Don Thomas
Analyst · David Scharf, who's with JMP Securities. Please go ahead, sir
Thank you, Peter. I am grateful to you for the fantastic partnership we've had over the last three years. I will certainly miss that as I move on. I appreciate everyone's well wishes. I have enjoyed working with all of you, and I'm looking forward to a more relaxed schedule, of course. Now let's move on to my comments on the quarter. Turning to Slide 3 in the supplemental presentation, we provide you with an overview of earnings for the quarter. Our second-quarter net income of $8.4 million, or diluted EPS of $0.70, was slightly higher than we expected at the end of the first quarter. As Peter mentioned, our revenues were up more than 16% over the prior-year period, and while most of the increase in revenues was driven by the more than 14% increase in average financed receivables, the remainder of the increase was due to the change in business practice to lower our utilization of non-file insurance that we've noted on prior earnings calls. This change grosses up our insurance income and net credit losses, with no impact on net income, and will cycle over the change in the fourth quarter of this year. Our provision for credit losses rose $5.5 million, or 27%, year over year. This increase includes approximately $1.4 million of net credit losses, due to the change in business practice I just mentioned. In addition, the provision was higher, due to the record portfolio growth during the quarter. With new credit tools in place, we should see some improvement in our credit metrics starting later this year, and continuing into 2020 and beyond. Peter mentioned a number of initiatives in his remarks. Those are some of the many ongoing investments we are making in our growing business, and therefore, our dollars of operating cost are expected to increase some over time, largely driven by branch expansion and account growth. It is our goal to continue to control expense, though, such that operating costs are low enough to contribute to improving returns. In the second quarter versus the prior-year period, G&A expenses rose 14%, but remained flat as an annualized percentage of average financed receivables, at 16.2%. De novo expenses from branches opened in the second half of 2018 accounted for $1.3 million of year-over-year increase, and existing branch expenses to support loan growth accounted for an additional $2.3 million. I'll talk more about G&A expense later in my comments. Flipping to Slide 4, our core loan products grew 20%, or $153 million versus the prior-year period, with small loans growing 12% and large loans growing 27%. From a mix perspective, the small and large loan portfolios are 44% and 51% of the total portfolio respectively. We expect large loans will continue to increase as a percentage of the total portfolio over the next few years. Total portfolio growth of 15% was less than core loan growth of 20%, as it was dampened by the continuing liquidation of the auto portfolio, which is now less than $16 million in receivables. For the rest of 2019, we expect sequential portfolio growth to be strong, but somewhat less than the record pace we saw in the second quarter. Turning to Slide 5, interest and fee yield declined 20 basis points from the prior-year period, primarily due to the change in the mix of our product. However, total revenue yield in the second quarter of 2019 actually increased 70 basis points from the prior-year period, primarily as a result of the increase in insurance income, due to the lower utilization of non-file insurance. In the third quarter of 2019, we expect interest and fee yield will be approximately 50 basis points lower than the prior-year period, based on the ongoing change in mix of our loan products. Moving to Slide 6, our annualized net credit loss rate as a percentage of average finance receivables for the second quarter of 2019 was 10.7%, an increase of 120 basis points from the prior-year period. The higher annualized net credit loss rate this quarter was expected, given the elevated levels of our late-stage delinquency bucket at the end of the prior quarter, from the introduction of new custom scorecards. The late-stage delinquencies have since returned to a more normalized level, which I'll talk more about shortly. In addition, approximately 0.6 percent of the increase in net credit loss rate was attributable to the business practice change to lower our utilization of non-file insurance. Flipping to Slide 7, the allowance as a percentage of finance receivables came down 0.3% sequentially in the second quarter, as the hurricane portion of the reserve has now been fully depleted. With improved loss results from the new marketing risk-and-response model we discussed on the prior call, as well as from the custom credit scorecard, we see the potential for further reductions in the reserve in the latter part of the year. With respect to CECL, which RM has to implement on January 1, 2020, we have run some initial models. During the third quarter, we will perform more analyses and make adjustments to the initial models, and run them parallel to our existing model for current and historical time period. My implementation of the new accounting standard will result in the initial CECL adjustment being charged directly to equity. After the initial adjustment of our allowance for credit losses, any increase or decrease to the ongoing reserve rate for new originations will flow through the 2020 income statement. We will provide further disclosure as the implementation process progresses. As I mentioned before, the new standard will not present any issues with respect to our debt covenant, funding the growth of our business, the cash flow of our operations, or our ability to return capital to shareholders. Turning to Slide 8, on the delinquency front, our 30-plus-day and 90-plus-day delinquency levels at June 30, 2019, stood at 6.4% and 2.7% respectively. Our 30-plus-day delinquencies increased 10 basis points on a year-over-year basis, while improving 60 basis points sequentially. Ninety-plus-day delinquencies increased 10 basis points on a year-over-year basis, while improving 80 basis points sequentially. The elevated delinquency levels we saw at the end of the first quarter that were primarily caused by not renewing higher-risk customers have almost returned to normalized levels. G&A expenses of $37.7 million in the second quarter of 2019 rose $4.5 million from the prior-year period, a little higher than our expectation. For the third quarter of 2019, we expect G&A expense to be about $4.2 million to $4.4 million higher year over year, with most of the increase related to branch expenses associated with increased loan growth. On a year-over-year basis in the second quarter, our G&A expense as a percentage of average finance receivables was 16.2%, comparable with the prior-year period. Our 2019 year-to-date operating expense ratio is 30 basis points lower than the prior-year period. Seasonally, our operating expense ratio is generally better in the second half of the year than in the first half of the year, and we expect the full-year 2019 ratio will decline by roughly 45 to 60 basis points. As we've noted previously, we expect to gain more operating leverage as we continue to control expenses and grow receivables. Turning to Slide 10, interest expense of $9.8 million was $1.9 million higher in the second quarter of 2019 compared to the prior-year period, primarily driven by higher interest rates and greater long-term debt amounts outstanding due to finance receivable growth. We expect interest expense in the third quarter of 2019 will be about $2 million higher than the prior-year period, primarily driven by receivable growth. As of June 30, 2019, 42% of the company's outstanding debt was fixed-rate debt. That concludes my remarks, and I'll now to turn the call back to Peter to wrap up.