Bob Miller
Analyst · Maxim Group
Thank you, Dan. I will first discuss our key strategies to achieve strong revenue growth for fiscal year 2017; second, a review of the financial results of our derm strategy and our overall financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2016 and lastly, will provide some revenue guidance for the second fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2016. First, what are our key strategies to continuous strong product revenue growth for fiscal year 2017? Our strategies for growth for the rest of this fiscal year, which have been the same and consistent since the beginning of 2015 are the following. The number one strategy is to focus on growing revenue in the U.S. dermatology market with our direct sales force and a robust product portfolio with both Microcyn and non-Microcyn products. The U.S. derm segment provides us with the largest potential growth and will lead us to overall breakeven. Our number two strategy is to continue strong unit growth in our international business with new product launches and stronger partners. The international segment was 61% of our product revenue for this June quarter and generates cash to help fund the US derm growth. This strategy is really simple. Bottom line we’re selling into the derm market only with an expanding direct sales force and with an expanding product portfolio. What have been the financial results of our dermatology focus starting in October 2014 through our first quarter ending June 30, 2016? As a preface to discussing these dermatology results, starting from zero direct sales revenue in late 2014, we have built a strong dermatology foundation over the past year and half, upon which to continue to grow in the future. Jim will cover this in very detail in his discussion. There are several ways to measure our success in the derm market. One is the sales of our products which are recognized when we ship to the wholesale distributors. This is a common way of recognizing revenue and is reflected in the following reported revenue. Our total US product revenue was $356,000 for the September quarter 2014, $615,000 for the March quarter 2015, $787,000 for the June quarter, $1.2 million for the September quarter, and $1.4 million for the March and June 2016 quarters. This method of recognition tends to be driven by product load-ins to the wholesalers which can be lumpy. More specifically, our U.S. dermatology net product revenue was $686,000 for the quarter ending June 30, 2016 compared to $319,000 in the same period last year, an increase of $367,000 or 115%. In the dermatology business, the gross revenue is calculated by multiplying the units sold to the wholesalers times the price sold to the wholesalers, often called WAC, wholesaler acquisition cost. Our primary wholesalers are McKesson, Cardinal and AmerisourceBergen that show the product and inventory in distribution centers and field [ph] requested by the pharmacy. At that time wholesalers ship the product to the pharmacy and it is dispensed to the patient and [indiscernible]. The deductions from gross revenue to net revenue include a wholesaler fee of 10% to 12%, a return reserve of 5% to 7% and a rebate amount of 25% to 30% of gross revenue. A rebate program is offered by all companies offering similar products and provide significant reductions to those patients who do not have any medical insurance or have high deductibles for the product. As you can see from these percentages, the reductions from gross revenue to net revenue are significant. While we recognize our derm revenue when we ship the product to the wholesalers, a second method to objectively gauge the Oculus dermatology performance is the number of prescriptions sold to the patients via the pharmacies multiplied times the price paid to us by the wholesalers. This is sometimes called demand dollars. This information is available to the public for a fee via several well known databases. According to the Symphony monthly data, the total prescriptions sold to patients via pharmacies times the average price paid by the wholesaler for all of our derm products to give you a sense of our quarter-over-quarter derm growth, was $151,000 for the March 2015 quarter, $227,000 for the June 2015 quarter, $331,000 for the September quarter, $631,000 for December, $1 million for the March 2016 quarter and $1.7 million for the June quarter just ended. This represents an average quarter-over-quarter growth of 65% for the last four quarters. Please keep in mind, as mentioned above, wholesaler fees, rebate fees, and return reserves are deducted from gross revenue or gross demand dollars to derive a net revenue – net demand growth. In addition, the gross revenue, just to summarize, is derived from unit shipped to the wholesalers versus demand dollars which is derived from units dispensed to the patients from the pharmacy. One way to keep this growth trend going is via the introduction of new products. In fact, as mentioned earlier, in late March 2016 we sold and loaded in Ceramax, a skin repair product for atopic dermatitis to the wholesalers. During the following June quarter, the one that just ended, there were 1084 Ceramax prescriptions filled with a WAC price of $214. This is our best and quickest product launch in our history. Our target is to launch at least one new derm product per quarter. Jim will talk more about our pipeline of new products in just a few moments. To give you a sense of the impact of the growth of dermatology sales on Oculus, the product revenue in the U.S. as a percentage of the total product revenue has grown from 27% in the 2015 June quarter, last year, to 39% in the 2016 June quarter. The bottom line is that for the last four quarters, the execution of our strategy to focus and grow the dermatology business where the direct sales force has been effective, meaningful and have shown a significant tangible impact on our overall financial results. Moving now to a review of our financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 ended June 30, 2016, covering only the highlights with details in today's earnings press release. Total revenue was $3.8 million for the June quarter when compared to $3.7 million in the same period in 2015. Product revenues were up 20% over the same period last year with strong growth in the U.S. dermatology and animal health sales, partly offset by a decrease in revenue from Latin America, with a 19% decline in peso with a strong sales quarter last year. The revenue for the same quarter last year in Mexico included the stocking of our new partner’s expansive distribution network. Licensing fees and royalty fees were down $372,000. More specifically during the first quarter, U.S. product revenue increased $586,000, up 74% to $1.4 million, mostly related to the increase in dermatology product revenue and higher sales through our new animal healthcare partner. On the other hand, total international product revenue was about flat with last year with strong growth in Europe and the rest of world offset by decreases in sales in Latin America due to the 19% decline in peso and the strong quarter last year that I just mentioned. Operating expenses minus non-cash expenses for the June quarter were $4.1 million, up $431,000 compared to the same period last year. The increase in cash operating expenses was due to higher sales and marketing expenses in the United States relating to the cost of our direct dermatology sales force. On the balance sheet, our cash position at the end of March was $5 million and our long term debt was zero. How do we do compare to our guidance for the quarter ended June 30, 2016? The following was provided to you on the last earnings call. “For the June quarter we expect total revenues to be in the $4 million range with US revenue growth of 50% plus led by growth in the dermatology segment”. As we already mentioned, the total revenue for the June quarter was $3.8 million on the low side of the $4 million dollar range and the U.S. product revenue was up 74% within the 50% plus guidance. What is our guidance for the September quarter? For the September quarter we expect the total revenue to be in the range of $4 million with 50% plus growth in the U.S. revenue, partly offset again by the lower revenue in Mexico mostly related to the decline of peso. As mentioned on previous calls, we continue to believe that Oculus remains a strong investment candidate for the value investor who is also looking for strong revenue growth. We have a market cap of about $20 million, if one deducts the $5 million of cash from the market cap and the ratio of adjusted market cap of $15 million compared with fiscal year end 2016 product revenue, that ratio was about one to one. Product revenue grew at 31% for the fiscal year 2016 and 20% for the June quarter that we just announced compared to the same period last year. The multiple of market cap to revenue for the typical derm companies tends to range between 3x to 6x. Thus a potential investor can benefit not only from the strong derm product growth, but also from a potential expansion of the multiple. With that, I will turn it over to Jim.