Mike Ludwig
Analyst · Stifel. Your line is open
Thank you, Bruce and good afternoon everyone. In the slides ahead, I'll review our second quarter 2019 results followed by our third quarter guidance. Turning to Slide 11, we will review the financial results for Q2, 2019. Second quarter revenues as previously noted were $242.9 million within our Q2 guidance range of $240 million to $250 million. Q2 revenues increased slightly on a sequential basis, but increased 13% over the second quarter 2018. The wireless infrastructure market for both 4G and 5G applications along with ADAS, portable electronics and mass transit markets were strong contributors to the sequential revenue increase. The company experienced weaker demand and lower revenues primarily from power semiconductor substrates for general industrial applications as well as conventional vehicle electrification applications. While we were able to achieve a gross margin of 35.3% within our guidance range of 35% to 36%, our continued execution challenges and PES exacerbated by lower volumes in the PES business offset significant improvement in ACS gross margin and improved gross margin performance in our EMS segment. The company's gross margin was also measurably impacted in the quarter by the increased tariffs resulting from an escalation of the trade tensions between the U.S. and China. Adjusted operating income for Q2, 2019 was $41.7 million or 17.2% of revenues compared to $41 million or 17.1% of revenues for Q1, 2019. Adjusted operating expenses decreased by $0.3 million in the second quarter compared to the first quarter. GAAP EPS of $1.30 per fully diluted share and adjusted EPS of $1.64 per fully diluted share for Q2, 2019 were at and above respectively the upper end of our guidance range for Q2, but below Q1 levels. The strong earnings performance both on a GAAP and an adjusted basis resulted primarily from good expense control and a slightly lower than forecasted effective tax rate for the second quarter. Turning to Slide 12, our Q2, 2019 revenues increased $3.1 million versus the first quarter of 2019. The sequential increase was experienced in both our ACS and EMS business segments with our ACS revenues growing 15% and our EMS revenues growing 1%. The PES business segment saw its revenues decrease by 14% sequentially. The increase in ACS revenues resulted primarily from strong wireless infrastructure applications demand growing greater than 20% compared to Q1, as both 4G and 5G revenues grew significantly in the quarter led by strong antenna application demand. The strong 4G revenues were driven by the previously announced 416,000 China Unicom 4G LTE installations we highlighted in our previous conference call. In fact, 4G has held steady through the first six months of 2019 as it was basically flat compared to the same period of 2018. As Bruce noted, 5G orders accelerated in the second quarter and we were able to act quickly to mitigate the negative impact in the quarter to both 4G and 5G revenues resulting from the restrictions on sales to Huawei. Revenues from ADAS showed continued strength in the second quarter with a slight sequential quarterly increase, but growing approximately 15% over the second quarter of 2018. Revenues in our EMS segment increased sequentially due to strong demand in both portable electronics and automotive applications. The increase in portable electronics’ revenues up 9% sequentially and 44% compared to Q2, 2018 was due to the timing of our customers commercialization of new handset and tablet designs. The increase in automotive application revenues resulted from increase in EV/HEV battery pads and battery pack sealing systems which grew slightly compared to Q1 and almost 75% compared to Q2, 2018. The growth in the application is another example of where Rogers’ technical capabilities have amplified our growth by solving our customers’ difficult technical challenges. General industrial application revenues were down slightly compared to the first quarter. As noted in Bruce's prepared remarks, PES experienced weaker demand and lower revenues primarily from power semiconductor substrates for general industrial applications as well as conventional vehicle electrification applications, as revenues for these applications decreased sequentially by 10% and 7% respectively and each declined by 11% compared to Q2, 2018. For power semiconductor substrates for EV/HEV applications, demand remain strong in the second quarter, but revenues decline sequentially due to production challenges that were separate from ongoing yield challenges. These issues were resolved in the quarter, but resulted in revenues being down 6% compared to Q1 for these applications. Even with the production and yield challenges, revenues for EV/HEV power semiconductor substrate applications were up 45% compared to Q2, 2018 and year-to-date are greater than 35% ahead of 2018. Despite the slowdown in our power semiconductor substrate business for general industrial and vehicle electrification applications, we continue to see increased current demand and expect to see significantly increasing demand over a multi-year period for our wide-band gap semiconductor substrate business serving EV/HEV applications. As a result, we will continue to bring on additional capacity to address the increasing demand. Currency exchange rates negatively impacted 2019 second quarter revenues by $0.5 million compared to Q1, 2019. Turning to Slide 13, our gross margin for Q2, 2019 was $85.8 million or 35.3% of revenues. 30 basis points lower than our first quarter gross margin of 35.6%. The decrease in gross margin percentage was due to a significant decline of the gross margin in the PES business and meaningful increases in tariffs resulting from the U.S. and China trade tensions, combining to offset the increases in gross margin of both the ACS and EMS businesses. We were pleased with the increased gross margin percentage from the ACS business in Q2 resulting from a favorable product mix, increased efficiency and improved factory utilization. The excellent results were delivered in the midst of a significant demand increase which was planned and invested for beginning in 2018. In the second quarter, the EMS gross margin percentage also increased due to increased efficiency, improve factory utilization and progress on EMS performance issues discussed on past calls. We expect to see further gross margin improvement in Q3 and Q4 from resolving the EMS consolidation and optimization issues. Consistent with comments from our prior calls, we anticipated the decline of the gross margin in PES in Q2 due to the continued challenges with productivity and yield issues with our new generation wide-band gap semiconductor Silicon Nitride product. In addition, the PES gross margin was negatively impacted in Q2 by the significantly reduced volumes resulting from the reduced demand in general industrial and conventional vehicle electrification applications. We continue to follow our yield productivity and commercial recovery plans. As Bruce discussed in his remarks, we made organizational changes to address the pace of the execution of our PES gross margin recovery plan and anticipate seeing progress in the second half of 2019 into the first half of 2020. In addition, we are addressing our cost structure in PES to compensate for lower volume while still maintaining our ability to support the increasing demand in the wide-band gap semiconductor power applications. The increase in tariffs due to trade tension escalation during the second quarter impacted our gross margin by over 60 basis points compared to the first margin due to both the increase in the tariff rate and the increased shipment of inventory subject to tariffs primarily ACS inventory. In total, tariffs impacted gross margin in the second quarter by over 80 basis points. We are working aggressively to leverage our factory footprint and to optimize our supply chain to mitigate the effective tariffs. We expect to see the benefit of these actions in the form of lower tariffs as a percent of revenues in the first half of 2020. The headwinds on company gross margin from performance issues from the PES and EMS business segments increased to approximately 230 basis points from approximately 175 basis points discussed in our Q1 call due primarily to greater inefficiencies from the lower volume of power semiconductor substrate business discussed earlier. The achievement of our financial target of 20% adjusted operating profit in 2020 is predicated on a gross margin of greater than 39%. The path to the higher gross margin is through improved operational execution in PES and EMS, which we expect to contribute 230 basis points mitigating the impact of tariffs which can contribute from 40 basis points with the actions described above to 80 basis points if trade tensions are resolved favorably and an incremental 100 plus basis points from increased volumes in all businesses particularly 5G revenues. We saw improvements in EMS in the second quarter and believe with the management changes in PES, we are on an enhanced more timely path to executing on the performance opportunities. We discussed our plans to mitigate the impacts of tariffs and we remain confident in the 5G ADAS and EV/HEV markets and expect them to continue to grow into the future. As a result, we remain confident in our path to achieve a gross margin of greater than 39% and an adjusted operating profit margin of 20% in the back half of 2020. Slide 14 details the changes to adjusted net income for Q2, 2019 of $30.7 million compared to adjusted net income for Q1, 2019 of $34.6 million. As discussed earlier, the adjusted operating income for Q2, 2019 was slightly higher than Q1's adjusted operating income both on a dollar and a percent of revenue basis. Adjusted operating expenses for Q2 of $44.1 million or 18.2% of revenues or $0.3 million lower than Q1 adjusted operating expenses of $44.4 million or 18.5% of revenues. The lower expenses resulted from reduced SG&A costs. Other income and expense for Q2 was unfavorable compared to Q1, 2019 as a result of increased expenses from currency and commodity hedging activities. Lastly, our effective tax rate for Q2, 2019 was 22.9% compared to our Q1, 2019 effective tax rate of 14.2%. The first quarter 2019 effective tax rate incorporated discrete tax benefits that were not expected to and did not repeat in the second quarter. In the second half of 2019, we expect the effective tax rate to be between 24% and 25% excluding the impact of discrete tax items. Turning to Slide 15, we ended the second quarter 2019 with a cash position of $173.1 million, an increase of $11 million from March 31, 2019 and an increase of $5.4 million from December 31, 2018. In Q2, the company spent $11.4 million on capital expenditures. We spent $24 million year-to-date. We continue to guide capital spending for the year in the range of $50 million to $60 million as we continue to add capacity for increasing demand for products serving 5G and EV/HEV applications. The company paid down $28 million of debt in the quarter and has paid down $33 million of debt in 2019 through June 30. As of June 30, we are in a net debt position of $22.4 million. The company generated $50.4 million from operating activities in Q2 including a decrease in working capital of $11.2 million. Through June, the company generated $67.5 million from operating activities, net of an increase in working capital of $13.9 million primarily from the increase in accounts receivable due to both strong revenues and the timing of revenues in the second quarter. Taking a look at our Q3, 2019 guidance on Slide 16, as we have discussed, we are seeing a decline in the demand for our power semiconductor materials for general industrial and vehicle electrification applications that will extend into the second half of 2019. And there continues to be uncertainty regarding the collateral effects of the U.S. sanctions against Huawei and how those will impact our wireless infrastructure application revenues in the second half of 2019. Therefore, revenues for Q3 are estimated to be in the range of $225 million to $235 million. We expect performance improvements made in our EMS and PES segments and slightly lower tariffs from reduced ACS volumes to be offset by lower factory utilization from the reduced volumes. As a result, we are guiding gross margin in the range of 35% to 36% for Q3. We guide GAAP EPS for Q3 in the range of $1.05 to a $1.20 per diluted share. On an adjusted basis, we guide fully diluted earnings in the range of $1.30 to $1.45 per diluted share. I will now turn the call back over to Bruce.