Thank you, Dan. I will first discuss the financial presentation of our businesses; secondly, our key strategies to achieve strong revenue growth for fiscal year 2017; third, a review of the financial results for our derm strategy and our overall financial results for the fiscal year and fourth quarter ending March 31, 2016; and lastly, we will provide some revenue guidance for first quarter ending June 2016. First of all, we have provided the detailed financial presentation of our businesses compared to last year separating product revenues, which are shown on the last page of the press release into two categories: one, revenue from direct product sales, and two, revenue in the form of product licensing and royalty fees. This provides more transparency on the true sales growth of our continuing products in various geographic areas, especially as we focus on growing the sales in the U.S. with our direct dermatology sales force. Secondly, what are our key strategies to ignite revenue growth for fiscal year 2017? Our key strategies for growth for the rest of this fiscal year, which have been the same since the beginning of 2015 are the following. The number one strategy is to focus on growing revenue in the U.S. dermatology market with our direct sales force and a robust product line – product pipeline with both Microcyn and non-Microcyn products. The U.S. dermatology segment provides us with the largest potential growth and will lead us to overall breakeven. Our number two strategy is to continue strong unit growth in our international business with new product launches and stronger partners. The international segment was 66% of our product revenue for fiscal year 2016 and generates cash to help fund the U.S. derm growth. Jim will cover both completed and future action plans, which are designed to execute our direct sales dermatology strategy in a few minutes. What have been our financial results of our dermatology focus starting in October 2014 through our fourth quarter ending March 31, 2016? As a preface to discussing these dermatology results, starting from scratch in late 2014, we have built a strong dermatology foundation over a year and a half upon which to continue to grow. One, we now have 20 plus experienced field salespeople, directed by three highly talented senior managers, each with over 20 years of sales and marketing dermatology experience. Number two, we now have 7 new unique and effective prescription dermatology products, a strong and growing product portfolio with Microcyn and other technologies. Number three we now have a strong base of over 550 consistent dermatology large prescribers. Number four starting from zero, in late 2014 until the end of March 2015 we have filled over 33,000 prescriptions to dermatology patients. There are several ways to measure our success in the derm market. One is the sales of our products, which are recognized as revenue when shipped to the wholesaler distributors. This is the common way of recognizing revenue and is reflected in the following reported revenue. Our total U.S. product revenue was $356,000 for the September quarter 2014, $615,000 for the March quarter 2015, $787,000 for the June quarter, $1.2 million for the September quarter 2015, and for the recently reported quarter $1.4 million for the March quarter. This method of recognition tends to be driven by the product load-ins to the wholesalers. More specifically, our U.S. dermatology product revenue was $832,000 for the quarter ending March 31, 2016 compared to $326,000 in the same period last year, an increase of $497,000 or 152%. For the fiscal year 2016, U.S. dermatology net product revenue was $2.6 million, up $1.8 million or 220% from $815,000. While we recognize our derm revenue, when we ship to the wholesalers, as I mentioned earlier, a second method to objectively gauge the Oculus dermatology performance is the number of prescriptions sold to patients, via the pharmacies multiplied times of price paid to us by the wholesalers. This is sometimes called demand dollars. This information is available to the public for a fee via several well-known databases. According to the Symphony monthly data, the total prescriptions sold to patients via the pharmacy times the average price paid by the wholesalers for all of our derm products to give you a sense of our quarter-over-quarter derm growth, was $151,000 for the March quarter 2015, $227,000 for the June quarter, $331,000 for the September quarter, $631,000 for the December quarter, and $1 million for the March 2016 quarter. This represents an average quarterly growth of 62% for the last four quarters. Please keep in mind that wholesaler fees, rebate fees and return reserves are deducted from gross revenues or gross demand dollars to derive a net revenue number. One way to keep this revenue growth trend going is via the introduction of new products. In fact, as I mentioned earlier, during the March quarter, we sold Ceramax, a skin repair product for atopic dermatitis to the wholesalers. Our target is to launch at least one new derm product per quarter. Jim will talk more about our pipeline and new products in just a few minutes. To give you a sense of the impact of the growth of dermatology sales on Oculus, the product revenue in the U.S. as a percentage of the total product revenue has grown to 43% in the March 2016 quarter, up from 19% in the same quarter last year. The bottom line is that for the last four quarters, the execution of our strategy to focus and grow the dermatology business with the direct sales force has been effective, meaningful and shown a significant tangible impact on our overall financial results. Moving now to a review of our financial results for the fiscal quarter 2016 and covering only the highlights with the details in the press release. Total revenues of $15.1 million increased by $1.2 million or 9% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, as compared to $13.9 million for the 12 months ended March 31, 2015, despite a decline of $2.1 million in licensing and royalty fees. Product revenues of $13 million increased $3.1 million or 31%, when compared to the same period in 2015. This increase was a result of strong product revenue growth in the United States of $2.4 million or 121% and rest of world up $799,000 or 27%, partially offset by a 2% decrease in Latin America due to the decline in the peso. Operating loss less non-cash expenses, EBITDAS for the 12 months ended March 31, 2016 was up $3.3 million due to the cost of the direct sales force in dermatology. For the full fiscal year 2016, the 31% product revenue increase of $3.1 million, caused by growth in dermatology and international segments, more than offset a $2.1 million decline in licensing and royalty fees resulting in a 9% growth in total revenue. The quarterly licensing and royalty fees have been reduced to almost zero and thus the drag from this decline on our total revenue growth will be negligible going forward. Now looking at the results for the quarter, total revenue was $3.5 million for the fourth quarter, a decrease of 11%, when compared to $4 million for the same period in 2015, due to a decline in royalty and licensing fees of $390,000. The product revenues were flat with the same period last year with strong growth in U.S. dermatology sales offset by a decrease in revenue from Latin America. More specifically, during the fourth quarter, U.S. product revenue increased $765,000 up 122% to $1.4 million, mostly related to an increase in dermatology product revenue and higher sales through our new animal healthcare partner. On the other hand, international product revenue decreased $787,000 or 30% to $1.9 million from $2.7 million caused by decreases in sales to Latin America, due to a 22% decline in peso, a very robust quarter last year and a warehouse consolidation. Furthermore, revenue increases in Asia and Europe were mostly offset by lower revenue in the Middle East. Operating expenses minus non-cash expenses for the fourth quarter were $4.1 million, up $850,000 compared to the same period last year. The increase in cash operating expenses was due to the higher sales and marketing expenses in the United States related to the cost of our direct dermatology sales force and seven new product launches. On the balance sheet, our cash position at the end of March was $7.5 million and our long-term debt was zero. How do we do compared to our guidance for the quarter ending March 31, 2016, the following has provided to you on the last earnings call “a general guidance that our total revenue for the quarter ending March 31, 2016 will be less than $3.8 million due to weak peso and lower volume related to warehouse consolidation in Mexico, we expect the U.S. product revenue will continue to grow in the 50%-plus range for the quarter ending in March.” As we already mentioned the total revenue for the March quarter was less than $3.8 million caused by lower revenue in Mexico, as we also mentioned before the U.S. product revenue for the quarter was up 123% well over 50%. What is our guidance for the June quarter, for the June quarter we expect total revenue to be in the $4 million range with U.S. revenue growth of 50% plus led by growth in the dermatology segment. As we mentioned on previous calls, we continue to believe that Oculus remains a strong investment candidate for the value investor, who is also looking for strong revenue growth. We have a market cap of about $20.5 million, if one deducts the $7.5 million of cash from the market cap, the ratio of the adjusted market cap of $30 million, compared to fiscal year 2016 product revenue is about one to one. For the fiscal year 2016, as I mentioned several times, product revenue grew at 31%. The multiple of market capital revenue for the typical derm companies tend to range from 3x to 5x to 6x. Thus a potential investor can benefit not only from strong derm product growth, but also the potential expansion of the multiple. With that, I will turn it over to Jim.