Robert Rehard
Analyst · Longbow Research. Please go ahead
Thanks Louis and good morning everyone. We feel we had a solid start to the year, especially on the metrics we can control. We did have topline headwinds in the quarter, as noted by our sales being down 9.8% on an organic basis. Much of the decline was related to record-breaking unseasonably warm winter weather in our HVAC business and sluggishness in general industrial applications globally, coupled with the negative impact of the coronavirus, which became progressively more severe as we ended the quarter. But despite these headwinds, Regal de-levered at 12%, well below our historic norm, helping to minimize the volume impact to our operating profit. At this point, I'll provide comments on each of the segments and end with more detail on the total company. In lieu of our normal guidance discussion, I'll share some of our scenario plans. Starting with Commercial, organic sales in the first quarter were down 12.5% from the prior year. The decline was largely volume-driven by end market. Headwinds were very broad-based. But the business saw particular pressure in pool pump, commercial HVAC, Europe air-moving market, and to a lesser extent, to our proactive approach to pruning low-margin accounts, as we continue to execute on our 80/20 initiative. The impact of this pruning initiative was approximately 110 basis points of the organic sales decline. Let me give you a little more color on two of the headwinds I just mentioned. In pool pump, COVID-related production delays at one of the company's facilities in China limited our ability to meet customer demand. But that facility has resumed operations and has seen positive momentum in April. Similarly, in Europe, we experienced COVID-related production delays at our air-moving factory in Italy, which was shut down for three weeks as mandated by the government, but this facility has also resumed operations and has seen positive momentum in April. The adjusted operating margin in the quarter for Commercial Systems was 7.8%, down 230 basis points compared to the prior year. This margin was primarily down due to the volume decline. We were able to partially offset the impact of these volume headwinds with cost initiatives we described in the second half of 2019. As we entered the latter half of the first quarter of this year and saw the impact of COVID-19 on our businesses, we worked to escalate many of the cost savings activities to ensure we could minimize the impact of the lower demand on our operating profit. Our deleverage in the first -- in the quarter was 25.3% in this segment. However, when comparing results in this segment on a year-over-year basis, which have been heavily impacted by tariffs, we should highlight the impact of the annual cost roll which affects the first quarter results of each year. In the first quarter of 2019, we saw a net favorable operating profit impact of approximately $1 million from the annual cost roll versus an unfavorable net operating profit impact of approximately $2 million in the first quarter of this year. When we consider this $3 million year-over-year unfavorable impact on our deleverage in the quarter within this segment and adjust for comparability purposes between years, we would see deleverage at a rate closer to 15%, well below the 25% to 30% deleverage we've historically seen in this segment. Orders in Commercial for the quarter were down approximately 11%, reflecting broad-based weakness. But with Asia, a bright spot, in April, orders were down 39%, again, on broad weakness, but with Asia tracking up slightly year-over-year. Some of the customer segmentation initiatives Louis referenced earlier are contributing to the growth we're seeing in Asia. In Industrial, organic sales in the first quarter were down 4.5% from the prior year. The segment saw double-digit, largely COVID-related declines in the power generation and core industrial end-markets. This was partially offset by our stronger sales into the data center market where our products provide standby power as previously stalled data center projects move forward. To a lesser extent, we also saw bright spots in the food and beverage, healthcare, and municipal end-markets. The decline in sales was also impacted by our proactive approach to pruning low-margin accounts as we continue to execute on our 80/20 initiative. The impact of this pruning initiative was approximately 300 basis points of the organic sales decline. The adjusted operating margin in the quarter for Industrial was 0.8%, up 230 basis points compared to the prior year. We still have a lot of work to do to raise our industrial operating margin to an acceptable level, but we are happy to see this result moving firmly in the right direction. And we have a path to further gains this year even with some of the pressure on the topline. The margin improvement was driven by favorable mix, favorable price cost, and continued cost reductions, partially offset by the impact of lower volume. And similar to our Commercial segment, the year-over-year impact of the annual cost roll as the Industrial segment was most impacted by tariffs. Orders for Industrial in the quarter were down almost 9%, would have -- but would have been down further were it not for the strength of the Data Center business. The headwinds from COVID-19 quickly became more pronounced as Q2 began, with April orders down 27%. Again, the pressure was broad-based across end-markets and geographies, with the exception of our business providing standby power and parallel and switchgear into the data center market, which remained a bright spot. Turning to Climate Solutions, organic sales in the first quarter were down 14.8% from the prior year. The decrease was primarily driven by the mild winter weather and COVID-related weakness, especially in Europe, plus softer general industrial end-markets and, to a lesser extent, lower price. For context, heating degree days were down 20% year-over-year in the first quarter, with January the warmest on record, and February, the second warmest on record, resulting in a severe weather-related headwind in HVAC. Similar to the comments I made related to our European operations in the Commercial segment, our Italian factory serving our Climate segment customers was also shut down for three weeks, but has now resumed operations. The decline in sales was also driven by our proactive approach to pruning low margin accounts as part of our 80/20 initiative. The impact of this pruning initiative was approximately 250 basis points of the organic sales decline. The adjusted operating margin in the quarter for climate was 15.2%, down 50 basis points compared to the prior year. We are pleased with the segment's ability to limit margin declines in the face of severe topline pressures. Deleverage in this segment was 18.3% in the quarter, well below the 25% deleverage we've historically seen in this segment. The margin decline that did occur was primarily driven by lower volumes, partially offset by favorable price cost, continued cost reductions and favorable mix, the majority of which was driven by our FER transition. Orders in the Climate segment for the quarter were down just over 7% on weaker demand in Europe and North America, partially offset by stronger demand in Asia. In April, orders were down 40%. We believe our reluctance by HVAC distributors and dealers to implement normal HVAC inventory builds into the summer cooling season is reverberating through the supply chain and is apparent in our weak climate orders in April. In addition, lower demand in the restaurant end-market is weighing on our Commercial Refrigeration business. Turning to Power Transmission Solutions or PTS, organic sales in the first quarter were down 4.2% from the prior year, reflecting relatively stable to even modestly higher markets in the early part of the quarter before more broad-based COVID-19-related headwinds started to impact March. Those effects were most impactful in oil and gas end-markets, which weighed heavily on our bearing and rotating businesses. The decline in sales was also driven by our proactive approach to pruning low-margin accounts as part of our 80/20 initiative. The impact of this pruning initiative was approximately 80 basis points of the organic sales decline. Partially offsetting these headwinds was an estimated two to three points of market -- above-market growth, including significant gains in the renewable energy end-market. The adjusted operating margin in the quarter for PTS was 15.7%, up 130 basis points compared to the prior year. Favorable price cost, improved productivity, continued cost reductions, and 80/20 actions more than offset modest volume and mix-related decline. Operating profit dollars grew by 4.1% despite the 4.2% organic sales decline in the quarter. Orders in PTS for the quarter were down approximately 23%, which mostly was planned due to the lumpiness of the segment's orders and strong orders in the fourth quarter. However, we started to see broad-based weakness toward the end of the quarter, we believe, most -- much of it COVID-related in markets that showed particular weakness, including oil and gas, both up and midstream, as well as metals and general industrial in China and in the U.S. Looking at April, orders were down 11% on broad-based weakness across most end-markets, with share gains in conveying and unit material handling as a bright spot. Additionally, we had strong aerospace orders driven by a large onetime purchase. For reference, Regal exposure to the aerospace market is small, but large orders in that market can create some lumpiness in our PTS segment. Our ModSort conveyor equipment offering continues to gain nice momentum, a lot of which we attribute to share gains, especially in the warehouse and food end markets. A ModSort sales opportunity funnel that we noted had tripled in the last three months of 2019 is starting to translate into orders, including a significant order received just after quarter closed from a key distribution center customer. We're excited about this truly differentiated technology moving forward. Now, I will summarize a few key financial metrics for the first quarter for total Regal. Our capital expenditures were $10.9 million in the quarter. We continue to be focused on ensuring that we deploy capital that drives returns above our weighted average cost of capital and, ultimately, to improve shareholder value. We are monitoring capital expenditures very closely, as we move through this difficult time. We have lowered our full-year expected capital expenditures from $75 million to $50 million, and we'll continue to reevaluate as we progress through the year. Our simplification and footprint consolidation activities resulted in $5.6 million of restructuring and related costs in the quarter. And we now expect $18 million of restructuring spend for the full year. We expect our 2020 restructuring actions to result in more than $38 million in annualized savings. As a reminder, coming into 2020, we had planned on realizing $29 million of 80/20 and restructuring-related cost savings this year. We estimate that we realized approximately $4 million of these savings in the first quarter, which was in line with our expectations. Not surprisingly, some of our planned restructuring actions have been delayed due to COVID-19. For example, around executing facility closures or product loops. But other initiatives are actually ahead of schedule. So, for now, we believe we are on track. Looking forward, the impact of COVID-19 continues to reverberate through the business. And so it's possible that some of our actions, particularly those involving our manufacturing operations in Mexico, could be delayed. On the flip side, we are actively identifying and implementing certain actions that can be accelerated, including potentially pulling forward some savings tied to action plan for 2021. While we are still working on these cost acceleration and pull-forward plans, we have identified approximately $3 million of additional actions we expect to benefit 2020, bringing our total cost savings in 2020 to $32 million. The restructuring actions I have been discussing underpin our goal to realize 300 basis points of operating margin expansion by 2022, what we referred to as our 303 initiative at our recent March 3rd Investor Day. In addition to these midterm initiatives which we expect to drive permanent savings, we have taken some additional temporary cost actions, which Louis briefly touched on earlier, to respond to the known pressures COVID-19 is already placing on our business. We believe these items, such as the salary -- such as salary pay cuts and furloughs and organization-wide discretionary spending measures, will result in an additional $6 million of savings in the second quarter, bringing our total savings in 2020 to $38 million; $32 million related to the cost savings we discussed in 2019, and $6 million related to the discretionary cost savings in Q2 I've just described. Now let's move on to tax. The adjusted effective tax rate in the quarter was 22.1%. We've provided a table in the appendix of this presentation to reconcile the GAAP ETR to the adjusted ETR. Our full year adjusted ETR is expected to be 21%. Our total debt at the end of the first quarter was $1.365 billion, and our net debt was $760 million. We ended the quarter with our net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio at 1.6, slightly below how we ended 2019 and well within our comfort zone of 1.5 to 2.0. Moving to free cash flow, we achieved $91.8 million of free cash flow in the quarter. Our first quarter free cash flow resulted in a conversion rate of 196% of adjusted net income and speaks to the cash-generating capability of the business. Trade working capital was a source of cash in the first quarter, driven primarily through decreases in inventory, a strong start to the year. Also in the first quarter, we purchased approximately 315,000 of our shares for $25 million. The balance remaining on our share purchase authorization is $210 million. We remain committed to returning excess capital to shareholders over time, but have temporarily paused our share purchase program to conserve capital during the COVID-19 pandemic. As Louis mentioned in his prepared remarks, we have decided to pull our guidance for 2020. Given the uncertainty created by COVID-19 makes it difficult to produce a meaningful forecast. Instead, we thought it made more sense to share with you some of our scenario planning. We'll discuss Q2 and the full year. First, on Q2, based on the short-cycle nature of our business, the forecast for Q2 is the only projection where we have any real level of visibility, and even that is very limited. We looked at how the P&L will look under scenarios of sales being down 20% and being down 35%. The sensitivity analysis indicates that with sales in the second quarter down 20%, we would still control deleverage at a rate below historical levels. We estimate at a high-teens to low-20s rate. Under the down 35% scenario, we'd expect to deleverage rate in the mid-20s to low-30s range. While we are not providing guidance for the year, if the impacts of COVID-19 remain beyond Q2, we would expect the deleverage rates provided for Q2 to be consistent as we move through the year or could even get slightly better with the continued progression of the cost-out initiatives I described earlier, barring any unforeseen project delays. In short, similar to the way we manage through the headwinds of -- in Q1, we will proactively manage discretionary spending across our businesses and within our plant to ensure we effectively manage utilization to mitigate the impacts of potential under-absorption and drive to achieve the cost-out saving we've discussed. The key takeaway from these scenarios is that even under significant topline pressure, we believe that benefits from our reorganization, restructuring, and 80/20 efforts, in addition to new cost actions we had taken in the last month and further actions we have identified should conditions deteriorate further, should allow us to delever at rates below those we've experienced historically. We also expect to maintain a strong balance sheet and cash position under these scenarios. We continue to expect free cash flow as a percentage of adjusted net income to exceed 100% for the year. I've included a few other modeling assumptions on this slide for your reference. Finally, I thought it made sense to make a brief comment on how we believe the business can perform when our sales start to grow again. We feel very strongly that through our 80/20 initiatives, our supply chain moves, and our other restructuring actions, we are building a business that has a fundamentally different cost structure versus in recent cycles. That means we expect a strong performance we've been executing on deleverage now for the last four quarters will also translate into stronger leverage rates versus history, which we think can be in the mid-30s range. I want to provide some additional color on our balance sheet and liquidity as well as updated thoughts on capital allocation in this environment. First, on our net leverage, we ended Q1 at 1.6 net debt to adjusted EBITDA. This is a slight improvement from the 1.7 level at the end of 2019 and brings us further within our comfort zone of 1.5 to 2.0. Some of you may have seen that on April 1, we drew down $255 million under our revolving credit facility. Combined with prior borrowings, the company has now borrowed the full $500 million under our revolver. These recent borrowings were done as a proactive measure to increase the company's cash position and preserve financial flexibility in light of current uncertainty in the global markets resulting from COVID-19. Regal has a strong balance sheet and cash flows. And we do not currently intend to use the borrow proceeds, but believe in abundance of caution regarding our cash position is prudent at this time. As of May 1st, 2020, we have cash and cash equivalents of approximately $890 million on our balance sheet. We also wanted to highlight that we have no material near-term debt maturities with the majority of our debt outstanding not coming due until 2023. Moving to capital allocation, as I noted previously, we lowered our CapEx forecast from $75 million to $50 million, or down 35%. We have temporarily suspended share repurchases. We also recently decided to maintain our dividend at the same level. Regarding M&A, we will continue to evaluate strategic opportunities, but we do think it's fair to say that doing deals becomes less likely in the current environment. From a trade working capital perspective, we are selectively building strategic inventory in parts of our business to manage the risk of potential supply chain disruptions and to bolster service levels for our customers. Bigger picture, we continue to manage all the elements of our trade working capital and target trade working capital to be a source of cash in 2020. Before I conclude our prepared remarks, I want to, once again, thank all of our Regal associates for everything you are doing to navigate these difficult times. Our results in Q1, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, showed strong execution as demonstrated by a very respectable 12% deleverage rate and strong free cash flow. And with that, I'll turn it back over to the operator. Operator, we're now ready to take questions.