Greetings and welcome to Intrawest Resorts Holdings First Quarter Fiscal 2015 Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. (Operator Instructions) I’d now like to turn the conference over to your host Ms. [Liz Derosier] Manager of Investor Relations for Intrawest. Thank you Ms. Derosier, you may begin.

Thank you, Doug. Good afternoon everyone and welcome to the Intrawest Resorts Holdings fiscal 2015 first quarter earnings conference call. After our prepared remarks, there will be a brief question-and-answer session. I’d like to remind you that some of the comments made by management during the fiscal call contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary, which are discussed in our public filings filed with the SEC including reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We caution you not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements made during this call speak only as of the date of this call and we undertake no duty to update or revise these statements. In addition, some of the comments made on this call may refer to certain measures, such as adjusted EBITDA, which are non-GAAP measures. Although adjusted EBITDA is not a substitute for net income, for other GAAP measures, management believe adjusted EBITDA is useful in measuring the operating performance of our business. For a full reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to GAAP results in accordance with Regulation G, please see our press release furnished as an exhibit to our Form 8-K dated November 10, 2014. This and the presentation that accompanying today’s call are located in the Investor Relations area on our website at www.intrawest.com. Our call today will include formal remarks from Bill Jensen, Chief Executive Officer; and Gary Ferrera, Chief Financial Officer. Travis Mayer, Executive Vice President of Operations & Business Development will be joining us for the question-and-answer session. Now, I’ll turn the call over to Intrawest CEO, Bill Jensen.

Thank you Liz and welcome everyone. I’m happy to report that it’s snowing today in Colorado and every time it snows in Colorado we get very excited. We’re pleased with our fiscal 2015 first quarter results and we’re excited about the upcoming 2014, 2015 ski season and look forward to realizing the full benefits of now owning 100% of Blue Mountain Ski Resort. Total reportable segment revenue for the quarter increased 7% to $74 million from $69.2 million primarily due to the Mountain Segment. Mountain Segment revenue in the quarter grew 9% driven by summer activities, lodging, food and beverage and retail and rental revenue as well as the inclusion of revenue from Blue Mountain. Blue Mountain’s vibrant summer business, 100% of which was included in our results for the 12 days beginning September 19, positively impacted Mountain Segment revenue by $1.3 million accounting for almost half of the 9% growth in the quarter. Lodging growth is driven by both volume and price primarily at Tremblant and Stratton. Tremblant hosted several large events this summer including multiple festivals and an Ironman competition each attracting several thousand visitors. We plan to continue to build upon the success of these events at our resorts going forward as part of an ongoing effort to drive greater summer visitation and revenues. Stratton benefited from the newly renovated Black Bear Lodge property completed last fall. The Black Bear Lodge renovation represents another successful capital project and illustrates our continued focus on high return investments at our resorts both for winter and summer operations. Our adjusted EBITDA loss for the quarter was favorable to our expectations while the Mountain Segment produced a loss for the quarter as the resorts do not open for ski operations until mid-way through our fiscal second quarter the adventure and real…

Thank you Bill and good afternoon everyone. In the first quarter of fiscal 2015 ended September 30, total reportable segment revenue grew 7% to $74 million as compared to prior year period and segment adjusted EBITDA loss with $20.1 million. $1.3 million in the reportable segment revenue growth and $300,000 of the EBITDA loss were due to including a 100% of Blue Mountain for the 12 days beginning September 19. Prior to the acquisition, our financial do not include any revenue from our 50% equity interest at Blue Mountain. While our adventure and real estate segment both generated positive EBITDA, the Mountain segment which is our largest segment has historically produced a loss in the first quarter. Our adjusted EBITDA loss for the quarter, while favorable to our expectations was larger than the prior year period primarily due to higher corporate cost and decreased U.S. firefighting revenue. Corporate cost increased primarily due to strengthening our public company infrastructure including additional headcount in third party IT services. As compared to the first quarter of the prior year, the Canadian dollar weaken by approximately 4% versus the U.S. dollar, negatively impacting total reportable segment revenue by approximately $2.1 million. However, the impact on adjusted EBITDA was minimal. Turning to our segment results; Mountain segment revenue increased 9%, $36.3 million. Going into little bit more detail, lodging revenue grew 14% due to increased revenue per available room primarily at Tremblant and Stratton as well as from the addition of Blue Mountain, which contributed incremental 500,000 of lodging revenue. Food and beverage revenue grew 16%, $7.4 million, benefitting from an increase in group business including wedding and banquets and from owning a 100% of Blue Mountain which contributed 400,000 food and beverage revenue. Retail and rental also produced notable revenue grew of 10.2% to…

Thank you, Gary. We’re excited about the upcoming skiing season and the continued success of our Season Pass and Frequency programs. With the acquisition of the reaming 50% of Blue Mountain and the opening of the new on-mountain restaurant at Winter Park, the fiscal 2015 ski reason represents an exciting time for Intrawest. As we look ahead to our two most important quarters, we remain focused on providing memorable experiences to our all our guest and delivering value to our shareholders. And with that operator we’d be happy to take any questions.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen at this time we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from the line of Shaun Kelley with BAML. Please proceed with your question.

Great. I’ll just lead up with a couple of questions on the Season Pass and Frequency product sales. So it sounds like the volume growth was very significant as the work closer to be end of the preseason selling period. So could you just remind us by this time typically how much of your Season Pass revenue you really have on the books going into the season?

Generally we’re little bit over two thirds of the way through the Revenue at this time of the year and so I kind of look at it as we’re in the final period of that selling process that goes right up to the Christmas holiday period.

Great, so you kind of answer the second which you keep the sales one to open all the way up until Christmas pretty much?

Just before Christmas, just before we get into that destination market that comes at Christmas time which this year will be about a four week earlier than the Christmas holiday itself.

Excellent, my second question is just as it relates to mix so with your units up so much as we -- it does sound like you’re getting pretty solid price increases on products right now but as we kind of move to the season, what’s your expectation in terms of how kind of increase usage particularly some of the maybe the resorts on the East Coast. I think last year for instance West Virginia was a bit of a drag on your total I think your mix. My question is just, how do you kind of think about increased usage of Season Pass with your units up impacting your mix and your ETP as we kind of see it in the model, we see it progress through the actual ski season?

As I mentioned on the call, our Season Pass and Frequency products sales were up at all of our resorts but I think the important pieces that are up significantly in Colorado. And in Colorado first of we command a higher price and a higher yield per visit, we’ve a long history utilizing that Season Pass in Colorado and basically we know the utilization runs from 9 to maybe 11 point some days per pass holder and we don’t anticipate any significant change in that utilization. So, despite given the fact that we’ve actually sold more passes in Colorado at higher price points than we did last year, we expect the utilization to be similar and that we would be able to capture the yield increase on a ETP per visit basis.

Our next question comes from the line of Afua Ahwoi from Goldman Sachs, please proceed with your question.

Thank you, hi guys. So just two from me, first of all, when you give especially some of the trend you’ve given through December the holidays. Is that on the same store basis so excluding the impact of having Blue as a 100% or if not could you give other same store impact? And then also I assume a little bit on Shaun’s point but I assume given where closer into the end of the selling season that is because as I’m looking at some of your trends versus what you said in Q4, you said first you were up north of 20% now it’s 20% too, is some of that sort of deceleration just a function of your latter in the selling season? Thanks.

First, the answer to your first question Afua, the lodging increases are same store and do not include Blue. So it’s a real increase in bookings for that two week Christmas period. I would say that our Season Pass sales we said up approximately 20% might be a couple of decimal points higher than that so I would say that through this period from our fourth quarter the consistency of sales has stayed.

Okay, got it. And then I guess just one final one I know you got mentioned in that sort of the revenue was definitely much better than we were looking for I know you said the EBITDA was also a little bit ahead of your plan but I know you never shared your plan externally but at least based on sort of the our internal numbers was maybe just a million or so short. So, maybe as you think about some of the models you saw, can you help us walk through maybe where some of that [indiscernible] or maybe even share with us where your internal plan was if that’s possible? Thanks.

Yes Afua, this is Gary. We’re not going to give our internal plan out I would just say we were comfortable with the number came out probably we’re little slightly ahead of where we were looking but we’re not going to give any more specific.

Our next question comes from the line of Joel Simkins from Credit Suisse. Please proceed with your question.

Yes, hey guys, good afternoon. Bill, you mentioned at end of your closing comments there so just conversations about continuing to find ways to monetize the real estate book, can you just give us anything new in that regard that you’re pursuing?

I think as you guys, no most people know the majority of our real estate value sits at Tremblant and Steamboat and Winter Park and we’re actively looking at opportunities at each of those resorts. Again, we’re looking at projects that could be scalable to kind of ascertain market demand and market interest. So, we continue to move forward on that, we seem to see that the interest in Tremblant seems to be picking up a bit which we view as a positive and we’re looking at some opportunities smaller opportunities, bigger opportunities at Winter Park as well as trying to really understand product and what the market is seeking there given the strength that we see here in the Denver market the economic strength, the housing market and the access to Winter Park which is basically 75 minutes away. We see that as potentially a near term opportunity to kind reinvigorate some real estate activity.

Sure. And you mentioned just obviously the strong Season Pass trend at this current point. Is there any certain, are there any particularly geography stronger than others as is it sort of allocated to the destination facilities or you’re seeing strength across the board putting some of the regional East Coast assets.

We are certainly seeing increases across all of our resorts but as I mentioned in the my comments Colorado is really very strong and the increases we see here are very encouraging for us primarily because it demonstrates that we’re providing a product to this market that the market is responding with real strong demand and we’ve been able to take several price increases as we work through the sales cycle and we see that is a positive as demand has not diminished at least to this point for the product.

(Operator Instructions) Our next question comes from the line of Joe Edelstein from Stephens Inc. Please proceed with your question.

Just wanted to ask a question on Blue Mountain I don’t recall you’re assuming any revenue or even expense synergies through that deal or maybe you can just correct me if I’m wrong on that. But it did sound like you now a joint product that you’re working on so I was curious if you have a sense for how large the revenue opportunity might be, maybe that’s too early at this stage at this point but even just commenting on customer databases or kind of helping us get a sense for how much cross over you might have there.

I guess my response is Toronto is a very strong scare market, scare population and Blue certainly is in our view the leading resort in resort market there. But we also know that Toronto residence like the travel to ski and we know historically that Tremblant is an attractive destination for them as well as Colorado and opening a 100% of Blue really allows us to leverage Blue Mountain’s database in our relationship where we only on 50%. We weren’t able to take advantages of the synergies that data base and as Blue held that database close and now that that’s been opened up us. It really provides some significant marketing opportunities. The other thing that we know is in our passport sales, the passport frequency product this year Toronto has been a market that has had real strong uptake of that product. And again because it’s a destination focused product we anticipate that we will see Tremblant will probably be the most favorite destination but we also see Colorado as offering significant value to the people that buy product. So we think there is some real opportunities and then as I said in my comments about the synergies on the cost side we’re confident that we’re going to be able to recognize some of those synergies on the cast side of the year in fiscal year ‘15.

That’s very helpful. I was hoping you could also give us the sense for what the broader M&A market looks like today I’d be curious how your pipeline looks now maybe compared to how it was a near ago and this would be excluding Blue Mountain of course but I’d be very interested to hear that as well as your general sense of overall valuations within the market if we’re seeing any movement that?

I think our focus is still very strategic with two specific targets for near-term acquisition growth one is the Northeast to build upon our base there the second would be Colorado. We’ve been active in both of those markets talking with different resorts I would emphasize nothing is eminent at this point. But there have been fruitful conversations but also because we’re acted in the market I think the Blue acquisition helped us that people see that we’re in acquisition mode. We’ve demonstrated we’re in acquisition mode. We also tend to see information of resorts outside of those two prime strategic markets that we look at. So I think we’re getting a pretty broad perspective on the market. As we talk to our investors our target is really resorts that fall on the $4 million to $10 million EBITDA range and as we discussed we acquired 50% of Blue we didn’t own for about seven multiple of trailing fiscal ‘14 EBITDA. We like to believe that valuation for at least the operating side of mountain resort business depending upon its location and how strategic it is in the market. We probably fall in that seven to perhaps eight times EBITDA range certainly trophy properties with much more significant either market share or market dominance would command a higher EBITDA.

This concludes our Q&A session, I’d like to hand the call back over to Mr. Jensen for closing comments.

Thank you Doug and thank you everyone for taking the time to join us on our fiscal 2015 first quarter call and we look forward to speaking with you again soon. Thanks everyone.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today’s teleconference. Thank you for your participation.