Good day, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the First Quarter 2018 Solar Capital Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] And as a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Michael Gross, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Sir, you may begin.

Thank you very much and good morning. Welcome to Solar Capital earnings call for the quarter ended March 31, 2018. I'm joined here today by our Chief Operating Officer, Bruce Spohler; and our Chief Financial Officer, Richard Peteka. Rich, before we begin, would you please start by covering the webcast and forward-looking statements?

Of course. Thanks, Michael. I'd like to remind everyone that today's call and webcast are being recorded. Please note that they are the property of Solar Capital Limited and that any unauthorized broadcasts, in any form, are strictly prohibited. This conference call is being webcast on our website at www.solarcapltd.com. Audio replays of this call will be made available later today as disclosed in our earnings press release. I'd also like to call your attention to the customary disclosures in our press release regarding forward-looking information. Statements made in today's conference call and webcast may constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. These statements are not guarantees of our future performance, financial condition or results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Additionally, past performance is not indicative of future results. Actual results may differ materially as a result of a number of factors, including those described from time-to-time in our filings with the SEC. Solar Capital Limited undertakes no duty to update any forward-looking statements, unless required to do so by law. To obtain copies of our latest SEC filings, please visit our website or call us at 212-993-1670. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Michael Gross.

Thank you, Rich. Solar capital results for the first quarter of 2018 extends our long running strong fundamental performance as measured by credit quality, net asset value preservation and earnings power. At March 31, 2018, our portfolio was 100% performing and our net asset value was $21.87 per share, up $0.06 per share from the prior quarter. Fundamental credit performance continues to be strong, supported by continued stable economic conditions and corporate earnings growth. In the first quarter, Solar generated $0.45 of net investment income per share, up from $0.44 per share in the fourth quarter 2017 and $0.41 per share distribution for Q1 2018. With approximately 80% of our comprehensive investment portfolio in fully weighted securities, we are seeing the income benefits of a rising interest rate environment. In addition, Solar's first quarter net investment income benefited from the first quarter of a voluntary 25 basis point permanent reduction in our management fee, which became effective January 1, 2018. At March 31, 98.2% of our comprehensive investment portfolio was in senior secured loans, which carried significantly less risk than junior debt or equities. The portfolio was highly diversified across senior secured cash flow and asset based lending strategies, including non-traditional asset based lending through Crystal Financial, life science lending and equipment finance through NEF. For the first quarter, over 60% of the contribution to gross investment income was generated from our commercial finance investment strategies. Our strategic initiatives have diversified and enhanced the earning power of Solar's portfolio. While we believe the long term investment thesis for private middle market capital lending remains intact, near term market technicals remain challenging. Solar's asset based lending initiatives enable us to be highly selective in its heated cash flow lending market. We have the flexibility to allocate capital to the most attractive…

Thank you, Michael. Solar Capital Limited's net asset value of March 31, 2018 was 924.3 million or $21.87 per share compared to 921.6 million or $21.81 per share at December 31, 2017. At March 31, 2018, Solar capital's on balance sheet investment portfolio had a fair market value of 1.47 billion in 100 portfolio companies across 33 industries compared to a fair market value of 1.46 billion in 93 portfolio companies across 34 industries at December 31. The weighted average yield on our income producing portfolio was 10.2% at March 31 compared to 10.1% at December 31, measured at fair value. At March 31, Solar Capital had 545.5 million of debt outstanding and leverage of 0.58 times net debt to equity. Subsequent to quarter end, the company utilized the accordion feature under its revolving credit facility and expanded commitments by 50 million to 445 million. When considering available capacity from the company's credit facility combined with available capital at 3/31 from non-recourse credit facilities at Crystal, NEF [indiscernible] and including the 50 million of expanded balance sheet revolver commitments, Solar capital has over 500 million to fund portfolio growth, subject to borrowing base limits. Turning to the P&L, for the three months ended March 31, 2018, gross investment income totaled 39.0 million versus 38.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017. Expenses totaled 20.1 million for the three months ended March 31 compared to 20.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017. Accordingly, the company's net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 totaled 18.9 million or $0.45 per average share compared to 18.6 million or $0.44 per average share for the three months ended December 31, 2017. Below the line, the company had net realized and unrealized gains for the first quarter totaling 1.2 million versus net realized and unrealized losses of 1.3 million for the fourth quarter. Ultimately, the company had a net increase in net assets, resulting from operations of 20.0 million or $0.47 per average share for the three months ended March 31. This compares to an increase of 17.3 million or $0.41 per average share for the three months ended December 31, 2017. Finally, our board of directors recently declared a Q2 2018 distribution of $0.41 per share, payable on July 3, 2018 to shareholders of record on June 21, 2018. With that, I'll turn the call over to our Chief Operating Officer, Bruce Spohler.

Thank you, Rich. Overall, the financial health of our portfolio companies remained sound, reflecting our disciplined underwriting and focus on downside protection. At quarter end, the weighted average investment risk rating of Solar's portfolio was just under two, measured at fair market value and based on our 1 to 4 risk rating scale with one representing the least amount of risk. This further indication of the strong underlying fundamentals of our portfolio companies, only 2% of the entire portfolio was on watchlist status and 100% of our portfolio was performing at quarter end. The weighted average yield on our fair value portfolio and current cost basis was 10.2% and 10.6% respectively, consistent with the prior quarter. At March 31, over 80% of Solar's income producing portfolio was floating rate. Fixed rate loan exposure principally comes from NEF's short duration equipment financing with an average life of 2.5 years and which carry a weighted average yield of just over 10.5% at 3/31. At the end of the quarter, our comprehensive portfolio totaled 1.8 billion, encompassing over 237 borrowers across 80 industries. The average investment per borrower was 7.6 million or 0.4% of our comprehensive portfolio. Also at quarter end, over 98% of our portfolio consisted of senior secured loans, comprised of approximately 79% first lien senior secured loans and approximately 19% of second lien senior secured loans. Including activity across our four business lines, originations totaled approximately 221 million and repayments were approximately 162 million, resulting in net portfolio growth of approximately 60 million for the quarter. As a result of the heated cash flow market conditions, we intentionally allowed our cash flow portfolio, particularly our second lien cash flow investments to shrink. We achieved our portfolio growth during the quarter through our ABL strategies, which currently offer more favorable risk…

Thank you, Bruce. From the inception of Solar Capital nearly 12 years ago, our investment and management decisions have been focused on building long term shareholder value, protecting capital and maintaining alignment with our shareholders. Solar Capital Limited had a very strong first quarter 2018, highlighted by continued progress on each of these strategic initiatives. The increase in our quarterly shareholder distribution to $0.41 per share is a direct result of the successful execution of our strategy to expand our commercial finance capabilities. At 0.58 times net debt to equity, we are under levered and have substantial dry powder to deploy via our differentiated investment verticals. We believe Solar Capital has a clear path to achieving a sustainable run rate, quarterly net investment income per share in the mid to upper-40s. As our earnings increase on a sustainable basis, our board of directors will evaluate further increasing our distributions to shareholders. Now, I would like to comment on the passage of the Small Business Credit Availability Act that increases the statutory leverage limitation for BDCs to two times debt to equity from one times. Since the passage of the legislation, we have studied how the increased leverage flexibility could impact the company's strategic priorities and long term value creation for our shareholders as well as the associated risks and how they can be managed and mitigated. Additionally, we've had discussions with our principal stakeholders, the rating agencies, our lenders and importantly our shareholders. We are being extremely deliberate in our analysis have not yet reached a conclusion regarding our course of action. As you know, we have never allowed levers to drive our investment decisions. Since inception, Solar has averaged 0.23 times debt to equity, despite a target of 0.75 times. For solar, our analysis is centered on balance sheet…

And our first question comes from the line of Casey Alexander of Compass Point.

A couple of questions. First of all, related to the small business credit availability act, do you actually think that given the really high quality construction of your portfolio at 79% in first lien senior secured loans, that your BDC or your specialty finance company is actually particularly well suited to take on a little bit of additional leverage and as a follow up to that, were you surprised that the rating agency's initially just drew kind of linear line in the sand without regard to the different constructions of various BDCs as it relates to how they expect to manage their ratings?

Yeah. I think perhaps we were a little bit surprised at the inception, but we do believe that over time, based on our dialog with the agencies, they will both begin to analyze each manager based on their performance and to your point Casey, the underlying risk in the portfolios and how those portfolios are constructed. So I think it's still early days and I think there will be divergence from the agencies in terms of how they look at the individual managers. I think to your first comment, while our portfolios have always been, to your point, more leverageable than the one to one regulation would allow, I think for us, as Michael mentioned, with an average leverage of 0.25 versus a 0.75 target, the strategic benefit is more perhaps in how we utilize that type of provision if we were to do so along building up our commercial finance strategies that it is just being current to additional leverage.

Given that we're currently levered at 0.58 times, we have tremendous amount of available capital. We don't feel the sense of urgency that we have to get it done immediately, so we can access more capital.

Yeah. Well, that led to another follow-up question is, with an access to the additional leverage also, potentially assist you if there was a scale type acquisition of a company that you might like to add to the portfolio?

Absolutely. That's the big consideration.

All right. And my last question is, as it relates to the cash flow loans, we appreciate the fact that you guys are actually doing portfolio management and judging risk within your verticals and bringing it down. Is there any type of dynamic shift between what you're carrying in cash flow loans in the slips versus what you're carrying on balance sheet?

There is no shift at all. I think where you see the biggest shift is a continued reduction of second lien exposure in our cash flow portfolio. We're down to 19%. We're down 40% year over year. That will continue to come down. We don't feel the need to reach for yield in second lien structures when we have the engines that we have on the specialty finance that are generating double digit yields.

The assets and the slips are the same assets we put on balance sheet.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Chris York of JMP Securities.

So, Michael you commented a little bit on this in your second prepared remarks. I mean, it appears earnings have sustainability at the 44, 45 level now. And then the outlook to grow earnings appears solid. So what do you think the board needs to see to support another increase in the core dividend maybe this year?

A couple more quarters of same earnings.

And then we did see the comprehensive yield on your senior cash flow loans expanded nicely. I think it was 60 basis points quarter over quarter. Curious how much of the movement do you attribute to LIBOR via maybe a beta and were there any other variables that explain that increase?

No. It is predominantly LIBOR because as Michael mentioned, at the same time, we've been withdrawing from new second lien investments where you would see some of the higher spreads in the cash flow book. So it's all LIBOR related.

And then we noticed Crystal's dividend to Solar declined a little bit from the quarterly run rate, I think which was like 7.9. And then the mark on the investment in Crystal declined. So could you help us understand some of the inputs in both of those movements and then maybe whether we should expect a dividend at this new level to be sustained or is that one time?

I think just stepping back for a second, Chris, as you appreciate, Crystal in particular because of the nature of their capital and the fact that their capital is somewhat expensive to a borrower, we've always seen rather short duration across their portfolio. So you will see ebbs and flows quarter to quarter. And in Q4, there was meaningful contraction in that portfolio. I will say as an aside Q1, they begun to ramp as you see in the net growth there and we see a continuation of that trend in Q2. So the dividend, we try to hold roughly consistent around that 11%, 11.25%, understanding that the income will average that over the course of a year period, but quarter to quarter, it will shift. So there's nothing more substantive there and again they're rebuilding as we speak. The other comment around valuation, we look to comparables and as you know, some of the comparables came down across the sector of finance companies in Q1. Having said that, we're, meanwhile, as you know, an active participant in commercial finance, looking at various opportunities to acquire businesses. I can tell you that acquisition multiples are meaningfully north of where we have that mark. So we've been looking at it really more in a trading comparable basis as opposed to acquisition multiples where companies are trading closer to two times book.

And then given the short duration of the assets there, Crystal, see total assets are at 413, which have declined in the last couple of quarters. So if we get to higher earning assets, I think I've heard in the market too some solid transactions there at Crystal, we get maybe to a 475, is that needed to get that dividend back up to that 79 kind of level we were at for a couple of years.

Look, the portfolio, to be honest, bumped around between 350 and 550. So it does move around a lot, and there are a lot of fee in the business, both when you go in, and when you exit and so we try to look at that on a sustainable basis. We think we look at the dividend yield over the last several years, that's a long term sustainable basis and it may move around quarter to quarter.

Last one, we've yet to really see expansion in I think SSLP 1 to your targeted ROE of the low to mid-teens. And then essentially accretive to Solar's net investment income. What have been some of the reasons that have precluded the yield expansion there from your goals and then is the low to mid-teens goal still achievable here?

Yeah. I think the low-teens is still achievable. I think mid-teens not in the near term, and I think the constraints in the past year or so have been the relatively low LIBOR as well as the spread compression we have all felt across cash flow lending. Remember, the SSLP is our all stretched first lien cash flow have loans. So they have clearly felt the pressure on the spread compression in the sponsor lending environment that we've been in. And I think the other dynamic has been trying to optimize but leverage on those assets to drive a little bit more ROE and we've been working at doing some things there to improve the leverage ability of the underlying asset. So we see some upside, particularly with LIBOR coming our way, but again I think that the competitive dynamic is going to keep them more in the low teens than in the mid-teens.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from the line of Jonathan Bock of Wells Fargo Securities.

[indiscernible] for Jonathan this morning. For the private funds, you guys are raising, can you explain if they will have strategies similar to Solar and SUNS with significant commercial finance or specialty finance verticals.

Yes. I can't really discuss the private capital raise at this time other than that we have looked at ways to expand our balance sheet alongside Solar Capital so that Solar Capital can continue to scale up across the platform and offer larger solutions to the potential borrower marketplace and we accomplished that through some of the JVs that we've established with our slips as well as potential private capital SMAs and funds and so forth. So the goal is that your question have them co-invest alongside Solar Capital so that Solar can continue to take on larger and larger positions and yet be highly diversified across Solar's portfolio.

The question - the follow-up of what I was getting to sort of relates to as opposed to a slip, which could kind of take an equity investment in the, the fincos are wholly owned of course by the BDCs and have their own G&A line. So, if you were to kind of syndicate down to other funds, would there be economics retained, origination agencies, et cetera by the finco if they were distributing outside of the BDC?

Well, I'll give you examples. So for example, in the example for Crystal, as you know, we let a transaction for a large retail that went through bankruptcy. It was too large for our balance sheet. We took the most we possibly could and we ended up bringing a partner that we were not able to take any fees from. To the extent we did a private capital to our platform that was allowed to buy the type of stuff, we would be able to take the entire transaction down. And if it's appropriate, then that other entity may pay a servicing fee to Crystal in exchange for managing the investment. But the whole goal to Bruce's point of bringing on app alongside is to increase the funnel for Solar, not decrease it and to allow us to participate in transactions that we otherwise would not be permitted to, because we would not have the consolidated balance sheet across the platform that would allow us to do so.

And then just one question, it was probably outlined at some point. Is there an upper bound on life science exposure obviously that's been very well performing, but I wasn't sure if you had - wanted to make that a major dynamic in your - in the solar investment opportunity, just any commentary there on how much of a venture styled BDC you wanted this to be.

Yeah. As you know, today, it's roughly 13%, 14% of the overall portfolio that's from a standing start, just four years ago, given the track record of 16%, 17% realized returns with no defaults and no losses, clearly, we'd like that portfolio to continue to grow but it is in niche as you appreciate and our team is extremely disciplined in terms of where they play within the life science venture lending niche. So we would like to scale it, but there are some natural boundaries as to how large we can actually get it.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Michael Gross, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for the closing remarks.

Thanks very much. We have no more comments at this time. Well, we appreciate all your time and support and look forward to talking to you soon. Bye-bye.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.