Good day ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Q4 2017 Solar Capital Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Michael Gross. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you very much and good morning. Welcome to Solar Capital Limited's earnings call for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2017. I'm joined here today by Bruce Spohler, our Chief Operating Officer; and Rich Peteka, our Chief Financial Officer. Rich, before we begin, would you please start by covering the webcast and forward-looking statements?

Of course. Thanks, Michael. I'd like to remind everyone that today's call and webcast are being recorded. Please note that they are the property of Solar Capital Limited and that any unauthorized broadcasts, in any form, are strictly prohibited. This conference call is being webcast on our website at www.solarcapltd.com. Audio replays of this call will be made available later today as disclosed in our earnings press release. I'd also like to call your attention to the customary disclosures in our press release regarding forward-looking information. Statements made in today's conference call and webcast may constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. These statements are not guarantees of our future performance, financial condition or results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Additionally, past performance is not indicative of future results. Actual results may differ materially as a result of a number of factors, including those described from time-to-time in our filings with the SEC. Solar Capital Limited undertakes no duty to update any forward-looking statements, unless required to do so by law. To obtain copies of our latest SEC filings, please visit our website or call us at 212-993-1670. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Michael Gross.

Thank you, Rich. On all three metrics by which we measure our fundamental performance, credit quality, net asset value preservation, and earnings power, Solar Capital had a successful fourth quarter and year 2017. At the end of the year our portfolio is 100% performing and our net asset value was $21.81 per share up slightly from Q3 and up $0.07 per share from a year ago. Fundamental credit performance continues to be very strong supported by continued stable economic conditions and corporate earnings growth in both the U.S. and globally. As a reminder, we put in place a strategic plan over eight years ago, when the impact of global easy monitory policies first became apparent. Our plan was twofold. First, to transition from fix rate, subordinated assets to senior secured floating rate investments in sponsor owned operate middle companies. And second, to diversify our origination platform into asset base lending strategies in less competitive niches where the risk return profile was more compelling. We have not wavered. We have made steady progress positioning the portfolio and further diversifying our platform across attractive commercial finance strategies. In the fourth quarter, SLRC generated $0.44 of net investment income per share compared to $0.41 per share in the third quarter. With approximately 80% of our comprehensive investment portfolio in floating rate securities, we have begun to see the income benefits of a rising interest rate environment. In addition, Solar's fourth quarter net investment income benefited from the first full quarter of operations, with Nations Equipment Finance or NEF. At December 31, over 98% of our comprehensive investment portfolio was in senior secured loans, which carry significant less risks than junior debt or equities. The portfolio is highly diversified across senior secured cash flow and commercial lending strategies including non-traditional asset based lending to…

Thank you, Michael. Solar Capital Limited’s net asset value at December 31, 2017 was $921.6 million or $21.81 per share, compared to $921.2 million or $21.80 per share at September 30th. At December 31, 2017, Solar Capital's on balance sheet investment portfolio had a fair market value of $1.46 billion in 93 portfolio companies across 34 industries. This compares to a fair market value of $1.39 billion in 88 portfolio companies across 33 industries at September 30th. The weighted average yield on our income producing portfolio was 10.1% at December 31st, compared to 10.2% at September 30th, measured at fair value. Actual 31, Solar Capital has $541.6 million of debt outstanding and leverage of 0.58 times net debt-to-equity. When considering available capacity from the company's credit facility, combined with the available capital from the non-recourse credit facilities of Crystal, Nations Equipment Finance, and the senior secured loan portfolios. Solar Capital has more than $615 million to fund future portfolio growth, subject to borrowing base limits. Going to the P&L, for the three months ended December 31, 2017, gross investment income totaled $38.9 million versus $36.1 million for the three months ended September 30th. Expenses totaled $20.3 million for the three months ended December 31, compared to $18.8 million for the three months ended September 30. Accordingly, the company’s net investment income for the three months ended December 31, 2017, totaled $18.6 million or $0.44 per average share, compared to $17.3 million or $0.41 per average share for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Below the line the company had net realized and unrealized losses for the fourth quarter totaling $1.3 million versus net realized and unrealized losses of $0.2 million for the third quarter ended September 30th. Ultimately the company had a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $17.3 million or $0.41 per average share for the three months ended December 31st. This compares to an increase of $17.2 million, our next question comes from the line of or $0.41 per average share for the three months ended September 30th. Finally, our Board of Directors recently declared a Q1, 2018 distribution of $0.41 per share payable on April 3, 2018 to stockholders of record on March 22, 2018. With that, I will turn the call over to our Chief Operating Officer, Bruce Spohler.

Thank you, Rich. Before diving into the details of our portfolio and our fourth quarter activity I’d like to take a moment to just set the table and review our diversified origination platform. As most of you know, we spend this past several years building and attracting specialty finance lending businesses to our platform in order to advance our strategic objective of becoming diversified commercial finance company that has expertise across both cash flow and assets based underwriting. Today, we have four core business lines, our largest is our cash flow business, which invest in senior secured loans to sponsor back companies in the upper mid-market with average EBITDA of approximately $65 million, included in this vertical our assets held on balance sheet as well as in our SSLPs. Our second line to business is our asset based business, which encompasses non-traditional senior secured asset based loans both to companies in transition as well as loans to other finance companies. Much of this is invested through our 100% owned subsidiaries Crystal Financial, as well as directly on SLRC’s balance sheet. These loans are typically made against the realizable liquidation value of a portfolio company’s assets, and these loans also come with meaningful upfront and prepayment fees. Our third vertical is life science lending, which lends to privately held or small market cap drug and medical device companies. Our team previously founded and managed GE Capital’s life science lending business before joining Solar. These loans are made to companies in the very late stages of either drug or medical device development. They are first lien senior secured loans and typically are accompanied with success fees for warrants. Finally, our equipment finance business lends the companies with a high percentage of essential use fixed assets in need of capital expenditure financing. Solar…

Thank you, Bruce. From the inception of Solar Capital nearly 12 years ago, our investment and management decisions have been focused on building long-term shareholder value, protecting capital, maintaining alignment with our shareholders. Solar Capital Limited had a very strong 2017, highlighted by continued progress on each of the strategic initiatives. Our long-term strategy of migrating the portfolio to senior secured floating rate securities and diversifying our portfolio through multiple investment channels continue to driver superior results. SLRC has become a more diversified commercial finance company, providing solutions across the capital structure to middle market businesses. Our origination engines provide us with the opportunity to source loans in specialty niches that are less competitive. In addition, the specialty finance strategies are less correlated to liquid credit markets and have a risk return profile that is highly complementary to our cash flow lending. Our diversified origination platform affords us greater flexibility to allocate capital to the best risk return opportunities and stick to our investment discipline. Meanwhile we have the flexibility to pivot back toward the higher percentage of cash flow loans in the portfolio should conditions in the sponsor market improve. The increase in our quarterly shareholders distribution to $0.41 per share is a direct result of the successful execution of our strategy to expand on commercial finance capabilities. At just 0.58 times net debt-to-equity, we are underlevered, and we have substantial dry powder to deploy via our differentiated investment verticals. We expect steady progress in growing our company asset the portfolio in 2018. As a result, we believe Solar Capital has the growth engines in place to eventually achieve run rate quarterly net investment income per share in the mid-to-upper 40s. As the earnings increase, our Board will further evaluate increasing our distribution to shareholders. At 11 O’clock this morning we will be hosting an earnings call for the fourth quarter 2017 results of Solar Senior Capital or SUNS. Our ability to provide traditional middle market senior secured financing to this vehicle continues to enhance our origination team's ability to meet our client's capital needs, and we continue to see the benefits of this value proposition in Solar Capital’s deal flow. Thank you very much for your time. Operator, could you please open the line for questions?

Certainly. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Ryan Lynch with KBW. Your line is now open.

Hey, good morning guys. First question has to do with Crystal, I know that you guys have talked about in the past this is a little bit of a countercyclical business. So you guys can experience maybe stronger growth in that business when the economy is struggling or a bit choppy. And so when I look at that business, when I look at the portfolio of that business kind of year-over-year you guys have portfolio decline by maybe $70 million. And when I look at the net income in 2017 versus 2016, which maybe is not always the best proxy for the potential dividend income you can distribution. But it went down quite substantially. So I was wondering, with that portfolio going lower, how confident are you guys, or how reasonable is it to expect a kind of steady consistent $7.9 million quarterly dividend from that business?

Sure, good question. I think first and foremost as you know Ryan, 30,000 feet [ph]. Because we have four different verticals good news is we don't rely on any one vertical. And I think you hit the nail on the head, Crystal does have an element of counter cyclicality to it, so that we think as some of the other verticals in particularly the cash flow vertical might dislocate for either market or economic reasons we tend to see more activity in Crystal. But stepping back over the last three years, for example, as you know this a -- the Crystal portfolio is a short duration asset class, in large part because it is expensive ABL money for companies in transition. So, we’ve typically seen that portfolio turn close to 60% a year. So we are not surprised at the churn and as you know the churn accelerates both of fund, fee income as well as repayment fee income. I think as we head into Q1, we are already seeing growth in that portfolio and the underlying income impart because of the economic headwinds that the retail sector is facing, as you know Crystal cut their teeth back when they started the business in the 1980s lending to retail and private companies in large part. And so they have been extremely opportunistic in that sector looking at fully secured financing. So that portfolio will move around quarter-to-quarter as well the underlying income, but we think it’s extremely well position long-term and as I mentioned short-term we are already seeing some increased activity this quarter. So we feel great about the business, and as you know the income may bounce around quarter-to-quarter, but over the course of a 12 month period we tend to smooth it out.

Okay, it’s helpful. And this quarter you guys had very strong growth in the cash flow lending business specialty finance verticals saw a little bit of net repayments given the competitive nature of the cash flow lending versus the specialty lending verticals would you expect future portfolio growth to mostly come in the specialty lending verticals, or do you expect that continue growth the cash flow lending business very fairly substantially like you guys did this quarter going forward?

Yes, I think, we love attractive market condition in all four verticals they hit at the exact same time so we see growth across all four. But as you know it a little bit episodic I think that we saw a couple of nice opportunities in the cash flow side, As I mentioned a moment ago in Q1 Crystal is seeing growth, life science is seeing a little bit of growth, NEF equipment finance business as you know it’s a straight line amortization. So there is always a constant repayment trickle effect there, but they also are seeing growth in originations and that team expects sort of steady growth quarter-to-quarter throughout the year. So I think we really expect to see growth in the three specially finance verticals and then the cash flow business to your point to some extent depends upon market conditions there, but we have been able to find some interesting attractive assets to bring on the platform. So, I think a year from now, we will be sitting here and you’ll probably see growth across all four verticals.

Okay, got it. And then, as far as the dividend goes, I mean, you guys put a $0.44 this quarter you guys have the lower base fee starting in Q1 of 2018, can you guys just talk about there clearly looks like there is the potential for meaningful dividend growth. I mean, how do you guys kind of determine dividend growth, do you guys want to have dividend kind of match all these or do you guys want to leave yourself cushion just how are you guys thinking about as earnings kind of continue to ramp forward where you guys -- what’s kind of your dividend power is as far matching the dividend close to the earnings?

So, I think we want to leave some cushion, and we also want to see ourselves put up a few quarters consequently above the dividend before we consider raising it, yes.

So if you look at sustainably NII with some cushion above the dividend, but to your point we do see growth in sustainable NII through the year. So, you could expect the distribution to follow-up.

Okay. And then just one final one if I can, I didn’t see that there is any life growth in the life sciences JV, can you just provide any update on that? I know you guys started that almost a year ago now and really hasn’t taken off at all. So is that -- I guess what is the delay in growing that and you guys see any growth in that entity in 2018?

Sure, the short answer is we do see some growth in that in 2018, as you may recall the JV is specifically focused on large cap public life science opportunities everything else either small public companies or private companies which maybe very large, we just did a fairly large investment this quarter for a private company, but everything else comes into Solar's balance sheet. So the JV is only for the large life science opportunity and large public companies. And so that is a narrower universe, but the team is actively looking for those opportunities and we do expect it to ramp. From our perspective, we are somewhat in different, as to whether it’s on the balance sheet or in the JV and I think from 30,000 feet the team has a very nice pipeline of investments and as you know this is also a short duration asset class given the straight line amortization and the nature of the assets themselves tend to be two to three year in duration. So there is an element of running in place similar to the Crystal ABL portfolio, but as we run in place, we generate extremely attractive returns as we mentioned the team has delivered just under 18% realized IRR. So I think you will see that as continued high velocity portfolio, with some room for growth, regardless of whether it’s in the JV or on balance sheet.

Okay, that's all for me. Thanks for taking my questions. And good quarter, guys.

Thank you.

Thank you, appreciate it.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Jonathan Bock with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.

Good morning, Jim Mazzoli filling in for Jonathan Bock. So the first question, there is no doubt that you have assembled a very, very attractive portfolio of specialty niches that are really providing a very attractive returns for investors. But the question is, with other BDCs and other finance companies, looking to diversify away from the pure play kind of sponsor lending model, can you walk us through some of the competitive dynamics within those businesses, because they are less competitive today, but is that changing? If you could provide some color around some of the barriers entry into those businesses?

So the good news is as opposed to capital lending where there are literally dozens and dozens of competitors in the specialty finance services each of them have their own set of competitors but they are literally a handful. And as we have seen -- we have seen in the private credit space, tons of people enter the capital lending business, because frankly a lot of private equity firm platforms saw that they could take the exact same skill set of evaluating capital firms like they do in private equity and apply that to cash flow lending, that's just not the case, when it comes to the ABL that we own. We now have 150 people across our platform, half of them are back office people focused on collateral management and asset management. So this is not a business that you can just hire few people and go after, it’s no coincidence that the businesses that we are in today we did either through acquisitions or bringing on teams that have been doing this for 30 plus years. So we don't see today our BDC breather in kind of entering these businesses at this point and we can talk about the competitive niche business, but again it’s literally three to five in each of these businesses and that's why there has been no spread compression to speak off.

And I think just echo Michael’s comments, good question there are competitors although it is more oligopolistic as you get into our commercial finance vertical. But importantly we don't have the same competitor in any of these verticals. To your -- the heart as your question, we have put together a unique platform in that we have all of these verticals under one roof and really what's lost in our comments is conveying adequately to all of you that from an origination perspective if we had our team on the phone here. But they would tell you is they have the ability to go to middle market borrowers, which is our only source of assets. We are exclusively focused on U.S. middle market corporation, but we have the ability to underwrite risk in many different ways. Our team can look at cash flow streams, they can -- if they are not comfortable with cash flow streams on a projected basis, and maybe the industry is in retail and has headwinds where they can bring in our asset based team and underwrite the underlying liquidation value of that collateral. If it’s in equipment heavy business, we can underwrite equipment. So we have a lot of ways to look at providing capital to a borrower. So our relevance is not only the scale of the platform in terms of the balance sheet that we have put together here to take large hold positions for borrowers and be a solutions provider, but we have a breadth of products and all of it goes out from our originators with a one team talking to the borrowers. The underwriting and the risk mitigation and the risk management is done on a specialized basis in each vertical. So we have that expertise to assess risk, but the sourcing is done by one team that broad in terms of their product offerings. And I think that's what's unique, and I think the barriers that Michael touched on are extremely high given that each of our teams has done this for 20-30 years. And so you need expertise in underwriting collateral, assessing it could be working capital assets, it could be in your net intellectual property and our life science business. And so the barriers are high and I think that's really the difference. I know a number of people are looking at these segments, but they are not easy to access.

That's very helpful. And there is no doubt that your investors benefit from that diversity. And just one final question, this touches on a question that was asked earlier. But in relation to the dividend and NOI, clearly there is a runway to further NOI growth and the portfolio demonstrating stability, right? So as we kind of look forward, there is president in the BDC space for more of a variable special dividend on top of a recurring level. Is that something you would consider, or are you more focused just on increasing the stable quarterly dividend?

At this point, we're just focused on increasing the quarterly dividend.

And as you look at the nature of our income too, it's pretty predictable income. And so we have pretty good visibility. It's not like there is equity in our portfolio that would lead to one-time gains that might justify a special dividend.

That's it for me. Thank you for taking my questions.

Thank you.

Thank you, Joe.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Casey Alexander with Compass Point. Your line is now open.

Hi, good morning. I just have one question. You mentioned that the dividend that came from Crystal was the standard $7.9 million quarterly dividend. But your release it suggested the gross investment income generated by Crystal was $10.8 million for the quarter. Could you explain where the additional income comes from so that we can kind of understand the various ways in which Crystal contributes to the platform?

Sure. I think the 30,000 feet their income, Casey, is obviously a combination of coupon as well as upfront fees and then prepayment fees. And as we talked about a moment ago, and as you appreciate, this is a high churn portfolio. So, while we are across our platform amortizing upfront fees across the holding period and the life of the security, they get accelerated more quickly in Crystal. But these are -- we don't have a lot of visibility on repayments at Crystal. Because their capital is expensive, we sort of get a prepay notice sometimes a couple of weeks in advance. And that's about it. So there is a lot of variability quarter-to-quarter in their earnings stream, given the mix of fees relative to coupon. And so we have done since we've held Crystal for last five years is tried to deliver a smooth distribution. Understanding that some quarters it will be a little higher, and some quarters it will be a little lower at the income level.

Right, okay. Great, thank you. That's it.

[Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from the line of Christopher Testa with National Securities. Your line is now open.

Hey, good morning, guys. Thank you for taking my questions. Just regarding your comments on obviously maintaining the mentality that the credit cycle will be ending very shortly when you do underwrite, are you assuming just a kind of one of the middle recession or something much more severe like a 2008-2009 recurrence?

So, couple of things. We're not predicting that we are at the end of the cycle. All we're saying is we invest as if we do. And so which means, as you know, we avoid those industry that are particularly successful to economic downturn. What we do, I mean, and just step back, the fundamentals are very strong across all the entire portfolio. But what we do is we do stress the portfolio to look at the scenarios that these actually companies went through back at that time to see what the impact on the capital structure would be. And that's part of our investment thesis, but that's clearly not our base case. So I think it's more of a manageable recession if you will.

And just to reiterate Michael's point. The fundamentals are strong, we have 300 investments across the platform, as you've seen we reported good revenue and EBITDA growth on our cash flow portfolios. And our watch list which is always a good indicator of how we are feeling in terms of future stress has continued to shrink quarter-over-quarter. So we feel very good, but to Michael's point we are always defensive.

Got it, okay. Yes, I know you guys are always defensive, I was just trying to see how your stress has been versus prices for the regular recession. So appreciate the color on that. Also just wondering if you guys know off the top of your head approximately how much of the first lien book is stretch first lien?

It is mostly stretch first lien at Solar, I can’t give you an exact percentage, but it start to stretch but that's really defined by leverage ratios as you know. And so we have seen with an average leverage ratio of 5 times a lot of our stretch migrating quickly to first. And that's when we decide is this an opportunity to get out or maybe there is a refinancing at lower leverage and lower pricing and we will look at it for Solar senior to optimize on our history with the company. but we’ve seen good deleverage first.

Okay, great. That's helpful. And obviously I know in terms of Crystal and ABL that guys have very, very limited visibility and so the future really just on a quarter-to-quarter basis, but just a more high level view, what are your thoughts on what the ABL opportunities will be if retail kind of regains its footing and it's not a stretch of the sector?

So, I think, Jeff if you look at since we’ve owned Crystal for 5.5 years now the portfolio has bounced around between 350 and 550. And that's probably where it would be unless we are in a prolonged economic downturn if you will. But if we do hit kind of [indiscernible] earlier, this could easily be $1 billion portfolio.

Got it, okay. And last one for me, just could you quantify I know obviously you hold some of the NEF loans on balance sheet, how much of the comprehensive NEF portfolio, what percentage of that is held on balance sheet and of the ones on balance sheet what is the contribution of that to you interest income?

There is $73 million on balance sheet over the $308 million total.

Got it.

And the other deal 11-ish percent you can do the math.

Okay, great. That's all for me.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Mickey Schleien with Ladenburg. Your line is now open.

Yes, good morning everyone.

Hi, Mickey.

Hi, I realized we are running out of time, so I’ll just ask a couple of questions. First, on location events that's obviously a large position, but it's now one of your lowest rates. So I was curious what the rational for that investment is? As it looks like it's not accretive to SLRC’s earnings?

Yes, so you should expect that to migrate to the SSLPs where that type of yielding investment has been held in the past.

Okay. So, you'll transfer and lever it up to get the ROE that you are looking for?

Exactly.

Okay. And maybe for…

As it is size making so that the yield is just over 7% leverage is under 5 times, call it 4.75. And it's a short maturity loan, so we expect that realized IRR, which is obviously what matter at the end of the day as appose to a yield to maturity is that we quote [ph]. We expect to be extremely attractive even on unlevered basis.

I understand. And maybe quick question for Mr. Peteka, can you tell us what the main drivers were of the unrealized gains this quarter?

Sure, hold on. On the unrealized gains.

Unrealized, yes.

Sure. I have it over here. Unrealized gains were driven by Breathe Technologies, Bishop Lifting, Achaogen, and KORE, Vapotherm as well, Axcella. So I would say those were the top, Breathe was $824,000, Bishop was $679,000, Occasion was $528,000, KORE Wireless was $512,000, those were the top contributors on an unrealized basis.

And Rich was that driven by technicals in the market or company performance?

Company performance.

Fair enough, thank you for your time this morning.

Thank you, Mick. Appreciate it.

And I'm showing no further questions at this time. So with said, I'd like to turn the conference back over to Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Mr. Michael Gross, for closing remarks.

Thank you all very for participating this morning. We look forward to talking to you soon and we'll talk to some of you in 10 minutes at our Solar Senior Conference call. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude the program and you may all disconnect. Everyone have a wonderful day.