Good morning and welcome to the RE/MAX Holdings Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. My name is Sarah and I will be facilitating the audio portion of today's call. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to, Andy Schulz, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Mr. Schulz?

Thank you, operator. Good morning everyone and welcome to RE/MAX Holdings second quarter 2024 earnings conference call. Please visit the Investor Relations section of www.remaxholdings.com for all earnings-related materials including our standard earnings presentation and to access the live webcast and the replay of the call today. Our prepared remarks and answers to your questions on today's call may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include those related to agent count, franchise sales and open offices, financial measures and outlook, brand expansion, competition, technology, housing and mortgage market conditions, capital allocation, credit facility, dividends, share repurchases, litigation settlement, strategic and operational plans and business models. Forward-looking statements represent management's current estimates. RE/MAX Holdings assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in the future. Forward-looking statements address matters that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. These are discussed in our first quarter 2024 financial results press release and other SEC filings. Also, we will refer to certain non-GAAP measures on today's call. Please see the definitions and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures contained in our most recent quarterly financial results press release, which is available on our website. Joining me on our call today are, Erik Carlson, our Chief Executive Officer; and Karri Callahan, our Chief Financial Officer; our brand leaders, Ward Morrison and Amy Lessinger are also here and will join us for Q&A. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to RE/MAX Holdings CEO, Erik Carlson. Eric?

Thank you, Andy, and thanks to everyone for joining us today. We had a good quarter with stronger-than-expected financial performance and several noteworthy conversions of real estate brokerages and teams. It's increasingly clear that our decisions over the past year to right-size our operations, settle industry class action lawsuits, strengthen our leadership team, replenish our cash, and prepare for the days ahead have been prudent and impactful. The notable industry business practice changes set to take place on August 17, we continue to prepare our affiliates for the future. With 51 years of history, we've had plenty of experience with many shifts that have occurred in our industry, and the associated wisdom that we've gained continues to serve as well. Education and outreach, two core strengths of RE/MAX, have been our top priorities following the NAR announcement. More broadly, we're focused on our playbook, operating our business as efficiently as possible, maintaining a growth mindset and delivering the absolute best customer experience. In what continues to be an uncertain time for housing and our industry, we remain focused on what we can control. We believe our second quarter financial results are proof that our efforts are making a difference. Karri will get into the details shortly, but to preview some of her comments, collections are timely and they continue to improve. Our cost management efforts have also been effective. We continue to see positive results from our growth initiatives, although not yet at a level to offset adverse industry-wide and macroeconomic forces. Our conversions, mergers and acquisitions or CM&A program continues to add brokerages and agents to the RE/MAX network. In late June, we added a 60-agent independent office in Utah. About the same time, we're also excited to announce that a prominent unaffiliated brokerage in Ontario converted to RE/MAX,…

Thank you, Erik. Good morning, everyone. Continued cost management, amid a soft housing market, highlighted our second quarter financial performance. Some of the notable quarterly financial metrics included: total revenue of $78.5 million; adjusted EBITDA of $28.1 million, up 5.4% over Q2 of last year; adjusted EBITDA margin of 35.8%, an increase of 350 basis points over the second quarter of 2023; and adjusted diluted EPS of $0.41. Looking closer at revenue, excluding the marketing funds, revenue was $58.4 million, a decrease of 4.8% compared to the same period last year, driven by negative organic growth of 4.5%, and adverse foreign currency movements of 0.3%. Negative organic growth was principally driven due to US agent count and reduced revenue from previous acquisitions, partially offset by higher broker fee revenue. Recall that previous acquisitions like booj and Gadberry have either wound down or are in the process of winding down. The increase in broker fee revenue was primarily driven by higher sales prices, more than offsetting the impact from reduced agent count. Importantly, second quarter selling, operating, and administrative expenses decreased 13.3% to $34.9 million due to several factors, including lower personnel expenses, improved collections, favorable property tax expense, and reduced legal and IT-related expenses. Reduced personnel expenses were largely a function of a difficult but necessary decision we made one year ago to streamline our operations, which also contributed to the reduction in IT-related costs. RE/MAX collections continue to improve this quarter and have been comparatively robust, despite the challenges of the current housing market. This is an encouraging sign when assessing the overall health of our franchisees. Favorable property tax expense of about $0.5 million was a onetime event. Lower legal expenses and miscellaneous reductions, eliminations, and efficiencies elsewhere across the enterprise, all contributed to this quarter's strong results.…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Soham Bhonsle with BTIG. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, everyone. Erik, I think, as you noted, there's some consensus out there that there will be fewer agents in the industry long-term, right, as we see this sort of professionalization after these settlements. So let's just assume that sort of plays out. I'm curious if you guys have given any thought on involving your pricing model to one where that takes more of the economics on the actual transaction rather than just the number of agents, right? Because if you're, in fact, providing all this value to your agent and making them more productive, then the thought is, why not participate in some of that upside instead of just agent count where the macro trend could be somewhat negative long term? Any thoughts there would be great.

Yes. I appreciate it, Soham. And I'll start off and then maybe Amy has a few comments around that. Obviously, she's been pretty close to the network as of late, especially kind of with the changes that are coming up. But it's a great question. I think, as I've been talking about for my eight, 9 months that I've been here now is, look that there's -- we have a great brand, we have a really strong community of broker owners and we have outstanding agents who are really passionate about what they do. And as we've talked about, I mean, we do -- we are in a position where we have a bit more full time professional, more productive agents than others. So, in that perspective, and with agent count decline, very, very likely in the future, we think that we're a little bit more mitigated than others. That doesn't mean that we're completely isolated or protected, and we have work to do. And Amy will be happy to talk about some of that work that we're doing to prepare folks. But we do feel like we're in a bit better position than maybe some others relative to the industry. With that being said, our model has been a strong model for us over many, many decades. But we're not naive enough to think that we might not have to change. And so, the way I phrased it, Soham, is look, we're trying not to leave any stone unturned. We're looking at all aspects of the business. And whether that's like a wholesale change to the model or whether that's a hybrid in the future, I do think there's opportunities because look at the fact of the matter is that agents are changing and it's a dynamic workforce. And…

Yes. And I think I'd add that because you just mentioned kind of pure agency -- buyer agency has been a part of the industry since the '90s. And interestingly enough, 90% of buyers used an agent last year. And so, I think we're really happy about the spotlight coming into buyer agency, because I think it's good for experienced agents, which is a large portion of our population. And as we've mentioned previously, our settlement came back in October, we were preparing all the way leading up to the announcement of the NAR settlement with education, tools, support on this front to make sure that even though our agents are experienced that they are absolutely ready and able to clearly articulate their value, clearly have a transparent conversation about how they're paid and really outlined to a buyer the benefits of being represented.

Yes. Great. And then, the second one, Karri, on the EBITDA guide for the third quarter, it looks like you're forecasting a similar level of revenue quarter-over-quarter, but the EBITDA is stepping down a little. Is there some investment coming through or something else going on there?

Soham, that's a great question. As we said in the scripted remarks, we had a really strong quarter in the second quarter. We did benefit from a couple of different things. One, just kind of ongoing efficiencies and really looking at managing the business as efficiently and effectively as possible. But we also did have some onetime items that benefited the second quarter that we don't anticipate kind of flowing through into Q3. I mentioned property taxes specifically in the scripted remarks. And then, as I noted, despite the macro, our bad debt expense and collections have been very, very favorable. And so, while we've taken down -- we've assumed in the third quarter some good progress there, not quite as strong as Q2. So there could be some upside to the back half of the year if collections really continue on a similar pace as Q2.

Okay. And then just the decision to sort of lower the agent count guide for the year, can you just talk about the biggest drivers there?

Sure. So, I think, we continue to remain optimistic about some of the things that we're doing here from an agent count perspective. Obviously, Erik talked about the momentum on CM&A both in the US and especially some activity that we've had in Canada. And so, from an adjustment to the guide perspective, I think it's really just been informed by the actual performance through July, kind of similar trends that Erik touched on in terms of the headwinds in the US given the macro environment, kind of flattish performance in Canada. But importantly, outside of the US and Canada, we're seeing some good growth resume, had some large conversion activity actually in Central and South America, and we're continuing to see some pockets of agent count growth outside of the US and Canada.

Your next question comes from the line of Anthony Paolone with JPMorgan. Your line is open

Great. Thank you.Good morning. The first question is, do you have a sense or view as to maybe how much of the pressure on aging count thus far has been as a result of the pending changes that are going to go into effect versus, say, just the housing market more broadly? And just trying to understand, like if you think perhaps in the next 3 to 6 months, we'll actually start to see some fallout, or do you think that these changes have been pretty well digested by folks?

Yes. Tony, this is Erik. I don't -- I think, like the macro environment is obviously impacting aging count, I think that new buyer representation is impacting aging count. I do think that the changes associated on 8/17 will continue to put pressure. I think the macro environment is definitely playing a big role right now. As I said, in my opening comments, but then in the last question, I do feel like we're a little bit more protected because the fact of the matter is, we have more productive agents. So, when I think about that, it's just more -- it's more swings of the bat, right? And so, over a period of time, with 10-year experience productivity, our team over generalizing is they're just -- they're more experienced at negotiating and dealing with customers and explaining their value. And I think what I've been -- I'm not surprised anymore, but when I came in, what I really loved about this team in this business is just the passion of our agents around the brand and what they do for buyers and sellers and the strength of our broker owners. So, we're not just reliant really on kind of Amy and her team and HQ deploying some training on changes that are going to occur within the market or how to deal with macro effects or how to go and get additional listings or how to talk about your value. I mean, we've got this outstanding network of broker owners that are providing training on a day-in and day-out basis, and reviewing whether or not they have somebody who's struggling with a particular part of the customer journey and providing those resources at a local level. So, not only with more intel on what's actually happening boots on the ground, but they're there to have a face to face touch point, which I think is one of the strengths of our network. So, do I think that that agent count will continue to be under pressure from an industry perspective? Absolutely. Do I think it'll hit part time harder than full time? 100%. Are we subject to continued agent count decline? Yes, but I think we are starting to bend the trend a little bit and understand who's leaving, why they're leaving and what we can do to course correct there. So, we're actually kind of excited that there might be more at bat for more productive full time agents here in the future. And we're excited that RE/MAX can pick up some of that market share. Hopefully that helps.

Yes. I don't know if this is maybe for Amy, but can you give us some specifics or any anecdotes or data on kind of what your messaging to the agents in terms of buy side commission rates, how to suggest negotiating this or just what the field practices are right now or what you expect them to be in the next month or so?

Sure. We always emphasize the value of the service that an experienced agent provides in the transaction. And we've been preparing our agents and bolstering their already extensive experience in education on this front, honestly before the announcement of the NAR settlement. So, we continue close monitoring of buyer broker commission trends. I'm out in the network all the time, and our brokers are not noting any notable changes. And that's very consistent with our internal analysis. So, we're definitely optimistic that RE/MAX agents are going to be less impacted due to their experience in their productivity.

Okay. So there's no -- but has there been any sort of recommendations on rate or way to approach how to set a buy side commission at this point?

Commissions are always negotiable, and so we don't provide guidance on that front. And I think I'd like to add to that these changes, although new to some markets, they have already been established in 20 markets across the country. And buyer agencies have been around since the '90s, buyer agency and representation agreements have always been available in the majority of markets. They just simply weren't mandatory. So, our agents, given their experience level and the amount of times that they transact, they're just more seasoned in navigating these discussions.

Your next question comes from the line of Tommy McJoynt with KBW. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking our questions here. Any early learnings, perhaps through trial and error, just of the implementation of buyer agent agreements without adding too much friction into the process that might otherwise lead to a higher fallout of the fall through, I guess, of clients choosing not to engage with an agent?

Yes, for sure. Thanks for the question. Buyer agencies have been around since the '90s. These agreements have been around for decades in the majority of states out there. And 20 of the 50 states, it's been a requirement already prior to the settlement. So, the remaining 30, it's not that they haven't had these agreements in place, it's simply that they weren't mandatory. And so, I think that when it comes to the spotlight on buyer agency, I think it's healthy for consumers to really now fully, fully understand what it means to be represented by a professional agent. And so, given the tenure and the amount of times that our agents transact, they're just more productive. It seems that buyers out there now really have an appreciation and a need and a drive for an experienced professional so they can trust.

Tommy, this is Erik. Let me say, let me add a little context to me, because I think that, look, there are changes that are going to happen in the market, right? And so, look, we've been really continuing to push education and having our brokers push education about being as transparent as possible. Helping the customer kind of weed through a complex transaction, which is very emotional and very important to a family. And so, I think it's been good for us to continue to remind our broker owners and the agents what we've kind of stood for, for 50 years. With all that being said, whenever there's change in process, there is going to be some noise and there'll be a bit of a learning curve. I think that because of our experience and our at-bats, we're a bit better off, but we're also talking to our folks about rising above the noise and making sure that they are creating a higher standard for the customer transaction, because with any change, there are good and bad actors. And I think that this gives the opportunity for some folks that either have intent or don't have intent. So, no intent, part time, not enough experience, don't understand the changes, and there'll be friction with that customer experience. And hopefully we can pick up those referrals after customers are dissatisfied. And then there'll be some that will be trying to complete workarounds, et cetera. And so, I think from an overall industry perspective, there will be some noise in the system. And here at RE/MAX, we're going to try to rise above and create a standard where, look, we're the most trusted brand. Customers want trust when they engage with a real estate agent. And we're really pushing that for our agents and brokers to continue to provide a transparent, trustworthy experience.

Got it. Does RE/MAX provide templates for buyer agent agreements to the franchises? And are there different types of templates out there that have different levels of services embedded in them?

Yes, good question. So, as a franchisor, we do not provide forms. They are derived from the local governing bodies. And we've been closely listening to our network and monitoring that. And largely we are finding that the governing bodies are producing what they need in terms of compliance forms that they can use to implement the changes on the 17.

Okay. And then, just last one real quick, trust to try to track your prepped market share in real time, or at least on a quarter-to-quarter basis. Is it a fair exercise to look at your variable broker fee revenues and look at the trends relative to what industry transaction volumes are doing?

Tommy, it's Karri. So I think that's going to be difficult. There's a lot of different components in terms of puts and takes that impact broker fee that we disclose more fully in our SEC filing. But obviously there's some differences in the US and Canada. And then there's also just some differences just in terms of the tenure of our agents. So I think that's a little bit difficult. Obviously, in the quarter we were very happy to see the broker fee performance that we did have despite some contraction in agent count in the US, broker fee was still up. So we did see some productivity gains. We did see some benefit from home price appreciation. And when we look at it on a sequential basis in the US, we did have some modest market share gains between Q1 and Q2.

Your next question comes from the line of Stephen Sheldon with William Blair. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Wanted to go back to the international agent growth, and can you just unpack the puts and takes there? It slowed a little bit more in the second quarter, but seems like you're off to a great start in July. Looks like it's up almost 1,300 sequentially outside of the US and Canada. I think here you may have called out agent growth in regions like Central America, but can you just give some overall detail on where you're seeing growth versus contraction or deceleration in some of your key markets outside of the US and Canada?

Sure. I can take that one. This is Amy. So, we've got some solid hot spots that include Asia Pacific, China and Australia. And then, in Europe, foundationally it's Germany and Portugal and Sweden, South America, in Colombia and Chile. And then that includes Africa and the Middle East and Kenya, Nigeria and Dubai. And I think that we're seeing some emerging trends, lots of technological integration, including proptech, AI, blockchain. And I think that there's a high influence on commercial real estate with respect to remote work. So, we've got strong leadership, also in Canada now, strong leadership and market presence there. And there is an anticipation of a rebound in housing activity later in the year. And I think our solid pipeline of M&A opportunities are really exciting to us. So, couple that with our expectation that interest rates are going to decline there. I think that we've got opportunity that is still to come for the remainder of the year.

Got it. I appreciate that. And then, just as a follow up, it looked like the loss from Motto was a little higher this quarter sequentially, even with the slight uptick in revenue. Anything to call out there on what would drive the bigger sequential loss? And I'm just curious if there's any incremental investing going on there ahead of a potentially more favorable mortgage market?

Great question. Obviously, with this market changing, the macro economy is a little tough in the mortgage segment for the last year. So we had some increase in terms. We do pick up some money when they do terminate. So that does sort of have a put and take, but it continues to be the fact that sales are down a little bit, but we see some trends changing in that and the positive light. So we hope we can change some of that in the near future.

Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Erdner with Jones Trading. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the question. I kind of have a follow up to that last one with regard to Motto. Franchise sales have continued to increase, but the number of offices open continues to kind of remain around that 240 number. Do you think this is more market dynamics or can I get a little more insight as to what you're seeing there?

Yes. I would totally concur on market dynamics. Obviously, as the volume of loans decreased within the market due to the macro economy, it's tougher for offices to get some of those. They have to go out there and scrap on a daily basis to try and get Refi's in the market, try and get purchases in the market. We felt even though we sold some and continue to sell and increase that count, we do have terminations. And those terminations are for many different factors. One is, wherewithal the broker owner, financial position, lack of deals, maybe not connected to real estate, so there are a lot of factors that may close somebody. So we've seen some of those terminations increase during this past year, but feel like when the macro economy changes, we'll be able to start re-growing that open office count and continue on the trend that we have prior to the macro.

Right. That's helpful. And then, kind of as that macro picture, have you seen the pipeline expand kind of ahead of the rate cuts or are you guys ramping up a little more marketing-wise there to try and get in front of it given the estimated 12 months to get that office open?

Yes. Obviously we've seen some refinance activity increase across our franchisees. The nice thing is, most of them are connected. 75% are connected to real estate. So they see the trend long before sometimes even a traditional mortgage broker would see it, because they're seeing that the homeowners come in, buy more homes. So we're continuing to try and stay ahead of that curve, whether it's Wemlo trying to do the processing, whether it's our Mottos trying to get the deal, but we firmly know that refinances are increasing as rates go down and feel like the rest of the year we're going to have a good opportunity and the Fed cooperates.

Your next question comes from the line of Ryan McKeveny with Zelman & Associates. Your line is open.

Hey, guys. Thank you very much. Karri, on the cost management side, it's a pretty nice step down, I think, across the categories within SO&A expenses. Maybe you can unpack that a little bit in terms of the drivers this quarter and then just thinking about whether any of that was more temporary in nature or more permanent in nature would be helpful.

Yes. Great question, Ryan. So I think, as we said in the scripted remarks, we've really been focused holistically around managing the business really as efficiently and effectively as we can. From a personnel perspective, we're really starting to see now about a year after the difficult decision we made last year to right-size the business from a personnel perspective, kind of the full impact of that. And so, when we look at our personnel expense for this quarter and kind of what the run rate looks like for the rest of the year, it's probably a pretty good run rate. I did mention that from our kind of facilities and our rent costs, we did have a onetime benefit in the quarter that hit that line item. So that was definitely favorable for this quarter. Also called out that when we looked at our professional fees on a year-over-year basis, we've had some benefit due to the prudent decision that we made last year with respect to the litigation. And so that's probably a pretty decent run rate. And then in our other bucket, that's where we really had some favorability this quarter. So again, I mentioned the really strong collections that we had there, tremendous focus by the team there as it relates to collections. So that definitely is probably a little bit low. But like I said, we could have some upside in the back half of the year from that perspective. We also, in that line item, had a few things from just a normal investment perspective that we kind of had initially planned for Q2 that we expect to push out into the back half of the year. And so, kind of if you're looking at SO&A run rate for the back half of the year, kind of looking in that high $30 million range for the run rate, just given the focus that we've had on optimizing the cost structure to the best of our abilities.

Your next question comes from the line of Ronald Kamdem with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning. Just two quick ones for me. So one just starting with the sort of the litigation updates. I know the settlement is in the appeals process and there were sort of other stuff in the 10-K that we were going through. But just in terms of timing, do you have a sense of when the next time we'll get updates or hear anything? Is it you have a certain timing in your mind or is it sort of just wait and see?

Yes. It's a great question, Ron. I think a couple of things. The first is, we continue to be very happy that we made the decision that we did to settle these in the interest of all of our stakeholders. We're happy that the district court granted final approval of the settlement. And I think importantly to note is going through the standard appeals process right now. I wish that we could say exactly what that timeline looked like, whether it is kind of towards the latter part of this year or into next, but it is on that standard timeline. We continue to -- we're going to continue to vigorously defend ourselves and the settlement during that appeals process and continue to believe that the settlement is fair and reasonable and that the district court's order should be upheld.

Great. And then my quick follow up is, just how does the dividend -- bringing back the dividend sort of factor into that? Is it something that's concurrent or you sort of wait to see everything clear through?

Yes, it's a great question. And I think, as we think about just the overall performance this quarter, I think one of the things that it highlighted is just the strength of the franchise brand and the franchise model that we have and the cash generation capabilities. As I said in the scripted remarks, our biggest focus right now is continuing to replenish the cash balance until we get through some of the litigation focusing on getting our leverage ratios down. We haven't made any decisions as it relates to capital allocation beyond that point. But I think we're looking forward to getting to a place where we have a lot of optionality and focusing on all capital allocation opportunities, including those that I mentioned in the scripted remarks.

Great. And then my last one is, just you guys did a nice job looks like on expenses, but just going back to the agent count change, maybe just double-clicking on that a little bit, can you talk about just what's changed and what's different in terms of what's happening on the ground with the agents? Is that maybe some of the rulings? Is it just the macro? Just maybe some color on what sort of change, what drove the guidance change and what's happening on the ground?

For sure. I think, no doubt. I think Erik covered it earlier that there is definite pressure just industry-wide. And we feel optimistic that we may have a little more insulation from that, given the tenure and experience of our agents. But we obviously understand that driving that top line through agent count growth is important. And we focus mainly on our initiatives and providing deep support to bend that trend without a doubt. And that includes our strategic initiatives that we've talked about our CMA program, the team's program, and then, of course, working really closely with our brokers to enhance their recruiting skills. And then obviously, once we add an agent, the big goal is to make that agent more productive once they're added. And I think that's really evident in our numbers that our agents have extremely high productivity. So, we will continue to provide that extensive support, that education and offer tools to help them win no matter what the market conditions are. But obviously, our deep focus is finding other opportunities to grow and drive that top line.

Your next question comes from the line of John Campbell with Stephens Inc.

Hey. Great job in the quarter. I mean, it looks like you brought profits up year-over-year for the first time in, I think, 7 quarters from continued revenue decline. Congrats on getting the cost order in place. I wanted to check on the franchise renewals. It sounds like you're seeing some success of late, but on the renewals, just curious if you can give an update on how that's held up so far. Obviously, a lot's changing in the market. So, just curious about cancellation rates and then on the successful renewals you've seen if you're just kind of able to hold the past terms and such.

Yes, for sure. Actually our renewals have been strong, and it reflects, I think, the confidence in the business model and the support that we provide. And obviously, we will continue to evaluate market conditions. But so far, we're seeing consistency on that front.

Okay. And then, I think I'm going to cue you up to kind of help the productivity of your agents. But if you look at the US housing market, at least, it looks like it was anywhere from down modestly to maybe up modestly. So, your broker fee revenue, it looks like that rose about 1% year-over-year. So, probably in line-ish with the market. But if you look at the US and Canada total agent count, that declined 4% year-over-year. So, you're playing from behind a little bit. That was a good result. I'm just curious about kind of what drove the outpacing of the market just on a -- at least on a per agent basis.

Yes, it's a great question, John, and you're right. And I alluded to this a little bit earlier. So we did benefit a little bit from price appreciation in both the US and Canada. From a productivity perspective, we benefited a little bit in both geographies as well. And so, those probably two things were the biggest drivers from a broker fee perspective.

Okay. And then last one for me. From a strategic standpoint, obviously, again, a lot changed in the industries as far as the MLS ability to communicate and to put the broker fee into the MLS. Obviously, there's going to be a little bit of a void of information in the market. So I'm curious how you're viewing the importance of the RE/MAX website. Do you feel like that's going to give you an advantage anyway? Just curious about your thoughts there.

Interestingly enough, offers of compensation are still allowed to be displayed on the broker website. That being said, we will not be displaying them on remax.com given our data fee is largely derived from the MLS, which that would be a violation of the settlement term. And so, we continue to monitor channels and we continue to hear about how our brokers are navigating this, given their freedom to display offers of compensation on their own websites. And foundationally, they're communicating with one another in their markets and making sure that they understand if the seller is willing to offer compensation, it's kind of a funny thing, the telephone. It's working really well right now. But obviously that will evolve.

Look, John, this is Erik. I mean, maybe I'll tell you about productivity here. I mean, the thing is that I do think because of the experience or the tenure, the professionalism, the more it adds, a large population of our agents are just, they're better at negotiating and talking, right? And so, we're really pushing for transparency. We've been pushing that through education. I think our local broker owners are going to be a significant asset in this transition for us and, by the way, just real estate, the real estate industry in general. So, I do think there's going to be noise. And those folks that just depended on items in the MLS or on a website in order to get through their day, that's changing a bit. So, I like our position from that perspective.

And the only thing else that I would add there too, John, with respect to remax.com is, I think as we look across just the innate assets that we have in terms of the trusted professional, the productivity of our agents, the strength of our network from a footprint and a geography perspective, our digital assets are assets that we think we can really leverage into the future. And we see it's under Erik's leadership and he's brought some unique insights here from his prior experience, some opportunities to really leverage that in the future.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I'll turn the call to Andy Schulz for closing remarks.

Thanks, operator, and thank you to everyone for joining our call today. Have a great weekend.

This concludes today's conference call. We thank you for joining. You may now disconnect.