Ladies and gentlemen, we thank you for standing by, and welcome you to the SBA Fourth Quarter Results. [Operator Instructions] And as a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to Mark DeRussy, Vice President of Finance. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us for SBA's Fourth Quarter 2013's Earnings Conference Call. Here with me today are Jeff Stoops, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and Brendan Cavanagh, our Chief Financial Officer. Some of the information we'll discuss in this call is forward-looking, including but not limited to, any guidance for 2014 and beyond. These forward-looking statements may be affected by the risks and uncertainties in our business. Everything we say here today is qualified in its entirety by cautionary statements and risk factors set forth in last night's press release and our SEC filings, which documents are publicly available. These factors and others that affected historical results may affect future results, and may cause future results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement we may make. Our statements are as of today, February 26, 2014, and we have no obligation to update any forward-looking statement we may make. Our comments will include non-GAAP financial measures as defined by Regulation G. The reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and other information required by Regulation G has been posted on our website, www.sbasite.com. With that, I'll turn it over to Brendan to comment on our fourth quarter results.

Thank you, Mark. Good morning. As you saw from our press release last night, we had another strong quarter in all areas. We exceeded the midpoint of our guidance for leasing revenue and exceeded the high end of our guidance for tower cash flow, adjusted EBITDA and AFFO. Changes in the Brazilian exchange rate during the fourth quarter versus our guidance negatively impacted leasing revenue by $400,000 and adjusted EBITDA and AFFO by $200,000 each. Total revenues were $335.4 million, up 14% over the year-earlier period. Site leasing revenues for the fourth quarter were $292.5 million or a 12.1% increase over the fourth quarter of 2012. As a reminder, on a sequential basis, approximately $3 million of site leasing revenue in the third quarter of 2013 was nonrecurring. Our leasing revenue growth was driven by organic growth and portfolio growth, including our initial Brazil acquisition of 800 towers, which closed at end of 2012, and our second Brazil acquisition of 2,113 towers, which closed in late November 2013. iDEN-related churn during the quarter had a negative impact of $1.3 million. The vast majority of our site leasing revenue continues to come from the U.S. and its territories, with approximately 8.6% of total leasing revenue in the quarter coming from international operations. Tower cash flow for the fourth quarter of 2013 was $217.6 million or a 16.4% increase over the year-earlier period. Tower cash flow margin was 78.3% compared to 77.7% in the year-earlier period. We have been able to expand our international operations with little impact to our tower cash flow margins. We continue to experience strong leasing demand both domestically and internationally. Amendment activity continues to be strong, still contributing over half of incremental leasing revenue in the fourth quarter. New collocation leases contributed just over 40% of our…

Thanks, Brendan. SBA ended the fourth quarter with $5.9 billion of total debt. We had cash and cash equivalents, short-term restricted cash and short-term investments of $175 million. Our net debt to annualized adjusted EBITDA leverage ratio is 6.8x. Our fourth quarter net cash interest coverage ratio of adjusted EBITDA to net cash interest expense was 3.3x. During the fourth quarter, we paid $55.5 million in cash and issued approximately 192,000 shares of common stock to settle the warrants associated with our 1 7/8% convertible notes. We have no further obligation with regard to these notes and the related warrants. Earlier this month, we obtained a new 7-year delayed draw $1.5 billion Term Loan B. The note was issued at a 25-basis-point discount to par. The first funding of $750 million occurred on February 7 and we expect the remaining $750 million to fund next month. Interest will accrue at LIBOR plus 250 basis points with a 75-basis-point LIBOR floor. This spread and LIBOR floor represent a combined improvement of 50 basis points compared to our previous Term Loan B, which we issued in 2012. Net proceeds from this financing were used to repay in full the $290 million balance on our existing Term Loan Bs and to repay the $390 million outstanding balance on our revolver. The remaining proceeds will be used to pay for our pending 2007 site Brazilian Oi acquisition and for general corporate purposes. As of the end of the fourth quarter and pro forma for the recent financing, the weighted-average coupon of our outstanding debt is 4.1% and our weighted average maturity is 5 years. We currently have no outstanding balance under our revolver and the full $770 million in commitments is available to us. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the quarter and currently have $150 million remaining under our existing $300 million authorization. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Jeff.

Thanks, Mark, and good morning, everyone. As you have heard, we did have another very good quarter, nearing or exceeding the high end of our guidance across almost all key financial metrics. Once again, we led our industry in many important growth metrics. SBA continues to perform in strong and steady fashion. Our organic leasing activity was particularly strong all through 2013 and the primary reason for our outperformance. We experienced strong demand across our entire portfolio, both domestic and international. In the U.S., we are seeing the benefits from that demand in both our leasing and services segments. We expect to benefit from these elevated levels of activity for the next several years as carriers build out their initial 4G coverage footprints to be followed by capacity spending as consumer adoption increases. Commentary from our customers has been very clear, that network speed and quality is now and will remain a primary focus. The path to better network speed and quality is more infrastructure. We are seeing strong activity in both amendments to existing carrier sites and new site locations in the U.S. and our backlogs remain large and continue to replenish. Internationally, we are seeing strong growth in new cell sites with a lot of basic 3G coverage builds ongoing in our markets. We look forward to the buildout of 4G in many of our international markets in the future. As a result of anticipated continued strong demand from our U.S. and international customers, we are guiding to strong organic leasing growth once again in 2014. A portion of the increase in our 2014 leasing revenue outlook is due to higher than anticipated -- previously anticipated organic leasing activity. In the fourth quarter, in the U.S., we had a very busy quarter with respect to new leasing business.…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from the line of Rick Prentiss with Raymond James. Richard H. Prentiss - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Jeff, I want to go back on one of the last things you've talked about, the same-tower revenue growth, and I think you said 9% to 10%. Now is that GAAP, not cash?

No, that's cash. Correct. Richard H. Prentiss - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: That's cash.

Yes. The way we look at that is we take off everything we had in Q4 of 2013 and look at where we're projecting to be in Q4 of 2014. And then taking out the impact of the acquisitions, it pencils out to about 9% to 10% growth rate. Richard H. Prentiss - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: And then the iDEN termination or iDEN churn that will be in 2014, how much of a negative is that, that would come down off that number?

Approximately 1.5%. Richard H. Prentiss - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Okay. And is there an ability to look at what the growth rate is domestically versus internationally since you have now increased the portfolio by the fourth quarter?

Yes. I mean, it's -- we're still getting Brazil off the ground, but we're probably 8% to 9% U.S. and then the remainder in international. So you're talking 300 or 400 basis points higher because of the lower number of sites and the lower amount of revenue off which that's basing. All in company-wide, 9% to 10% before iDEN. Richard H. Prentiss - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Makes sense. There's been a lot of consternation it seems with FX rates the way they're going. People trying to figure out, given that international might be 11% to 13% growth, how does FX affect that? How do you look at return on invested capital on those international portfolios, given that growth rate you're seeing?

Well, we're looking for, over time, 300 to 500 basis points above what we're expecting in the U.S., which will be a low double-digit number. So as we move through our 5-year plus time horizon, Rick, that's what we're modeling and expecting to get. Richard H. Prentiss - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: And comfort -- with the FX, you can't control FX, obviously, but comfort that still put minor work in Brazil. You mentioned you're looking at acquisitions in the Brazil market.

Well, we're -- we believe there will be some additional assets available and we will continue to -- no, my point in my comment was we feel like our strategic geographic flag has been planted with enough scale that we're in good shape there to proceed on a more of a build-to-suit basis. But just as we have always in the U.S., we'll be looking for good acquisitions that make eminent financial sense going forward. Richard H. Prentiss - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: So still a lot of comfort that investing in international even in Brazil is going to be a good return.

For the right price.

And Rick, we do consider FX when we're looking at what our plans are. And one of the ways that that's mitigated is that all of the escalators in our lease agreements in Brazil are tied to inflationary indexes down there. So those tend to come in at a much higher rate, which is a mitigant to the risk of a weakening FX rate. Richard H. Prentiss - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then augmentation, $15 million in the quarter, 73% reimbursed. If you look at your 2014 guidance, what's the expectation of what augmentation is in the CapEx and what reimbursement might be?

Well, the augmentation is in at -- roughly what we had for this year, so you're looking at somewhere in the neighborhood of $50 million to $60 million for the year. From a reimbursement standpoint, we would expect that to continue at a similar clip. Although that doesn't -- when we give guidance, we're putting the gross amount in our discretionary CapEx. So the reimbursements are capitalized and amortized into income over the term of the lease agreement that they're related to. Richard H. Prentiss - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Exactly. So you spread that over 7, 10 years or whatever the remaining lease is.

Right.

Next in queue is David Barden with Bank of America.

Just a couple. This first, Brendan, it feels like or sounds like the iDEN churn has not been at the worst case, which you've baked into your guidance. Do you -- would you still have, I think, the worst case baked into the forward outlook? But do you have some kind of increased level of comfort or communication with Sprint on their intentions and the expectation that maybe this is more of an overly conservative view at this stage of the game? I think the second question is real quick, a smaller one is, just on the -- subsequent to the fourth quarter ending disclosures, you talked about a small portfolio that you bought that the implied value per tower is $1.5 million, which is a big number. I was wondering if you could kind of elaborate a little bit on that deal. And then just lastly, in terms of -- on Rick's question, just international. There's obviously a lot of other international portfolios that have been thrown out there in Africa, in India. Your wheelhouse has been really the Latin America and to a lesser degree Canada markets. Are you kind of interested in venturing further afield? Are you comfortable kind of in your home base here?

Okay. David, first, on the iDEN, we have been assuming worst case, which is made up of 2 things, which is the total number of leases that they are entitled to terminate in any 1 quarter and we've assumed that they'd terminate the highest dollar leases first for purposes of guidance. They have been terminating their full allotment in terms of number of leases each quarter. However, they've not necessarily been the highest dollar leases first. Based on what we've learned to date, we were able to pick up about $1 million to our revenue guidance for 2014 based on actual notices versus that worst case assumption. It is possible and probably likely that there will be some additional pick up during the year. We continued with the convention though that we've been using and, frankly, I think that pickup will be relatively immaterial. And as we get further along, the -- what's left, the average becomes closer to what we would expect them to terminate.

On the acquisitions, David, we did acquire some very high cash flow sites, high-quality towers, had some really nice tenants beyond the big 4 folks like the Coast Guard and guys who we're very comfortable with, big installations, big dollar rents, and we acquired that for a mid-teens multiple. We're very happy with that transaction but that was what that was all about. And in terms of future expansion, we are deciding this year how much additional international growth we're going to pursue. On a pro forma basis, we have about 15% of our revenue internationally. 10% of that -- well, 2/3 of that is in Brazil. So we're considering where we want to go. Given that there will be some limits on how far we want to take that, which I can't define for you today, we are likely to be able to satisfy everything we want to do inside those limits within the near-term by continuing to stay in the Western Hemisphere. So that makes not impossible, but I think unlikely that, at least for the next year, we'd do anything outside the Western Hemisphere.

Next in queue is Jonathan Atkin.

Yes, I wondered in Brazil if you could kind of tell us of the portfolios that you -- the towers that you have bought and closed on what kind of lease-up you -- contribution you saw. And now that you kind of have a team on the ground, how do you feel about integrating kind of all the systems and records? Are you ready -- is there going to be further improvements in your ability to accommodate demand on those sites? Or do you have more kind of back-office work that you need to do?

Yes, really the only sites that we've had for any period of time, Jonathan, were the 800 Vivo sites, which we probably added 20, 30 leases on. Happy with those numbers. The telecom towers stuff came in, in September. I know we've added some leases there, probably a little bit on the Oi 2013. Obviously, we don't own yet the Oi 2007. So where we are is we are continuing to develop the master terms and conditions with the carriers, which is a process and kind of a norm that we need to have down there to truly be hitting on all 8 cylinders. That process is well underway. We're almost done with everybody there. We are adding some folks. We will continue to improve our leasing capabilities and transfer as quickly as we possibly can, the skills, the culture, the methods that we've learned in United States over the years to Brazil. But we still have a little bit more to do down there in terms of people cultivation.

And then in the U.S., can you tell us how much of your growth was basically MLA-driven versus kind of falling outside of activities relating to MLAs within the carriers you've been signing with?

Well, with the -- I mean, the T-Mobile MLA was all kind of already included because that had a stepped-up escalator over time. So some of that contributed in the fourth quarter but not any kind of different than where it had been previously. On the Sprint deal, we recognize on a cash basis the amendments as they are installed, although they were -- the payment terms were obligated. So there was some but a little bit. The vast, vast, vast majority, Jonathan, which we've kind intimated because we said most of the activity was from AT&T and Verizon, was outside of any MLA-type structure.

Next in queue is Jonathan Schildkraut.

So 2 questions that jump out. First, on the international side, just to dig in a little bit more. Jeff, you talked about 15% of the revenue being pro forma, about 10% coming from Brazil. I also -- we've talked about in the past that a good portion of your revenues outside of the U.S. are U.S. dollar-denominated. So I just wanted to make sure I understood if it was just the Brazil that is foreign currency denominated amongst the international? And then my second question just has to do with Sprint Spark and T-Mobile 700-megahertz, if those carriers pick up activity around those 2 spectrum band in the back half of the year, how does that roll through the reported numbers at SBA, given the MLAs?

On the international, the only other country that is not U.S. dollar-denominated, Jonathan, is Canada, which is a fairly small piece of the remaining 5%. On the -- and I'm sorry, your last question on the Sprint and T-Mobile. The T-Mobile 700 is totally outside their existing 4G modernization agreement with us. And the Sprint 2.5G could fall inside or could fall outside depending on how much on a per-site basis the agreed-upon equipment bucket has already been filled before the 2.5G equipment comes on. So that will be determined on a site-by-site basis. We know that there'll be some additional leasing revenue because we know some buckets have been filled. Can't tell you how much at this point.

Okay, great. And if I can just ask 1 more question, we're going through the calculation around the converts for later this year. We're showing, I don't know, call it, $825 million, $850 million of incremental capital on top of the face value. I just want to make sure that that's in line with what the company is seeing. And then I was wondering if there were warrants similar to the 1.75% convert warrants.

Jonathan, that number is in line with what we think is obviously subject to change depending on movements in the stock price, but that's in the right range. And that really is the value on the warrants because we have a bond hedge that offsets the notes that effectively makes them settleable at just their face amount. So it's really the warrants that drive that incremental premium, that $800 million, $850 million that you're talking about and they are similar to the previous deal. They just have different terms.

Next up is Michael Bowen.

Two. First, on EPS, I think you've mentioned some asset impairments and I'm sorry if I missed it, but if you could talk a little bit about that. And secondly, with regard to Sprint, we talked a lot about the 2.5 gigahertz, but I want to go back. Sprint has talked about an additional 50 million POP coverage using the 800 and 1,900-megahertz. And I think, heretofore, you've said that's not -- that is also not in your contemplated 2014 guidance as well. And if that is the case also, are you seeing activity there and can you give us some color around that?

I'll take the first one, the asset impairment question. There was a -- there's a higher amount of what we call asset impairment and decommissioning cost and it's really -- this year relative to previous years, and it's really attributable to my concerted effort on our part this year to focus on towers that are -- over the last 17 years that are underperforming sites that we've made a focus on decommissioning those sites, recovering some of the costs that we incur on a regular basis associated with those sites. These are nonrevenue-producing sites or iDEN-only sites, where we've determined that Sprint will no longer be using those sites so we've decommissioned those. So basically what goes through that line is the cost of writing down the carrying value of those assets, as well as the actual cost of taking down the tower to the extent that we'd do that. Most of that line is a noncash item. It's a write-off as opposed to actual cash expense.

On the Sprint, we have not seen a lot yet of that, although we have seen some that's come in the form of brand new leases and outside of the existing MLA agreements.

Okay. And again, that's not contemplated in your '14 guidance, correct?

No, it's not.

Now we'll move on to the line of Jonathan Chaplin.

This is Spencer Kurn in for Jonathan. One of the biggest concerns amongst investors is the potential impact of a Sprint-T-Mo merger. I was wondering if you could just talk about how you view the impact -- the potential impact of the merger. And just in general, what sort of impact have you seen from consolidating events?

Well, one of the benefits and one of the reasons that we did enter into MLAs with Sprint and T-Mobile was to reduce the risk of that possibility, Jonathan. And in doing so, we got greatly extended lives. So our average T-Mo lease now has 6 years left and our average Sprint lease now has 8 years left. The overlap, where they're both on the same site, if you lost the shortest-term lease of those 2, it's about 6% of revenue and that, of course, if it occurs at all, would be spread out over a long period of time. The big consolidation that you might draw comparisons to, although it's very dissimilar, was when Cingular acquired AT&T. That was very different because they're working on the same technologies and it was a much easier integration. And I think the decommissioning there was much less -- or had a much greater potential. And at the end of the day, we had on a combined basis, higher revenue from that combined company than we did from each of its predecessors because they still had a lot to do on their networks to now support new services for the combined subscriber base. And we think that something similar would occur if Sprint and T-Mo ever got together, although the initial integration would be much more difficult and I think the initial decommissioning would be much slower because of the disparate technologies that they both use.

We'll move on to the line of Phil Cusick. Richard Yong Choe - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: This is Richard for Phil. Just a clarification on the Sprint Spark stuff. That seems like it's going to be on a case-by-case basis, but how would you move that into guidance? Is it something that you need to get a better clarity around or sizing of it? Or is it just something that is going to kind of come through in the results as you go through?

The latter. We'll just probably take it in through actual results. Richard Yong Choe - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: And then on the T-Mobile side, would that warrant another MLA or an update in MLA? Or do you think that the 700 would be more on a site-by-site basis?

Don't know the answer to that yet. It's still a little early. I mean, T-Mo hasn't even acquired Spectrum yet. Although there have -- discussions have begun as to how it might get deployed.

We'll move on to the line of Armentez Chavitchez [ph].

Yesterday, one of your peers talked about an aspirational goal of doubling their AFFO per share by 2017. And I think one of the things that the Street struggles with is keeping your leverage target, particularly in the out years. So I was hoping you could help us understand better the long-term capital allocation, how acquisitions, buybacks, status fits into all of that?

Yes, our primary focus has been and will continue to be portfolio growth that meets our returns. We think growing AFFO per share is preferable by growing the top line and EBITDA line. But having said that, given the strength in the organic business and the quality of our assets, we can create a lot of AFFO per share growth through buying back our stock. If we -- if the world changes on the capital market side, we would, obviously, take those changes into account and, perhaps, look to adjust our leverage levels. Today we're extremely happy and convinced that where we are levered and what our target leverage range is, is the right place to be. If we only became a stock repurchaser, we may bring that down some. But in terms of our particular aspirational goals, I mean I would, as we've talked about all along, our aspirational goal is at least 20% compounded AFFO per share growth for the foreseeable future and that clearly gives you more than a double in 5 years. And I think a good and solid component of that and where people should easily see that the way we do is by maintaining target leverage, provided the capital markets stays the same.

There are no further questions at this time. Please continue.

Well, thank you, all, for joining us and we look forward to our next get-together when we report first quarter results. Thank you.

That does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for your participation and for using the AT&T Executive Teleconference service. You may now disconnect.