Good morning, and welcome to the SB Financial Group Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2018 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today's presentation there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please also note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Melissa Martin. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone. I'd like to remind you that this conference call is being broadcast live over the internet and will be archived and available on our website at www.yoursbfinancial.com under Investor Relations. Joining me this morning are Mark Klein, Chairman, President and CEO; Tony Cosentino, Chief Financial Officer; and Jon Gathman, Senior Lending Officer. This call may contain forward-looking statements regarding SB Financial's performance, anticipated plans, operational results and objectives. Forward-looking statements are based on management's expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied on our call today. We have identified a number of different factors within the forward-looking statements at the end of our earnings release, which you are encouraged to review. SB Financial undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement except as required by law after the date of this call. In addition to the financial results presented in accordance with GAAP, this call will also contain certain non-GAAP financial measures. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Klein.

Thank you, Melissa and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining Tony, Jon and me for our fourth quarter and full year 2018 web call and webcast. In addition to our comments today on our quarterly and annual performance, obviously, please reference our earnings release that we filed yesterday as well. Highlights for this quarter and full year excluding the effects of a one-time fourth quarter 2017 deferred tax liability, just for comparative purposes only, include net income for the quarter of $3 million, 27% improvement. For the year net income was $11.6 million or $2.3 million over the prior year representing a 24% improvement. Return on average assets for the quarter, 1.19%, up 13 basis points or 12%. For the year return on average assets, 1.23%, up 13 basis points or 12%. Diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.37 per share, in line with prior year quarter. For full year fully diluted EPS were $1.51 or an increase of $0.04 or 2.5%. Operating revenue expanded to $12.5 million, up $800,000 or 6.8%. On a full year basis, operating revenue increased to nearly $50 million, $49.9 million, up $4.3 million representing an expansion of over 9.4%. Loan balances were essentially flat with the linked quarter at $772 million and represents full year expansion of $75.3 million or nearly 11% growth this year. Deposits grew $13 million or 1.7% for the quarter and over $72 million or 10% for the entire year. Expenses were up 0.7% from the linked quarter and up 9.2% over the prior year, and we'll talk a bit more about that shortly. Mortgage origination volume increased by $6.7 million or 9.3% and for the year volume was $342 million, or 8.3% [ph] expansion representing an increase of over $26 million over the prior year. As…

Thanks, Mark and good morning again, everyone. Recapping our earnings as Mark highlighted; net income of $3 million for the quarter, $0.37 per diluted EPS. Our prior year comparisons are impacted significantly by the $1.7 million one-time adjustment in December of 2017 due to our deferred tax liability. For the full year, our adjusted results of $11.6 million in net income would be up 24% or $2.3 million as contrasted by the GAAP results of a 5% positive change of $0.6 million. Diluted EPS of $1.51 for the year is up 2.5% or $0.04 per share. And this measure, of course, is impacted by the higher share count associated with the $30 million capital raise we completed in the first quarter of 2018. Highlight for the quarter, operating revenue flat from the prior year and down 6% from the linked quarter. Loan sales delivering gains of $1.9 million from mortgage, small business and agriculture, and mortgage volume of $78.8 million was higher by 9.3% from the fourth quarter of 2017. As we look further at our income statement for the quarter, we'd begin with margin. Net interest income was up from the prior year by 12.5% and for the full year by 17.2%. Average loan yield for the quarter of 5.01% increased by 32 basis points from the prior year with overall earning asset yield up 38 basis points to the prior year. In addition to the balance sheet impact of higher loan and deposit balances, the four rating rate increases that have affected our interest income this year have driven yields higher. On the funding side, we continue to have experienced an increase in the cost of our interest bearing liabilities coming in at 1.15% for the quarter, up 46 basis points from the prior year, and up 15…

Thank you, Tony. Our results this quarter were in line with our expectations for the year. We are quite pleased with our ability to grow loans and deposits in nearly each of our markets. As a result our $11.6 million in net income is our best performance in 15 years in reflex [ph]. As Tony indicated a 24% improvement over the year excluding the facts of the 2017 deferred tax liability we spoke up last year. Our performance this year places at the 83 percentile of our 65-bank peer group and well within sight of our strategic performance goal always of the 98 percentile of that peer group or higher. With the top desk aisle performance near opportunities in those low-share high-growth markets we've talked about for a number of quarters certainly within our reach, and now ample capital to leverage our expertise on our way to the $2 billion vision that we've now embraced were driven to remain one of the highest performing community banks in America. With that, I'll turn it back to you, Melissa, for wrap up.

Thanks, Mark. Operator, we are now ready for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions].

While we're waiting for questions to assemble, I would like to remind you that today's call will be accessible on our website at www.yoursbfinancial.com under Investor Relations.

The first question today will be form Brian Martin with FIG Partners. Please go ahead.

Maybe just a couple of things; just kind of high level -- whether you, Mark or Tony kind of take but just maybe starting on the loan growth, it seems like there is -- this quarter, you had -- you talked little bit about pay-offs being up, commercial growth was still really strong. But, just can you can give your thoughts on how you're thinking about these pay-offs and just kind of growth in 2019? You know, both, kind of geographically and by segment, just -- you more cautious given some of the angst in the market that a lot of people seem to have been talking about growth being a little bit less but just some color on kind of your outlook and how pay-offs play into that and it would be helpful.

As we've discussed a number of quarters before we are clearly built for growth with our 17 lenders and now 8 more individuals that have literally been decoupled from the operations of an office and now are on the street delivering treasury management services and potentially very small SBA credit. But clearly, we're fully on offence; we had a few pay-offs right at the end of the year, roughly -- I don't know, maybe $8 million to $10 million right at the end of the year. So, no, we're built for growth but make no mistake, we love our asset quality. We are patient for growth on the asset side. And clearly, we've been able to find the deposits at the margin or less. And so we're excited about the opportunities in 2019 and we're looking for similar growth trends of that higher single-digit or lower double-digit. But Jon, any additional comments on how we did for the year? We were on pace to do much better and then we slowed down a bit.

Yes, I will just add to that. The couple payoffs were large dollar payoffs but we maintain those relationships, there were two or three different clients in there, all of them with commercial real estate prices soaring here over the last couple of years, there were just some opportunities for some of our clients to take and execute on some gains. So we anticipate replacing balances with those clients here in 2019 and beyond. But as Mark said, we have a lot of people on the street and I think we feel good about growth across all our regions, frankly. Certainly, the metropolitan markets will offer more opportunity but we have plans for all 17 plus 8 as Mark mentioned earlier.

And just geographically or by segment, which markets kind of did the best in '18 and I guess if it's kind of a similar outlook for next year or for '19?

Well, in terms of actual growth, all of our regions contributed something unique; Fort Wayne and Findlay, for example, on the SBA front that don't necessarily show up this growth. But in terms of growth Columbus, certainly, our Lima [ph] market had a very nice year, Defiance, our legacy market did quite well, Toledo had a nice year. So those markets, in particular, some of the payoffs came in, some of the other markets I didn't mention, but they were as Mark said, trending nicely heading into literally the last couple of weeks of the year. And I think this year our focus is across the entire footprint but again, the metropolitan markets of Columbus, Toledo, Fort Wayne and Findlay are certainly going to offer more opportunity.

And then just on the CNI side, I guess the focus is still on shifting more towards CNI and away from commercial real estate?

It is. And I'm very pleased with our results here in 2018, the first year and sometime we saw that mix approach more what we've been targeting, and we continue to place that emphasis in terms of calling efforts, incentives and just general overall credit towards that. Not that we don't like commercial real estate growth as well, but we want to achieve a mix similar to '19 or '18 rather in '19.

In the pipeline; I mean, first quarter usually seems to have some seasonality to it. The pipeline's pretty good right now heading into the first quarter?

I certainly think so. Again, it's a bit regional at the moment. Columbus and Toledo have both the nice pipelines heading here into the beginning of the year. But it is a bit seasonal depending on market. I think we'll see that accelerate in the second quarter, but we have a very nice pipeline here in the first as well.

Okay, perfect. And then maybe one -- I don't know if it's for Tony but just on the margin, Tony, I think you talked about maybe a little pressure but kind of what's going on with the funding costs. But if we don't get -- if the Fed isn't backed on pause or maybe we get one increase, but I guess I have to think about it. If it's on pause and we don't see anything, how does -- how do you -- what are the puts and takes of the margin? You know, what -- it's going to take it higher or lower, help you maintain, it sounds like maybe there is a little drift lower, but just -- if we don't assume any rate increases, how should we think about it?

Yes, I think that you hit on it. We've got some expectations in our go-forward forecast of kind of the market-based expectation of a couple of rate increases. Certainly, our assets sensitivity would tell us those coming off the floor would impact us a little bit. I'm more drifting down our margin based upon, I think the general rise in funding costs that we're seeing. We are seeing significantly more competition than we did say in the first half of 2018 among our banks and our communities. So I think as we maintain -- trying to maintain to get our pipeline funded on the loan side, that's going to generally drift up our interest expense costs, not as dramatic as we did an '18, but still, that will move up.

And I think, Tony, it probably represents certainly the deposit betas of competition are driving our marginal cost of funds certainly higher, everyone's doing quite well in our region, Brian. And that's certainly adding pressure to the deposit side of the balance sheet, but which is why we now have eight individuals who were tied to the office, now on the street and finding more opportunities in that small business arena. And hopefully continuing to see GDP continue to expand at 3-plus mark to make more opportunities for everyone, but we're poised for growth and we continue to intend to take market share.

And so the -- I guess, that drift lower -- if the funding costs keep going up, I guess if we don't see Fed increases, then it's just tougher to get better pricing. Are you getting better pricing that -- now I can see you're pushing pricing up regardless of rates going up to help offset that funding cost pressure or is it getting more difficult to push the loan yields up?

I'd say, Brian -- this is Tony again, and Jon will jump in. I'd say we've seen a general rise in loan pricing. It has not certainly been on the same beta as deposit pricing has been, but I think we've established kind of new floors as we've gone through each couple of months in our local communities. Jon, if you'd like to add anywhere to that.

Yes, I think that's a fair statement. I would just add, as we saw the rate curve decrease here, particularly in November, December on the long end, I think as Tony said, a new floor was sort of set and competition sort of all readjusted to that level. So while we're able to increase loan pricing generally, Brian, I agree with Tony, I don't know that it's at the same level or at the same rate that we're forced to increase deposit pricing. That said, a normalization of the recurve here, if that happens in '19 will certainly help that effort.

And Brian, just one follow-up comment; we certainly have -- like probably most banks have certainly put an increased emphasis on the discussion with our clients that borrow our money with more conversation about the deposit side. And that's why we've taken a much broader and deeper stance on that relationship potential with a 96%, 97% loan to deposit ratio currently.

And just I guess -- as far as just the deposit, I think you mentioned a deposit price initiative or some deposit price initiative, maybe you're going to be putting in place. I guess is that something that -- I guess it's kind of baked into your thought here on what you do with the margin or can you give any color on what you're thinking on that initiative or is it just kind of wait and wait until you guys announce something?

No, actually it's a great question and that's when we thought about deeply for a long time. And we certainly -- one of our competitive disadvantage is that we don't have brick-and-mortar on every corner of every street unlike much of our regional competition. So safe to say, you'll see some more about it, but safe to say, we're going to take our office generally to our clients. And so we're going to be heading out in the marketplace as opposed to waiting for them to come to us and that's all about treasury management services, and actually picking deposits up and making sure that we're taking care of the client and that outside of remote capture, how can we become more intimate with the client, and that's a part of going to the client's place of business versus waiting them to come to us. So we're going to try to alleviate a competitive disadvantage there.

And Tony, just remind me one thing on the margin. Is there seasonality to the margin? So, I mean if you're three -- I guess, your level today is 3.95; if you do drift lower, I mean is there other quarters where it should be more impacted by mortgage than the other quarters? And I guess, just…

Yes, that's absolutely right Brian. As we've talked about kind of Q1 and Q4 are probably a 10 basis point differential between kind of the mid-year quarter's given mortgage volume which is significantly seasonality-based.

So how about just one last thing and then I'll jump out and let someone else jump in. But just on mortgage, if you could just kind of give your -- the mortgage -- I think the originations were up 10% this year. Just as you guys think about your goal -- your longer-term goal of getting to 500, just -- how do we think -- well, given the environment we're in, how do you think about 2019 and then just can you remind me the people you've added; it sounds like you've added producers that help you kind of take the origination volume up this year, even -- I guess, a difficult rate environment or maybe -- just your thoughts on '19 and production and kind of gain on sale margins, how you're seeing things.

First, just a couple of comments on the strategy. We fully intend Brian to do in Annapolis [ph] what we began to do 10 years ago in Columbus market, now fifth in the whole market down there, have a pretty sizable market and pretty sizable players. But that said, we're looking for certainly a better number, a larger number for production across the board as well as sales in 2019, we continue to play a key role in that private client arena in the mortgage lending area which has certainly helped us drive that volume. But the variable here clearly is not the amount, we still have a vision of the $500 million and beyond and the variables, production and producers which is why we've gone in Annapolis [ph], we now -- as I mentioned, we just -- Brian, had our first closing there, we have a gentleman there that's going to be assimilating some individuals that he's familiar with in that market. We have great aspirations for that market, including potential SBA and small business and commercial lending there in time as well. So higher expectations in 2019, and even with marginally higher rates which hopefully will not increase precipitously, even with lower inventory which we know is kind of constrained our volume over the last couple of years anyway. So other than that, the margin, Tony?

Yes, I think as we said, our pricing has maintained very strong in the mortgage business. It's been kind of inventory and a little bit of pricing but I don't see a lot of dark clouds in that business line as we've looked at it. I think it's still very strong for us, we have a very good process, our MLOs [ph] had a great 2018 kind of individually and feel very good about where we are.

So there is 270, this type of margin seems like it's at least a comfortable level Tony for -- as you think about '19?

Absolutely, yes. Yes, we've been in that range for some time and I don't see us drifting down from there.

And just remind me, the people you've got in -- I guess that the mortgage people you've added recently that aren't really -- if I look at the number, the production numbers for '18 and I start thinking about '19, what new people are not in -- are onboard today that weren't like contributors in '18?

Well, we have -- again, the leader down in Columbus that we're looking for several individuals and we're pretty optimistic that at least the first half of the year that's going to happen. And we continue to take on some additional talent and some assistance. Again, we're willing to do whatever it takes to get our number, we were short this year from -- but we're looking for better numbers this coming year. I'm certainly hoping that the yield curve will remain accommodative to the mortgage world. I know there is some stress generally on the industry with higher rates and inventory but again, our variable is the number of producers, not the number of production.

And the number of producers that weren't in '18 that I guess are out there is not much different today yet, Mark. Is that right? I mean, you're hoping to add people but if we sit today, it wasn't like you hire 10 people late in the year that are going to be kind of ramping up in '19 just yet. Your hope is, that's what you do, but you haven't done it yet.

No, that's a true statement there. What we have in '18 other than the one that we closed in Annapolis and maybe a person or two in the Columbus market that we've brought onboard, clearly, a couple individuals that might be coming on as an intern kind of a thing in the mortgage arena. But generally speaking, now these are individuals that will marginally need to come on in '19 to give us that 400 lift up from 340.

Let me hop out and I've got a couple more questions, but if there's someone else, I don't want to take too much time; so let me hop out and then I can hop back in.

All right, thanks, Brian.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Tony [ph] with Butler Capital Management. Please go ahead.

I just have two quick questions. First, congratulations on the upgrade in your CRA rating to satisfactory, I know that's a big undertaking. In the filing, you mentioned that this allows you to pursue a number of strategic opportunities. Could you provide some more color on those strategic initiatives that you'll be pursuing as a result?

We've had some great success organically and we feel that's one of the key ways to build shareholder value. But clearly, we've begun now with a new-found $30 million in capital, we know what we need to do to lever that capital and we're having additional conversations as we speak to potentially take what we think are our key business lines into other markets. And without announcing anything definitively, we're certainly encouraged about our new prospects or at least continuing on prospects that we've been thinking about for some time that now with full compliance in our back pocket and building a case that we are, in fact, very attuned to the needs of our communities. We're ready to move on to the next level now and potentially augment some M&A with that organic balance sheet growth that over the last five years I might add in all of our markets is about $600 million deposits and loans and with the majority of that coming from new markets like Columbus and Toledo, and Findlay and Fort Wayne. So, now we're excited about the opportunities.

And the second question has to do with -- there was a bit of deterioration in the commercial and agricultural portfolio, and I think you mentioned some troubled SBA credits. Could you talk a little bit more about those?

Absolutely. Jon?

Yes, it's confined to two credits, both SBA as Mark mentioned, really the charge-off -- the charge now we took in the fourth quarter was all related to one credit and we took a very conservative approach there and cherished off virtually all, not quite, but virtually all of the non-SBA guaranteed portion. Right at this moment we fully anticipate recovering all of that back but -- now we're working with both of those on for balance plans to move forward, and we think we will resolve one in the first quarter or the other will be a little longer term resolution. But I think they're both isolated cases and they're both relatively seasoned loans, they weren't new loans, they had been around for a while, they had some changes in their business dynamics that forced them into a situation where we're working closely with them.

The next question is a follow-up from Brian Martin with SIG Partners. Please go ahead.

Just a couple of last ones for me and just maybe touching on -- how about capital deployment at this point. I mean, I guess you talked about M&A on the call, but I mean also -- with the backup and banks just kind of looking at potential buybacks, just kind of how you guys are thinking about capital deployment at this point?

I think we were certainly hopeful with the capital raised in February of the opportunities that would present to ourselves in '18. We couldn't come to some resolution on pricing on some transactions we're looking at. As Mark indicated, we're going to have a fee-based business line that we're going to announce here shortly that will help supplement our noninterest income that'll utilize a bit of that capital. We're continuing to look at various alternatives on recall buybacks, dividends, etcetera and we'll have some discussions about that shortly as well. So I think we'll have a lot of opportunities here for further capital development in '19 deployment.

And just one comment, Brian, as you well know, we were pretty excited on our first quarter $30 million capital raise and certainly, a clear intend on leveraging that capital, it took us a little while to get some of our compliance and CRA issues aligned; now we have all that. So while we have our capital, we got our markets and we think we have a great opportunity to continue to expand on that which we've begun in some of those low-share high-growth markets. So we're kind of ready to go and we have the capital to get it done.

In the discussions today, I mean with the market conditions, are they -- I guess are discussions active? Have they kind of tailed off a little bit or how would you characterize M&A and just kind of -- I guess, hope to get something done maybe in '19 as far as I'm on the bank side front rather than the fee-based side?

Clearly Brian, when we raised the capital, I think we indicated at that juncture that we would be disappointed if we didn't have something in our pocket by the end of '18. And we were and are, and that's why we continue to be optimistic for 2019. Again, we think we have a good business model, we think we have some good opportunities on the fringes of our current footprint. And we think it'd be very good for us, not only from a book perspective, but from accretion of EPS perspective. So without divulging much beyond that, we're continuing to look at our strategic options.

And then just last two -- just on SBA and wealth management; I mean SBA with some of the government shutdown here, is that impacting production there or I guess your outlook for -- how you're thinking about full year '19, I mean?

I would answer, it's not impacting production, we continue to forge ahead just as we were before and it's not changing outlook for '19. At this point we still believe that will get it resolved and/or create some kind of temporary bridge. It is having a short-term implication in terms of getting us pay [ph] authorization in sales completed but it's just delaying and as long as that delay stays short-term, clients are sort of hanging in there with us and we're bridging temporary needs.

Well, just one comment. We're currently now -- we're -- instead of double-digit gains, 10, 11, 12; we're thinking this year maybe 7 or 8, Mark. And so we're strategically looking right now is to how can we take those higher yield potentially, have a much shorter breakeven and potentially keep them on our books. We're continuing to look at that as we speak, we certainly know there is a tactical downside which would be a reduction in that non-interest income but with the breakeven much closer, we're looking at that in terms of how we can build the organic sheet. Organic or the balance sheet organically with pretty good yielding loans worth of 75% guarantee, so we're pretty optimistic about the business line and we've been able to continue to develop it across the entire market.

It reminds me, what was your -- kind of budget your target; how you guys were thinking about SBA for this year?

We wanted the $30 million mark, we delivered a $16 million mark. The BDO platform that we have in place was just kind of marginal in '18. We currently have plans to kick that up with a restructure and underwriting, rejuvenation if you will, not to become a little more agile, a little more nimble with the process. But we know we have to -- if we're going to have the gain potential then we know we've got to double the volume and so now we have -- again, those 8 individuals who are going to be doing the small ones in the marketplace coupled with the four BDOs, we're looking for improved results across our entire footprint in 2019.

And you said the production in '18 was $16 million?

Yes.

And then, just on the -- I thought you said something -- was there any changes you had made to wealth management, maybe I missed that but if you did, I was just going to ask what that was? If not, then no need to go into it.

No, not on wealth management; we did land a couple of larger accounts on $50 million, $60 million kind of thing, and certainly put us in a better position to bring some profitability to the bottom line but -- now same leader expanded our team over in the Fort Wayne, Indiana market and the goal is to continue to drive that on upto $600 million, $700 million in the next several years.

We had indicated that in last quarter's call but we thought we'd have a very nice fourth quarter and all of those results came to pass in terms of our assets under management.

And then, just on the expenses Tony; I guess it's fair to say that in the event controlled I guess, do you still expect to see some operating leverage in 2019? I guess is that kind of the thought at this point, we're just kind of maintaining the expenses or being disciplined on them?

Yes, I think that's the right way to look at it. We've certainly grown expenses, roughly, certainly in '18 about the same as we've done revenue. You know, looking back two or three years, we were growing revenue kind of two in three times of what our expense growth has. I think our '19 expectation is that we'll get to a more positive level than we achieved in '18 which will drive net income growth to the levels that we expect. We deployed a lot of resources I think on the front-end Brian as we've talked about in '18; the leasing side, the BDO strategy that Mark referenced. We were looking for those to really pay-off at a bit higher level here in '19.

In a nutshell Brian, if the prior several years is all about optimism and a bit of pessimism, I mean we were all optimistic. I mean, we've put a lot of people on the street and some of those bets have yet to deliver our expectations. And so in '19 the message would be -- maybe just a little bit of pessimism with the process to make sure that we're keeping a keen eye on expenses so that we can get back to that positive operating leverage that we've been known for that has conspicuously been absent in 2018 from some of the bets that we've made, so we know we have to improve on that and we're going to be just a little bit more of pessimism to balance majority of the optimism is how I'd say it.

And the biggest areas Mark that -- to your point about, maybe not hitting exactly what you wanted to; I mean where is the most upside or where you see the most potential upside if there is execution this year? You know, which area is in the business?

Well, clearly we have high expectations across all fronts, the other 98% [ph] at the start and $2 billion, so M&A is a big part of our strategic discussion going forward but we've got great commercial lenders, we've got great diversity in our markets, we've got great asset quality, as I mentioned we're very patient for growth on the asset side because we're nearing the greatest bull market of all-time and I've been around long enough to know that credit cycles don't last good or bad forever. So commercial lending, we continue to be strong in, we think we know it well. SBA, I think there is continual opportunity there, we're just scratching the surface of a four year old business line. And I think that $30 million is certainly within our grasp but particularly with our BDO model we have, and as always, wealth management continues to be area of emphasis for us because of all the wealth that's going to be changing hands, is changing and has changed and will continue to change going forward. So we like our business lines and we like our treasury management services and all the people we have on the street because we're going out of the brick-and-mortar and inside to intimacy and client contacts and going to the client on the outside instead of them coming to us.

And last one was just on the allowance, it just had -- I mean it sounds like it drifted a little bit lower this year. I guess as you think about growth and where credit quality is at I guess would you think about that drifting a little bit lower again in -- I guess, based on your outlook for credit today or is it -- I guess, is there -- how do we think about the reserve in provisioning?

As you might expect, the 200% of non-performance is a good place to be. As Tony mentioned, median is okay, I don't get up in the morning wanting to be average; so we want to have a greater reserve because we've got Cecil [ph] coming here which is going to have a positive impact, that's towards the end of '19 but generally speaking, our work in the asset quality arena has allowed us to take up marginally a bit more risk in some of the SBA arena which is certainly improved profitability but going forward, we know that the ability to hedge on the provision and the allowance is not going to be as great as it was this past year because we intend to continue to grow. And hopefully, there will be some more opportunity with an M&A environment and opportunity. So, any more comments on it?

I would just add. I would say our -- significant downward trend we've had in non-performing assets has allowed us to be a bit more aggressive on the provision side in the last couple of years. I would say as we look out in '19, we would expect non-performing to stay in as kind of [indiscernible] general level of range, kind of upto a 50 basis point type level at the high end of assets. And given those numbers, provision levels would be kind of return to a more normalized levels in '19.

All right, that's helpful. I appreciate all the colors. Thanks.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mark Klein for any closing remarks.

Once again, thank you all for joining us. We're quite pleased with our 2018 year and even more excited about the prospects for 2019. We're looking forward to bringing you up-to-date again in April on the first quarter of 2019 as we'll be broadcasting our annual meeting live over the internet. So we're looking forward to chatting with you all again with regard to first quarter of 2019 in April. Thanks for joining.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.