believe that that has been pretty much stabilized now as we exit from first to second quarter, and now we're seeing the impacts of overall end-market dynamics. Keep in mind that some of our customers in Europe are also exporting to China, and so we'll measure that impact in Europe where the demand takes place, but there is a knock-on effect in Europe as well. So those are the two things that we're looking at closely; the dynamics of the European end-market, and then what happens to European suppliers when overall China continues to move.

My followup is on China automotive; what are you hearing about any potential automotive stimulus? At this time is that still on the table? And if - we have other credit measures, but is there a direct automotive stimulus we should be expecting if things get weaker? And what kind of rebound should we expect from Sensata if that were to happen? Thank you.

There have been measures that have now been enacted. And so, one in particular is around incentives to take sort of older more polluting vehicles and upgrade those to NEVs. And we know that that has been enacted, we know more broadly there have been VAT incentives that have been in place in China. We're counting on those to have an impact, although we expect the impact will be late in the year, so not tremendous overall impact. As it relates to Sensata, keep in mind that our year-over-year comps, particularly as it relates to China, become much easier in the second half; so we saw very large contraction in the end-market in China in the fourth quarter of last year and that began actually in the third quarter. So much of our improvement comes from continued execution on our part, secular growth, but also easier comps, quite frankly, as we get into the second half of the year.

Got it, thank you.

The next question will be from David Kelley of Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Good morning, thanks for taking my questions, a couple from me. Just looking at Slide 10 and the performances in segment margin; could you give us a bit more color on the impacts of the higher R&D investment and then some of the product launches that are taking place right now?

From an R&D perspective, the couple of million dollars increase year-over-year is related to investment in some of these emerging trends like we've mentioned around Smart & Connected and some the Electrification initiatives that we have ongoing.

I think relative to the new product launches, keep in mind, it is very typical for us when we are launching brand new products and brand new processes and equipment. Those will generally launch at margins that are lower than our company average, and that's because the yields are lower, that's because these are mission-critical products; so there is a lot of redundancy to ensure that our quality levels are where they need to be. And that's not the way we operate once we get to stabilization of the overall new products, those margins will improve. What's a little bit unusual in the first quarter is that we have so much of that activity early in the year in our first quarter which is usually our down quarter; so typically in terms of margin. So the lowest margin quarter for Sensata is always in our first quarter. It's not generally the quarter of the most intense new product launch. The good news is the new product launch is the proof-point which underlines our secular growth performance. So it's great to be having that early in the year and it will serve us very well as we go forward through the balance of the year, but that is an element of what's driving the lower operating margin in the Performance Sensing.

Okay, great. Thank you, that's helpful. And just a quick followup on an earlier point; you mentioned Europe auto end-market weakness has kind of been the biggest surprise to the downside. It seems to be a recurring thing from the rest of the auto space this quarter and I think you referenced general end-market weakness. How much do you think is tied to the next round of emissions testing that kicks off I believe in Q3 of this year? And are there any end-markets, and specifically to call out where you're seeing broader weakness? And I guess, as we think more broadly, some of your content expansion opportunities and some of the recent product launches; anything specific to call out as it relates to Europe in the back half that might be a nice offset?

Good question. So there is another round of emissions testing. I believe it happens in September and it's related to evaporative emissions, and we've been watching that one very, very closely. And looking at what the actual protocols are, we don't expect that we're going to see another bottleneck in the overall supply chain in getting vehicles to market given that new product or protocol. I think the industry has learned from the first round, so we're not expecting that to be what's driving the incremental downside that we're seeing. It really does come down to what's happening in specific geographies in Europe; Germany, in particular, has not been a strong country. We look at the impacts of Turkey, for example. We're mindful about Brexit being a potential overhang and continuing to monitor that as well, but it's much more around the economic conditions in some of the countries in Europe that's driving our incremental downside. As it relates to new product launches; we are very active in Europe with content growth and that's important. Those are legislatively mandated applications that are driving our overall growth and our launches are very much in line with expectations, very much helping us to offset that overall end-market decline.

The next question will be from Jed Dorsheimer of Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks. I guess my first question Martha is, you mentioned inventory levels of autos, in particular; and so if we look at the current levels, we have to go back to I believe 2007, pre-crisis to kind of get to these same bloated levels in terms of inventory in the markets. And so if we look at what happened from '08 to '09, we saw about a 13% reduction in production levels and you've done a nice job of kind of framing and/or shifting the business, talking about how you've gone from fixed cost to more variable cost. So, if I look at the new guide of $50 million lower which is about 5 million auto units from a production just in percentages, I was wondering if you could help frame and remove FX and the share buyback; it looks like you're flat in EPS. So on $50 million lower, you're able to manage a flat EPS for the year. So I was wondering if you could frame whether or not there would be a waterfall if we see greater auto production cuts than what you're forecasting right now, maybe for every 5 million units what we should expect? Thanks.

Jed, it's a good analytical question which I would expect from you. I think a couple of things to keep in mind. The $50 million that's coming out of our overall view isn't all auto. It's a big piece of it when you look at Europe, and particularly, little incrementally worsened China. But we're now biased towards the sort of worse end of our expectations in the HVOR market as well, and we're seeing some softness in our Industrial business which makes it challenging to tie all of the downside in the overall drop out. Also, recognize that while we have been growing really well in China, our content per vehicle in China is still lower than mature market content per vehicle, so it matters a lot where that overall dropout is in the end-market. So we'll try to think of ways to be helpful, to make sure folks understand where further changes in the end market may impact our overall top line. I think the key thing to recognize is, we are very deliberate about ensuring that our costs are aligned with where the market is going; and so it's not simply an independent top line call, there are cost actions that come with that. We are continuing to reposition our costs in some locations, given what we see coming in terms of overall end-market softness. So that's the piece you can be very, very confident of in terms of preserving our margins and minimizing any fall-through that comes out of revenue declines.

That's helpful. Just as a followup, Martha and just shifting gears over to the win that you got in the trucking with the gateway. I was wondering if you could provide any additional color with respect to content on that as it seems like clearly it's a content growth story for both, auto as well as HVOR, and I just - maybe a little bit of color would be helpful? Thanks.

Sure. We're really excited about this one. I think the way to think about it is that there - as we talked about, we're very strong in wireless sensors. That has given us an ability to take a look at the consolidation of input of sensors across the commercial truck and quite frankly the trailer information as well. So you can think of it as an area network that we're providing on that commercial truck trailer. What that allows us to do is really enhance our overall sensor content. But frankly, much more importantly, we're bringing brand new content to the vehicle. The gateway itself, the range of that ASP, there can be quite a range on that given what the overall optionality of function the OEM or the fleet manager chooses. Keep in mind there's a retrofit piece of this. But we're talking about ranging from, I would say very high double-digit ASPs for this kind of added functionality. And then as we look ahead, there are opportunities to move beyond just the hardware piece of that but also look at the service and even Software-as-a-Service element that comes with owning that particular gateway. So we're really, really excited about it.

The next question will be from Steven Fox of Cross Research. Please go ahead.

Thanks, good morning. First question, just on some of the margin pressures related to the new product ramps. I'm just trying to understand the math there a little bit more. I mean, is it basically the quantity of ramps or was there any specific ramps in there that put more pressure than others on the margin or was it the percentage relative to sort of a slower overall Q1 and can you just sort of describe how those ramped from here and whether we see more margin pressures in the next quarter or two?

Yes. It's really the latter 2 factors that you cited. It's the quantity of ramp. Again, that is the expected consequence of stronger overall secular growth and wins in the marketplace. And it's the fact that it's happening at a time where overall volumes are down in the product areas that are moving more with market. So it's a combination of the overall mix impact of those 2 things: quantity of ramps and lower overall rate at large in the business. And then as we look ahead, the remedy for that is quite straightforward and very familiar to Sensata. We have to do 2 things. We have to quickly get the overall margins of those new products up to their designed margins, and that is a task that is part of our overall launch strategy. This is not unusual, that challenge. And then secondly, we have to make sure that we are constantly repositioning the cost where we see volume down, also not an unusual challenge for Sensata, and we've got a great track record of doing that effectively.

Great. That's very helpful. And then just as a followup, could you - given sort of the incremental down cuts to your end markets expectations, how does that affect what type of slope we should be thinking about for the second half of the year? Obviously, the comparisons get easier. But in aggregate, do you think it's - your sales are a little bit more back-end loaded based on what you're now seeing in the end markets? Thanks.

Yes, I'd say they are somewhat back-end loaded. Again, just given the way we see the overall end-market dynamics playing out. Couple of things to keep in mind; so we moved from a really down quarter, for example, in China in the fourth quarter, that end-market moved sideways into the first quarter. So we are expecting that market to get better from a year-over-year perspective, but it doesn't have to get a lot better for us to achieve our overall second half.

I would say, we expect to see the improvement in organic growth improved from Q3 to Q4, so we - somewhere in the low single-digit organic growth in Q3, and then improving in Q4 to get to the full year guidance. So gradual improvement and that's also benefiting from the favorable comps year-over-year given how low last year's Q4 was in many of our end-markets, not just China.

[Operator Instructions] The next question will be from Shawn Harrison of Longbow Research. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning everybody. Martha, I was hoping you could give us a sense on inventory in the Sensing Solutions business, particularly just you're - the inventory of your product or final product within China in the Industrial and kind of HVAC and appliance markets; and how much of an overhang that is right now if at all?

Yes. That's - keep in mind that's a really diversified end market space for us. We do keep our eye on indicators. For example, industry online information that we can get in that overall market. We recognize that inventories were high coming into the year. We've seen some improvement on that, so we expect to see that overall inventory rate come down and some production levels then come down with that as we move through the balance of the year. And that's part of what's informed our guide as we look to the second half of the year.

Thank you. And this is a brief followup, gross margin that everyone's touched on was down 110 basis points year-over-year. Is there a way to bucket how much of that was because of lower volume on legacy products versus the valves business sales/the GIGAVAC acquisition versus the cost from launching new products just to have an idea of, as you get those new products back to the corporate average, kind of the bounce back we should expect?

I think the two big drivers would be the change in customer pricing that happens every year at the beginning of the year. That's probably half of that. And then the new product launches make up the rest.

Yes. The - one thing to keep in mind, too, as we get into the second half of the year, that, that acquisitions headwind also diminishes because we divested the valves in the third quarter. So that's been a piece of it. That diminishes as we move through the year.

And the next question will be from Christopher Glynn of Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Thank you, good morning.

Good morning.

I had a question about new product launches by automotive OEM customers. And curious how you think about the impact of trade and tariff uncertainty because the major OEMs have global production, some local for local, some not, and they have to decide how to allocate production. So wondering if you could comment on that dynamic if you think it exists?

Well, from -- the way that dynamic would impact Sensata, if at all, would be whether those customers end up seeing their overall demand come down. We have positioned pretty effectively to be region for region. So in Europe, we're providing from Bulgaria. In North America, it's from Mexico. China for China. So that has less direct impact on our overall supply chain movement. What we're keeping an eye on are - is if, for example, it becomes more difficult to bring a vehicle produced in Europe into North America, how then will OEM share shift change. We're generally agnostic to overall OEM mix inside the region because we're pretty well represented across that OEM space. I think the one customer we've always been really transparent about that we don't have great position on is Toyota. So we look to see whether or not they're advantaged given any of these changes. But I'd say to respond to that, Chris, it's really more what the overall impact it has on demand in the end markets.

So, you don't see that trade uncertainty causing any deferrals or push-outs in new platform launch cadence?

We have not seen that. No, absolutely not.

Okay. And then a question on GIGAVAC, you talked about a $300 million sales pipeline. Just to put that into context, wondering how you're thinking about perspective capture rates competitively?

Yes. We're very encouraged. It's early days. But when we look at our hit ratios or our win ratios, they're high, in line with overall Sensata's and, I would say, even above what our expectations had been when we did our diligence. And that's a function really of strong technology that comes from GIGAVAC as well as a great position that we have in the overall market, so feeling really good about our success rate in the market.

And the next question will be from Brian Johnson of Barclays. Please go ahead.

Yes, Martha. Several questions. First, just touching upon the share repurchase plan. You mentioned pulling $150 million to it. But can you - $550 million over 10 months. I know last May you did a $400 million authorization. So there must have been some remaining. How are you thinking about the pace going forward and what you as a Board might be bringing to shareholders or have already presented to shareholders, but I haven't seen it, for the upcoming year?

Hey Brian, it's Paul. So we come back to our strategy around balanced capital deployment, weighing the benefit of M&A and share repurchases. So since we redomiciled to the U.K. back in the end - middle of last year, springtime, we bought back $550 million of shares, we've acquired GIGAVAC. And so as we go forward, we have $100 million left on our authorization to the Board who we interact with fairly regularly around capital deployment. And it's likely we're going to spend $100 million over the next 6 to 9 months and complete the authorization. Depending on what other opportunities are in front of us, we may go back to the Board for increase, but we're going to continue to look at that in a balanced way that drives the greatest returns for the company and for shareholders.

Okay. And second question, more housekeeping question and a more strategic one. The housekeeping question anything unusual or in terms of greater pressures this year in the annual price downs that you mentioned at calendar first quarter? I'm thinking in particular the automotive side given the pressure on margins across the OEM industry.

No, nothing unusual. And in fact, when we look at our overall price downs, we're running at less price giveaway than we have historically. So when volume's down, it's an opportunity to revisit the conversation, where volumes were expected to increase at a particular level, and renegotiate price downs given less volume being delivered, quite frankly.

Okay. And final question, more strategic. This overall secular shift of wireless sensing, both in regular automotive, future automotive and probably your industrial and HVOR end markets as well, is that something that will help - it's certainly your growth platform. But how do you think about it in terms of margins and ROIC both in the growth phase and then when - as the market gets more substantial and more mature?

At a gross margin perspective, we would expect that to be accretive to our overall growth margins. It's an area where we're investing heavily in R&D. So I would think about probably at about company average when it comes to PFO or EBIT but accretive on the gross margin line.

The next question will be from Matthew Sheerin of Stifel. Please go ahead.

Hi, thank you for taking the question. This is Alvin Park on behalf of Matt Sheerin. Could we - could you elaborate a little bit more on what you're seeing - what your expectation is for auto production demand? I believe global auto production was 3% to 4% decline with China at 5% to 6% and Europe at 4%. So what's a gauge of how you're seeing North America markets and the cadence of it, especially in the second half, in relation to prior year comps?

Yes. North America is playing out in line with our overall expectations coming into the year. And then we again, we expected it to be a down market. I think we called it around overall 1%. When we look at what's happening in the customer base, it's behaving in line with our expectations.

Thank you very much.

The next question will be from Joseph Giordano of Cowen. Please go ahead.

Good morning, this is Rob in for Joe. I just had a quick follow-up to the question asked earlier. But the Wireless Battery Management agreement that you mentioned, I just wonder if you could give us some color on what kind of content that would be. And then also, just like how discussions have gone in the industry regarding technologies like that, how much excitement there is around that? Just anything you could provide would be helpful.

Sure. When we look at the content, again given these are much more complex products, mission critical, and they have optionality in terms of what we can deliver to the customer. So the ASPs move around a bit. But we're talking about ASPs here that are in the hundreds of dollars. So significant adder. I think at one point, we provided in an earnings call the trajectory of our content per EV, and our base case on that was something like $175, probably up to a couple hundred, per vehicle. So it's quite significant, well, because really important is to make sure that we're doing two things. First of all, providing at or better performance from the current wired solutions that are in place. And then secondly, delivering on incremental benefits to our customers, and they're really seeing those. So this notion of being able to increase overall energy density is a big one. The ability now to actually monitor battery cell information throughout the manufacturing process as well as through the life of the overall vehicle, a lot of excitement around that as well. So I - we consider it's still early days, but the engagements now are significant enough and developed enough where we're able to say we see a line of sight to overall first revenue.

The next question will be from Mark Delaney of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Yes, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. I was hoping you can talk more on the HVOR market. Martha, you highlighted the content gains the company has seen in that market. I was hoping you can elaborate a bit more on maybe what specific products are helping with that content gain. And you talked about the variability quarter-to-quarter. Were you trying to signal anything about the rate of content growth investors should be expecting for the balance of this year or is that just talking about the normal cyclicality and lumpiness that can occur with content in general?

It's really the latter, the - just recognizing that the content piece moves around quarter-to-quarter. We expect that we'll see strong overall content growth in HVOR when we look back on 2019, so really happy about the overall performance there. And it's driven by the - many of the things we've talked about. We continue to see a move towards electrifying the cabin of off-road equipment. So we're moving from mechanical, hydraulic controls into electric, electronic solutions. What we bring to that challenge continues to increase in terms of the overall subsystem and their functionality. We see lots of opportunity to continue to add content per cabin as we work that opportunity. We're now seeing very early days on bringing Electrification products to that overall segment, so very, very early in the process. But when you look at medium-duty trucks and commercial buses, that's our focus, so we're engaged closely with customers, beginning to respond to some overall RFPs for those solutions. And then finally, we continue to see the need for cleaner overall conventional powertrains when you look broadly at the commercial truck market, and we're helping our customers solve those problems as well.

And so a follow-up along those same lines. I think it was last summer you highlighted some initial wins with steer-by-wire. Can you remind us when those start to go into production and what the content per truck opportunity is from steer-by-wire?

Yes. Steer-by-wire is a ways out. The - and my recollection is that we're in the 3 to 4-year horizon when we see as a meaningful revenue on that. Content can be quite high. Our overall content on those subsystems tends to be high anyway, triple digits when you look at what that overall functionality is. One other thing I should mention in HVOR really I forgot to mention is we are launching in TPMS as well, and we're using the TPMS opportunity as the basis for up-selling to this overall gateway, and we're having success in doing that.

The next question will be from Jim Suva of Citi. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much. And Martha, you gave a lot of details on all that thus far. Setting aside the kind of near-term auto headwinds, looking at some of your recent announcements of the battery optimization and benefits from that and steer-by-wire, so it sounds like we're setting up for maybe - and maybe my time line, you can correct me, in like 2-ish or 3-ish years, a potential meaningful step-up in your content. Is that the way to think about it, about the design cycle happening now and getting the wins and the production in a few years? So that could be a meaningful step-up. And if you can clarify if that's the time line we should think of. And then my second point is more near term. The fluctuations in raw materials, aluminum, copper, plastics, oil, resins, are you guys hedged? How should we think about the fluctuations in the raw materials?

Yes. Let me address your first question, Jim. I'll let Paul chime in on what's going on in commodities in the business. We are certainly very much focused on continuing to extend our overall secular growth and, quite frankly, inflect it. And so when you look at the overall value of the new solutions we're bringing, much higher ASPs, that's an important element of it, is positioning to be able to inflect the overall growth. Having said that, I would say it's still early days. And in things like our Wireless Battery Management, sensing, it's really going to happen also at the rate of electric vehicle growth per penetration in the fleet. So there are some externalities that will impact how these play out and impact Sensata's overall growth. But the intention is very much to inflect from what is, I think, a strong secular growth rate today to one that's even stronger.

Jim, on the currency piece - sorry, on the commodity piece, we hedge our commodities the way that we do currencies. So we hedge out forward about 18 months. And so it doesn't have a meaningful impact on our financials in 2019, and our commodity spend is probably around $65 million, $70 million per year.

So the true commodity piece of what we procure is pretty small, Jim.

The next question will be from Craig Hettenbach of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Yes. Just a follow-up question on the gross margin and understanding it's expected to improve through the course of the year. Is there a level you think you would settle out, how long a term, how to think about what the range of gross margin is for your mix of business?

Longer term, Craig, we continue to work the productivity side to more than offset the contractual price downs that we see in the automotive business, and we've had a rich history of doing that, whether it's reducing material costs through working with suppliers or design-driven cost savings or increasing the productivity or managing our network to be the most optimized, efficient it can be. All those activities go into driving costs out of the product every year, and we look for that to be more than the price that comes down, which is the long-term nature of our business, particularly on the auto side. So we expect gross margins to continue to grow year-over-year. We've seen that trend over the last few. The launch of the new products certainly has created some challenges in terms of margin profile in the first quarter, but we expect that to improve, as we continue to do - we always do every year, day in and day out. And if you look at our trends in the past, you'll see gross margins continue to grow quarter-to-quarter. So I feel confident that we'll be able to achieve the expectations that we have for the year and going forward.

And ladies and gentlemen, that's all the time allotted for the call today. I would like to turn the conference back over to Josh Young for his closing remarks.

Thank you. I'd like to thank everybody for joining the call this morning. Sensata will be attending the following investor conferences in the next two months; the JPMorgan Technology Conference, the Melius Industrials Conference, the Robert Baird Tech Conference and the Stifel Cross Sector Insight Conference. We hope to see you at these conferences, and we invite you to visit us at our headquarters in Attleboro, Massachusetts. We appreciate your interest in Sensata. Thank you, and good day.

Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.